Department of Health

Older people in hospital provides clinicians with evidence-based information and simple strategies to minimise the risk of functional decline for older people in hospital. It is underpinned by the principles of person-centred practice.

This resource is the third edition of the Best care for older people everywhere: the toolkit. It has been developed in collaboration with Victorian health services, the Clinical Leadership Group on Care of Older People in Hospital, the National Ageing Research Institute, and a number of subject matter experts.

The material included in Older people in hospital and the accompanying e-learning and audio visual resources are classified as informal learning opportunities. Professional health practitioners can choose to keep a detailed record of the number of hours spent on this site. This is classified as self-directed and Internet-based learning and contributes to the informal learning component of Continuing Professional Development required for ongoing accreditation.


Date:
March 2024

Hospital environment audit tool (HEAT)

The Hospital Environment Audit Tool (HEAT) is an evidence-based tool for staff to audit their hospital environment. It provides practical strategies to optimise the environment in order to best meet the needs of older people and increase their participation in their care.

The Hospital Environment Audit Tool (HEAT) encourages the user to consider the ways the environment, including the model of care and policy framework, affects an older person’s mobility, independence and wellbeing during a hospital stay, and provides practical strategies that can be implemented to optimise the environment.

The HEAT is divided into five sections:

  • Patient bedside orientation
  • On the ward – limited resources
  • On the ward
  • Facility audits
  • Policy and procedure

Patient bedside orientation is designed to be completed in 5 to 10 minutes and should be used with every patient on admission or after transfer to the ward.

The other sections include multiple modules, each of which are designed to take from 15 minutes to 35 minutes to complete. Staff can complete all sections or simply the section or module which is most relevant at the time. Options are provided for where there is a small budget and short timeframe available, and alternatively for where there is some budget and a longer timeframe available. It is not designed to be used for major refurbishments or new builds.

The HEAT is designed to be completed online, however printable versions of each module have also been provided. An action plan template that can be printed and completed has also been provided for you to document the progress of any changes suggested by the audits.


On the ward - limited resources

This section of the Hospital Environment Audit Tool (HEAT) contains modules that look at how the environment in the ward spaces of a hospital meet older people’s needs and enable them to participate in their care.

There are four modules in this section:

  • Rooms and bed bays
  • Bathroom
  • Communal spaces
  • Lighting, signage and wayfinding

These audit modules are designed to be used when you have a limited budget and short timeframe. Interventions suggested are able to be undertaken with a small amount of money (if any) and in a short space of time. Please note – there are separate ward audit modules that are more comprehensive and suggest interventions that require a larger budget and a longer timeframe. They can be found in the section: On the ward.

The Communal spaces module contains some suggestions would take some budget and/or timeframe to implement, while some may be able to be changed quickly and with minimal budget.

The modules in this section are each expected to take between 15 minutes and 20 minutes to complete. The audit modules may be completed individually or as part of a broader audit of the ward or other parts of the facility. The modules are not designed to be used for major refurbishments or new builds.

Rooms and bed bays

This audit module is designed to look at patient rooms or bed bays.

The audit module is designed to be used when you have a limited budget and short timeframe. Interventions suggested are able to be undertaken with a small amount of money (if any) and in a short space of time. Please note – there is a separate ward audit module for rooms and bed bays that is more comprehensive and suggests interventions that require a larger budget and a longer timeframe. Neither are intended for major refurbishments or new builds.

You may use this audit module on its own or as part of an audit of other parts of the ward.

This audit module contains 16 questions and will take approximately 15 – 20 minutes to complete. It contains questions about orientation, safety and comfort.

Start the rooms and bed bays audit.External Link

Bathrooms

This audit module is designed to look at bathrooms in a ward. It can be used for bathrooms with both a toilet and shower, or one or the other.

The audit module is designed to be used when you have a limited budget and short timeframe. The interventions suggested are able to be undertaken with a small amount of money (if any) and in a short space of time. Please note - there is a separate bathroom audit module that is more comprehensive and suggests interventions that require a larger budget and a longer timeframe. Neither are intended for major refurbishments or new builds.

You may use this audit module on its own or as part of an audit of other parts of the ward.

This audit module contains 16 questions and will take approximately 15-20 minutes to complete all sections. It contains 7 general questions, plus an additional 5 questions for a toilet and additional 4 questions for a shower.

Start the bathroom audit.External Link

Communal spaces

This audit module is designed to look at the communal spaces of a ward - the ward entrance, hallway areas, any shared spaces and wayfinding around the ward.

Some suggestions would take some budget and/or timeframe to implement, while some may be able to be changed quickly and with minimal budget. It is not intended for major refurbishments or new builds.

You may use this audit module on its own or as part of a broader audit of other parts of the ward.

This audit module contains 16 questions and will take approximately 20-30 minutes to complete.

Start the communal spaces audit.External Link

Lighting, signage and wayfinding

This audit module is designed to audit ward lighting, signage and wayfinding.

Wayfinding refers to all the ways in which people orientate themselves in a space and navigate their way from place to place. Older people need more wayfinding aids to assist orientation in a space and they need to be more obvious.

The audit module is designed to be used when you have a limited budget and short timeframe. Interventions suggested are able to be undertaken with a small amount of money (if any) and in a short space of time. Please note – there is a separate ward audit module for lighting, signage and wayfinding that is more comprehensive and suggests interventions that require a larger budget and a longer timeframe. Neither are intended for major refurbishments or new builds.

There is a separate audit module available for wayfinding in the ‘Facility audits’ section. You may also find some questions about lighting, signage and wayfinding in the other facility audit modules and the module ‘On the ward - communal spaces’.

You may utilise this audit module on its own or as part of a broader audit of other parts of the ward.

This audit module contains 12 questions and will take approximately 15 – 20 minutes to complete.

Start the wayfinding audit.External Link


On the ward

This section of the Hospital Environmental Audit Tool (HEAT) contains modules that look at how the environment in the ward spaces of a hospital meet older people’s needs and enable them to participate in their care.

There are five modules in this section:

  • Rooms and bed bays
  • Bathroom
  • Communal spaces
  • Lighting, signage and wayfinding
  • Furniture, equipment and handrails

Most suggestions arising from these audits would take some budget and/or timeframe to implement. Several modules have a version that contains ideas that can be implemented with little or no budget and a short timeframe. These can be found in the section: On the ward - limited resources.

The modules in this section are each expected to take between 20 minutes and 30 minutes to complete. The audit modules may be completed individually or as part of a broader audit of the ward or other parts of the facility. The modules are not designed to be used for major refurbishments or new builds.

Rooms and bed bays

This audit module is designed to look at patient rooms or bed bays.

The audit module is designed to be used when you have some resources available. Most suggestions would take some budget and/or timeframe to implement. Please note – there is a separate rooms/bed bays audit module designed to be used when you have a small budget and short timeframe. Neither are intended for major refurbishments or new builds.

You may use this audit module on its own or as part of an audit of other parts of the ward.

This audit module contains 24 questions and will take approximately 25 – 30 minutes to complete. It contains questions about orientation, safety and comfort.

Start the rooms and bed bays audit.External Link

Bathroom

This audit module is designed to look at bathrooms in a ward. It can be used for bathrooms with both a toilet and shower, or one of the other.

The audit module is designed to be used when you have some budget and timeframe. Most suggestions would take some budget and/or timeframe to implement. Please note – there is a separate bathroom audit module designed to be used when you have a small budget and short timeframe. Neither are intended for major refurbishments or new builds.

You may use this audit module on its own or as part of an audit of other parts of the ward.

This audit module contains 26 questions and will take approximately 25-30 minutes to complete all sections. It contains 14 general questions, plus an additional 6 questions for a toilet and additional 6 questions for a shower.

Start the bathroom audit.External Link

Communal spaces

This audit module is designed to look at the communal spaces of a ward - the ward entrance, hallway areas, any shared spaces and wayfinding around the ward.

Some suggestions would take some budget and/or timeframe to implement, while some may be able to be changed quickly and with minimal budget. It is not intended for major refurbishments or new builds.

You may use this audit module on its own or as part of a broader audit of other parts of the ward.

This audit module contains 16 questions and will take approximately 20-30 minutes to complete.

Start the communal spaces audit.External Link

Lighting, signage and wayfinding

This audit module is designed to look at lighting, signage and wayfinding in a ward.

Wayfinding refers to all the ways in which people orientate themselves in a space and navigate their way from place to place. Older people need more wayfinding aids to assist orientation in a space and they need to be more obvious.

The audit module is designed to be used when you have some resources available. Most suggestions would take some budget and/or timeframe to implement. Please note – there is a separate lighting, signage and wayfinding audit module designed to be used when you have a small budget and short timeframe. Neither are intended for major refurbishments or new builds.

There are separate audit modules available for wayfinding throughout the whole hospital facility. You may also find some questions regarding signage and wayfinding in the ward module on communal spaces.

You may use this audit module on its own or as part of a broader audit of other parts of the ward or hospital.

This audit module contains 19 questions. It will take approximately 20 - 30 minutes to complete.

Start the wayfinding audit.External Link

Furniture, equipment and handrails

This audit is designed to look at furniture, equipment and handrails in a ward area.

The audit is designed to be used when you have some resources available. Most suggestions would take some budget and/or timeframe to implement. It is not intended for major refurbishments or new builds.

You may use this audit module on its own or as part of an audit of other parts of the ward.

This audit contains 16 questions and will take approximately 20-25 minutes to complete.

Start the furniture, equipment and handrails audit.External Link


Hospital environment audit tool - policy and procedure

This section of the Hospital Environment Audit Tool (HEAT) contains five modules:

  • Model of care
  • Food and mealtimes
  • Equipment maintenance
  • Sensory and thermal environment
  • Cleaning

These modules consider how systems, policies, procedures and processes in a hospital setting can be built upon to ensure the environment supports the care of older people and enables them to participate in their care.

The modules in this section are designed to take from 15 minutes to 30 minutes to complete. The audit modules may be completed individually or as part of a broader audit of the facility. Some questions in these audit modules may need to be checked with other staff or departments in your facility.

Your facility may have some services provided by external contractors, for example cleaning, and this may mean that your ability to alter policies and procedures may be limited or indirect. In these case, you are still encouraged to undertake the audits and consider way you might implement any suggested changes.

Model of care

This audit module is designed to be used when you want to determine how your systems, policies, procedures and processes support best practice in the care of older people.

It looks at how the policies and procedures regarding your ward’s model of care optimise an older patient’s participation in their care and encourage their family and carer to be included as part of the care team.

You may use this audit module on its own or as part of an audit of other aspects of policy and procedure, or of the physical space.

We recommend that this audit module be used in conjunction with the ‘Bedside orientation’ audit module. The ‘Bedside orientation’ audit module is designed to be used with every patient, on admission or after a transfer. Consider incorporating the use of the ‘Bedside orientation’ audit module into your hospital or ward policies and procedures.

This audit module contains 15 questions and will take approximately 20-30 minutes to complete.

Start the model of care audit.External Link

Food and mealtimes

This audit module is designed to be used when you want to determine how your systems, policies, procedures and processes support the provision of food and drink during and between mealtimes.

It also looks at how the policies and procedures regarding your ward’s day to day operation enable an older patient’s participation in their care and encourage their family and carer to be included as part of the care team.

You may use this audit module on its own or as part of an audit of other aspects of policy and procedure, or of the physical space.

This audit module contains 12 questions and will take approximately 15-20 minutes to complete.

Start the food and mealtimes audit.External Link

Equipment maintenance

This audit module is designed to be used when you want to determine how your systems, procedures and processes support the maintenance of equipment.

It looks at how the policies and procedures regarding your ward’s equipment maintenance schedule enables an older patient’s participation in their care.

You may use this audit module on its own or as part of an audit of other aspects of policy and procedure, or of the physical space.

This audit module contains 6 questions and will take approximately 20-30 minutes to complete.

Start the equipment maintenance audit.External Link

Sensory and thermal environment

This audit module is designed to be used when you want to determine how your systems, policies, procedures and processes can help optimise the sensory and thermal environment experienced by patients.

It looks at how light, noise, smells, textures and temperature influence an older patient’s participation in their care.

You may use this audit module on its own or as part of an audit of other aspects of policy and procedure, or of the physical space.

This audit module contains 11 questions and will take approximately 20-30 minutes to complete.

Start the sensory and thermal environment audit.External Link

Cleaning

This audit module is designed to be used when you want to determine how your systems, policies, procedures and processes support the maintenance of a clean environment.

It looks at how the policies and procedures regarding your ward’s cleaning schedule optimise an older patient’s care, noting that cleaning may be a service that is outsourced by the health service, therefore the ability to alter cleaning policies and procedures may be indirect.

You may use this audit module on its own or as part of an audit of other aspects of policy and procedure, or of the physical space.

This audit module contains 8 questions and will take approximately 20-30 minutes to complete.

Start the cleaning audit.External Link


Hospital environment audit tool - facility audits

This section of HEAT contains modules that consider the whole hospital facility and its ability to meet the needs of older people and support their participation in their care.

This section of the Hospital Environment Audit Tool (HEAT) contains modules that consider how the general areas of the hospital environment support the needs of older people and increase their participation in their care.

There are five modules in this section:

  • External areas and parking
  • Entrance, foyer and reception
  • Stairs, lifts and paths - internal areas
  • Outpatient and waiting areas
  • Wayfinding, signage and use of colour

Some suggestions for improvement would take some budget and/or timeframe to implement, while some may be able to be changed quickly and with minimal budget. It is not intended for major refurbishments or new builds.

The modules in this section are designed to take from 15 minutes to 35 minutes to complete. You may use these audit modules individually or as part of a broader audit of other parts of the facility. The modules are not designed to be used for major refurbishments or new builds.

External areas and parking

This audit module is designed to look at the external areas of a facility, including parking areas, external pathways and garden areas.

Some suggestions for improvement would take some budget and/or timeframe to implement, while some may be able to be changed quickly and with minimal budget. It is not intended for major refurbishments or new builds.

You may use this audit module on its own or as part of a broader audit of other parts of the facility. We suggest completing it with the other facility audits to enhance your understanding of how to improve the environment for older people.

This audit module contains 17 questions and will take approximately 15-20 minutes to complete.

Start the external areas and parking auditExternal Link

Entrance foyer and reception

This audit module is designed to look at the entrance, foyer and reception areas of a facility.

Some suggestions for improvement would take some budget and/or timeframe to implement, while some may be able to be changed quickly and with minimal budget. It is not intended for major refurbishments or new builds.

You may use this audit module on its own or as part of a broader audit of other parts of the facility. We suggest completing it with the other facility audits to enhance your understanding of how to improve the environment for older people.

This audit module contains 15 questions and will take approximately 15-20 minutes to complete.

Start the entrance, foyer and reception area auditExternal Link

Outpatient and waiting areas

This audit module is designed to look at outpatient and other designated patient waiting areas.

Some suggestions for improvement would take some budget and/or timeframe to implement, while some may be able to be changed quickly and with minimal budget. It is not intended for major refurbishments or new builds.

You may use this audit module on its own or as part of a broader audit of other parts of the facility. We suggest completing it with the other facility audits to enhance your understanding of how to improve the environment for older people.

This audit module contains 13 questions and will take approximately 15-20 minutes to complete.

Start the outpatient and waiting areas auditExternal Link

Stairs, lifts and paths - internal areas

This audit module is designed to assess internal stairs, lifts, paths and the ramps and handrails used to facilitate access to general or public areas of a facility.

Some suggestions for improvement would take some budget and/or timeframe to implement, while some may be able to be changed quickly and with minimal budget. It is not intended for major refurbishments or new builds.

You may use this audit module on its own or as part of a broader audit of other parts of the facility. We suggest completing it with the other facility audits to enhance your understanding of how to improve the environment for older people.

This audit module contains 23 questions and will take approximately 25-35 minutes to complete all sections. It contains 11 general questions on paths, handrails and ramps, plus an additional 8 questions on lifts and an additional 4 questions on stairs.

Start the stairs, lifts and paths - internal areas auditExternal Link

Wayfinding, signage and use of colour

This audit module is designed to look at wayfinding in the general or public areas of a facility.

Wayfinding refers to all the ways in which people orientate themselves in a space and navigate their way from place to place. Older people need more wayfinding aids to assist orientation in a space and these need to be more obvious.

Some suggestions for improvement would take some budget and/or timeframe to implement, while others can be changed quickly and with minimal budget. It is not intended for major refurbishments or new builds.

You may use this audit module on its own or as part of a broader audit of other parts of the facility. We suggest completing it with the other facility audits to enhance your understanding of how to improve the environment for older people.

This audit module contains 21 questions and will take approximately 25-30 minutes to complete.

Start the wayfinding, signage and use of colour auditExternal Link


Patient bedside orientation

This section of the Hospital Environment Audit Tool (HEAT) contains the module: Patient bedside orientation.

It is designed as a checklist of key questions that will assist clinicians to introduce patients to the hospital environment and orientate them in the ward and is designed to be used with every patient, on admission or after a transfer.

It looks at the immediate bedside environment and orientation to the ward.

This audit module contains 22 questions and will take approximately 5-10 minutes to complete.

Start the patient bedside orientation audit.External Link


Assessment, communication and person-centred practice

Improving outcomes for older people in hospital requires good communication, assessment and person-centered practice.


Person-centred practice

Person-centred practice can minimise the functional decline of older people in hospital and help us tailor care to meet each person’s needs

Person-centred practice puts the person at the centre of everything we do.

It recognises that every patient is a unique and complex person. It respects and responds to their needs, preferences and values and the knowledge they bring about their health and healthcare needs with the aim of delivering individualised care that is holistic.

Person-centred practice can minimise the functional decline of older people in hospital and help us tailor care to meet each person’s needs. It can result in decreased mortality, readmission rates and healthcare-acquired infections; improved functional status and increased patient and carer satisfaction.1

For this reason person centred practice is integral to meeting many of the actions in the National Safety and Quality Health Standards, especially Comprehensive Care and Partnering with Consumers.

This topic gives an overview of person-centred practice and recommends actions that we and our organisations can take, in addition to health service policy and procedures, to provide quality person-centred care to our older patients.

Person-centred practice and functional decline

Person-centred practice is important because it can improve experiences and outcomes for our patients and improves our own satisfaction and morale.

  • Person-centred practice is crucial in reducing functional decline in older people in hospital, for example:
    • if we know what types of foods and drink a patient prefers then we can look at how they access these while in our care so they are less likely to lose weight or become dehydrated in hospital
    • if we know that a patient likes to take a walk every day we should encourage them to keep active while in hospital so they can continue this when they go home
    • if we listen to the family’s concerns about a change in a patient’s level of alertness, we can investigate delirium
    • if we understand how a patient usually takes their medication, we can look to alter how we might administer them.
  • Person-centred practice can mean decreased mortality, readmission rates and healthcare-acquired infections; improved functional status; a shorter length of stay in hospital; and increased patient and carer satisfaction.1
  • Person-centred practice improves the patient’s experience, reduces their anxiety and enhances trust – all important in an unfamiliar hospital environment.
  • Person-centred practice leads to better outcomes through partnerships and shared decision-making.

‘When you are caring for somebody who is acutely unwell, it is hard to sometimes look at them as a person and not just as a bunch of observations’ – Luke, graduate nurse2

Implementing person-centred practice

Person-centred practice is a natural part of our day-to-day work

We can make person-centred practice a part of our work through our everyday interactions with patients and their family and carers, for example:

  • smile and introduce ourselves
  • wear a name tag that people can see and read
  • explain your role to the patient
  • ask the patient how they are feeling today - both physically and emotionally
  • see the patient as a person who has a life outside hospital
  • treat the patient as an equal partner
  • listen to the patient and respect the knowledge they bring about their own health
  • listen to their family and carers
  • acknowledge that being in hospital can be a frightening and uncertain time for patients and their families
  • acknowledge that feeling lonely or isolated in hospital can be a common experience
  • make sure the patient has all the information they need to make informed choices.

‘ find that the families and the carers that come along to us, with the patients, have a wealth of knowledge. When the patients can’t tell us what they need, their carers often can.
- Dora, clinical resource nurse2

Person-centred practice must be embedded at an organisational level

Person-centred practice should be embedded in our organisations.3 To achieve this, ‘senior leaders need to unite them around a common sense of common purpose’.4

Embedding person-centred practice

The World Health Organization’s framework for creating age friendly communities urges organisations like hospitals to consult with ‘older people on ways to serve them better’ as it ‘contributes to empowering older people and fostering age-friendly respect and social inclusion’.4

Ask how your organisation is embedding person-centred care in day-to-day practice:

  • Are there policies and procedures for involving patients and carers in their own care?
  • Is training provided to staff on person-centred care?
  • Do leaders explain and promote the importance of person-centred practice?
  • Do we seek and use patients’ and carers’ feedback to improve our practice?
  • Do we engage patients in staff education programs?
  • Do we have systems to collect and report patient experience data?
  • Are person-centred principles part of core business and embedded in organisational and employment documentation and performance review processes?
  • Do we have a culture of reflective practice, continuous improvement and lifelong learning?

Achieving person-centred practice

Many Victorian health services are surveying their patients and families to improve their understanding of their patient’s needs and adapt their service to these needs.

As part of the Victorian Department of Health’s Improving care for older people initiative, health services across Victoria undertook to implement person-centred practice in settings involving older people. Some examples include:

  • Alfred Health has a Patients Come First plan and has developed an organisation-wide patient experience survey, which has been translated into five different languages. In collaboration with the Department of Health, Alfred Health also produced a DVD resource called Best Care for older people: the patient experience
  • Eastern Health implemented performance monitoring strategies including mystery shopper observations and patient interview, leadership walk-rounds, patient experience trackers which capture real-time information, and monthly patient experience surveys.
  • Melbourne Health conducted a ‘Board to Bedside Consultation’ in 2012, which surveyed more than 300 staff and consumers about what matters to them when receiving healthcare. It also developed an audiovisual resource, Lola’s Story, which emphasises patient experience and has been used to open executive/board meetings. Melbourne Health also runs tailored sessions on person-centred practice.
  • Peninsula Health has embedded person-centred practice principles in employment position descriptions; they are also a formal component of orientation.
  • Western District Health Service has developed and implemented a Partnering with Consumers policy, and principles of person-centred care are included in orientation for new staff. Fifty staff have attended education sessions on person-centred care, and older people are represented on the Consumer Advisory Committee.
  • Barwon Health has introduced electronic bedside assessments on tablets to increase the time nursing staff spend with their patients and their families when gathering information and developing care plans and facilitate shared decision making.

Measuring person centred practice

Measuring person-centred practice is helpful in assessing services, the outcomes of particular initiatives and whether or not people’s needs are being met1. It is important in improving the patient experience and reducing the risk of functional decline, creating a culture of constant learning, keeping services accountable, encouraging cultural change and boosting morale.

However, before measuring person-centred practice, we need to know what we are measuring. Do we want to understand what person-centred care means to different people, the type of care patients expect or experience, or the impact?

The tool we choose will depend on whether we are measuring definitions, preferences, experiences or outcomes5.

There are three common methods used to measure person-centred practice:

  • surveys and interviews with patients and carers
  • surveys and interviews with health professionals
  • observation of practice.5

Other methods include focus groups and reviewing patient notes5.

A variety of tools have been used in the field, but there is no one specific resource that can evaluate all aspects of person-centred practice.

Person centred practice and discharge planning

The chronic nature of many of the conditions our older patients experience means that we must encourage them to participate in their care in hospital and involve them and their families and carers, as appropriate, in the process of discharge planning.

Patients and their families and carers play a critical role in keeping themselves well once they are discharged. Consider how aspects of each person's unique biological and psychosocial needs interact with their environment. By understanding their particular values, preferences and social supports we can shape meaningful discharge plans, encourage participation in social activities of interest and equip them with realistic strategies they can implement once discharged to keep well. Each of the clinical topics on this site emphasises the role of partnership in this process.

    1. National Safety and Quality Health Service Standards 2012: 23; Institute for Healthcare Improvement 2011: 6; Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care 2010: 15.
    2. Best care for older people in hospital: the patient experience
    3. Goodrich and Cornwell 2008, Seeing the person in the patient: the point of care review paper. The King's Fund, London.
    4. World Health Organization, Global age-friendly cities: a guide, 2007.
    5. De Silva, D 2014, Helping measure person-centred care. The Health Foundation, London.

Screening and assessment

Screening and assessment on admission and throughout an older person’s hospital stay can help us to quickly identify and respond to actual or potential risks to patient safety and wellbeing.

Older people have a higher risk of functional decline and preventable harm during a hospital stay than younger people. This is due to changing physiology and the presence of multiple, complex and often chronic problems.

Clinicians often focus on an older person’s acute health problems that led to the hospital admission. We may neglect to prioritise issues such as nutrition and hydration, maintaining mobility, providing good pressure care and the psychosocial and emotional needs of the person - all of which can impact negatively on an older person’s outcomes.

The issues of social isolation and loneliness, which are distinct but related concepts, are gaining increasing attention in Australia and overseas as they can have a significant impact on an individual’s health. Identifying those at risk of these issues and developing a person-centred plan to actively engage the older person, encouraging them to participate in their care in hospital and after their discharge, is integral to good care.

Providing the best care for older people rarely requires a single intervention. However, the complexity of integrating multiple assessments, managing best practice interventions for different risks and integrating patient preferences is not a straightforward task.

Screening and assessment on admission and throughout an older person’s hospital stay can help us to quickly identify and respond to actual or potential risks to patient safety and wellbeing.

This topic provides an overview of some components of screening and assessment. It is to be read in conjunction with the accompanying clinical topics and with health service policy and procedures.

Assessment and ageing

Screening is the process of identifying risks that indicate a patient would benefit from further or more detailed assessment.

Assessment is the process of collecting information to identify the exact nature of a patient’s problems and protective factors (medical, physical, social and psychological). The information collected during an assessment should be analysed, interpreted, verified and communicated. It is used to inform the development of a prioritised, individualised person-centred care plan that includes evidence-based responses to treat a problem and prevent harm.

Screening and assessment are more than completing forms. As clinicians, we draw on our clinical reasoning skills, work with our team, and with the older person and their family, to establish their needs, wants and status.

Screening and assessment of our older patients, on admission and throughout their hospital stay, can identify concerns and changes, monitor progress and inform safe, effective and appropriate care.

Screening and assessment of older patients

Screening and assessment for older people is different to screening and assessment of younger people because older people often present to hospital with non-specific symptoms, and those symptoms may indicate different concerns and mask other issues that occur with ageing. For example, the symptoms of a urinary tract infection in a younger person may be frequent urination, pain from bladder spasms, blood in the urine, and fever. In an older person, the first sign of a urinary tract infection may be confusion or a fall as the other symptoms can be masked by changes that occur with ageing.1

Older age provides a challenge for patients and clinicians to identify ‘normal’ from ‘abnormal’. While everyone is different and therefore ages in a different way and at a different rate, ‘normal’ ageing is generally accompanied by a decline in many homeostatic and metabolic processes.

Normal ageing can cause changes that require interventions to prevent further deterioration and to assist the person maintain their wellness. If illness does occur, the older person often has less reserve and less capacity to recover than younger people.

Changes in physical, cognitive and mental function are ‘normal’ ageing. Things to consider for older people in hospital include:

  • Decreased muscle strength and aerobic capacity
  • Decreased bone density and joint flexibility
  • Vasomotor instability
  • Skin thins and loses elasticity
  • Changes in nutritional requirements and loss of appetite
  • Changes in bladder and bowel function
  • Decreased glucose tolerance
  • Reduction in sensory perception
  • Memory loss and reduced cognitive awareness
  • Changes in mental health and wellbeing
  • Altered sexual functioning.

Losses, such as bereavement and changes in function, are common experiences for older people and can be risk factors for loneliness and social isolation. These can in turn increase risk of various health problems.2 Older patients are also more likely to have multiple comorbidities which may increase their risk of social isolation.3

It is up to us to be curious, determine what matters to our patients, think about the information we collect and consider the best possible interventions that we can employ to minimise risks and maximise our patient’s quality of life. This can involve balancing some risks with some gains and working with our team and the older person and their family to make an informed choice about this.

Screening

Screening identifies people or conditions that would benefit from further assessment. The aim is to identify concerns early and avoid further problems in hospital.

Screening usually involves using a prompt to identify various ‘red flags’ or risks associated with the patient. These can include medical, functional and psychosocial risk factors such as:

  • being older than 70 and living alone. This includes an increased risk of isolation or loneliness that negatively affects a person's physical and mental health, and increases the risk of mortality4
  • a diagnosis of dementia or displaying signs of cognitive impairment
  • a recent stay in hospital
  • polypharmacy, a history of falls, mobility problems and incontinence
  • a recent unexplained weight loss
  • a functional limitation with personal care, domestic and community participation
  • relying on a significant amount of community service support.

Once we have identified any of the above red flags, we can use targeted screening tools as outlined in the individual topics in this section. Trained staff can conduct screening at any time during a person’s time in hospital. Ideally screening is conducted on admission and regularly throughout the episode of care. Early screening is important in establishing a baseline for monitoring an older person’s level of function and identifying changes in health.

Screening can identify increased risk for functional decline and in many cases trigger an immediate response to mitigate risk until further assessment is possible.

Examples of screening tools

Identification of Seniors at Risk Screening Tool (ISAR)6 - a six item screening tool for seniors in the emergency department.

Fulmer SPICES: An Overall Assessment Tool for Older Adults - SPICES is an alert system that obtains information to help prevent health deterioration in the older adult patient.

UCLA Loneliness Scale - a set of three questions currently recommended in the International Consortium for Health Outcome Measures (ICHOM) to measure if an older person is feeling lonely

Assessment process

Assessment tools cannot substitute for good clinical skills and judgements. As clinicians we need to be aware that assessment tools can tell us more than just a score.

Assessment involves collecting information that gets to know the patient in detail, evaluates their risks and the nature of problems to be identified.

Assessment should integrate all the relevant issues. It should explore the medical, physiological, social and psychological function of the older person.

The assessment process encourages us to be curious and to consider the best possible interventions that we can employ to minimise risks and maximise our patient’s quality of life. This can ultimately involve balancing some risks with some gains and working with our team and the older person and their family to make an informed choice about this.

Assessment supports us to:

  • treat the condition that caused the admission (such as shortness of breath)
  • detect and quantify additional conditions or psychosocial issues that contribute to or complicate the admission and respond to them as able both during the admission and when planning for discharge. For example
    • depression - consider if the person needs a medical review
    • poor nutrition - consider what can be done to optimise the person’s intake
    • social isolation, or risk of loneliness - consider how you can encourage the person to participate in their care by harnessing their personal and social connections, and consider linking them to supports that are meaningful to them on discharge
  • use strategies to prevent conditions that often emerge during hospital stays but can be avoided (such as delirium and falls).

We can gather information as part of the assessment process from multiple sources, and these may vary at the stages of a hospital admission.

The four main sources of information are:

  1. Older people themselves - self report.
  2. Others who know the older person well - informant report.
  3. Observation of the person undertaking various activities - direct observation.
  4. Various secondary written or verbal sources - including hospital records, medical reports, investigation results, communication from community care providers.

Unless there are reasons to suspect otherwise the older person is considered the best source of information about their own health1. Direct observation is the best source of information about physical function; however, we should consider how the environment or setting where observations take place may impact on the older person’s performance.

Assessment tools

Assessment tools can be focussed on exploring one particular condition such as pain, pressure injury or nutrition. They can also be more comprehensive and encompass a broader focus beyond one particular issue. Examples of these types of tools include:

  • InterRAI Comprehensive Assessment Tool: Acute
  • Systematic Evaluation and Intervention for Seniors At Risk (SEISAR) - a short, standardised, comprehensive tool for the evaluation of active geriatric problems in seniors in the emergency department.

The assessment tool or scale should enable collection of useful patient data that supports interpretation of the holistic health status, identifies patient needs, and informs care planning and interventions to restore health and wellbeing.

Selecting an assessment tool

Consider the following factors when selecting an assessment tool include:

  • A standardised tool can reduce variation in practices and interpretation of findings and allow comparison across assessments.
  • A validated assessment tool ensures the right data is captured to evaluate the patient and their progress.
  • Is a specific tools mandated for specific circumstances or settings? See the individual topics for examples.
  • Does the tool cater for cultural or language differences?
  • Is the tool appropriate for the physiology of ageing?

The format used will also depend on the discipline, skill and expertise of the clinician, the context and setting of the assessment, the time available and the number of assessors involved. The assessment can be:

  • unstructured – if the professional expertise of the assessor is high
  • semi-structured – incorporates specific tools and checklists
  • structured and standardised – using global assessment instruments.

Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment

There is no gold standard for assessment of older people; however, a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment is highly recommended to understand the multidimensional complex care needs of frail older people and to determine both short and long term care needs.

A Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment can be undertaken by any member of the interdisciplinary healthcare team who has the required knowledge and skills. Multiple team members with specific skills may need to be involved depending on the patient’s needs.

Ideally, the assessment should be completed within the patient’s first 24 hours in hospital and communicated to all team members, the patient and informal carers.

Conducting assessments

We also need to be aware of the following when conducting assessments of older people:

  • At all times, it is vital that we maintain an understanding the older person’s perspective.
  • In acute hospital settings, circumstances may mean older people are not able or willing to be actively involved when health professionals assess them.
  • Older people may take more time to complete tools than younger people, so allow for rests during formal assessments.
  • Ensure that any needs for communication assistances are met. These may include use of interpreters, ensuring the older person is wearing their glasses and/or hearing aids if they are used routinely.
  • Do not assume older people know why they are being assessed. Explain why certain questions or tests are being undertaken.
  • Establish cognitive status as early as possible in an assessment. Do not assume older people are able to hear, comprehend what is said or are capable of accurate, intelligible responses (for example if they are acutely unwell).
  • Note that appearing ‘flat’, minimal eye contact and being non-committal responses may indicate depressive symptoms are present. Depressed older people can give the appearance of being cognitively impaired.
  • Consider the need for an interpreter for those with limited English proficiency. The interpreter can also assist with cultural care delivery.
  • Consider specific cultural issues and seek assistance necessary from cultural liaison officers or Indigenous health workers.

Applying clinical skills to assessment

Good clinical skills, observation, listening, interpreting and clinical judgement are all vital in decision-making.

When we assess older patients, we use tools and draw on our clinical reasoning skills. The reasoning cycle7 sets out the elements of effective clinical decision-making:

  • Consider the patient situation
  • Collect cues and information – through observation, questions
  • Process the information – what does it mean?
  • Identify problems and issues – what does the information indicate?
  • Establish goals – what actions need to be taken?
  • Take actions
  • Evaluate outcomes
  • Reflect on process and new learning.

Responding to assessment

The result of the screening and assessment process is the development and implementation of a care plan in conjunction with the patient and their family.

The aim of a care plan is to meet the individual patient’s needs and goals. When compiling a care plan, take the time to get to know what matters to your patient and what they would like to achieve. Maximise their opportunities to participate in their care, tailor simple evidence based strategies to their needs and encourage them to play an active role in maintaining their health. Revisit and update the care plan following reviews of progress or changes in the patient’s status.

Interventions identified in a care plan can involve:

  • curative care - to improve specific conditions
  • comfort care - to improve quality of life when an older person is receiving palliative care
  • preventive strategies to minimise risk of functional decline such as pressure care, nutrition and hydration, regular mobilisation, maintaining continence, pain management, orientation and cognitive functioning, and maintaining social connections both during and after a stay in hospital.

Once we have introduced the interventions, we need to regularly assess the older person’s ability to participate in the implementation of the plan and adjust the interventions as required.

    • Nay, R., Garratt, S., & Fetherstonhaugh, D. Older People: Issues and Innovations in Care, 2013 (4th ed.): Churchill Livingstone, Australia.
    • Vanderhorst, R. K., & McLaren, S. Social relationships as predictors of depression and suicidal ideation in older adults, (2005). Aging & mental health, 9(6).
    • Victor, C. R., Scambler, S. J., Bowling, A. N. N., & Bond, J. The prevalence of, and risk factors for, loneliness in later life: a survey of older people in Great Britain, (2005). Ageing and Society, 25(06).
    • Campaign to End Loneliness, Threat to healthExternal Link , [Accessed 28 October 2016].
    • McCusker, J., Bellavance, F., Cardin, S., Trepanier, S., Verdon, J., Ardman, M. Detection of older people at increased risk of adverse health outcomes after an emergency visit: The ISAR Screening Tool. Journal of the American Geriatric Society, 1999. 47(10): 1229-37.
    • Levett-Jones, T. (2013). Clinical Reasoning: Learning to think like a nurse. Frenchs Forest: Pearson Australia
    • Dorevitch 2004 p 229 in Nay, R., Garratt, S., & Fetherstonhaugh, D. (2013). Older People: Issues and Innovations in Care (4th ed.). Australia: Churchill Livingstone Australia


Communication and older people in hospital

Good communication skills are essential to delivering person-centred care.

By communicating effectively with patients we can find out what matters to them and tailor care to meet their needs and wishes.

Communication is a ‘procedure’ in good clinical care1 that we can use to improve our patients’ experience and their participation in care. This will help minimise their risks of functional decline in hospital.

Like wound care or surgical procedures, we need to learn and practise good clinical communication skills.1

Every interaction we have with our patients, their family and carers, and our colleagues requires us to draw on our communication skills. This includes screening, assessing, developing and delivering intervention and discharge plans, and providing safe and effective clinical handover.

This topic gives an overview of communication and recommends actions that we and our organisations can take, in addition to health service policy and procedures, to communicate effectively with our older patients.

Purpose

During their stay in hospital, people often require care from many clinicians; they may move wards and their care plans may change. This can cause stress, particularly in older patients. We can use communication to reassure patients, alleviate their fears and develop a partnership to reach the best possible outcomes.

We can think of communication as a ‘procedure’2 that we use to encourage patients to participate in their care. We know from the feedback received by hospitals, that communication and the quality of our interactions are very important to our patients. Older people remember how we made them feel during their hospital stay and not necessarily what we did. We also know that failures of communication and teamwork can play a role in avoidable adverse events in hospitals.

Elements of communication

Communication is more than information exchange, it includes the subtle ways we interact and how we use and respond to verbal and non-verbal cues2,3. Often, communication is about being curious, observing your patient and, most importantly, listening and responding to their concerns.

Communication is the interplay of many elements including:

  • language and speech
  • eye contact
  • body language, gestures and postures
  • facial expressions
  • active listening
  • empathy
  • touch
  • distance from the person
  • voice quality, rate, pitch, volume
  • communication tools and frameworks
  • written aids
  • communication aids (for example, interpreters, hearing aids, glasses)
  • identifiers such as red trays, the cognitive identifier, falls risk signs to indicate a prevention plan is in place to staff and patients
  • health system design
  • health system roles, hierarchies and teamwork.

Effective use of these elements encourages older people and their families and carers to participate in their care.

Communicating effectively

Effective clinical communication is about building a relationship, providing and sharing information, and sharing decision-making. Here are some things we can do to communicate effectively with our patients.

    • Introduce yourself, explain your role and why you are seeing the person in language they understand. For example, 'I am a senior nurse' not 'I am a NUM'.7 You may need to repeat this throughout the patient’s stay; remember, hospitals are busy places with many clinicians coming and going.
    • Wear a name badge with your first name written in large font and a simple role or treating team description (such nurse or doctor).8
    • Ask people how they prefer to be addressed and respect this by using the names they choose.
    • Use direct language that the older person can understand rather than medical jargon.7
    • Verify with the older person what he or she has understood from your conversation.
    • Orient older people to the ward, explaining ward routines such as when a doctor may visit.
    • Be mindful of the language you use. Generalisations or labels such as ‘cute’ or ‘difficult’ can impede good communication and terms such as ‘a good teaching case’, ‘bed blocker’, ‘frequent flyer,’ ‘difficult family’, ‘failed discharge’, ‘just palliative’ and ‘granny dumping’ are inappropriate, dehumanising and not reflective of person-centred care. Using respectful language and gestures promotes dignity.9
    • Find out what matters to your patients. As clinicians we can focus on what is the matter with our patients rather than exploring what matters most to them.
    • Spend more time actively listening to patients.
    • Ask, Tell, Ask, ask your patients what they want, tell them what you can, and then ask them what they understand.10
    • Teach Back, a technique where a clinician asks the older person to teach what they have learned back to the clinician. This technique offers the opportunity to verify understanding and can screen for cognitive problems because if your patient cannot teach what they have learned, you should investigate why.11
    • Acknowledge and respond to emotional cues. For example, if a patient says “I’ve been having a hard time lately and then I go and fall getting out of bed this morning”, don’t ignore the “I’ve been having a hard time lately”. Emotions can override cognitive thinking and emotional cues are shortcuts to important areas for discussion12.
    • Be aware of non-verbal cues. People will rarely tell you that they are experiencing loneliness or are at risk of loneliness. Loneliness is a subjective, private experience. It does not necessarily relate to simply living alone, but rather to a perceived negative feeling of lack of quality relationships.12 It can have a profound impact on an person’s health and wellbeing. Look for signs like tearfulness or withdrawn behaviour, which may indicate that your patient is feeling lonely or depressed, or is vulnerable. These signs warrant further exploration.
    • Be positive, assume capacity rather than incapacity when meeting an older person.13
    • Acknowledge and care for the older person as an individual person. Welcome and respect those defined by the older person as family or significant others.
    • Set the scene: if possible sit at eye level with the older person, maintain eye contact (where appropriate), minimise external distractions, respond appropriately, focus solely on what older person is saying, minimise internal distractions, ask questions for clarification.7
    • Be mindful of sensitive conversations on busy wards and consider noise levels and privacy before engaging in discussion, particularly of sensitive topics.7 For example, raising continence issues with older people in shared wards may best be done in a private meeting room. The conversation is important and should not be avoided because your patient is in a shared ward, but the environment must be appropriate for a sensitive discussion.
    • Advocate for the older person’s involvement in decision-making to the extent they want. Encourage the older person to ask questions. Listen attentively to them and provide appropriate answers. If you can’t answer their questions try to find someone who can.
    • Be mindful of your own feelings, perceptions, body language and expectations of older people, as these will impact on your communication with them. Before we can act to improve our communication we must be aware of our own beliefs and attitudes.14

Communicating with team members

As clinicians we communicate with other clinicians in person, in the patient record, in handover documentation and in other charts. We also have discussions during ward rounds, in meetings with treating team members, at handovers, and in informal conversations. All of these tasks require skilful clinical communication7.

Teamwork impacts on patient wellbeing

A supportive health service team culture has been associated with higher functional wellbeing for patients post discharge2.

Communication is a critical element in effective teamwork. A well-functioning team fosters an environment where we can ask questions and be ‘respectfully assertive’ with other team members, no matter the role or position, whenever a patient appears at risk3,4. Good team member communication processes support clinicians, translating into better individual interactions.5

Effective teamwork does not just happen; it requires skill development, practice and a supportive environment. Excellent individual skills do not guarantee effective team performance in delivering care4,6.

Team meetings

Team meetings can be used effectively to organise and learn6. Even brief one to five minute team meetings at handovers (and within shifts if required) to assess and organise are important4.

Items to address in team meetings to improve patient care include:

  • identifying team members and leaders
  • establishing or re-establishing situational awareness
  • assigning or re-assigning responsibilities and tasks
  • making team decisions
  • discussing problems
  • reviewing lessons we have learned.4, 6

Teamwork actions

Individual teamwork actions are the most common teamwork activities. Failures in four individual teamwork actions have been most implicated in medical errors4. The following are the four clinical teamwork skills that most reduce medical errors:

  1. Know what protocol or plan is being used. This should be clear to everyone on your team.
  2. Advocate for your patients. Assert your opinion or a correction to team members if you believe a patient is at risk. Leaders have a responsibility to create an environment where this is possible.
  3. Understand the care plan and prioritise tasks for your patients accordingly.
  4. Cross-monitor the actions of team members for simple errors and act to correct if required. Leaders should create an environment where this is an acceptable practice.

Documentation

Documentation helps us monitor interventions to minimise functional decline in our patients and communicate with the team.

In addition to following local documentation policy and procedures, consider the following actions to provide the information needed by the team7.

Record observations and actions accurately; clearly state the facts, what you saw, heard, smelt, felt and did.

  • Record enough information so that another clinician can continue care, include what preceded an event or change in care if that information is relevant to continuing care (for example, if a code grey is called for an older person with dementia, the events preceding the code grey are important for other clinicians to know how to deliver safe and effective person-centred care).
  • Document information about medications completely. Write medication names in full.
  • Document every assessment while the older person is in your care. This establishes a baseline, a record and a timeline of the person’s health.
  • Document as soon as possible to ensure important details are recorded and facts are not lost or shaded by subsequent events. Timely documentation also aids in treatment.
    1. J. Philips, 'Communicating with Patients', (Melbourne: Centre for Palliative Care, 2074).
    2. The Ossie Guide to Clinical Handover Improvement, 2070. ACSQHC: Sydney.
    3. Keller, A.C, Bergman, M.M., Heinzmann, C., Todorov, A. Weber, H., Heberer, M. The Relationship between Hospital Patients Ratings of Quality of Care and Communication. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 2074. 26: pp. 26-33
    4. The Gerontological Society of America, Communicating with Older Adults: An Evidence-Based Review of What Really Works, The Gerontological Society of America, 2072.
    5. Risser, D.T., Rice, M.M., Salisbury, M.L., Simon, R., Jay, G.D., Berns, S.D. The Potential for Improved Teamwork to Reduce Medical Errors in the Emergency Department, Annals of Emergency Medicine, 7999, 34: 373-83.
    6. Social Care Institute for Excellence, Dignity in Care,External Link 2073, [Accessed 22 June 2075].
    7. Gawande, A. Being Mortal: Medicine and What Matters in the End, 2074. Metropolitan Books/Henry Holt & Company.
    8. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Communication Training – Powerpoint Presentation for Communication Training That Can Be Co-Led by a Physician, Nurse, and Patient and Family Advisors, for a Group of Physicians, Nurses, and Other ProfessionalsExternal Link , 2073, [Accessed 25 May 2075].
    9. Perlman, D, Peplau L. Toward a Social Psychology of Loneliness. Personal Relationships 3: Personal Relationships in Disorder, (7987) Pp. 37–43.
    10. Philips, J. Communicating with Patients, 2074. Centre for Palliative Care: Melbourne.
    11. Tinney, D.J. Still Me: Being Old in Care, 2006. University of Melbourne.
    12. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care, National Statement on Health LiteracyExternal Link , 2014, [Accessed 17 February 2015].
    13. Shortell, S.M., Jones, R.H., Rademaker, A.W., Gillies, R.R., Dranove, D.S., Hughes, E.F.X., Budetti, P.P., Reynolds, K.S.E., Huang, C-F. Assessing the Impact of Total Quality Management and Organizational Culture on Multiple Outcomes of Care for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Patients', Med Care, 2000. 38: 207-17
    14. Clinical Communique [electronic resource]: Department of Forensic Medicine Monash University Victorian Institute of Forensic Medicine, 2 (2015)
    15. Risser, D. T., M. M. Rice, M. L. Salisbury, R. Simon, G. D. Jay, and S. D. Berns, The Potential for Improved Teamwork to Reduce Medical Errors in the Emergency Department, Annals of Emergency Medicine, 1999. 34: 373-83.
    16. Safran, D. G., W. Miller, and H. Beckman, Organizational Dimensions of Relationship-Centered Care: Theory, Evidence, and Practice, Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2006. 21: S9-15.
    17. WHO Guidelines for Safe Surgery: 2009: Safe Surgery Saves LivesExternal Link , 2009.
    18. Hunter, S., M. Bauer, D. Fetherstonhaugh, M. Winbolt, and R. Nay, Module 2: Communication of Assessment - Professional Issues, (Melbourne: La Trobe University).

Communicating with older people

Some older people have conditions that can impair their capacity to communicate, for example, stroke, COPD, dementia and hearing impairments.

Communication and ageing

Some older people have conditions that can impair their capacity to communicate, for example, stroke, COPD, dementia and hearing impairments.

There are also less obvious symptoms and conditions that can affect communication with our patients particularly when they are unwell. These include:

  • pain
  • frailty
  • mobility impairments
  • self-care impairments
  • under-nutrition
  • dehydration
  • delirium
  • depression
  • low mood
  • anxiety
  • sleep deprivation
  • medication effects and side-effects
  • polypharmacy
  • hearing impairments
  • vision impairments
  • acquired brain injury.

We can use our communication skills to assess what is affecting the person’s ability to receive or give information and to show that we are interested and care.

‘The people who do come in and treat you as a person, with a family, with a history, with… a life. You respond to so much better. There’s… a link, a communication that takes place.’ (patient)

We can also use communication skills to solve problems by asking the patient about their needs, concerns and their condition.

There is increasing interest in the role health literacy plays in determining outcomes for older patients. Health literacy is a person’s ability to seek, understand and use health information and services1.

‘...he said you got SOBOE…I had to go look it up to see what…he was talking about.’ (patient)

Only 40 per cent of adults can understand health messages in the form they are usually presented2. Questions we can ask to help assess our patients’ health literacy include:

  • Can you tell me why you are in hospital?
  • Can you tell me about what medications you are taking and why?
  • Is this an accurate understanding? If not, what appears to be the cause of the misunderstanding? (for example, insufficient explanation/language/cognition)

If we understand our patients’ health literacy and our own abilities to meet their needs we can better tailor our communication and our care to meet their needs.

Communicating with older people who have diverse needs

Older people with specific communication needs have an increased risk of experiencing functional decline in hospital. Identifying any functional or psychosocial barriers to communicating in hospital and responding to these will enable the older person to participate in their care, both in hospital and on discharge.

Vision and hearing loss

It is common for older patients to have vision and hearing impairments. These can be challenging during an inpatient stay and can limit a person’s confidence to participate in their care and ability to follow instructions, and may contribute to social withdraw.3 To reduce the risk of this happening:

  • Encourage the older person to wear their prescribed glasses in hospital.
  • Encourage the older person to wear their prescribed hearing aids in hospital. Check the hearing aids are on and the batteries are working if the older person is still having trouble hearing.
  • Ensure your patients’ glasses and hearing aids are within their reach if they choose to remove them.
  • Consider encouraging the older person to have their vision or hearing assessed if communication is difficult.

Speech impairment

Speech impairments range from mild (where there is only an occasional problem) to severe (when a person may have lost all ability to use and/or understand speech).

  • If an older person is unable to use speech as an effective form of communication, work with them and their family and carers to use an alternative method of communication.
  • Refer to speech pathology as appropriate.
  • Use appropriate communication aids and written aids.
  • Ensure the older person is given adequate time to communicate.

Cognitive impairments

Older people with cognitive impairments can communicate their wants and needs.

  • Be positive in your approach to communication.4
  • Greet the older person you are caring for by name, address and speak to them; do not ignore or talk over them.
  • Include the older person in their care to the extent they are able and want to be involved.
  • Allow time for the older person to express their needs.2 Behaviours of concern are often expressions of unmet needs.
  • Talk to family and carers; they often have valuable information about caring for an older person with a cognitive impairment.
  • If the older person no longer has capacity to consent to medical treatment, identify and record the name and contact details of the Medical treatment decision maker5, the substitute decision-maker under the law. Shared decision-making about care will require effective communication with the Medical treatment decision maker.

They’ve got to listen to the family in that situation, and it’s very hard if they don’t, because you do know that person better than what they do, they’ve only met that person only just then.
Relative of a patient

Culturally and linguistically diverse communities

In Victoria, a significant number of older people who use hospital services are from culturally and linguistically diverse communities. Be aware that not having English as your first language can add an extra layer of complexity for an older person and their family, and may increase feelings of loneliness or isolation, both in and out of hospital.

  • Ask your patient and their family and carers if they need an interpreter and, if so, organise this through your hospital’s interpreting services. Consider the older person’s and family’s wishes if there is a preference not to use an interpreter.6
  • When selecting an interpreter, consider confidentiality, kinship and gender issues.6
  • Focus on the older person’s strengths and wishes7. Be positive in your approach to communication.3
  • While written aids that have been professionally translated might be helpful, be aware that literacy might be a barrier to use. Over-reliance on written materials should not replace individualised care.6
  • Be aware that literacy might be a barrier to completing forms.
  • Try to learn a few basic words in the language of your linguistically diverse patients.3
  • Try to link together patients on the ward that speak the same language; for example, by sharing a room.
  • Cue cards can be helpful, but should not be used in place of accredited interpreters. Cue cards can be used by our patients, families and carers to communicate simple needs such as hungry, thirsty, telephone. We can use the cards to communicate simple instructions or ideas.
  • Connect older people to culturally specific and/or bilingual community services and clinicians, as appropriate.
  • Be prepared to explore the cultural context of some symptoms and diseases. For example, in some cultures there is a stigma around dementia and depression and a patient may use a different term to describe their feelings, for example they may say they are 'heart sick'.
  • Always check your understanding of what the older person has said.4
  • Screening and assessment tools often have cultural biases and many ‘standard’ tools have not been validated in multicultural samples in Australian hospital. Seek specialist advice for appropriate use and interpretation of results.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders

In Australia, many Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders experience morbidities typically associated with advancing age, such as cardiovascular disease and dementia, up to 20 years earlier than non-Aboriginal people. Therefore, from the age of 45, functional decline in hospital is a concern for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders.

Be mindful that Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders come from a variety of cultural and personal backgrounds.7

  • Many Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders find institutions such as hospitals particularly daunting or frightening, and being in hospital may trigger feelings of loneliness and isolation from networks. Ask the person to identify strategies that might help them during their stay, and optimise their ability to retain social connections on discharge.
  • To enable culturally safe care, identify with your patient and their family or carer if a cultural liaison officer is required and make a referral if needed.
  • Communicate with your patient, their family and carers to identify if an interpreter is required and organise this through your hospital’s interpreting services.
  • When selecting an interpreter consider confidentiality, kinship and gender issues6.
  • While written aids that have been professionally translated might be helpful, be aware that literacy might be a barrier to use. Over-reliance on written materials should not replace individualised care.7
  • Literacy might be a barrier to completing forms.
  • Source information and advice from Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people and culturally specific organisations.
  • Connect people to culturally specific and bilingual community services and clinicians, as appropriate.
  • Communicate with your patient, their family and carers to build a picture of all family members and significant others. It is not always obvious who has final authority in relation to an Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander’s health and wellbeing.8
  • Be aware that an illness may be seen as affecting the entire family, in terms of origins, symptoms and management.8
  • Screening and assessment tools often have cultural biases and many ‘standard’ tools have not been validated in multicultural samples in Australian hospitals. Seek specialist advice for appropriate use and interpretation of results.

Communication and discharge planning

The relationship between hospital care and ongoing community care within a complex health system can be difficult to understand and navigate for an older person, family and their carers. Discharge summaries should be clear and complete and promote continuity and quality of care in the community.1 The older person and their family and carers, as appropriate, should understand the discharge summary and be provided with copies to keep, so they can refer to the summary and provide it to community services as required.

The older person should leave hospital knowing:

  • their next contact with the health system (next appointment)
  • their key contact within the health system (for example their GP) and how to contact them
  • the medications and ongoing management or care they should be undertaking until the next appointment
  • the medical, functional and psychosocial issues that were identified during the admission
  • what to be aware of on discharge
  • who to call if they need help or advice.

Psychosocial interventions can play a significant role in an older person’s recovery after discharge. If loneliness or social isolation has been identified as a risk factor, ensure you have identified meaningful activities for the person and refer them to appropriate and accessible resources and community programs.9

Shared decision-making between us as clinicians, the older person, family and carers (as appropriate), is imperative to effective discharge planning. One method that has been trialled in a Victorian health service to assist discharge communication is Care Transfer Video.10 Care Transfer Video involves videoing ward rounds before discharge so patients can take home the discussions on a USB stick to watch with their families, GPs and other services as appropriate for follow-up. CareTV helps patients to remember details from their admissions and the plans for their ongoing care.

    1. Deakin University, 'Ophelia: Optimising Health Literacy to Improve Health and Equality'), 2015 [Accessed 17 February 2015].
    2. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care, National Statement on Health LiteracyExternal Link , 2014. [Accessed 17 February 2015].
    3. DHHS, Ageing is everyone’s business: a report on isolation and loneliness among senior Victorians, 2016.
    4. Tinney, D.J. Still Me: Being Old in Care, 2006. University of Melbourne.
    5. Office of the Public Advocate, Medical treatmentExternal Link , viewed February 2024.
    6. NARI, Kimberley Health Adults Project Guides for Clinicians, 2013.
    7. Likupe, G. Communication with Older Ethnic Minority Patients, Nursing Standard, 2014. 28: 37-43.
    8. Dudgeon, P., Ugle, K. Communicating and Engaging with Diverse Communities, in Working Together: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Mental Health and Wellbeing Principles and Practice, 2014. Ed. Dudgeon, P., Milroy H., Walker, R.
    9. Jopling, K. Promising Approaches to reducing loneliness and isolation in later life, 2015 Age UK, Campaign to End Loneliness.
    10. Newman, H. H., Gibbs, H. H., Ritchie, E. S., Hitchcock, K. I., Nagalingam, V., Hoiles, A., Wallace, E., Georgeson, E., Holton, S. A Feasibility Study of the Provision of a Personalized Interdisciplinary Audiovisual Summary to Facilitate Care Transfer Care at Hospital Discharge: Care Transfer Video (Care Tv), International Journal for Quality in Health Care Advance Access, 2015: 1-5.

Cognition - dementia, delirium and depression

Older people presenting to hospital with cognitive impairment are at greater risk of functional decline. Patients who are at risk of developing these problems during their admission are also vulnerable to functional decline. Identifying, investigating and responding to their needs is important to minimise this risk.

These topics provide information and recommend actions that we and our organisations can take to improve care for older patients.

Cognitive impairment screening

Cognitive screening, on admission to hospital and routinely throughout the stay, is important to rule out possible treatable causes. It provides a baseline to identify a decline in cognition that may be due to delirium; depression or dementia. An improvement in a person’s test scores, once treatment has been administered, can help to confirm a diagnosis of delirium.

The most commonly used cognitive assessment tools in the hospital setting are:

  • the Standardised Mini Mental-State Examination (SMMSE)1
  • the Abbreviated Mental Test Score (AMTS)
  • The Clock Drawing Test (CDT)

Two tools developed for use with people from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds are:

  • Mini-Cog
  • Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale (RUDAS)

A tool developed specifically for indigenous Australians (remote and urban modified versions) is:

  • Kimberley Indigenous Cognitive Assessment (KICA)

Informant-based questionnaires are completed by someone who knows the person being assessed well; they provide complementary information on a person’s cognitive status or can be used in situations where testing a person’s cognition is difficult due to illness, dysphasia or literacy deficit. They include:

  • Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly (IQCODE)

Complete cognitive screening using one of the tools above before administering the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) to identify delirium.

  • 1. The Independent Hospital Pricing Authority (IHPA) has purchased the Australian intellectual property rights of the SMMSE and has granted permission for all health care facilities and aged care services throughout Australia to freely use the SMMSE (copyright issues are associated with use of the MMSE).


Differential diagnosis - depression, delirium and dementia

High rates of delirium and depression are reported in people with dementia so these conditions may co-exist and each needs to be addressed. Dementia and depression are also risk factors for delirium.

Depression, dementia and delirium have some features in common. Depression and delirium, particularly hypoactive delirium, may present with apathy, withdrawal and tearfulness. Delirium occurs suddenly (over a matter of hours or days) and the symptoms tend to fluctuate throughout the day; depression describes a negative change in mood that has persisted for at least two weeks; and the onset of dementia is generally slow and insidious.

Differentiating depression from dementia and delirium requires knowing the characteristic features of each condition (see table below) and establishing the patient’s premorbid cognitive status and mood. This involves obtaining the patient’s history (from the patient or if cognitively impaired from an informant - family or carer or staff) and conducting a depression, cognitive and delirium screen.

FeatureDementiaDeliriumDepression
Onset and durationSlow and insidious onset; deterioration is progressive over time.Sudden onset – over hours or days; duration – hours to less than one month, but can be longer.Recent change in mood persisting for at least two weeks – may coincide with life changes – can last for months or years.
CourseSymptoms are progressive over a long period of time; not reversible.

Short and fluctuating; often worse at night and on waking. Usually reversible with treatment of the underlying condition.

Typically worse in the morning. Usually reversible with treatment.
Psychomotor activity

Wandering/exit seeking

Agitated

Withdrawn (may be related to coexisting depression)

Hyperactive delirium: agitation, restlessness, hallucinations

Hypoactive delirium: sleepy, slow-moving

Mixed: alternating features of the above.

Usually withdrawn

Apathy

May include agitation

AlertnessGenerally normalFluctuates, may be hyper-vigilant through to very lethargic.Normal
AttentionGenerally normalImpaired or fluctuates, difficulty following conversation.May appear impaired
MoodDepression may be present in early dementiaFluctuating emotions – for example: anger, tearful outbursts, fear

Depressed mood

Lack of interest or pleasure in usual activities

Change in appetite (increase or decrease)

ThinkingDifficulty with word-finding and abstractionDisorganised, distorted, fragmentedIntact; themes of helplessness and hopelessness present
PerceptionMisperceptions usually absent (can be present in Lewy body dementia)Distorted – illusions, hallucinations, delusions; difficulty distinguishing between reality and misperceptionsUsually intact (hallucinations and delusions only present
in severe cases)

Delays in investigating and treating underlying reasons for cognitive impairment, or initiating inappropriate treatment, can have serious consequences for an older person’s health and wellbeing whilst they are in hospital and on discharge.

Delirium must be differentiated from Dementia with Lewy Bodies

It is important to differentiate delirium from Dementia with Lewy Bodies (DLB). These conditions can appear identical, however, haloperidol, which may sometimes be used to manage delirium symptoms, can cause severe movement disturbances (such as spasms or rigidity) and can even be fatal to some patients with DLB. The presence of parkinsonism helps in differentiating DLB from delirium.1


1. Gore, R.L., E.R. Vardy, and J.T. O'Brien, Delirium and dementia with Lewy bodies: distinct diagnoses or part of the same spectrum? J Newurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 2014. 23.


Delirium

This topic gives an overview of delirium, its risk factors, how to prevent it occurring and how to manage its symptoms once diagnosed.

Key messages

  • Delirium is an acute disturbance in a person’s attention, awareness and cognition that can be caused by an acute medical condition or medication changes. Delirium is serious and may be the only sign of a deteriorating patient.
  • Delirium should be treated as a medical emergency.
  • Delirium is common in older patients, yet it is often overlooked, misdiagnosed and poorly managed. This can lead to the person experiencing falls, incontinence, malnutrition, dehydration, infections and pressure injuries.
  • Delirium can often be prevented and can be treated and managed. As clinicians we must listen to the families of our patients when they tell us the person seems confused. If the person does not have family or friends visiting regularly, we need to be extra vigilant to detect changes in a person’s behaviour and investigate promptly. All team members are responsible for this and should feel confident to escalate their concerns.
  • In addition to following health service policy and procedures, consider the recommended actions and discuss them with colleagues and managers.

“We must recognise and respond to delirium as we would any other medical emergency…[if we don’t] the outcome is as bad for older patients as if they experienced an acute myocardial infarct” (Geriatrician, Clinical Leadership Group on Care of Older People in Hospital)

Delirium is a serious condition where the person experiences a disturbance in attention, perception, awareness and cognition. Delirium may be caused by general medical conditions (for example, infections, hypoxia), certain medications, intoxicating substances or a combination of these.

Delirium develops quickly and symptoms fluctuate throughout the day. It usually lasts for a few days but may persist for weeks or even months in vulnerable older adults1,2. Delirium may be the only sign of medical illness or a rapidly deteriorating patient.

Delirium can be hyperactive, hypoactive (‘quiet’ delirium) or mixed. Hyperactive delirium is characterised by increased motor activity, restlessness, agitation, aggression, wandering, hyper alertness, hallucinations and delusions, and inappropriate behaviour. Hypoactive delirium is characterised by reduced motor activity, lethargy, withdrawal, drowsiness and staring into space. It is the most common delirium in older people. ‘Mixed’ delirium is where people have features of hyperactive and hypoactive delirium.

Delirium symptoms develop quickly

Delirium develops quickly, over hours or days, and symptoms fluctuate throughout the day and are often worse at night.

Symptoms include:

  • difficulty directing, focusing, sustaining or shifting attention
  • confusion
  • fluctuating or reduced consciousness
  • disorientation to time and place (particularly time)
  • disturbance of the sleep-wake cycle, for example, agitated or restless at night and drowsy during the day
  • impaired recent memory
  • speech or language disturbances, for example, rambling speech
  • increased or decreased psychomotor activity
  • emotional disturbances, for example, fearfulness, irritability, anger, sadness
  • hallucinations and delusions
  • lethargy and fatigue.

Delirium and ageing

Studies have reported that:

  • older patients in surgical, palliative care and intensive care settings experience the highest rates of delirium3
  • patients may come to hospital with delirium or may develop delirium while in hospital4
  • patients are frequently discharged from hospital with persisting symptoms of delirium5
  • delirium is preventable in 30–40 per cent of cases5.

Older people who experience delirium are at greater risk of functional and cognitive decline, falls, hospital acquired infections, pressure injuries and incontinence. Delirium can cause longer lasting cognitive impairments in patients after surgery and may ‘lead to permanent cognitive decline and dementia in some patients’3. Delirium is also associated with higher mortality and morbidity, increased length of hospital stay and admission to residential care6,7.

Risk factors for delirium

A range of factors affects an older person’s risk of developing delirium in hospital. Some factors are predisposing, that is they are related to characteristics of the person; some are precipitating, that is they are related to the person’s illness or the hospital environment. Delirium involves an interaction between the patient’s predisposing vulnerabilities, which puts them at greater risk when faced with precipitating factors.

Predisposing factors – related to the personPrecipitating factors – related to the illness or environment
  • Dementia or cognitive impairment
  • Older age (age 75 and older)
  • Functional impairment (mobility and decreased activities of daily living)
  • Visual or hearing impairment
  • Comorbidity*
  • Severe illness
  • History or previous episode of delirium
  • Depression
  • History of transient ischaemia or stroke
  • Alcohol misuse
  • Renal impairment
  • Malnutrition or dehydration
  • Frailty
  • Medications – polypharmacy, psychoactive drugs, sedatives or hypnotics (high risk)
  • Use of an indwelling catheter
  • Physiological [electrolyte disturbances] (increased serum urea or BUN:creatinine ratio**; abnormal serum albumin, sodium, glucose or potassium; metabolic acidosis)
  • Infection (especially chest and urinary)
  • Use of physical restraint
  • Hospitalisation/length of stay
  • Any iatrogenic event
  • Surgery (aortic aneurysm, non-cardiac thoracic, neurosurgery)
  • Trauma or urgent admission
  • Coma
  • Malnutrition or dehydration
  • Constipation
  • Hypoxia
  • Alcohol withdrawal
  • Uncontrolled pain
  • Neurological insults
  • Sleep deprivation
  • Organ failure

Notes:

* Comorbidity can be measured using the Charlson Comorbidity Index.

** BUN:creatinine ratio is the ratio of blood urea nitrogen (BUN) to serum creatinine and is used to determine acute kidney problems or dehydration. In Australia, it is referred to as urea:creatinine ratio.

Delirium and discharge planning

After an episode of delirium in hospital, an older person’s cognitive function and ability to manage at home or in care may be impacted. To help patients make a smooth transition from the hospital to their home or care facility, consider how the patient will manage and how their family or carer will cope, and what services and supports are required. Discharge planning should be documented, include the patient, carers and other professionals, and incorporate referrals to community health and support services where required.

Involve the patient, carers and other professionals

  • Involve the older person and their family or carer in discharge planning.
  • Obtain recommendations from the treating team and allied health.
  • Give the person and their family and carer written information about delirium and who to contact if they have any ongoing concerns.
  • If the person is socially isolated, consider what extra supports they will require and how you can address these needs.

Document the episode, patient status and medication

The discharge summary paperwork to be provided to the GP should include:

  • the patient’s episode of delirium, including details of persisting symptoms
  • the person’s cognitive and functional status on discharge compared with their pre-morbid status
  • any changes to their medication, including the reason for the change, possible side effects or drug interactions, how long the medication should be taken, and when it needs to be reviewed and by whom
  • antipsychotics should be ceased unless there is good reason for their continuation; an ongoing evaluation and a plan to cease use should be included.

Refer to community health and support services

Describe the person’s need for monitoring and support by health professionals and other services in the community.

  • The person’s GP will do the monitoring and follow-up, so provide test results and reports of all key and unresolved issues, including those needing further consideration or ongoing surveillance.
  • Identify additional services needed and refer to inpatient or community health and support services.

Preventing and managing delirium

There are many things we can do to help older people and their families and carers understand, prevent and manage delirium. Here are some recommendations.

Preventing and managing delirium

    • Communicate effectively – use short sentences and ask single questions; use interpreters and liaison staff.
    • Address sensory impairment – help patients wear their hearing and visual aids and check they are in good working order. Address reversible causes, such as impacted earwax.
    • Give patients, their family and carers clear information about delirium. Explain the risk factors, what delirium is, the simple strategies that can prevent or manage delirium and how they can work with staff.
    • Use a tool such as ‘This is me’, which has been adapted by some Victorian Hospitals and introduced as ‘A key to me’ or ‘About me’ to help reduce the older person’s agitation and improve their orientation and experience.
    • Introduce the TOP5 Initiative, to encourage staff to:
      • Talk to the carer
      • Obtain the Information
      • Personalise the care
      • 5 Strategies developed.

    “If we know the name of their football team or their granddaughter’s name it can help calm them – it doesn’t always work, but when it does work it’s really, really good.” (Nurse, Northern Health)

    • Provide orientation and reassurance - remind the person where they are, who you are and what time it is.
    • Have large-font clock, calendars and signage on the ward.
    • Light the room for that time of day.
    • Promote cognitive stimulation, for example, talk about news or reminisce.
    • Avoid room changes.
    • Reduce environmental stimuli and invasive procedures to a minimum.
    • Discourage daytime napping to aid night-time sleep.
    • Encourage the family, carer and friends to be involved in patient care or to visit (if this is calming to the patient).
    • Encourage independence in activities of daily living and minimise risk of falls.
    • Encourage movement - to reduce the risk of experiencing falls, developing pressure areas, constipation and incontinence, and to promote normal sleep patterns.
    • For patients who use a walking aid - make sure it is accessible and that they use it.
    • For patients unable to walk – encourage them to do in-bed (range of motion) exercise.
    • Encourage and help patients with eating and drinking to reduce the risk of constipation, dehydration and under-nutrition.
    • Ensure dentures are well fitted and worn.
    • Avoid using mechanical restraints.
    • Consider relaxation techniques, music or massage (this may also help with sleep).
    • Avoid using indwelling catheters as they are a source of infection.
    • Consider one-to-one nursing care, for example for patients at high risk of falls.
    • Ask the doctor or pharmacist to conduct a full medication review and reconciliation – they will consider the type and number of medications taken, including any sudden withdrawal of medications.
    • Reducing, ceasing or avoiding the use of psychoactive drugs is recommended as they may worsen the delirium.
    • Pharmacological therapy – should only be considered in severe cases of behavioural or emotional disturbance because there is no strong evidence they effectively improve prognosis. They may prolong the duration of the delirium and associated cognitive impairments or simply switch the patient’s delirium from hyperactive to hypoactive1. Always:
      • document the indications for using and stopping use of antipsychotic medication in the patient’s medical history
      • become familiar with the documented instructions regarding medication dosage, administration and the frequency with which a medical physician will review the patient’s status. It is recommended that only one antipsychotic medication is used at a time, start on a low dose, review frequently and use short term only.
      • review the use and effectiveness of any medications regularly by monitoring the patient for over-sedation, postural hypotension and Parkinsonism. These adverse effects increase the risk for falls and pressure injuries and should be managed by dose reduction rather than addition of other medications. Escalate adverse reactions to the doctor or pharmacist.
      • explain the rationale for starting or stopping any medications with the patient and their family and carer.

    1. Inouye, S.K., R.G.J. Westendorp, and J.S. Sacznski, Delirium in elderly people. The Lancet, 2014. 383: p. 911-922.

    • Check for pain – conduct a pain screen or look for non-verbal cues if the patient cannot communicate.
    • Ensure that pain relief is adequate and that a pain management plan is in place.
    • Orient the patient to the time.
    • Keep the environment quiet, for example, use vibrating pagers rather than call bells.
    • Keep lighting to a minimum.
    • Schedule procedures, rounds and observations to avoid disturbing sleep.
    • Give family or carers the option of staying overnight.
  • 1. Kiely, D., et al., Characteristics associated with delirium persistence among newly admitted post-acute facility patients. Journals of Gerontology Series A-Biological Sciences & Medical Sciences, 2004. 59(4): p. 344-9.

    2. Dasgupta, M. and L.M. Hillier, Factors associated with prolonged delirium: a systematic review. International Psychogeriatrics, 2010. 22(3): p. 373-394.

    3. Inouye, S.K., R.G.J. Westendorp, and J.S. Sacznski, Delirium in elderly people. The Lancet, 2014. 383: p. 911-922.

    4. Travers, C., et al. Delirium in Australian Hospitals: A Prospective Study. Current Gerontology and Geriatics Research, 2013. 2013, 8.

    5. Cole, M.G., Persistent delirium in older hospital patients. Curr Opin Psychiatry, 2010. 23(3): p. 250-254

    6. Inouye, S., et al., Does delirium contribute to poor hospital outcomes? A three-site epidemiologic study. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 1998. 13(4): p. 234-42.

    7. Wass, S., P.J. Webster, and R.N. Balakrishnan, Delirium in the elderly: a review. Oman Medical Journal, 2008. 23(3): p. 150-157.


Depression

Given two-thirds of older people in hospital have been found to have a mild depression there is much we can do to improve their experience and outcomes.

Depression is more than a low mood; it is a serious illness that impairs a person’s ability to function and causes significant distress for them and their family1.

Depression presents as a complex combination of:

  • behaviours – such as withdrawing from people and activities, neglecting personal appearance and commitments
  • thoughts for example, indecisive, negative comments
  • feelings– such as moodiness and irritability
  • physical symptoms – for example, unexplained headaches or pain, digestive upsets or nausea, dizziness, constipation.

Depression can be an acute or chronic condition. It can occur for the first time in an older person (referred to as late onset or late-life depression) or can be a recurrence or relapse of a previous episode2.

Depression is a serious illness

Characteristics of clinical depression

Clinical depression (major depressive disorder or depressive episode) is characterised by five or more of the following symptoms during the same two-week period. The symptoms must represent a change in functioning and include a depressed mood or loss of interest or pleasure. Symptoms include the following3:

  • Depressed mood most of the day, nearly every day (subjectively reported or objectively observed; for example, reports feeling sad or empty; appears tearful).
  • Marked decreased interest or pleasure in all, or almost all, activities most of the day, nearly every day (subjectively reported or objectively observed).
  • Significant weight loss or gain (more that five per cent of body weight in a month) or increased or decreased appetite (nearly every day).
  • Insomnia or hypersomnia (feeling sleepy throughout the day) nearly every day.
  • Psychomotor agitation or retardation nearly every day (observable and not merely subjective feelings of restlessness or being slowed down). For example, unintentional and purposeless movements due to mental tension (such as pacing or hand wringing); or slowing of thought, coordination and speech, presenting as sluggishness or confusion in speech.
  • Fatigue or loss of energy nearly every day.
  • Feelings of worthlessness or excessive or inappropriate guilt (may be delusional) nearly every day (not merely self-reproach or guilt about being sick).
  • Diminished ability to think or concentrate, or indecisiveness, nearly every day (subjectively reported or objectively observed).
  • Recurrent thoughts of death (not just fear of dying) or suicidal ideation without a specific plan, or a suicide attempt or specific plan for committing suicide.
  • These symptoms cannot be attributed to direct physiological effects of a substance or general medical condition.

Subtypes of major depression include melancholic (a severe form of depression where many of the physical symptoms are present, particularly moving slowly, and where more likely there is a loss of pleasure in most or all things), non-melancholic and psychotic (include hallucinations and delusions)1.

Severity of depression

Depression can be divided into four categories of severity:

  • Mild: characterised by five to six symptoms with mild functional impairment or the capacity to function normally with substantial effort.
  • Moderate: lies between mild and severe.
  • Severe (without psychotic features): characterised by the presence of most of the symptoms with observable functional impairment.
  • Severe with psychotic features: also includes delusions (for example, false beliefs, typically of being a bad person, deserving punishment or that bad things will happen) and hallucinations (such as hearing voices, smelling bad smells or other physical sensations).

Depression and ageing

Being admitted to hospital can be daunting for older people and their families. People can be afraid of the unknown and concerned about loss of independence. Their concerns may be shaped by their past experience of illness, episodes in hospital and the support systems they have in place.

Treatment for depression can be complicated and take longer to take effect in older people; however, prognosis for depression in older age is no worse than for younger patients4.

Given two-thirds of older people in hospital have been found to have a mild depression there is much we can do to improve their experience and outcomes.

In hospital I was so depressed, and I was there for about eight days … it was just the whole experience, I felt depressed because nobody much was around… Nobody is taking any notice because they just think you’re old and quiet I think… [In rehab there are] lots of people around to talk to… They were lovely there and so helpful. Depression is something that a lot of people deny. I got to the point [in hospital] where I was ready to go to the doctor and get an antidepressant ... and I have never been depressed in my life… [Depression can be prevented by hospital staff]. …acknowledging, and talking to you.
- Patient, 87 years old

The experience of loneliness, like mild depression, can change over the day. It may arise due to certain trigger events, or it can be long-lasting. It is also associated with a ‘feeling of disconnection from community, and of feeling like a stranger or an outsider’.5 It is important to recognise that loneliness, like depression, can have a negative impact on a person’s health, and some people can feel very reluctant to speak openly about it. 5

Risk factors

Depression, like dementia, is difficult to diagnose in hospital due to the high probability of delirium. However, there are key risk factors that we should be aware of in order to investigate further and respond appropriately. Identifying risks early and implementing prevention strategies can help prevent depression becoming severe and improve the older person’s chance of recovery.

The following are identified risk factors:

  • multiple physical health problems and chronic conditions
  • a past or family history of depression
  • cognitive decline or dementia (approximately 20 per cent of older people with dementia experience moderate to severe depression)
  • chronic pain
  • medication side effects (particularly drugs used to treat high blood pressure, some steroids and hormonal treatments, painkillers, tranquillisers and tablets or patches used for quitting smoking)
  • bereavement, grief and loss, including loss of relationships, independence, work, lifestyle, self-worth, mobility and flexibility
  • social isolation, lack of intimacy, poor social supports
  • the experience of loneliness
  • significant change in living arrangements, such as moving into a residential care setting6
  • caring for a family member with chronic illness, particularly dementia
  • prolonged stress, chronic or acute
  • drug or alcohol abuse
  • gender - older women have double the risk of depression compared to men.6

Screening and assessment

Screening

As mild depression is common among older people in hospital, it is essential to conduct a screen on admission or as soon as the patient’s acute condition has stabilised. At the same time, it is essential to conduct a cognitive impairment screen, which assists us to rule out other possible causes such as delirium, which can be treated, or dementia. This process is known as differential diagnosis.

When screening older people for depression, involve their families and carers as they can recognise a change in the older person’s normal ways of thinking and reacting and may be able to identify early signs of depression in hospital. It is important to recognise that depression and loneliness are closely related.

Screening tools used with older people for depression or loneliness

Geriatric Depression Scale short form (GDS-15 or GDS 5/15)

This is a tool for screening depression in cognitively intact older people. It is available in English and other languages.

Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia (CSDD)

This tool is designed for people with dementia. It comprises both an informant and patient interview. Many patient interview items can be filled by observing the patient. About 20 per cent of people with dementia have moderate or severe depression; both conditions need to be addressed if present. Instructions and a demonstration are available online.

UCLA Loneliness Scale

Use this scale if you suspect that your patient is experiencing loneliness. It is a set of 3 questions currently recommended in the International Consortium for Health Outcome Measures (ICHOM).

Assessment

A comprehensive mental health assessment involves a one to one interview, patient history and suicide risk assessment. A diagnosis of depression may require the following7, 8, 9:

  • a physical examination and laboratory investigations to identify any underlying condition that could be causing the symptoms, such as delirium, anaemia or thyroid problem
  • medical history and medication review and reconciliation to identify any medication side effects that may be causing the symptoms
  • clinical and/or mental health interview regarding:
    • the number, severity and duration of symptoms, including the risk of suicide or harm due to neglect, and associated disability
    • any major life changes that may have caused the depression; past and family history of mood disorders, successful and unsuccessful past treatment, and availability of social support.

Assessment may also involve families and carers, particularly if the patient has cognitive impairment.

Once we have identified concerns, we should consider the interventions and discuss with the treating team whether the patient would benefit from a referral to a medical specialist to complete a differential diagnosis.

Many hospitals have access to a clinical psychology or older adult psychiatry service to confirm the diagnosis, and to determine the duration and the impact of the patient’s depressive symptoms on their everyday functioning. The degree of impairment is key to developing the most appropriate management and treatment plan8.

Preventing and managing depression

We can implement various strategies to improve an older person's outcomes during their stay in hospital, contribute to their recovery and prevent the risk of functional decline.8, 9, 10, 11

We know it's the simple things that actually significantly improve the care of older people, straightforward things, such as …a team-based approach …involving and listening to patients and their families and carers is so important… whether the meal tray is in reach during meal time, whether there's plenty of fluid available during the day to prevent dehydration, it's getting people out of bed and making sure they are kept ambulant and mobilising during the course of the day. It's making sure that we look out for the problems of depression and anxiety and actively manage those with the patient.
-Geriatrician

Encourage patients to be active

Assist and encourage patients to participate in their care and to keep mentally, socially and physically active.

  • Encourage and help patients to eat and drink well and help prevent constipation. Depressed patients have more eating and digestive problems and there is a significant link between under-nutrition and depression11.
  • Encourage patients to care for themselves when they can, such as washing, dressing etc.
  • Provide stimulation and interaction.
  • Encourage or assist patients to get out of bed and move regularly.
  • Implement and monitor strategies to reduce the patient's risk of falls and pressure injuries.
  • Minimise isolation. Frequent brief visits from staff, volunteers, family and friends can help maintain the patient's morale. If family, friends and carers can't visit, encourage them to telephone the patient.

Communicate with patients

Communicate with patients and provide reassurance, encouragement and comfort.

  • Acknowledge the patient and help them maintain their sense of self; consider their physical, emotional, social and spiritual needs.
  • Encourage communication by demonstrating warmth, concern, a non-judgemental attitude and patience.
  • Give the patient time to respond to questions and requests. Speak calmly and give clear and concise explanations about care and treatment.
  • Use gentle but persistent encouragement and reassurance to engage the patient in tasks. Ask the whole healthcare team to adopt a consistent approach.
  • Encourage patients to talk about their mood. Respond with respect; gently challenge negative thoughts by providing an alternative perspective; avoid dismissive statements such as “It can't be that bad”.
  • Reinforce positive responses; reinforce the patient's strengths and positive attributes; avoid criticism.
  • Point out progress in the patient's condition no matter how small (patients may not recognise these).

Consider night-time strategies

Difficulty getting to sleep, restlessness, nightmares, waking early, loneliness, and the lack of distractions can lead patients to ponder over fears or feelings of hopelessness.

  • Encourage habits that promote sleep, for example don't have caffeine before bedtime, avoid afternoon napping, make sure the room is dark and noise is minimal.
  • A familiar staff member who listens can be comforting. It may be easier for some people to express their thoughts and feelings when the ward is quieter.

Explore treatment options

Talk to the person and the healthcare team about treatment options.

  • Encourage strategies to reduce anxiety, such as relaxation techniques.
  • Request a medication review to determine whether pharmacological treatment is appropriate. Note that antidepressants may be overprescribed and should be reserved for patients with chronic, recurrent or severe depression.
  • Discuss whether a referral to a psychologist for Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (to change negative thought patterns) and Interpersonal Therapy (to improve relationships and cope with grief) may be appropriate. In mild cases of depression therapy may be more effective than medication.
  • During admission have volunteers and pastoral care workers spend time with patients, helping them explore their feelings of loneliness, and keeping them company.
  • Explain the importance of maintaining social connections. If someone is socially isolated, encourage them to initiate new social activities and contact their local council, neighbourhood house or library to find out about activities in their area.

Involve patients and families

Always involve the patient and their carers and family in the care plan and decision making. Give patients and their family and carers information about depression and how to stay well.

Discuss lifestyle changes

Talk to the older person about incorporating some lifestyle changes to manage their symptoms, such as diet, nutritional supplements, exercise and social activities.

Depression and discharge planning

The discharge plan promotes continued improvement in a person’s mental health through psychological intervention, medication, physical activity, social connection, and regular contact with the patient’s GP.

A discharge plan must address issues such as the risk of self-harm and self-neglect, non-compliance with diet and medication instructions1, low social supports and limitations in daily activities.2

Discharge planning should involve educating the older person, family and carers and identifying strategies to enhance recovery. Provide patients and families or carers with information about depression and staying well.

In addition to referring to the patient’s GP, consider the following referrals:

  • Aged Care Assessment Service for follow up in the community
  • planned activity groups and local councils, neighbourhood houses, libraries, churches and men’s sheds to enhance opportunities for social connection based on patient's interests
  • community supports such as Home and Community Care (HACC) and Meals on Wheels
  • psychologist, psychiatrist, old age psychiatrist or aged psychiatric team.

If the patient is at risk of developing depression post discharge, monitoring (via the GP) is important.

  • 1. Jorm, A.F., et al., A guide to what works for depression, 2013, Beyond Blue: Melbourne.

    2. National Ageing Research Institute, Depression in older age: A scoping study, 2009, National Ageing Research Institute: Parkville.

    3. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edition.

    4. Snowdon, J., Late-life depression: what can be done? Australian Prescriber, 2001. 24(3): p. 65-67

    5. Commissioner for Senior Victorians. Ageing is everyone’s business: a report on isolation and loneliness among senior Victorians, 2016, State of Victoria: Melbourne. p. 10

    6. National Ageing Research Institute, Depression in older age: a scoping study, 2009, National Ageing Research Institute: Parkville.

    7. Snowdon, J., Late-life depression: what can be done? Australian Prescriber, 2001. 24(3): pp. 65-67.

    8. Thomas, H., Assessing and managing depression in older people. Nursing Times, 2013. 109(43): pp. 16-18.

    9. State of Queensland (Queensland Health), Queensland mind essentials: mental health nursing documents., 2010.

    10. Let's Respect. Depression. 2014.

    11. German, L., et al., Depressive symptoms and risk for malnutrition among hospitalized elderly people. The Journal of Nutrition, Health & Ageing, 2008. 12(5): pp. 313-318.

    12. Albrecht, J.S., et al., Hospital discharge instructions: Comprehension and compliance among older adults. J Gen Intern Med, 2014. 29(11): pp. 1491-1498.

    13. Ciro, C.A., et al., Patterns and correlates of depression in hospitalized older adults. Arch Gerontol Geriatr, 2012. 54(1): pp. 202-205.


Cognitive impairment screening

Cognitive screening provides a baseline to identify a decline in cognition that may be due to delirium; depression or dementia

Cognitive screening, on admission to hospital and routinely throughout an older patient's hospital stay, is important to identify risk of functional decline and rule out possible treatable causes. It provides a baseline to identify a decline in cognition that may be due to delirium; depression or dementia. An improvement in a person’s test scores, once treatment has been administered, can help to confirm a diagnosis of delirium.

The most commonly used cognitive assessment tools in the hospital setting are:

  • the Standardised Mini Mental-State Examination (SMMSE)1
  • the Abbreviated Mental Test Score (AMTS)
  • The Clock Drawing Test (CDT)
  • 4AT

Two tools developed for use with people from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds are:

  • Mini-Cog
  • Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale (RUDAS)

A tool developed specifically for indigenous Australians (remote and urban modified versions) is:

  • Kimberley Indigenous Cognitive Assessment (KICA)

Informant-based questionnaires are completed by someone who knows the person being assessed well; they provide complementary information on a person’s cognitive status or can be used in situations where testing a person’s cognition is difficult due to illness, dysphasia or literacy deficit. They include:

  • Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly (IQCODE)

Complete cognitive screening using one of the tools above before administering the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) to identify delirium.

    1. The Independent Hospital Pricing Authority (IHPA) has purchased the Australian intellectual property rights of the SMMSE and has granted permission for all health care facilities and aged care services throughout Australia to freely use the SMMSE (copyright issues are associated with use of the MMSE).

Dementia in older people

Dementia is not one specific disease; it is an umbrella term to describe a set of symptoms caused by a number of neurological diseases that affect the brain and a person’s ability to think, remember, understand, make judgments, communicate, socially interact and perform everyday tasks.

Dementia is generally under-recognised and under-diagnosed in the early stages of the disease because the signs are very subtle 1. An admission to hospital may be the first opportunity to initiate investigations that lead to a diagnosis and a greater understanding of how to support the person to maintain as much independence as possible during and after the admission.

Dementia is not one specific disease; it is an umbrella term to describe a set of symptoms caused by a number of neurological diseases that affect the brain and a person’s ability to think, remember, understand, make judgments, communicate, socially interact and perform everyday tasks.

The type of symptoms and how they develop vary depending on the form of dementia a person has and the areas of the brain that are damaged.

Dementia usually has a gradual onset and is progressive and irreversible.

Symptoms and signs

Most people are aware that dementia affects a person’s memory; in particular their short-term memory. It can also impact a person’s thinking, behaviour, movement and ability to do everyday tasks.

Symptoms and signs of dementia can include:

  • loss of insight, difficulty learning and following instructions
  • difficulty with language and comprehension
  • problems with calculation, judgment and reasoning
  • difficulty with decision making and concentration
  • lack of motivation, including apathy and withdrawal
  • change in their personality and social behaviour
  • problems with orientation to time and place
  • difficulty sequencing tasks, such as coordinating getting dressed
  • poor hygiene and dental care.

Behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD)

Changes in behaviour, such as wandering, pacing, agitation, depression, aggression, social inappropriateness, repetitive behaviour, sleep disturbances and hallucinations, are common in people with dementia - affecting up to 90 per cent of people with dementia.

Severity

The severity of dementia is commonly referred to as mild, moderate or severe:

  • Mild – at the early stage, deficits are noted in a number of areas but the person can function with minimal assistance.
  • Moderate – deficits become more obvious and greater levels of assistance are needed to help the person function.
  • Severe – the person is almost totally dependent on the care and supervision of others1.

Types

There are many types of dementia. Alzheimer’s disease is the most common (50–70 per cent of all dementia cases worldwide); vascular dementia accounts for 20–30 per cent of cases, frontotemporal dementia accounts for 5–10 per cent of cases, and Dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) accounts for 5 per cent of cases. Other types of dementia include younger onset dementia, alcohol-related dementia (Korsakoff’s Syndrome) and dementia in other diseases (such as Parkinson Disease, Huntington’s Disease, AIDS and Down syndrome). Mixed dementia may be more widespread with Alzheimer/vascular dementia accounting for 25 per cent of dementia cases and Alzheimer/DLB accounting for 15 per cent, particularly with increasing age.

Dementia and ageing

Older people with dementia are admitted to hospital each year at twice the rate of older people without dementia. They have longer lengths of stay, are at risk of falls, gait and balance impairments, inattention, hypotension, eating and hydration problems, sleep problems, pneumonia, untreated pain, delirium, urinary tract infections, sepsis, pressure injuries, fractures, functional decline and even death.2,3 4 The longer a person stays in hospital, the worse their outcomes.5

For people with dementia, the hospital environment, routines and interactions with multiple people can be overwhelming, and can increase their confusion and trigger changes in their behaviour and emotions. It is important that we address these behaviours and do not label patients with dementia as ‘difficult’.

Carers and family members often find hospital environments overwhelming. It is important to include them in your assessment and be alert for signs of for carer stress and carer fatigue. Involve carers and family members when developing a person-centred care plan. If the person does not have family or carers, seek information from other sources, such as their GP and service providers.

All people aged 65 and over should be screened for evidence of cognitive impairment on admission to hospital. Screening identifies the existence and extent of cognitive impairment and provides a baseline to help identify any decline or fluctuation in cognition that may be attributed to treatable causes, such as delirium or depression. This process is known as differential diagnosis.

Identifying dementia - screening and assessment

Use a validated screening tool

There is a range of validated tools suitable for screening older patients for dementia. These include tools designed for hospital settings, for people from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds, for Indigenous people and for family members and carers. For descriptions of tools, see Cognition screening tools.

Most people are aware that dementia will affect a person’s memory, in particular their short-term memory. It can also impact a person’s thinking, behaviour, movement and the ability to do everyday tasks. You may include the older patient is experiencing things including:

  • difficulty following conversation and instructions and learning new tasks (such as post-surgery precautions)
  • problems with orientation to time and place
  • difficulty navigating an unfamiliar environment, such as filling in a menu, eating off a meal tray,
  • unable to recall your previous conversation or whether they have eaten their meal and are drinking water regularly and taking medications
  • difficulty sequencing tasks, such as coordinating getting dressed, getting our of a hospital bed
  • problems managing hygiene and dental care.

Behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD)

Changes in behaviour, such as wandering, pacing, agitation, depression, aggression, social inappropriateness, repetitive behaviour, sleep disturbances and hallucinations, are common in people with dementia. These behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) can be stressful to the individual, their family and carers, staff, other patients and visitors. BPSD affect up to 90 per cent of people with dementia.

Determining diagnosis

There is no definitive test for dementia; we use findings from a variety of sources and tests, often conducted over many months, to build a case for diagnosis.

Some investigations may commence during the patient’s hospital stay (to eliminate treatable causes), however, most generally occur post discharge. A referral for post discharge follow-up, either through a geriatrician or referral to a Cognitive, Dementia and Memory Service (CDAMS), is essential because there are benefits to early diagnosis of dementia.

When a patient is suspected of having dementia, we can undertake a range of medical investigations, such as1,2:

  • a medical history; including a review of all medications
  • physical examinations and laboratory tests to rule out other conditions such as vitamin deficiency, infection, metabolic disorders and drug side effects. Pathology tests include full blood examination, urea and electrolytes, liver function tests, thyroid function tests, vitamin B12, folate, calcium and random glucose. Additional tests may be required depending on clinical indications
  • cognitive testing, which may include referring to a neuropsychologist for further tests. Neurological tests examine different areas of function in greater detail, such as memory, language, reasoning, calculation and ability to concentrate. They help distinguish between different patterns of decline and help identify the individual’s particular type of dementia
  • brain imaging: computerised tomography (CT) scans, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or positron emission tomography (PET)/single-photon emission computerised tomography (SPECT) help rule out other conditions, such as brain tumours, blood clots, or hydrocephalus, and detect patterns of brain tissue loss that help determine the form of dementia
  • collateral information from those who know the older person, such as their family and carers, their GP and regular service providers.

Assessing behavioural and psychological symptoms in hospital

As clinicians, the primary goal of assessing BPSD is to understand how the person’s cognitive impairment impacts their day-to-day function and behaviour. We can then reduce the risk of adverse events in hospital and make suitable plans for discharge.

By closely observing a patient’s symptoms, we can determine which BPSD are present, identify triggers for the behaviour and implement a person-centred response to minimise the risk of functional decline during admission.

We should clearly and fully document the patient’s behaviour and the circumstances that lead to the behaviour.

A cycle of evaluation that includes acceptance, assessment, action and reassessment is recommended3. This involves:

  • accepting the person and their history and the involvement and expertise of different health professionals and families and carers
  • assessing the physical and psychosocial care needs of the patient
  • developing and implementing an action care plan
  • reassessing the person and outcomes and refining the care plan.

The ABC (Antecedent-Behaviour-Consequence) approach is another model of understanding and supporting patients and staff when behaviour change3 occurs.

  • 1. Draper, B., Understanding Alzheimer's and other dementias 2011, Woollahra, NSW: Longueville Books.

    2. Joosse, L.L., D. Palmer, and N.M. Lang, Caring for elderly patients with dementia: nursing interventions. Nursing: Research and Reviews 2013 3: p. 107-117.

    3. Alzheimer's Australia, Dementia care in the acute hospital setting: Issues and strategies. A report for Alzheimer's Australia. Paper 40 2014.

    4. Bail, K., et al. Potentially preventable complications of urinary tract infections, pressure areas, pneumonia, and delirium in hospitalised dementia patients: retrospective cohort study. BMJ Open, 2013. 3, 1-8 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002770

    5. Health Foundation, Spotlight on dementia care: A Health Foundation improvement report 2011, The Health Foundation: London.


Managing dementia

We can improve outcomes for patients by implementing strategies that respond to their symptoms and their needs.

There are strategies we can use to improve care for patients with dementia. These can include working with family and carers, staff and other health professionals, as well as adapting the environment.1,2,3

Involve family and carers

  • By involving family and carers in assessment, care planning and in delivering care we can improve outcomes for people with dementia, provide comfort, and also help family and carers understand and cope.
  • Use the TOP 5 initiative to draw on their knowledge and experience of the patient and their care needs. Family and carers understand what is normal for the patient with dementia and this knowledge helps us identify changes that may be indicative of delirium, pain or other treatable conditions.
  • Collect information from family and carers. Use forms such as the ‘This is me’, Information about ‘me’ for planning care in hospital. These forms include questions related to the patient’s social care needs and preferences, and behavioural management strategies (including mobility, toileting, medication administration, and what comforts or distresses the patient).
  • Inform them about what to expect during an admission and how they can work with hospital staff.
  • If possible, provide one contact person within the organisation for any queries.

I really got to know her and her husband. He had a lot of behaviours and caused a lot of problems on the ward. But I sat down with them both and did the Key to Me [a form similar to the ‘The information about me for planning care in hospital’] … I think that was really good. I’ve been nursing for a long, long time, and sometimes you forget …they’re not just a patient… It made me realise that he’s not a naughty patient who caused a ruckus on the ward. He was a very kind man. After that I had a lot more patience with him…he was wonderful remembering his past, he had the most amazing life… it blew me away.… You don’t get the same sense completing the form compared to when you talk to someone and fill it in with them.
- Enrolled nurse

Alert all staff

  • Consider a method for informing all staff that a patient has dementia, for example a discreet bed-based sign such as the Cognitive impairment Identifier.
  • Ensure that all staff are trained to respond appropriately to the needs of patients with dementia.

Communicate clearly and effectively

  • Introduce yourself and explain your role.
  • Make sure you have eye contact at all times.
  • Remain calm and talk in a matter-of-fact way.
  • Keep sentences short and simple.
  • Focus on one instruction at a time.
  • Give time for a response.
  • Repeat yourself – don’t assume you have been understood.
  • Do not give too many choices.
  • Involve family and carers.

Assist with activities of daily living

  • Assist the patient with toileting, eating and drinking; encourage regular movement, prompt with self-care and other activities of daily living where required. These interventions play a key role in minimising the person’s risk of under-nutrition, falls, pressure injuries and delirium.

Change the environment

  • Place familiar personal belongings around the patient and, where possible, follow familiar routines.
  • Have large faced clocks and calendars and clear signage to the toilet to assist the patient with orientation. If not available on your ward, talk to your team about purchasing them.
  • Normalise the surroundings and reduce environmental stimuli as much as possible.
  • Keep walkways clear to prevent falls.

Consider referrals

  • Access the expertise of comprehensive geriatric medical services or on-site geriatricians or psychogeriatricians, or in emergency departments, dedicated aged care staff.
  • Where appropriate, consider alternatives to hospital admission, for example, hospital in the home or return to their residential aged care facility with Residential In-reach services.
  • It’s important that the person living with dementia, as well as their family and carers, maintains their social networks. Explain how this can reduce the risk of becoming socially isolated or experiencing loneliness, both of which can have a negative impact on a persons’ health. Local councils, local newspapers, neighbourhood houses and libraries can be a good place to find out what activities exist in each neighbourhood. Alzheimer’s Australia can help with information about local activities and groups. Ask a social worker for ideas.

Managing behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia

We can use a range of strategies to help manage behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD).

Non-pharmacological strategies are the first line of action and require us to identify and address internal stressors, such as illness or care needs, and external stressors, such as noise and glare.

Family and carers should be included in the development and implementation of the care plan.

The following strategies may assist you develop a person centred intervention plan when these symptoms arise.1,2,5

Reassure and reduce triggers

  • Actively listen to, respond and reassure the patient.
  • Be aware that patients with dementia are very sensitive to non-verbal cues and mirror the affective behaviour of those around them; a calm and gentle manner has a positive effect.6
  • Identify and reduce triggers for BPSD.
  • Avoid surrounding the patient with too many staff at one time, minimise multiple assessments and provide the same staff.
  • Provide activities to reduce agitation and quiet areas where the patient with dementia can retreat to in order to avoid the over stimulating hospital environment. Be aware that these symptoms can be an expression of an unmet need such as pain or discomfort.7
  • Use specialist support from services such as The Dementia Behaviour Management Advisory Service which provides a 24-hour telephone support service.

Wandering

Wandering is one of the most troubling behavioural symptoms reported by family and carers. There are different patterns of wandering behaviour and different management issues and levels of risk. Screening tools can help differentiate between different types of wandering and help develop an individualised person-centred intervention8. Some strategies to try include:

  • keep objects that might encourage wandering out of sight (for example a coat or handbag)
  • make sure the patient’s room is convenient for observation, is away from stairs or elevators, and is located so the patient has to pass the nursing station to reach an exit
  • make sure all staff are alerted to the possibility of the patient wandering
  • provide appropriate opportunities for exercise and activity. The family or carer, allied health assistants or trained volunteers can help (for example, take the patient for a walk within the hospital grounds at appropriate times)
  • designate a safe place for the patient to mobilse
  • ensure the patient has identification intact at all times. Keep a description of what the patient is wearing on a daily basis and ensure a current photo is available.
  • check the patient regularly
  • consider using a bed or chair alarm.

Sundowning

Sundowning is restlessness, increasing confusion or changed behaviours in a patient with dementia that can occur late in the afternoon or early evening. Some strategies to try include:

  • use early evening routines that are familiar for the patient; ask their family or carer
  • find out what activities or strategies calm the patient (for example, warm milk, back rubs, calming music). The This is me, Information about ‘me’ for planning care in hospital, Top 5 or equivalent form completed by or with a family or carer can provide this information.
  • allow the patient to mobilise in a safe environment
  • encourage an afternoon rest, if fatigue is making sundowning worse
  • consider environmental factors, such as lighting and noise
  • avoid activities in the late afternoon that may be unsettling (for example, showers, dressings).

Anxiety or agitation

It is important tounderstand the reality the person with dementia is experiencing and validating this may help settle the patient. Some strategies to try include:

  • talk about the anxiety-producing thoughts
  • reassure the patient
  • identify and relieve the cause of the anxiety.

Aggression

Physical or verbal aggression can be triggered by issues such as fatigue, an over-stimulating environment, asking the patient too many questions at one time, asking the patient to perform tasks beyond their abilities, too many strangers in a noisy, crowded atmosphere, failure at simple tasks or confrontation with hospital staff. Some strategies to try include:

  • identify and address the triggers and underlying emotion or feelings
  • simplify the task and communication
  • ask a ‘why?’ question to understand and reduce repetitive questioning
  • if an explanation doesn’t help, a distraction or activity may diffuse the situation
  • remain calm and use a low tone of voice
  • state things in positive terms – constantly saying ‘no’; or using commands increases resistance
  • don’t force or restrain the patient.

Hallucinations or false ideas

These can be present in later stages of dementia. The person may hear voices or sounds or see people or objects. This can cause severe reactions such as fear, distress, anxiety and agitation. Strategies include:

  • don’t argue and don’t take any accusations personally
  • maintain a familiar environment, with consistent staff and routine, as much as possible
  • ignore some hallucinations or false ideas if they are harmless and aren’t causing agitation
  • avoid triggers
  • pharmacological treatment may be part of a coordinated response for some patients who may benefit from treatment with antipsychotics (see below).

Disinhibited behaviour

By understanding why a patient is behaving in this way (for example due to memory loss, disorientation or discomfort), we can help avoid triggers. A patient may have forgotten where they are, how to dress, the importance of being dressed, where the bathroom is and how to use it; they may have confused the identity of a person; they may be feeling too hot or cold or their clothes may be too tight or itchy; or are confused about the time of day and what they should be doing. Some strategies to try include:

  • respond with patience and in a gentle, matter-of-act manner
  • don’t over-react; remember it is part of the condition
  • reassure and comfort the person who may be anxious
  • gently remind the patient that the behaviour may be inappropriate
  • lead them gently to a private place
  • provide clothing that is more comfortable
  • distract the patient by providing something else to do.

Pharmacological treatment

Psychotropic drugs can play an important but limited role in managing BPSD; there are modest benefits and significant potential adverse events5. They should be avoided where possible and used only if there is a risk of self-harm or harm to others, and only after a thorough examination has eliminated other possible causes (for example pain or illness) and where behavioural and psychological interventions were proven inadequate1,5.

Pharmacological treatment will not assist with some behaviours, such as wandering or repetitive questioning9.

Work closely with doctors to monitor medication effects. Refer to a geriatrician or specialist and pharmacist as part of the care team.

Be aware that:

  • medications should be administered orally, in low doses and for a limited time
  • usage should be monitored (for effectiveness and side effects) and adjusted accordingly; medication should be ceased if not effective or if side effects are evident
  • multiple psychotropic medication are not recommended.

Pharmacological treatment should always be used in conjunction with a consistent, non-pharmacological management plan.

Dementia and discharge planning

We can help patients, their family and carers, and their healthcare professionals provide appropriate care in the person’s home or care facility.

Inform their GP

If we suspect that a patient may be suffering from dementia, we must communicate this to the patient’s GP who will provide ongoing primary care and coordinate diagnosis and management. Provide the GP with results of cognitive and other screening and tests performed during the person’s admission.

Other referrals

Consider referring the person to other relevant services.

Memory clinics are known as cognitive dementia and memory services (CDAMS) in Victoria. These clinics incorporate a range of specialists (such as neurologists, geriatricians, psycho-geriatricians, psychiatrists and neuro-psychologists) involved in diagnosing dementia and provide diagnostic services for all types of dementia. They have more detailed knowledge of memory and behaviour changes associated with dementia and may perform, or arrange, in-depth assessments. In Australia, a specialist must confirm the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease for a patient to be eligible for subsidised Alzheimer’s medications.

Aged care assessment services (ACAS) comprise multidisciplinary professionals who conduct comprehensive, medical assessments for older people needing community services or aged care residential services. They help identify the type of care that best meets the needs of older people and their family and carers, put them in contact with relevant services, make recommendations about the level of care required and approve eligibility for certain services and packages.

Dementia Australia provides information and support for people and carers with dementia. Their national dementia helpline is 1800 100 500.

Meaningful activities enhance opportunities for social connection and participation. Encourage the older person and their family or carers to make contact with their local library, council or neighbourhood house, or check their local newspaper, to determine what activities might be available in their area.

Discharge summary

Provide patients, family and carers with a written discharge summary, including dates and contact details for any follow-up required.

  • 1. Ballarat Health Services, Understanding dementia: a guide for hospital staff. , [undated].

    2. Joosse, L.L., D. Palmer, and N.M. Lang, Caring for elderly patients with dementia: nursing interventions. Nursing: Research and Reviews 2013 3: p. 107-117.

    3. Alzheimer's Australia, Dementia care in the acute hospital setting: Issues and strategies. A report for Alzheimer's Australia. Paper 40 2014.

    4.Moyle, W., U. Kellett, A. Ballantyne and N. Garcia, Dementia and loneliness: an Australian perspective. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2011 20: p. 1445-1453.

    5. The Royal Australian & New Zealand College of Psychiatrists, Assessment and Management of People with Behavioural and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia (BPSD): A handbook for NSW Health Clinicians, 2013.

    6. International Psychogeriatric Association. Behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) educational packExternal Link . 1998 [cited 2014 13 November].

    7. Alzheimer's Society Reducing the use of antipsychotic drugs: A guide to the treatment and care of behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia 2011.

    8. Dewing, J., Screening for wandering among older person’s with dementia. Nursing Older People, 2005. 17: p. 20-24.

    9. Osser, D. and M. Fischer, Management of the behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia: review of current data and best practices for health care providers., 2013, National Resource Centre for Academic Detailing.


Continence in older people

Incontinence has an enormous impact on an older person’s quality of life. It adds a significant burden on family and carers and is a major factor in deciding to go into residential care.

Continence issues are rarely the reason for hospital admission. Older people who experience incontinence or constipation, or develop these issues during their stay, are at risk of poorer outcomes than those who do not.

Incontinence and constipation are often signs that an older person is experiencing other health conditions.

Targeted screening, assessment and intervention can have a positive impact on the patient’s ability to participate in all recommended activities in hospital, reduce the person’s risk of experiencing a range of cascading problems such as infection, wounds and delirium, and have a lasting effect on their social and functional quality of life when they are discharged.

Continence and ageing

As a person ages, their bladder and bowel changes, which affects their function.

Bladder changes include1:

  • the elastic tissue of the bladder wall becomes tough and less stretchy and unable to hold as much urine
  • weakening of the bladder muscles
  • increases in involuntary bladder contractions
  • urethral blockage:
    • in women this can be due to weakened muscles causing the bladder or vagina to prolapse
    • in men this can be due to an enlarged prostate gland
  • increases in post-voiding residual volume (50–100 mL)
  • increases in fluid excretion at night.

Bowel changes include2:

  • sphincter weakness (for example, due to childbirth stretch injury)
  • loss of anal sensation
  • impairment of gastrocolic reflex
  • softening of stools.

Incontinence has a big impact on health and quality of life

Incontinence has an enormous impact on an older person’s quality of life. It adds significant burden on family and carers and is a major factor in deciding to go into residential care.

Incontinence also puts people at greater risk of health issues such as falls and pressure injuries.

Incontinence has financial implications due to the cost of continence aids. It can affect a person’s general wellbeing and make them socially isolated due to embarrassment.

Continence problems can develop with other issues

In older patients, incontinence is usually caused by a combination of factors, including age-related changes to the urinary tract.

Continence problems can develop or become more severe if an older person is experiencing:

  • Reduced mobility – can lead to falls when attempting to reach the bathroom. This is the single most predictive factor for incontinence, and urge incontinence has been identified as a high falls risk for men and women and as a major contributing factor to hip fractures in older women.3
  • Impaired cognition – including delirium, dementia and depression, limit a person’s ability to self-toilet, particularly in an unfamiliar environment. Incontinence may add to the burden of depression.4
  • Under nutrition (hydration and fibre) – adequate hydration and fibre intake is essential in maintaining bladder and bowel function. Many older people report limiting their fluids to avoid getting up to go the toilet while in hospital. This can contribute to constipation and urge incontinence.
  • Medication side effects (particularly diuretics, sedatives, caffeine and alcohol) – medications can cause constipation and drowsiness, which can increase the risk of falls. Diuretics can increase frequency. Caffeine and alcohol are bladder irritants and can also increase urinary frequency.
  • Skin integrity problems – exposure to urine and faeces can cause skin breakdown and leave the skin susceptible to damage from friction and pressure, dermatitis, and bacterial and fungal infections.
  • Frailty – people who are frail and functionally impaired need accessible, safe toilet facilities and often benefit from assistance or supervision in hospital.

Identifying continence issues

Incontinence is rarely the reason a patient is admitted to hospital; however, it plays an important part in their recovery. Continence issues are often treatable and, in some cases, reversible.

Hospital admission presents an excellent opportunity to investigate continence issues and develop a management plan. This could improve the patient’s experience and recovery, and have lasting positive impact after discharge.

In addition to following health service policy and procedures, the following actions can help identify patients with continence issues and risks.

Screening questions

Continence is a sensitive issue. Even though we might talk about this topic with patients every day, we need to be mindful to:

  • actively listen to the patient and avoid making judgements
  • respect the patient’s right to choose the most appropriate treatment option.

While there are no validated screening tools available, when a person is admitted it is useful to establish their usual bowel and bladder habits. Ask these screening questions:

  • Do you leak urine before you get to the toilet?
  • Do you have to wear pads?
  • Do you suffer from constipation or diarrhoea?
  • Do your bowels or bladder ever cause you embarrassment, pain or concern?
  • Are you rushing to the toilet or looking for the toilet all the time?
  • Are you going to the toilet every half an hour? (in addition to leaking urine, overflow incontinence can also be identified by frequency)
  • Was this an issue before you were ill or has it become worse?

If a patient answers YES to any of these questions, they should be assessed for incontinence.

If the person has a pre-existing cognitive impairment or is experiencing delirum, confirm their answers with their family or carer. If applicable, contact the patient’s residential care facility to obtain their continence plan. This information will help identify the risk of episodes of incontinence during their stay.

Assess contributing factors

As a first step, we should seek to eliminate as many contributing factors to incontinence as possible.

Use DIAPPERS to screen for reversible causes5:

  • Delirium
  • Infection--urinary (symptomatic)
  • Atrophic urethritis and vaginitis
  • Pharmaceuticals
  • Psychological disorders, especially depression
  • Excessive urine output (for example, from heart failure or hyperglycemia)
  • Restricted mobility
  • Stool impaction

Also ask about:

  • decreased fluid intake
  • urinary retention
  • lack of toilet access
  • whether the patient is emptying their bladder, especially if they have a neurological condition.

Use the Urinary Distress Inventory to check for symptoms of incontinence on admission.

Once you have identified an issue and treated underlying causes, further assessment may include physical examination, taking a brief targeted history, gathering more information on the person’s usual baseline functional abilities and using standardised tools to gather more evidence.

Take a history

A person may have a mixture of continence types, which can make the underlying cause more difficult to work out. Take a brief and targeted history, gathering the following information.

    • urge
    • stress
    • voiding difficulty - hesitancy, intermittency, weak stream, incomplete emptying
    • blood in the urine (haematuria)
    • waking at night to go to the toilet (nocturia)
    • pain or difficulty urinating (dysuria)
    • postmenopausal/prostatism
    • malaena
    • rectal bleeding
    • anaemia
    • loss of weight
    • unexplained change in bowel habits
    • nocturnal diarrhoea
    • abdominal or pelvic mass.
    • >during the day or during the night
  • Women

    • gynaecological/obstetric history (the most common cause of stress urinary incontinence in women is childbirth).

    Men

    • urologic history (the most common cause of stress urinary incontinence in men is benign prostatic hypertrophy).
    • arthritis and related disorders
    • musculoskeletal conditions
    • neurological conditions such as Parkinson’s Disease, Multiple Sclerosis
    • stroke
    • diabetes
    • dementia.
    • diuretics
    • high blood pressure medications
    • antidepressants and sedatives
    • muscle relaxants and sleeping pills
    • calcium channel blockers (can cause constipation)
    • non-prescribed drugs.
  • How they are managing

    • mobility
    • using toilet facilities
    • continence aids
    • the social and routine activities. Some people report a restriction on their ability to lead their lives6 and stigma about incontinence can be a barrier to seeking help.7
  • If needed, check the following:

    • Fluid status and signs of dehydration
    • Abdominal examination and rectal and genital examination, looking for
      • palpable bladder
      • incontinence associated dermatitis
      • for women
        • signs of vaginal atrophy or prolapse
        • pelvic floor muscle contraction
      • for men
        • prostate shape, size and consistency
        • pelvic floor muscle strength.
    • Cardiac and respiratory examinations:
      • cardiac failure history and treatment
      • obstructive sleep apnoea (can lead to nocturnal polyuria and nocturia)
    • Neurological examination to include cognition and function/mobility.
  • The following investigations can help us better understand urinary tract function, other conditions, patient management and the degree of continence to aim for (dependant, social, independent).

    • Two-day bladder chart:
      • include voided volumes for two consecutive days and nights
      • note if incontinent and the degree of leakage (damp/wet/soaked).
    • Urine full ward test (dipstick): refer the patient to medical staff if nitrite/leucocyte/blood positive.
    • Bowel chart: Bristol Stool Chart©.
    • Post-void residual scale: is collected using a bladder scanner
      • if < 100 mL - no action
      • if > 100 mL - refer to medical staff. Incomplete bladder emptying leads to urinary stasis and increases risk of UTI
      • if >500 mL – refer to medical staff as soon as practicable. This may imply urinary retention requiring catheterisation.
      • Note: When using the scanner select male or female setting; for female with hysterectomy, select male setting.
    • Abdominal X-ray
      • May be recommended to rule out abdominal masses and can be useful in identifying faecal impaction.

Preventing and treating incontinence

Continence interventions can reduce or minimise functional decline and promote social continence and good bladder habits and strategies.

In hospital, there are many barriers to maintaining continence and many factors contribute to incontinence. These include:

  • medical factors – such as the person’s existing medical conditions, acute illness and medications
  • environmental factors – such as poor signage on doors, inadequate lighting, shared bathrooms and an unfamiliar environment
  • need for assistance to toilet.

We are all responsible for helping older people to maintain continence in hospital. This requires an individualised approach at the patient level, but needs to also include policy, systems and environmental design.

There are many things we can do to support continence and treat incontinence. Here are some recommendations.

  • Immediately treat any conditions that are causing the person’s incontinence, for example:

    • delirium
    • infection
    • fluid intake
    • faecal impaction
    • depression.
  • Consider:

    • bladder re-training (refer to physiotherapy)
    • anticholinergics (monitor residuals, not in dementia)9
    • vaginal oestrogen.
    • Discuss weight reduction.
    • Address coughing and sneezing.
    • Recommend pelvic floor exercises (refer to physiotherapy).
    • Consider vaginal oestrogen.
  • If the person is getting up to go to the toilet more than twice a night:

    • encourage them to get out of bed to use the toilet or a commode next to the bed
    • ask them if they are reducing the amount they drink to reduce getting up at night. If they are, tell them that this can lead to dehydration, which causes swallowing problems, malnutrition, falls and delirium.
  • If the person has dementia, consider:

    • timed toileting according to their voiding pattern determined from the bladder diary regular toileting
    • continence products, such as disposable pull ups or washable continence pants
    • the person’s body cues that indicate they need to use the bathroom, such as fidgeting or pulling at their clothes.
  • If the person's stool is too hard, consider:

    • increasing water consumption
    • increasing dietary fibre (note: for older people this can add to faecal loading and increase the risk of urinary incontinence and flatulence; seek advice from a dietitian)
    • using laxatives using titrate aperients according to stool pattern (as per Bristol Stool Chart)
    • encouraging regular mobilisation around the ward.

    If the person’s stool is too soft, consider:

    • searching for the underlying cause, such as irritable bowel syndrome or inflammatory bowel disease
    • using loperamide
    • using an enema or suppositories to help the person empty their bowel at a predictable time and prevent soiling.
  • The environment can make it difficult for a person to access the toilet. Modify the environment so the person can toilet independently and to minimise the risk of falls.

    • Orientate the person to their new environment, showing them where the bathroom is and where the call bell is.
    • Consider moving the person to a bed closer to the toilet.
    • Consider if using toilet substitutes (non-spill urinals, bedside commodes, bedpans) would be appropriate.
    • Eliminate hazards (obstacles on the path to the bathroom, inadequate lighting, lack of handrails, restraints such as bed rails and bed height).
    • Provide adequate lighting and lit signage to toilets at night.
    • Consider altering the person’s clothing to make toileting easier (for example, use Velcro fasteners and pants with elastic waist bands rather than buttons and zippers).
    • Refer the patient to Occupational Therapy for gait aids, such as a bed stick. Make sure these aids are easy to reach at all times.
  • An individualised continence management plan should be developed and implemented in conjunction with the older person. It should be regularly reviewed and adjusted as needed.

    The plan should be based on information provided by the patient, their family or carer, and their residential care facility if they are not living at home.

    The plan should be comprehensive and include the following elements.

    • Find out when the person normally uses their bowels. Encourage them to go to the toilet when they get the urge because this is the most effective time to completely empty their bowels (for most people, it is usually first thing in the morning after breakfast10).
    • Encourage the older person to get out of bed and use a commode next to the bed or walk to the toilet if possible.
    • Show the older person and their family how to use the call bell if they need assistance to use the toilet.
    • Encourage the patient to completely empty their bladder with each void.
    • Discourage the use of bedpans and urinals in the bed if possible.
    • Do not place, or leave in place, indwelling catheters for urinary incontinence or convenience or for monitoring of output for non-critically ill patients.
    • Review the indication for catheterisation – question the reasons, note the date it is inserted, and plan for review by an expert (including trial of void).
    • Provide education about bladder and bowel function.
    • Discourage the use of known bladder irritants (such as coffee, alcohol and soft drinks).
    • Provide education on continence products if required and:
      • check and assist the older person to change their disposable pads after each episode of incontinence if necessary
      • monitor and protect the patient’s skin integrity (with particular attention to the perineum, inner thighs and buttocks)
      • limit the use of continence pads ‘just in case’, especially large ones that may reduce a patient’s ability to self-toilet. These can be difficult to remove, particularly for patients with arthritis or poor vision. Look at strategies so ‘just in case’ is not required.
  • Refer the person to:

    • a dietitian for fibre and fluid advice, to ensure adequate hydration and fibre intake to maintain optimal bladder and bowel function
    • a physiotherapist for functional mobility and strengthening advice, gait aids, bladder and bowel re-training, and pelvic floor exercises
    • a continence service or specialist for advice on continence products, behavioural therapy, medication treatment or surgery.11,12
  • Person-centred practice and clear documentation are the keys to managing continence issues. It is important to respect the dignity and privacy of the older person and to involve them in every aspect of care. Communicating the care plan with the rest of the healthcare team, including the patient and family or carer, is also vital in providing a consistent person-centred approach to continence management.

Continence and discharge planning

People experiencing continence issues may have difficulty managing their continence, particularly outside the home, or feel embarrassed by their condition. They may feel reluctant to seek help due to social stigma. This can cause them to restrict their activity, increasing their risk of experiencing social isolation.7 We can help patients make a smooth transition from the hospital to their home or care facility by finding out what they understand about their condition, acknowledging their concerns, demonstrating sensitivity and developing a care plan that addresses the person’s ongoing continence management needs:13

  • Do they need a referral to a continence clinic?
  • Should their GP be advised of continence issues identified in hospital?
  • Do they need written materials and resources to help manage continence? Refer to Continence Foundation of Australia website.
  • Are they eligible for government funding support for the cost of continence aids?
  • Do they need referrals for aids and specialist services?
  • Would they benefit from a continence nurse follow up phone call or assessment in the community?
  • Would they benefit from a referral to a dietitian for advice on maintain healthy bowels?
  • Where is the person going after discharge – their own home, supported accommodation (with or without stand-up staff overnight) or residential care?
  • If the person is going home, will they be alone or have help? Do they have a carer who can assist them?
  • Can they afford the cost of aperients (mild laxatives) and continence appliances?
  • Are they eligible for an aids assistance scheme, for example, from the Department of Veterans’ Affairs, Continence Aids Assistance Scheme or the Department of Health and Human Services’ Aids and Equipment Program?

Your organisation can develop a discharge kit that includes resources and contact details specific to your local area.

    1. Keane, D.P, O'Sullivan S, Urinary incontinence: anatomy, physiology and pathophysiology. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 2000. 14(2): p. 207-226.
    2. Cooper, Z.R, Rose S, Fecal incontinence: a clinical approach. The Mount Sinai journal of medicine, New York, 2000. 67(2): p. 96-105.
    3. Gray, M., The importance of screening, assessment, and managing urinary incontinence in primary care. Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners, 2003. 15(3): p. 102-107
    4. Trantafylidis, S.C.-A., Impact of urinary incontinence on quality of life. Pelviperineology, 2009. 28(28): p. 51-53.
    5. Resnick, N.M. and S.V. Yalla, Management of Urinary Incontinence in the Elderly. The New England Journal of Medicine, 1985. 313: p. 800-804.
    6. Mitteness, L.S. and J.C. Barker, Stigmatizing a normal condition: urinary incontinence in late life. Medical Anthropology Wuarterly, 1995. 9: p. 188-210.
    7. Heintz, P.A., C.M. DeMucha, M.M. Deguzman, R. Softa, Stigmas and microagression experienced by older women with urinary incontinence: A literature review. Urologic Nursing, 2013. 33: p. 299-305.
    8. Society of Hospital Medicine. Five Things Physicians and Patients Should Question. 2013 [cited 2015 March 26]; Available from Choosing Wisely AustraliaExternal Link
    9. Kim, S., S. Liu, and V. Tse, Management of urinary incontinence in adults. Australian Prescriber, 2014. 37(1): p. 10-3.
    10. Continence Foundation of Australia, The Continence Guide - Bladder and Bowel Control Explained, 2014, The Continence Foundation of Australia: Melbourne.
    11. Deakin University/Eastern Health, A continence resource guide for acute and subacute settings, 2008, Melbourne: Deakin University/Eastern Health.
    12. Deakin University/Eastern Health, Assessing urinary incontinence and related bladder symptoms educational resource, 2008, Eastern Health: Melbourne.
    13. Elstad, E. A., S. P. Taubenberger, E. M. Botelho, S. L. Tennstedt, Beyond incontinence: the stigma of other urinary symptoms, Journal of Advanced Nursing, 2010. 66: pp. 2460-2470.


Falls, mobility and self-care

Older people who present to hospital with a fall, a history of falls or mobility problems are at risk of functional decline.

Older people who present to hospital with a fall, a history of falls or mobility problems are at risk of functional decline. Patients who are at risk of developing these problems during their admission are also vulnerable to functional decline. Identifying, investigating and responding to their needs is an important part of minimising this risk.

These topics provide information and recommend actions that we and our organisations can take to improve care for older patients.


Mobility and self-care

Older people in hospital are at risk of functional decline and de-conditioning as early as two days after admission.

Regardless of why an older person is admitted to hospital, their ability to move and care for themselves will determine the care and services they will need while in hospital and after discharge.

Older people in hospital are at risk of functional decline and de-conditioning as early as two days after admission1. As clinicians, we should encourage older people to maintain or improve their mobility and self-care skills participating in activities.

This topic gives an overview of the importance of mobility and self-care, tools to identify issues, and strategies to improve an older person’s mobility and self-care. In addition to following health service policy and procedures, consider the following actions and discuss them with colleagues and managers.

Understanding how patients move

Functional mobility is the capacity to move from one position to another, enabling participation in normal daily routines and activities. It includes bed mobility, transfers, walking, wheelchair mobility, accessing toilets, getting in and out of a car, driving and taking public transport. It is important to be aware that mobility restrictions and using gait aids can have a significant impact on a person’s ability to access their home and local area. This can result in difficulty maintaining and initiating social connections within their community.

In hospital, functional mobility refers to your patient’s ability to get in and out of bed, to walk to and from the toilet and around the ward.

Self-care is the personal care carried out by a person. Common self-care activities while in hospital include eating, bathing, personal grooming and using the toilet. An older person may require assistance, supervision or guidance from healthcare workers for these tasks.

In hospital, mobility and self-care are often key measures we use to predict length of stay, discharge destination and need for support services. It is important that we understand our patients’ prior levels of ability and how they move and care for themselves in their usual living environments.

Wherever possible, we should ensure that our patients’ mobility and capacity for self-care is maintained or improved while they are in hospital. This will increase the likelihood that they can return to their previous levels of function, independence and social activities after leaving hospital.

Mobility and self-care support independence

By maintaining mobility and adequate self-care, it is possible for older people to maximise their opportunities for personal independence, social connectedness, security, activity and dignity.

During a hospital stay, a person-centred partnership with the older person is necessary to ensure mobility and self-care are maintained or improved. Mobility and self-care are fundamental to many of the other functional domains addressed on this website. For example, an older person's ability to walk to the toilet may help to maintain continence. Promoting or facilitating mobility and self-care is recommended for minimising the risk of depression, delirium, under-nutrition and can reduce the likelihood of falls and fall-related injuries and loss of confidence due to fear of falling.

Bed rest has considerable impacts on an older person’s ability to be independent. This includes impacts on self-care and walking. Bed rest during hospitalisation can lead to functional decline and deconditioning as early as two days after admission.

Effects of bed rest

SystemEffects of bed rest 2,3
Cardiovascular
  • Postural hypotension
  • Reduced aerobic capacity
Respiratory
  • Reduction in arterial oxygen level
  • Increased potential for atelectasis
Musculoskeletal
  • Loss of muscle strength
  • Loss of muscle mass
  • Muscle shortening
  • Joint contractures
  • Reduced bone density
  • Increased risk of falls/injury
  • Pain
Gastrointestinal
  • Constipation
  • Malnutrition
Genitourinary
  • Continence issues
Skin
  • Potential for breakdown in skin integrity
Psychological
  • Confusion
  • Social isolation
  • Depression

Screening for mobility and self-care difficulties is often done in the context of screening for other issues such as falls or frailty. It is important that we identify our patients at risk of:

  • de-conditioning – a decline in strength, balance or endurance
  • falls
  • loss of independence.

Assessment

A Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) (initial and ongoing) will assist in identifying factors contributing to functional decline. A CGA includes an assessment of ADLs and Instrumental ADLs as well as other factors such as cognition, continence, vision and hearing, psychological wellbeing and social supports4.

Physiotherapists undertake a full assessment of mobility and occupational therapists undertake assessments of ADLs. You can use assessment tools to identify underlying risk factors and prompt a more detailed assessment.

Tools to identify underlying risk factors to prompt a more detailed assessment

ToolModeComponents of tool
FIM ® (also known as the Functional Independence Measure)Observation18 items
Timed Up and Go test (a test of functional mobility):Timed sit-to-stand, 3m walk out, turn around, 3m walk back, stand-to-sit1 item test
Barthel Index (assessment ADL/functional mobility): N.B. there are a number of modified Barthel Index types in useBest available evidence10 items

Maintaining and improving mobility and self-care

We need to understand our patient’s prior level of mobility, independence in self-care and usual living situation if we are to implement appropriate and effective mobility and self-care interventions. For example, if a patient's mobility restrictions affected their ability to remain socially connected and manage their own affairs, we should develop a plan with them to rectify this.

Consider five areas of mobility and self-care interventions as part of an interdisciplinary strategy: incidental activity, exercise, retraining activities of daily living (ADLs), ensuring appropriate supervision, and environmental modifications.

Interventions should be discussed and implemented in partnership with the older person and their family and carer, as appropriate.

Incidental activity

Incidental activities are those where physical activity occurs as part of regular daily activities, for example, walking to the toilet, transferring and dressing. Performing regular daily activities, including self-care, is the easiest exercise for our patients to undertake in hospital. Self-care can be beneficial to your patient’s mobility.

Encourage your patients to:

  • dress (consider the possibility of wearing their normal day clothes and footwear)
  • get out of bed and move around the ward, with supervision or assistance and an appropriate gait aid if required
  • sit out of bed as soon as it is considered safe to do so, as much as possible as appropriate to their condition
  • walk to the toilet, with supervision or assistance if required
  • eat meals out of bed, preferably in a communal dining room where available and appropriate
  • undertake or participate in showering and other grooming and self-care activities.

As staff, we can:

  • supervise or assist older people during walking, transfers and ADLs if required
  • create a continence and mobility plan that fits with patients sitting out of bed for meals
  • adjust bed height to allow for safe, independent transfers
  • orient our patients to the ward, showing them where the toilet is
  • provide a culture that encourages incidental exercise
  • provide aids to assist with optimal transfers and mobility
  • avoid using bed rails, which may limit mobility and be a hazard
  • improve our understanding of the risks of restricting mobility and provide strategies to prevent de-conditioning.

Exercise

As part of an interdisciplinary intervention, an exercise program may benefit your patient.

Exercise programs can be administered in both individual and group settings and may include strength, balance, functional retraining and aerobic (or endurance) exercises. Group classes also provide an opportunity for social interaction and may help prevent loneliness.

We can refer older patients to physiotherapy for prescription of individual or group exercise.

Retraining ADLs

Our patients’ abilities to live independently may depend on retraining their skills in ADLs. We can:

  • provide the minimal amount of assistance required to encourage optimal participation; assistance should be reduced as the person’s condition improves
  • encourage and guide our patients to promote independence
  • assist with alternative strategies for self-care, as necessary
  • refer our patients to occupational therapy, as appropriate
  • make sure aids are available to assist with optimal independence
  • ensure bed and chair heights are optimal for independence
  • recommend patients for self-care programs, such as cooking groups and self-care education sessions, as appropriate
  • consider use of everyday clothes and footwear
  • clear any clutter
  • ensure obstacles to mobility or self-care are moved
  • ensure any tools or aids for mobility or self-care are clean and maintained
  • ensure bed and chair heights are optimal for independence
  • avoid using bed rails, which may limit mobility and be a hazard.

Ensuring appropriate supervision during mobility and self-care tasks

We can:

  • supervise patients who are acutely unwell during walking and transfers. It may be appropriate to reduce supervision as medical stabilisation occurs and familiarisation with the environment and equipment is achieved.
  • consult physiotherapy if we are in doubt about the supervision needs of our patients. Use strategies such as a traffic light colour coding system, a common way to inform all care staff of an individual's mobility supervision needs.

Environmental modifications

The hospital environment is important in promoting mobility and self-care for older people. We should:

  • clear any clutter
  • ensure obstacles to mobility or self-care are moved
  • ensure any tools or aids for mobility or self-care are clean and maintained
  • ensure bed and chair heights are optimal for independence
  • avoid using bed rails, which may limit mobility and be a hazard.

Mobility and self-care in discharge planning

Planning for discharge should occur as early as possible. Discharge planning should be person-centred and undertaken with the patient and their family and carers, as appropriate.

  • Aim to create person-centred discharge plans that our patients and significant others understand and support
  • Understand our patients’ normal daily routines and living arrangements and what supports they will require after discharge.
  • Provide referrals to appropriate community services and equipment providers for older people who require assistance with self-care or who may be at risk of falls post discharge
  • Consider referrals to community services if premorbid mobility and self-care levels have not been attained by discharge.
  • Identify people at risk of becoming isolated on discharge because of immobility or changes in mobility. Encourage them to remain socially connected, for example by contacting their local library, council, Neighbourhood House or Men’s Shed as sources of neighbourhood activities.
  • Provide appropriate written resources and ensure our patients and their significant others understand the resources.
  • Encourage and facilitate physical activity beyond discharge.
  • 1. Hirsch, C.H., et al., The Natural-History of Functional Morbidity in Hospitalized Older Patients.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 1990. 38(12): p. 1296-1303.

    2. Creditor, M.C., Hazards of Hospitalization of the Elderly. Annals of Internal Medicine, 1993. 118(3): p. 219-223.

    3. Convertino, V.A., Cardiovascular consequences of bed rest: Effect on maximal oxygen uptake. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 1997. 29(2): p. 191-196.

    4. Ellis, G., et al., Comprehensive geriatric assessment for older adults admitted to hospital: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.BMJ, 2011. 343: p. d6553.


Falls

Falls occur everywhere, including in hospital, and can cause injury and functional decline. They are the result of the interaction between personal and environmental factors and are often associated with fear, depression, anxiety and loss of confidence in older people.

Falls occur everywhere, including in hospital, and can cause injury and functional decline. They are the result of the interaction between personal and environmental factors and are often associated with fear, depression, anxiety and loss of confidence in older people.

Many falls can be prevented; so we all need to be aware of our patients’ falls risks and respond appropriately.

This topic gives an overview of falls in hospital, assessing and responding to falls risk, and preventing and managing falls in hospital. In addition to following health service policy and procedures, consider the following actions and discuss them with colleagues and managers.

Falls in hospital

In Australia, there are more hospital admissions for fall-related injuries than for transport related injuries1.

Falls are one of the most common adverse events in hospital and can result in serious injury or death; falls are particularly common in older patients13. Every person admitted to hospital has risk factors for having a fall while in hospital.

According to the World Health Organization, a fall is defined as "an event which results in a person coming to rest inadvertently on the ground or floor or other lower level"2. This includes slips, trips, loss of balance and applies to events that are witnessed as well as unwitnessed.

Falls contribute to increased length of stay, risk of functional decline and may trigger residential aged care admission.

Investigating a patient's risk of falls while in hospital will also help to reduce their risk of falls after they are discharged.

Falls can be described as:

  • Accidental: resulting from environmental factors, such as clutter, tubing or spills that cause a patient to slip or trip.
  • Anticipated physiological: stemming from known intrinsic factors (such as postural hypotension, dementia and gait or balance deficits) or extrinsic factors (for instance, certain medications or improper ambulatory aids).
  • Unanticipated physiological: caused by unexpected or unknown medical episodes (such as sudden myocardial infarction, stroke, syncope, or seizure). These falls can’t always be prevented, which is one reason why organisations can’t expect to achieve a zero fall rate.
  • Intentional: when patients intentionally fall to the floor; these are rare in general hospital settings3.

Regardless of falls classification or category, falls result from the interaction between the individual and their physiological risk factors, behaviour and the environment.

Identifying falls risks

Screening can determine whether a person has a low or high risk of falls and assessment of risk can inform the development of prevention strategies.

Currently, the National Standards require that all patients have a documented falls risk screen on admission to hospital and on transfer between settings.

Examples of screening tools currently in use in Victorian hospitals include:

Experts emphasise that drawing on our clinical judgement can be equivalent if not superior to using these types of tools. Given this we should consider the following patients as having a higher risk of falling:

  • aged 65 and over
  • aged between 50 and 64 who are at higher risk of falling (according to clinical judgement) due to an underlying condition7, for example Parkinson’s disease, stroke, early onset dementia
  • all inpatients admitted following a fall.

For all these patients, we should undertake falls assessment and provide one to one patient education.

Assessment of falls risk and falls risk factors

Early identification of falls risk factors enables us to tailor care and respond to each patient's individual needs. Whilst the evidence for multifactorial intervention based on risk assessments is weak in the hospital setting, identifying, exploring and addressing these issues will be of benefit to the older person.

Assessment of risk factors should include assessment for individual risk factors such as:

  • past history of falls
  • cognitive impairment
  • delirium
  • incontinence, indwelling catheters
  • extended period of medical illness
  • foot problems and footwear
  • visual impairment
  • poor balance
  • problems with walking and self-care
  • health conditions that may increase the risk of falling, such as stroke, Parkinson’s disease, peripheral neuropathy and postural hypotension
  • medication, including number and types of medication associated with falls, particularly sedatives, analgesics (opioids and antineuropathic pain medications) and antipsychotics
  • musculoskeletal conditions, such as osteoarthritis of the knee and hip
  • frailty
  • significant weight loss and under nutrition leading to loss of muscle mass and strength
  • prolonged bed rest.

Assessment for injury risk

Assessment for the risk of injury (for example, fracture, head injury) also needs to be undertaken and we should consider:

  • conditions such as osteoporosis
  • long term steroid use
  • previous fractures
  • conditions such as metastatic bone disease
  • use of anticoagulants such as warfarin.

Assessment of the environment

Assessment of the environment is also vital. Scan the ward environment for hazards such as:

  • clutter
  • poor lighting
  • slippery surfaces
  • equipment in need of repair
  • equipment or gait aids without brakes locked appropriately.

Falls prevention in hospital

Falls are a complex problem with multiple causes and risk factors. Preventing falls in hospital is not easy, but there are many things we can do to help reduce the risk.

Some hospitals may routinely use some or all of the following strategies to prevent falls. Please note that not all strategies have been proven to work for all patients in all settings.

We should choose strategies in consultation with our care teams, considering all clinical and organisational factors.

Identify falls risk

  • Use falls risk identifiers, for example coloured signs or traffic light symbols, to communicate level of falls risk.
  • Ensure staff understand what the identifiers mean and what strategies they should be implementing.
  • Explain what the identifiers mean to the patient and their visitors.

Intentional rounding

Consider undertaking regular rounds (for example hourly or two hourly) to check on patients to ensure fundamental needs are being met. Note that while there is evidence to suggest that rounding is associated with improved patient experience, the impact on falls is less clear.

Low-low beds

Consider using low-low beds for patients at risk of falling or rolling out of bed. Consult with all team members, considering the following aspects:

  • Is the patient at risk of rolling out of bed? Would they benefit from a low-low bed with an adjacent floor mat?
  • Is the use of the low-low bed a form of restraint? It may be inappropriate to use a low-low bed for patients who are mobile.
  • Does the patient have enough strength to stand up but has poor balance or walking and has risk taking behaviour (such as decreased awareness of ability, perceptual difficulties, delirium, dementia)? A low-low bed may be contraindicated in this case.
  • Is the use of a mat next to the bed a trip hazard for staff and other patients/carers?
  • The availability of one low-low bed for three standard beds may contribute to a decrease in the rate of serious fall-related injuries8 whereas providing one low-low bed per 12 beds does not seem to effect rate of falls.9
  • Where is the low-low bed placed? If it is close to the wall but there is space between the wall and the bed, this can be a hazard.
  • What height is appropriate? For example, low when resting, raise bed for transfers and care activities.

Bed or chair alarms

Consider using bed or chair alarms for patients who do not ask or wait for assistance or who require supervision to mobilise.Note that there is high level evidence indicating that the use of bed or chair alarms as a single strategy has no effect on the rate of falls.

Clinical judgement should be used in deciding whether to use a bed or chair alarm, considering factors such as:

  • patient characteristics: can and will the patient use their call bell?
  • staffing: are there enough staff to respond? Is there a risk of ‘alarm fatigue’: have staff become desensitised to alarms?

Non-slip socks

Many hospitals have introduced non-slip (red) socks to identify individuals at risk of falls and focus attention on prevention strategies. Note there is no published high-level evidence to suggest that non-slip socks prevent falls in the hospital setting.

For patients with bone conditions

Patients with conditions such as osteoporosis, previous fracture and metastatic bone disease are at greatest risk of fracture following a fall. For these patients consider the following:

  • hip protectors (worn at all times)
  • low-low bed (low when resting, raised for transfers and care activities)
  • evaluation of osteoporosis.

For patients with bleeding disorders

Patients with bleeding disorders due to use of anticoagulants or an underlying clinical condition are at increased risk of haemorrhage following a fall. For these patients consider the following:

  • evaluate use of anticoagulation medication, including considering risk vs benefit
  • use of a low-low bed (low when resting, raised for transfers and care activities)
  • use of protective helmets for some patients.

For surgical patients

Surgical patients are at increased risk of falls. For these patients, consider the following:

  • pre-op education
  • post-op reinforcement about using call bell
  • toileting prior to providing centrally acting pain medication.10

Referral to other health professionals

Consider whether the patient should be referred to other health professionals such as physiotherapists, occupational therapists or pharmacists. On completion of a comprehensive assessment, all health professionals should work with the patient and their family to develop an intervention plan.

Multifactorial interventions

Multifactorial interventions have been shown to work in some, but not all, settings11,12. This type of intervention refers to strategies to address risk factors identified in a comprehensive falls risk assessment. It can include a combination of interventions such as:

  • treatment of delirium and agitation
  • improving continence, for example through regular toileting, treating constipation, referral to a continence nurse specialist, urinalysis to check for infection
  • footwear: ask family and carers to bring in supportive shoes or slippers
  • foot problems: provide foot care and refer to podiatrist
  • visual impairment: ensure patient has the right glasses and they can reach these easily
  • poor balance: refer to physiotherapist, consider using a gait aid, assist or supervise the patient when walking to the toilet
  • stay with patients who require assistance on the toilet or while showering
  • medication review: consider medications known to increase falls risk such as sedatives, centrally acting analgesics, psychotropic medications
  • treat postural hypotension
  • ensure nutritional needs are met and consider referral to a dietitian
  • exercise program: strength and balance training may be effective in reducing falls and improving awareness of risk.

Educate the patient, their family and carers

Provide personally tailored falls prevention education to the patient and their family and carers. Talk to them about their knowledge and perceptions of falls risk, their goals for their hospital stay, and things they can do to reduce the risk of falls. Encourage patients to ask for assistance. Remember, simply providing a brochure on falls prevention is not enough: talking to the patient and their family and carers is essential.

On each shift, we can:

  • orientate new patients to the ward, including to the toilet, and provide regular reorientation for patients with cognitive impairment
  • place the call bell within reach
  • reduce clutter around the bedside
  • position the gait aid within reach
  • provide easy access to objects according to patient’s needs and preferences, for example the TV control, glasses, magazines
  • lock wheels on the bed and other equipment
  • help the patient put on appropriate footwear and clothing
  • ensure adequate lighting
  • encourage the patient to walk regularly, even for short distances
  • provide assistance or supervision for walking as needed
  • keep hallways clear, provide safe seating opportunities.

Responding to falls

If a patient falls in hospital, review their falls risk status as they are at high risk of falling again. Refer to your health service’s policies and procedures for post-fall management guidelines. These may vary between hospitals and settings but will generally include actions such as:

  • reassuring the patient
  • calling for assistance
  • checking for injury
  • providing treatment as indicated
  • assessing vital signs and neurological observations
  • notifying medical officer and nurse in charge
  • notifying next of kin
  • ensuring falls risk assessment and interventions are updated and implemented
  • providing education to patient and family.

Some health services use post-fall huddles to decrease the likelihood of patients experiencing recurrent falls by determining the cause of the fall and guiding intervention.

Generally a huddle is an immediate bedside evaluation of a fall, which includes staff present, the patient and their family and carers and the interdisciplinary team. The purpose of the huddle is to analyse the factors leading to the fall and plan for prevention of falls. The huddle information should be documented.

Falls and discharge planning

You can help patients make a smooth transition from the hospital to their home or residential aged care facility through comprehensive and clear discharge planning and communication.

When a patient is being discharged:

  • Reinforce the strategies you have outlined to the patient and their family to prevent falls.
  • Emphasise the importance of maintaining a combination of interventions.
  • If the person has experienced a fall, explain that maintaining levels of physical activity, perhaps in group settings, may not only minimise their risk of further falls but may also be helpful to increase opportunities for socialising and decrease loneliness.
  • A fear of falling may limit a person’s confidence to maintain or initiate new activities or social connections. Explore with them ways they might address their fears.
  • Provide documentation about falls risk and falls risk factors in discharge information for the person’s GP and other services.
  • Ask the GP to reinforce the strategies and to monitor their effectiveness post hospitalisation.
  • Consider referral to other services for ongoing management of fall risk. Victoria's Health Independence Program provides ambulatory care support for people following hospitalisation. Falls and mobility clinics are provided through HIP. Group strength and balance classes are available through most community centres, and are also useful to promote socialisation. The Victorian Falls and Balance DirectoryExternal Link provides information on services and locations .
    1. Tovell, A., et al., Hospital separations due to injury and poisoning, Australia 2009-10, in Injury research and statistics 2012: AIHW, Canberra.
    2. World Health Organization, Fact Sheet 344: Falls 2012, World Health Organization.
    3. Quigley, P., et al., Reducing serious injury from falls in two veterans' hospital medical-surgical units. Journal of nursing care quality, 2009. 24(1): p. 33-41.
    4. Stapleton, C., et al., Four-item fall risk screening tool for subacute and residential aged care: The first step in fall prevention. Australasian Journal on Ageing, 2009. 28(3): p. 139-143.
    5. Barker A, Kamar J, Graco M, Lawlor V, Hill K. Adding value to the STRATIFY falls risk assessment in acute hospitals. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2011;67:450-7.
    6. Oliver D. et al. Development and evaluation of evidence based risk assessment tool (STRATIFY) to predict which elderly inpatients will fall: case-control and cohort studies. BMJ. British medical journal, 1997. 315(7115): p. 1049-53.
    7. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, NICE Clinical Guideline 161. Falls: Assessment and prevention of falls in older people, 2013: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence.
    8. Barker, A., et al., Reducing serious fall-related injuries in acute hospitals: are low-low beds a critical success factor? Journal of Advanced Nursing, 2013. 69(1): p. 112-121.
    9. Haines, T.P., R.A.R. Bell, and P.N. Varghese, Pragmatic, Cluster Randomized Trial of a Policy to Introduce Low-Low Beds to Hospital Wards for the Prevention of Falls and Fall Injuries. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2010. 58(3): p. 435-441.
    10. Boushon B, Nielsen G, Quigley P, Rita S, Rutherford P, Taylor J, Shannon D, Rita S. Transforming Care at the Bedside How-to Guide: Reducing Patient Injuries from Falls, 2012. Institute for Healthcare Improvement: Cambridge, MA.
    11. Cameron, I.D., et al., Interventions for preventing falls in older people in care facilities and hospitals. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2012. 12.
    12. Oliver, D., et al., Strategies to prevent falls and fractures in hospitals and care homes and effect of cognitive impairment: systematic review and meta-analyses. BMJ, 2007. 334(7584).
    13. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care 2018, Hospital Acquired Complications: Falls resulting in fracture or intracranial injury, ACSQHC

Frailty

This topic gives an overview of frailty and recommends actions that we and our organisations can take, in addition to health service policy and procedures, to provide quality care to older patients.

Frailty is a multidimensional geriatric syndrome characterised by a decline of physical and cognitive reserves that leads to increased vulnerability.

Frailty increases with age and is associated with falls, longer stays in hospital, difficulty recovering from illness and surgery, and mortality.

It is important to recognise frailty in older people in hospital so that we can develop and implement individualised care plans, reduce the risk of onset or deterioration and provide people with the opportunity to retain their independence and social connections on discharge.

Frailty and ageing

Frailty affects a person’s ability to recover from a clinical episode, their resilience, and function across multiple body systems. Frailty increases as we age.

Older people who are frail often experience poor health, falls and disability as well as longer stays in hospital and increased mortality.1

Older people who are frail can have difficulty coping with minor illnesses and events, such as infections and constipation, and they can be more susceptible to side effects from certain medications. They are more likely to have difficulty recovering from surgery and periods of acute hospitalisation or rehabilitation.

We should identify and respond to a frail older person’s vulnerabilities during their admission to reduce their risk of functional decline so that people don't just survive hospital, but make a full recovery.

Signs of frailty can be obvious or subtle

While some signs of frailty and risk of frailty are obvious, others are not. Common presentations of frailty2 include:

  • non-specific signs - extreme fatigue, unexplained weight loss, frequent infections
  • falls - frequent falls, fear of falling, restricted activity
  • delirium - acute changes to their cognition
  • fluctuating disability - day-to-day variation in ability to look after oneself, for example a loss of interest in food, difficulty getting dressed, experiencing good and bad days.

Frailty and discharge planning

We can help patients make a smooth transition from the hospital to their home or residential aged care facility through comprehensive and clear discharge planning and communication.

Educate patients, family and carers

  • Remind patients and their family and carers about strategies to optimise function and wellbeing at home.
  • Emphasise the importance of maintaining a combination of interventions, which includes optimising opportunities for social connections.

Refer to health professionals and support services

  • Include documentation about frailty and contributing factors in the discharge summary to the GP and other services.
  • Inform the patient’s GP about ongoing treatment goals for the patient.
  • Refer the patient to community or hospital based specialists to support functional independence in the longer term.
  • Discuss services and opportunities for social participation based around the patient’s interests. This could include planned activity groups, or activities sourced through local councils, local newspapers, libraries, Neighbourhood Houses or Men’s Sheds that can keep the patient socially connected.

Practise person-centred care

  • Encourage patients to ask questions or raise concerns about their recovery.
  • Tailor plans to the individual patient, as discharge planning is not a one size fits all approach.

Responding to frailty

Frailty is a complex problem that usually requires multiple interventions. These interventions should target physical performance, nutritional status, mental health and cognition. There is emerging evidence that a person’s health assets - that is, the strength of their social supports, stability of their housing, their economic independence, level of education - could mitigate the effects of frailty.3

There has been little research into the effects of interventions on frailty in hospital; however, best practice suggests that healthcare professionals should consider the following actions.

  • A comprehensive geriatric assessment can improve outcomes for frail older people in hospital, particularly when undertaken in geriatric evaluation and management units4. Most policy indicates that older people who are identified with frailty should receive one.

    Ensure that reversible medical conditions are considered and addressed.

    Explore their social circumstances to determine what existing supports can be harnessed to help them to manage their condition and identify where additional supports might be of use.

    • Identify frailty in older people undergoing surgery, to manage the post-operative risk.
    • Be alert to the development of delirium and the risks of incontinence, falls, pressure areas and malnutrition.
    • Consider early transfer of patients with frailty to a subacute care setting.
  • Regular mobilisation can improve muscle strength, stamina and reduce the risk of older people experiencing adverse events such as pressure injuries.

    • Encourage and where necessary assist patients to sit out of bed if possible.
    • Encourage and support patients to mobilise, even short distances, around the ward on a regular basis.
    • Refer patients for physiotherapy assessment and treatment and for exercise programs to maintain function.
  • Nutrition plays an important role in maintaining muscle mass and function.

    • Encourage and assist patients to sit out of bed for meals.
    • Monitor food wastage and encourage and assist patients to eat and drink regularly.
    • Educate patients about adequate protein intake (leucine-enriched amino acids and possibly creatine) and vitamin D levels5.
    • Refer any older person at risk of frailty to a dietitian

    • Encourage patients to get dressed each day if possible.
    • Support and encourage patients to be as independent as possible in activities of daily living such as showering and dressing.
    • Educate patients and their family and carers about the factors associated with frailty.
    • Tell patients, their family and carers how they can minimise the risk of increasing frailty while in hospital.
    • Highlight the potentially modifiable risk factors – as outlined above.
    • Engage patients in activities designed to reduce social isolation and involve carers and family in this process.


    1. Xue, Q.L., The frailty syndrome: definition and natural history. Clinics in Geriatric Medicine, 2011. 27(1): pp. 1-15.
    2. Clegg, A., J. Young, S. Iliffe, M. Olde Rikkert, and K. Rockwood, Frailty in elderly people. Lancet, 2013. 381(9868): pp. 752-762.
    3. Gregorevic K.J., W.K. Lim, N.M. Peel, R.S. Martin, and R.E. Hubbard, Are health assets associated with improved outcomes for hospitalised older adults? A systematic review. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 2016. 67: pp. 14-20.
    4. Ellis, G., M.A. Whitehead, D. Robinson, D. O'Neill, and P. Langhorne, Comprehensive geriatric assessment for older adults admitted to hospital: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ, 2011. 343: p. d6553
    5. Morley, J., W. Argiles, S. Evans, D. Bhasin, N.E.P. Cella, W. Deutz, K.C.H. Doehner, L. Fearon, M. Ferrucci, K. Hellerstein, H. Kalantar Zadeh, N. Lochs, K. MacDonald, M. Mulligan, P. Muscaritoli, M. Ponikowski, F. Posthauer, M. Fanelli, A.M.W.J. Schambelan, M. Schols, S. Schuster, and Anker, Nutritional Recommendations for the management of sarcopenia. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 2010. 11(6): pp. 391-396.

Identifying frailty

When screening and assessing for frailty, we should consider a person’s physical performance, nutritional status, cognition and mental health and be proactive in providing preventative and tailored care when the person is in hospital.

Keep in mind that the terms ‘frail’ and ‘frailty’ may have negative connotations.

“One way to overcome this is to say that the older person ‘has frailty’, this approach reduces the use of ‘frailty’ as an adjective and makes it more like a diagnosis/syndrome.” (Geriatrician)

When screening and assessing for frailty, we should consider a person’s physical performance, nutritional status, cognition and mental health and be proactive in providing preventative and tailored care when the person is in hospital. It is also useful to understand the person's health assets and how these might act as protective factors. Health assets can include supportive family, community supports, social connections and economic independence.

In addition to following health service policy and procedures, the following actions can help us identify patients with or at risk of frailty.

Screening tools

There are very few validated tools that specifically screen for frailty. Recognising the importance of this emerging issue, the Failsafe Initiative is testing a new screening tool in UK acute hospital settings. The results of this study are yet to be published.

Some ways to determine the risk of frailty include:

  • measuring walking speed: people aged 75 and over who have a walking speed of less than 0.8 m/s are at high risk of frailty1
  • evaluating the presence of risk factors, including poor mobility, reduced strength, poor nutrition, delirium, falls, impaired cognition and low mood.

Assessment tools

Overview of frailty assessment scales

Name of scale/approachComponentsGradingHow assessed?Pros/Cons for clinical setting

Fried’s Frailty

Phenotype approach2

Performance on five variables:

  • Weight loss
  • Exhaustion
  • Physical activity
  • Muscle strength
  • Walking speed

Robust: no problems

Pre-frail: one or two problems

Frail: three or more problems

Clinical performance-based measures

Pros: Widely used

Cons: some floor effects

Frailty Index

Rockwood-Mitnitski

Deficit Accumulation model3

Deficit count and proportion of potential deficits that a person has accumulated

Range: 0-1.0

less than 0.25 (robust/pre-frail)

Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment

Pros: robust indicator of frailty, precise grading

Cons: Cumbersome in clinical setting

Clinical Frailty Scale5

Single descriptor of a person’s level of frailty

Seven-point scale ranging from very fit to severely frail

Clinical judgement

Pros: Easy to use and implement

Cons: subjective assessment, has only been validated for use by specialists

Edmonton Frail Scale6

Descriptor of a person’s level of frailty based on 9 components:

  • Cognition
  • General health
  • Functional independence
  • Social support
  • Medication use
  • Nutrition
  • Mood
  • Continence
  • Functional performance

Five categories ranging from not frail to severe frailty

Self report, observation of function

Pros: can be administered by non-specialists

Cons: time consuming in acute settings

Adapted from Goldstein et al 20127

Fried’s Frailty Phenotype

This is the most common scale used to screen and assess for frailty. It measures deficits in the five domains:

  • Weight loss (self-reported unintentional weight loss or decreased appetite)
  • Exhaustion (self-reported energy levels)
  • Physical activity (frequency of moderate intensity activity)
  • Muscle strength (measured grip strength with dynamometer)
  • Walking speed (self-reported slow speed or measured slow gait)2.

Frailty Index

The Frailty Index is calculated by counting the number of deficits out of a total list of potential deficits for that person3. For example, if an individual has 10 deficits from a total of 40, the index is 0.25. Scores of 0.2 and over are considered as approaching frailty. The Frailty Index is the best predictor of poor outcomes in older people in hospital4. It includes deficits such as osteoporosis, chronic illness, depression, anaemia and cognitive impairment. The more deficits a person has, the more likely they are to be frail.

Clinical Frailty Scale

The Clinical Frailty Scale5 classifies levels of frailty as follows:

  • Very Fit– robust, active, energetic, well motivated and fit; these people commonly exercise regularly and are in the most fit group for their age
  • Well - without active disease, but less fit than people in category 1
  • Well, with treated comorbid disease – disease symptoms are well controlled compared with those in category 4
  • Apparently vulnerable – although not frankly dependent, these people commonly complain of being “slowed up” or have disease symptoms
  • Mildly frail – with limited dependence on others for instrumental activities of daily living, which includes meal preparation, ordinary housework, managing finances, using the phone, shopping, transportation
  • Moderately frail – help is needed with both instrumental and non-instrumental activities of daily living which includes, mobility in bed, transferring on and chairs, toilets and into and out of bed, walking, dressing, eating, toilet use, personal hygiene, bathing
  • Severely frail – completely dependent on others for the activities of daily living, or terminally ill

People in categories 4, 5 and 6 may not be as easily identified as being at risk of frailty.

This version of the Clinical Frailty Scale was extended in 2008 to include two more levels, a total of nine, and includes a comment about scoring frailty in people with dementia. This extended version is available for use in research and educational purposes only.

Edmonton Frail Scale

People with no training in geriatric assessment can use the Edmonton Frail Scale. It measures level of frailty through questions and activities related to cognition, general health, functional independence, social support, medication use, nutrition, mood, continence and functional performance.

    1. Castell, M.-V., M. Sanchez, R. Julian, R. Queipo, S. Martin, and A. Otero, Frailty prevalence and slow walking speed in persons age 65 and older: implications for primary care. BMC Family Practice, 2013. 14(1): p. 86.
    2. Fried, L.P., C.M. Tangen, J. Walston, A.B. Newman, C. Hirsch, J. Gottdiener, T. Seeman, R. Tracy, W.J. Kop, G. Burke, and M.A. McBurnie, Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences, 2001. 56(3): p. M146-56.
    3. Mitniski, A., X. Song, and K. Rockwood, The estimation of relative fitness and frailty in community-dwelling older adults using self-report data. The Journals of Gerontology Seris A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 2004. 59: p. M627-M632
    4. Dent, E., I. Chapman, S. Howell, C. Piantadosi, and R. Visvanathan, Frailty and functional decline indices predict poor outcomes in hospitalised older people. Age and Ageing, 2014. 43(4): p. 477-484
    5. Rockwood, K., X. Song, C. MacKnight, H. Bergman, D.B. Hogan, I. McDowell, and A. Mitnitski, A global clinical measure of fitness and frailty in elderly people. CMAJ, 2005. 173: p. 489-195.
    6. Rolfson, D.B., S.R. Majumdar, R.T. Tsuyuki, A. Tahir, and K. Rockwood, Validity and reliability of the Edmonton Frail Scale. Age and Ageing, 2006. 35(5): p. 526-529
    7. Goldstein, J.P., M.K. Andrew, and A. Travers, Frailty in older adults using pre-hospital care and the emergency department: a narrative review. Canadian Geriatrics Journal, 2012. 15.

Nutrition and swallowing in older people

Older people presenting to hospital with nutrition and swallowing problems are at risk of functional decline. Patients who are at risk of developing these problems during their admission are also vulnerable to functional decline. Identifying, investigating and responding to their needs is an important part of minimising this risk.

These topics provide information and recommend actions that we and our organisations can take to improve care for older patients.


Nutrition and hydration

Nutrition and hydration are essential for health and quality of life.

For older people, adequate food and drink can help them recover from illness and surgery, remain independent, reduce their length of stay in hospital and help avoid readmission to hospital.

Malnutrition is common in older people. To identify people over 65 at risk of malnutrition, they should be screened within 24 hours of admission and at regular intervals throughout their hospital stay.

This topic gives an overview of nutrition and hydration and recommends actions that we and our organisations can take, in addition to health service policy and procedures, to provide quality nutrition and hydration care to our older patients.

Impacts on health

Nutrition is the intake of food and fluid to meet a person’s dietary and biological needs. Good nutrition is fundamental to physical and mental wellbeing.

Under-nutrition occurs when a person is not consuming enough calories or nutrients to meet their energy requirements. It can cause weight loss, health problems, muscle and skeletal loss and lead to serious conditions such as frailty and sarcopenia1. Under-nutrition is more common in older people and can be exacerbated by illness and hospitalisation.

Some causes of under-nutrition include:

  • choosing to eat less
  • medical conditions that affect the absorption of nutrients by the body
  • poverty, social isolation and functional decline that affect a person’s ability to buy food2
  • depression3 and other conditions that affect cognition.

Malnutrition or malnourishment occurs when food and nutrient intake is not appropriate to maintain body function. It can lead to iron deficiency anaemia and sarcopenia.

Common causes of malnutrition are:

  • medical conditions that reduce appetite or impede the person’s ability to care for themselves
  • changes that impact on the swallowing process
  • weight loss and low body weight is common in patients with dementia; in particular those with advancing Alzheimer’s disease.4

Over-nutrition occurs when a person eats more food than their body needs. This can lead to obesity, diabetes and cardiovascular disease.

Hydration is essential to life

Hydration is having enough fluids each day for health and function; 6–8 glasses per day are recommended.

Dehydration can lead to delirium, constipation, urinary tract infections, swallowing problems, falls, inability to regulate medications and life-threatening conditions, especially in people with co-morbidities5.

Nutrition and hydration and ageing

As we age, many physiological factors can affect our ability to maintain optimal nutrition and hydration, such as:

  • changes to taste and smell can decrease appetite and interest in food
  • hormonal changes can affect weight and mood
  • musculoskeletal changes can impact on a person’s mobility and ability to feed themself
  • underlying disorders can reduce our food and fluid intake and affect the absorption of important nutrients and vitamins

Changes to a person’s routine can affect nutrition and oral intake. For example, losing a spouse, moving house or entering residential care can mean usual eating and drinking habits are disrupted and this can lead to poor nutrition and hydration.

For older people in hospital, poor nutrition and hydration care can result in a loss of functional independence, delayed recovery from surgery, falls, infection, slow wound healing, delirium, frailty and increased mortality6.

Hospital provides an ideal opportunity to identify existing or potential nutrition problems and focus on preventative measures to help patients achieve good nutrition in hospital and when they leave.

Identifying nutrition and hydration issues

When nutrition and hydration issues are identified early, we can tailor care and treatment to respond to each patient’s biological and medical needs, abilities, and their lifestyle and cultural preferences.

In addition to following health service specific policy and procedures, the following actions can help identify patients who have or are at risk of problems.

  • Screen all patients over 65 years within 24 hours of hospital admission. We should consider those patients who require surgery, as routine fasting for prolonged periods can lead to serious complications in people who are malnourished.7

    Use a validated screening tools such as the following.

    The Malnutrition Screening Tool (MST)

    This simple three-step tool assesses recent weight and appetite loss and is the most widely used nutritional screening tool in Australian hospitals. It can be used by staff, family or friends. It asks two questions, gives a score to indicate risk of malnutrition, and recommends steps for follow-up8.

    The Mini Nutrition Assessment (MNA)

    This assessment was developed for people over 65 years. It explores 18 items relating to the patient’s medical, lifestyle, dietary, anthropometrical and psychosocial factors8. The score indicates patients at risk of or suffering from malnutrition.

    The Mini Nutrition Assessment Short Form (MNA-SF)

    This shorter version of the MNA includes a ‘two step nutrition screen’ that identifies patients with under-nutrition and patients who should be referred to a dietitian for further assessment. This form is useful for patients who are not suspected to be at risk of malnutrition.

    The Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST)

    This five-step screening tool is simple to use and can be used by all care workers. It focuses on Body Mass Index (BMI), unexplained weight loss and acute illness effect and can also be used to detect obesity. This tool provides management guidelines to assist with developing a care plan.9

  • A medical history should explore the following issues.

    Medication

    • What medications are being taken? Some can cause nausea or affect appetite.
    • Be aware that if the patient is not eating and drinking well, they may not metabolise medications effectively.

    Continence

    • Incontinence and constipation can impact on nutrition. For example, patients who are constipated are at risk of developing delirium.
    • Some patients may drink less in fear of using the toilet regularly.

    Other conditions or impairments

    • Arthritis or vision impairment can affect the person’s ability to open food packages and feed themselves.
    • Pain and nausea may reduce appetite.
    • Stroke and Parkinson’s disease can affect a person’s food consumption and ability to safely swallow and feed themselves.
    • Cognitive impairment, such as dementia or delirium, can cause problems with eating and drinking, especially in an unfamiliar environment.
    • Social isolation can impair a person’s ability to access adequate healthy food. For example, a change in home circumstances or lack of social or physical support can make it difficult for someone to get to shops.
    • Lifestyle diseases, such as diabetes, hypertension, alcoholism and smoking, can impact on nutrition and vitamin absorption.
  • Dehydration is very common in older patients, and if not addressed can lead to serious complications including prolonged recovery from illness and surgery, and increased mortality. Dehydration also increases the risk of serious medical complications such as delirium, urinary tract infections, medication toxicity, decreased muscle strength and falls.10,11

    Be aware of the signs of dehydration in patients who are malnourished as 70 per cent of our daily fluid requirements can be obtained from the diet.10 Signs of dehydration include:

    • postural hypotension – dizziness from the sit to standing position
    • decreased urinary output
    • dark urine colour
    • dryness of the mouth
    • poor skin turgor
    • sunken eyes10,12
    • headaches
    • fatigue
    • constipation.
  • Asking the patient (and their family and carers) what matters to them enables us to tailor treatments to suit them. Ask if they have:

    • noticed any changes in weight
    • noticed changes in appetite
    • specific food preferences and intolerances
    • lost teeth, have mouth sores, if their dentures fit poorly or they have problems with chewing and swallowing
    • been depressed or have experienced other changes to their mental and cognitive health
    • people and services that support them at home, such as Meals on Wheels or help getting to the shops.
  • To gauge an older patient’s nutritional health, assessment should include the following issues:

    Weight and height

    Calculating the patient’s BMI provides a baseline to monitor their weight throughout their stay. A BMI of around 27.5 generally indicates better outcomes for older people13.

    Vitamin deficiencies

    The following are signs of vitamin deficiencies.

    • Dry lips and dry scaly skin can indicate poor hydration and nutrient deficiency.
    • Swollen, bleeding gums or a sore red swollen tongue (glossitis) can indicate vitamin C and or Vitamin B deficiency or gum disease.
    • Pale skin, breathlessness on exertion, fatigue and dizziness can indicate iron deficiency.
    • Pressure injuries are common in older people with poor nutrition and can indicate a need to promptly increase vitamin C and protein.
    • Regular respiratory infections, such as colds, flu or COPD can indicate a compromised immune system and nutrient deficiencies.
    • Poor mobility and balance, being bed bound or unable to sit upright to eat and drink – assist the patient with positioning and refer to a physiotherapist or occupational therapist.

    Laboratory data

    Take blood tests and check for deficiencies such as iron (Fe), vitamin D, calcium, B vitamins and zinc. Vitamin D and calcium are important for bone health, vitamin D also helps protect the immune system, low B levels are associated with delirium and dementia and low zinc levels can affect sense of taste and reduce appetite.14,15

    Work with a dietitian

    If you think a patient is malnourished or at risk of malnutrition or dehydration, refer to a dietitian and ask the medical team for a comprehensive assessment. The dietitian may prescribe a specialised diet or supplements.

There are many things we can do to improve a patient’s food and fluid intake and help prevent functional decline. Here are some recommendations.

  • Food is as important as medicine. Nutrition should be a priority for everyone - the patient, their family and carers, the healthcare professionals and food service providers.

    • Become ‘food aware’. Food and drink are as important as medication.
    • Be alert that older people who are fasting for procedures, such as surgery, are particularly at risk. Follow local procedures and enlist the support from a dietitian to minimise poor outcomes.
    • Follow the dietitian’s recommendations on food modification or special diets.
    • Document treatment goals clearly, familiarise yourself with diet codes and ensure all staff can access this information.
    • Consult with the dietitian to determine how and when foods will be fortified, for example with protein powders, glucose, skim milk powder and cream.
    • Ask the speech pathologist for advice on food modification for patients with swallowing issues.
    • Discuss with the dietitian introducing high calorie and high protein foods that can assist a patient increase their weight.
    • Involve the patient in setting weight and calorie goals. Placing the patient at the centre of their care will assist in achieving clinical outcomes.
    • Ask the patient what foods they like to eat. If the patient’s family wants to bring meals from home, advise them on choosing nutrient-dense foods.
    • Check if meals are culturally appropriate.
    • Order the right meal for the right person and enter the correct diet codes to avoid adverse events such as aspiration or allergic reactions.
    • Work as a team to monitor food waste after meals (food charts can be used to correctly monitor food and drink consumption), this is a good indication of those needing assistance.
    • Introduce programs, such as protected meal times which minimises disruptions to meal times or use identifiers such as red trays or domes to identify which patients need assistance during meals. Use volunteer programs to optimise intake.
    • If space permits, consider establishing communal dining arrangements, to encourage socialising, combat loneliness and potentially improve dietary intake while in hospital.
    • Consider using ward champions to promote best practice on your ward.
  • Ask every patient if they need assistance to eat and drink and respond to their needs.3

    • Encourage communal dining where possible.
    • Engage nursing staff, volunteers and family members to assist at meal times.
    • Encourage patients to use the toilet prior to meals.
    • If the patient can’t sit out of bed, use pillows to help them sit upright.
    • Adjust the bed table so the tray is within reach.
    • Clear the tray table of clutter or hazards.
    • Remove or reduce distractions, such as bright lights, offensive smells such as urine bottles, and sounds especially for patients with delirium or dementia.
    • Encourage people to wash their hands or provide hand hygiene gel prior to meals.
    • Provide every patient with a serviette, cutlery and water.
    • Put the utensils in front of the patient, check they can use them, and provide help if needed.
    • Help patients open food packages.
    • Monitor food waste. If a patient regularly leaves trays of uneaten food or untouched drinks, investigate.

    Also you know how busy they are [hospital staff] and you don’t want to worry them - you’re not going ring the bell to ask them to open your fruit salad - so you just don’t do it. So either you don’t eat it or you wait for someone. Or if you’ve got someone from your family coming in that’s fine.
    - Patient

  • Stimulating appetite and helping people eat and drink can make a difference.

    • Help patients fill out their meal order form and educate them about good choices.
    • Encourage the patient to sit out of bed for meals or eat in the communal dining area.
    • Encourage patients to eat at meal times or to eat small meals regularly when they are most hungry and to indulge in their favourite foods.
    • Offer patients snacks to keep them interested in food. Remember, the longer a patient goes without food for the more likely they will not feel hungry.
    • Encourage the patient to keep hydrated. Offer drinks regularly.
    • Acknowledge that a patient may be more motivated and interested to eat food they are used to. Engage family members to provide meals where possible.
  • Some medications can impact on appetite, cause dehydration and nausea, and contribute to under-nutrition.

    • Ask the pharmacist to review the patient’s medication, look at possible side effects and drug interactions.
    • Patients with swallowing problems may need assistance with taking medications and supplements. Some tablets may need to be given with food for ease of swallowing. Consult with the speech pathologist if you are concerned.
    • If a patient is feeling depressed, consider what could improve their mood, for example, allow them to eat in a social environment – invite family and friends to provide company.
  • Encourage patients to be active as this can stimulate appetite and enhance muscular strength and reduce the risk of pressure injuries.

    • Encourage the patients to take regular breaks from their bed or chair and mobilise around the ward.
    • Encourage them to have time away from the ward, if possible, outside. Sunshine helps lift a person’s mood and provides Vitamin D.
    • Refer to a physiotherapist if the person has mobility problems.
    • Older adults need more protein in their diet than younger people, to help the body recover from illness, maintain functionality, assist with the inflammatory processes that occur with many diseases, and to be used as energy by the body when carbohydrate intake in inadequate.
    • It is vital that people over 65 years maintain lean muscle mass and function and their protein intake should be at least 1.0 to 1.2 grams of protein per kilogram per day.16 A dietitian can make recommendations on how to incorporate protein through foods or supplements, taking into account each patient’s needs and history.
    • High-protein foods include cheese, yoghurt and dairy products; soy products including soy milk, tofu and tempeh; meat such as chicken, red beef and fish; pulses, lentils and beans; whole grains; eggs; nuts and seeds.
    • Familiarise yourself with the benefits of a High Energy High Protein (HEHP) diet and work with a dietitian to prescribe this if necessary.
  • Nutrient and vitamin supplements can help elderly people achieve good nutrition.

    • Ask the dietitian to assist with prescribing supplements. Supplements should be given two hours before meal times.17
    • Some patients may not like the taste of supplements or have difficulty swallowing them. Discuss these concerns and tailor a treatment plan to the individual.
    • Swallowing problems will affect a person’s ability to swallow supplements. If the patient has, or is suspected of having, dysphagia, refer them to a speech pathologist for assistance.
  • Eating in hospital is very different from home; not just what we eat but how we eat.

    • Check if the ward can accommodate the family bringing in appropriate foods that might stimulate the patient’s appetite and interest in food.
    • Ask food staff if the patient’s food preferences can be met, for example, some cultures eat more of certain foods such as rice or pasta.
    • Ask the patient how they like to eat their food, for example, if they like to eat with others arrange for family, friends or volunteers to be there.

Nutrition and hydration and discharge planning

Nutrition and hydration are always important and treatment is often ongoing. We can help patients make a smooth transition from the hospital to their home or care facility.

Educate patients and carers

  • Provide nutrition and hydration advice and print out information that people can take with them.
  • Remind patients and their family and carers that regular and healthy eating and drinking is important if they are to stay healthy and independent.
  • Stress the importance of eating a variety of foods. Tell patients to select fresh, healthy options across all food groups and include protein with each meal.
  • If the patient needs to take supplements, make sure they know when and how much to take, where they can buy them and if they can afford them.
  • Tell the family and carers how to position the patient to help them digest food and techniques for encouraging people to eat and drink.
  • Make sure the patient understands how their medicines may impact on nutrition and vice versa.

Refer to health professionals and support services

  • Inform the patient’s GP about treatment goals and any referral that have been made to other health professionals.
  • Tell the patient and their family and carers how they can access a community or hospital based dietitian.
  • Inform existing services about strategies to help the patient optimise their nutrition.
  • Discuss services such as Meals on Wheels, transport and shopping services.
  • Discuss social supports to keep the patient socially connected, such as lunch clubs or Casserole Club.

Practice person-centred care

  • Encourage patients to ask questions or raise concerns about their recovery.
  • Tailor plans to the individual patient, as discharge planning is not a 'one size fits all' approach.
  • 1. Visvanathan, R., Nutrition in the Frail Elderly, R. Visvanthan, Editor 2014, Aged & Extended Care Services, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital And Adelaide Geriatrics and Research with Aged Care Centre.

    2. Shetty, P. Malnutrition and Undernutrition. 2003. 5.

    3. Visvanathan, R., Managing nutrition in the elderly: Grief and depression. Editor 2011: N.H. Science, Victoria, Australia.

    4. Kurrle, S., Brodaty, H, Hogarth, R, Physical Comorbidties of Dementia. 2012: Cambridge University Press, New York.

    5. El-Sharkawy, AM, Sahota, O, Maughan, RJ, Lobo, DN, The pathophysiology of fluid and electrolyte balance in the older adult surgical patient. Clinical Nutrition 2014. 33(1): p. 7.

    6. Ahmed, T., Haboubi, N, Assessment and management of nutrition in older people and its importance to health. Clinical Interventions in Aging 2010. 5: p. 9

    7. Daniels, L., Good nutrition for good surgery: clinical and quality of life outcomes. Australian Prescriber, 2003. 26(6).

    8. Barker, L., Gout, B, Crowe, T, Hospital malnutrition: prevalence, identification and impact on patients and the healthcare system. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2011. 8(2): pp. 514-27.

    9. Bapen UK, Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool, www.bapen.org.ukExternal Link

    10. Wotton, K., Crannitch, K, Munt, R, Prevalence, risk factors and strategies to prevent dehydration in older adults, Comtemporary Nurse, 2008. 31(1): p. 16.

    11. Mentes, J.C, Oral hydration in older adults: greater awareness is needed in preventing, recognizing and treating dehydration. American Journal of Nursing, 2006. 106(6): p. 49.

    12. Fortes, M.B., Owen, J.A, Raymond-Barker, P, Bishop, C, Elghenzai, S, Oliver, S.J, Walsh, N.P, Is this elderly patient dehydrated? Diagnostic accuracy of hydration assessment using physical signs, urine and saliva markers. JAMDA, 2015. 16(3).

    13. Deakin University. Carrying extra weight could be healthier for older people. 2014; Media Release. Available from: http://www.deakin.edu.au/news/latest-media-releases/2014/carrying-extra-weight-could-be-healthier-for-older-peopleExternal Link

    14. Hobbins, N., Eat to cheat ageing. 2014: Citrus Press, Northbridge, NSW.

    15. Aliani, M., Udenigwe, C, Girgih, A, Pownall, T, Bugera, J, Eskin, M, Zinc deficiency and taste perception in the elderly. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 2013. 53: p. 5.

    16. Bauer, J., Biolo, G, Cederholm, T, Cesari, M, Cruz-Jentoft, AJ, Morley, JE, Phillips, S, Sieber, C, Stehle, P, Teta, D, Visvanathan, R, Volpi, E, Boirie, Y, Evidence-based recommendations for the optimal dietary protein intake in older people: A position paper from the PROT-AGE Study Group. JAMDA, 2013. 14: p. 14.

    17. Silverbook Australia, Medical care of older persons in residential aged care facilities. 2006: Tthe Royal Australian College of General Practitioners.


Swallowing

Swallowing without difficulty is necessary to easily and safely consume food, drink and medication.

Given the high prevalence of many medical conditions that can impact on the normal swallowing process in older people, we must observe all older patients for signs of swallowing difficulty.

Swallowing difficulties, medically known as dysphagia, are most apparent to an older person, their family and hospital staff when the person is eating, drinking or taking medication. Swallowing difficulties can have an acute onset during illness and may be short term in nature or they can be a symptom of severe illness and become more severe due to neurological diseases such as Parkinson’s disease or dementia.

Mild swallowing difficulties are common in older people, particularly in those over the age of 80. There are many strategies we can implement to optimise food and fluid intake to avoid the difficulties becoming more severe and avoid a series of cascading risks.

This topic provides an overview of swallowing difficulties. It recommends actions that we and our organisations can take, in addition to health service policy and procedures, to provide quality care to older patients with swallowing difficulties.

Swallowing process and its impact on health

Swallowing difficulties (dysphagia) range from mild to severe, can be short or long term in duration, and acute or progressive in nature. Although it is not considered a normal part of ageing, dysphagia can occur due to the physiological ageing process, especially in people over 80. However, it is often a symptom of an underlying disease or condition.

Swallowing is a complex process that relies on many nerves and muscles of the mouth, throat and oesophagus1. Swallowing difficulties can cause problems with drinking, eating, chewing, controlling saliva, taking medications and protecting the airway2. An older adult with swallowing difficulties is at increased risk of pain3, dehydration and malnutrition.

Swallowing problems can mean that food and fluids entering the airway (laryngeal penetration) or the lungs (aspiration) can cause chest infections (aspiration pneumonia), choking or even death.

The swallowing process

The normal adult swallowing process occurs in four stages:

  • Oral Preparatory Phase – also known as the pre-oral stage, involves the cognitive response to food and fluid and the ability of the person to think about eating. This is the initial phase, which starts with the mouth closing and chewing the food.
  • Oral Transit Phase – is where the tongue works to move the food back towards the throat. Food and liquid is chewed and mixed with saliva, which is then pushed into the pharynx by the tongue.
  • Pharyngeal Phase – is where the soft palate elevates and creates pressure within so food doesn’t go back into the nose. The food or fluid reaches the pharynx and triggers the swallow reflex. This acts to protect the airway so that food or fluid pass into the oesophagus and not into the lungs.
  • Oesophageal Phase – is the final stage and involves the passage of the food and fluids down the food pipe (the oesophagus) into the stomach4.

Dysphagia

Dysphagia occurs when one or more of the four phases of swallowing is disrupted.

There are two main types of dysphagia:

Oropharyngeal dysphagia – trouble with moving food around the mouth and forming a bolus, as well as ‘initiating a swallow’. Patients are often medically unwell, and the most common causes are neurological disorders, such as stroke, Parkinson’s disease and dementia5.

Oesophageal dysphagia – the sensation of having food stuck in the throat or chest when swallowing and patients may complain of chest pain. Causes include gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD), cancer, Zenker’s diverticulum, infection, inflammation, motility disorders and certain types of medications6. Oesophageal tract changes, which may contribute to swallowing difficulties, are common in people over 80 years.

Causes of dysphagia are varied and patients may present to hospital in the acute or chronic stage with varying symptoms. Patients who are severely ill or have a disability or who have suffered from stroke, brain injury, Parkinson’s disease or dementia, are especially at risk of developing dysphagia6.

Impacts of dysphagia

The more unwell an older patient is and the more their overall function is affected, the more vulnerable they are to developing swallowing problems. Critically ill older patients with dysphagia are at higher risk of developing life-threatening conditions, including aspiration and aspiration pneumonia, obstruction, pneumonitis and abscess7,8.

Aspiration

Aspiration occurs when material is ingested and ends up in the lungs. This may be food particles, fluids, oropharyngeal secretions containing infectious agents9 or bacteria, which can cause an inflammatory condition8. Patients with dysphagia are at increased risk of developing aspiration, as are patients who are critically ill.

Silent aspiration and silent strokes

Silent aspiration is aspiration without any key clinical symptoms and signs, making it difficult to identify without imaging and assessment10. However it is common, occurring in more than 50 per cent of patients who aspirate5.

Similarly, ‘silent strokes’ are those occurring without symptoms and they are also a common cause of swallowing difficulties.

Aspiration pneumonia and pneumonitis

Dysphagia is also a risk factor for aspiration pneumonia – pneumonia caused by inhaling secretions or food that have been colonised by bacteria. Aspiration pneumonitis is caused by aspirating gastric contents. It is the most common cause of death in patients with dysphagia.

Malnutrition and dehydration

Older adults in hospital who have swallowing difficulties of any type are prone to weight loss and developing malnutrition and dehydration, which can severely impact their ability to recover from illness or surgery and remain independent and can increase the risk of other problems including delirium and falls.

Swallowing and ageing

Dysphagia is not considered a normal part of ageing; however, it can occur due to the physiological ageing process, especially in people over 80. Older people may have difficulty swallowing (mild) or may not be able to swallow at all (severe).

The ability to swallow can be affected by:

  • loss of muscle mass and strength
  • faitigue or exhaustion
  • loss of dentition
  • a decrease in mouth and tongue movements
  • changes in eating habits and taste buds (often due to loss of senses of taste and smell)
  • extended time in eating and drinking
  • difficulty managing oral secretions11
  • food taking longer to travel down the oesophagus to the stomach.

For older people in hospital, swallowing difficulties can prolong recovery time and contribute to functional decline, frailty and loss of independence. Severe dysphagia is often indicative a person is in the end stage of their disease.

Hospital provides an ideal opportunity to identify signs of swallowing difficulties and help older patients achieve and maintain optimal nutrition and hydration during their stay. This assists us to prevent cascading problems such as delirium, incontinence, falls and pressure injuries.

Identifying people at risk of swallowing problems

Screening older people for swallowing difficulties is vital to avoid choking, dehydration, malnutrition and extended hospital stays due to complications with other illnesses. When swallowing difficulties are identified early, we can tailor care and treatment to respond to each person’s biological and medical needs, their abilities and their lifestyle and cultural preferences.

Screening patients who present with a stroke

Prompt screening is particularly important after stroke as no food, drink or oral medications should be given to the patient until it is clear there are no swallowing problems.7

Screen all patients who present with a stroke within 24 hours of hospital admission.

Speech pathologists recommend using the ASSIST (Acute Screening for Swallow in Stroke) screening tool (and training staff in its use), which is the most widely used, thorough, evidence-based dysphagia screen. It is one component of The Victorian Dysphagia Screening Model and consists of five short questions.

Screening patients with certain medical conditions

Many medical conditions can impact on the normal swallowing process. Finding out whether a person has experienced any difficulty is crucial, particularly with the following conditions:

  • Parkinson’s disease and other neurological problems
  • head strike due to a fall
  • depression
  • dementia (mild, moderate or severe)
  • delirium
  • previous surgery to the mouth, throat, nose, spine or brain
  • cancer of the mouth, throat, head or neck
  • GORD
  • multiple comorbidities
  • frailty which is associated with a high risk of dysphagia and malnutrition8.

Oral health should be screened at the same time as swallowing. Poor oral health and dental issues can seriously impact on swallowing and enjoyment of foods and liquids

Signs of swallowing difficulties

Look for signs of:

  • difficulty swallowing or lack of swallowing7
  • coughing before swallowing7, during meal times, or after eating
  • heartburn7
  • drooling12,13
  • taking a long time to eat and drink, wasting food
  • altered level of alertness or reduced response
  • speech or voice changes as they may indicate silent aspiration. Look for slurred speech, a weak, hoarse, crackly, gurgling or wet-sounding voice. If in doubt, ask family members if they have noticed any recent vocal changes
  • a history of recurrent chest infections14 or suspected aspiration
  • tongue, facial or lip weakness or altered appearance
  • pocketing food or tablets in the cheeks
  • the patient describing food as sticking to the roof of their mouth or throat, or the sensation of a ‘lump’ or discomfort in the throat or chest, or frequent throat clearing during meal times (can indicate GORD)
  • unexplained weight loss7
  • reluctance to swallow food, water or medication.

“I had difficulty swallowing tablets when I was in hospital. I had to take my teeth out and I didn’t want the staff to see me, but they have to see you swallow. They have to make sure that you take the medication. I don’t know if anything can be done about that. It was just my vanity but… It’s an issue”. Consumer

Gather information from the patient, their family and carers

If we observe any of the signs or symptoms of swallowing difficulties or the patient complains of any of these problems, we should gather further information from the patient and their family and carers, explore the history of these issues, raise the concern with the treating team and work together to mitigate any immediate risks.

As a first step, ask the patient, their family and carer:

  • about the severity and duration of their swallowing problem
  • if they have been self-managing this issue, and if so, ask them what strategies have been helping them
  • to describe the location of the difficulty in swallowing
  • about the types of foods or liquids which make swallowing difficult
  • whether the swallowing issue is progressive or intermittent7
  • if they are experiencing reflux, as it is often associated with dysphagia.

Swallowing and discharge planning

The ability to swallow and eat and drink easily is important for our health and wellbeing. As clinicians, we can help patients make a smooth transition from the hospital to their home or care facility.

A change in a patient’s swallowing ability can be daunting for an older person and their family to manage once they leave the hospital. To improve outcomes in this area:

  • check that the patient understands their treatment goals and provide them with handouts and information to aid in their comprehension
  • inform the patient's family and carers about the swallowing issues and ongoing interventions required so they can work closely with the patient to keep them well
  • emphasise the importance of maintaining safe swallowing and good nutrition while at home or an alternative care facility
  • provide verbal and written information about safe swallowing practices if these have been recommended, as well as oral hygiene and food preparation
  • stress the importance of keeping well hydrated to sustain recovery and assist with managing dysphagia; dehydration can lead to a dry mouth and throat which will affect swallowing ability
  • ensure the patient and their family and carer are aware of how to take prescribed medication
  • provide the patient with information on where to purchase nutritional supplements if needed and check that they have the funds to do so
  • consider referring the person to a community dietitian and speech pathologist to provide ongoing support
  • refer the patient to social support services if necessary
    • There is a risk of older patients with dysphagia becoming socially isolated, as they may be reluctant to eat in front of others15
    • Find out if the patient was experiencing social isolation prior to their admission, and help them with strategies and referrals to access support
  • recommend that the patient has regular dental checks as dental hygiene is an important factor in managing dysphagia.
    1. Matsuo, K., Palmer, JB, Anatomy and Physiology of Feeding and Swallowing - Normal and Abnormal. Phys Med Rehabilitation 2008. 19(4): p. 16.
    2. Australia, S.P., Position Paper, Dysphagia: General, 2004. p. 36.
    3. National Stroke Foundation. Clinical Guidelines for Stroke Management, 2010.
    4. Nestle Health Sciences. Dysphagia: Mechanisms of dysphagia. 2012.
    5. Silverbook Australia, Medical care of older persons in residential aged care facilities, 2006: Tthe Royal Australian College of General Practitioners.
    6. Australian and New Zealand Society for Geriatric Medicine, Position statement: dysphagia and aspiration in older people. Australasian Journal on Ageing, 2011. 30(2): p. 5.
    7. Marik, P., Aspiration Pneumonitis and Aspiration Pneumonia. New England Journal of Medicine, 2001. 344(9): p. 4.
    8. Liantonio, J., Salzman, B, Snyderman, D, Preventing Aspiration Pneumonia by Addressisng Three key risk Factors: Dysphagia, Poor Oral Hygiene and Medication Use. Annals of Internal Medicine, 2014. 22(10): p. 13.
    9. Irwin, R., Lilly, C, Rippe, JM, Irwin & Rippe's Manual of Intensive Care Medicine. 6 ed., 2014: Wolters Kluwer Health.
    10. Medicine, A.a.N.Z.S.f.G., Dysphagia and Aspiration in Older People, Posiiton Statement 12 2010.
    11. Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing, Guidelines for a Palliative Approach for Aged Care in the Commuity Setting - Best practice guidelines for the Australian Context, 2011: Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing, Canberra.
    12. Wieseke, A., Bantz, D, Siktberg, L, Dillard, N, Assessment and Early Disgnosis of Dysphagia. Geriatric Nursing 29(6): p. 8
    13. Daniels, S.K., Brailey, K, Priestly, D.H, Herrington, L.R, Weisberg, L.A, Foumdas, A.L, Aspiration in patients with acute stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1998. 79: p. 6.
    14. Leslie, P., Carding, P.N, Wilson, J.A, Investigation and management of chronic dysphagia. British Medical Journal 2003. 326: p. 3.
    15. Ekberg, O., Hamdy, S, Woisard, V, Wuttge-Hannig, A, Ortega, P, Social and psychological burden of dysphagia: Its impact on diagnosis and treatment. Dysphagia, 2002. 17(2): p. 8.

Medication

Medicine use in older people is complex and highly individual. It needs to be monitored and managed to avoid errors and adverse effects and to help older people get the best outcomes from medication use.

Medication use in older people involves balancing disease management with avoiding adverse events.

As we get older, physiological changes can affect our metabolism, making it more likely that we will experience adverse reactions and side effects from medications. With age, we are more likely to have multiple medical conditions and be taking multiple medications, which puts us at higher risk of falls, delirium, hospital admissions, declining nutritional status, decreased physical and social functioning and death.

The ability to manage complex medication routines is influenced by a person’s level of social support and connectedness, with lower levels of support being associated with higher medication use.1 If we understand a patient’s circumstances we can help them to manage their medications successfully.

Up to 30 per cent of hospital admissions for patients over the age of 65 are medication related and half of these are potentially preventable.2

This topic gives an overview of issues around medication use in older people. It recommends actions that we and our organisations can take to ensure older patients have an effective medication regime that they can manage.

In addition to following your health service specific policy and procedures, consider the recommended actions and discuss them with colleagues and managers.

Medication and ageing

“Medicines…have the potential to provide great gains as well as significant harms to older people” 1

Physiological changes can cause adverse reactions

Medicines can be problematic for older people because as we age physiological changes can affect the way our body absorbs, distributes, metabolises and eliminates drugs. These physiological changes include increased body fat, decreased body water, decreased muscle mass, and changes in renal and liver function and in the Central Nervous System. These changes can cause adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in older people.

Frail older people are more likely to have pronounced changes in response to medicines. Generally, medications in frail older people aim to control symptoms and help maintain function.

For older people there can also be a higher risk of unintended consequences of medical treatment (iatrogenesis) related to medication.

Polypharmacy increases risk of adverse events and errors

As people age they are more likely to be taking several medications, including prescribed medications, over the counter or complementary medicines.

Taking multiple medications – known as ‘polypharmacy’ – increases the risk of medications being implicated in hospital admissions, particularly when an older person presents with falls, confusion or incontinence3. Polypharmacy can cause problems due to prescribing errors, problems with taking the medicines, and interactions of medicines.

When people take multiple medications, they are at greater risk of:

  • falls and associated harms, such as fractures
  • dehydration
  • functional decline
  • cognitive impairment
  • delirium
  • declining nutritional status
  • adverse drug reactions
  • hospitalisation
  • mortality4.

Also, the more medications a person takes, the greater the risk of medication errors. These errors may be due to difficulty in getting an accurate medication history and review, in prescribing and in following complex medication regimes.

An average of five to seven medication changes are made during the hospitalisation of an older person5, which also increases the risk of prescribing errors and adverse drug events.

It is estimated that up to 30 per cent of all hospital admissions of people aged 65 years and over are medication-related, and approximately half of these could be prevented6.

Medication-related admissions in older people can be caused by:

  • ADRs
  • failure to receive or take a prescribed medication
  • errors with taking medications.

Identifying medication risks and issues

Identifying people at risk

A patient is considered at risk of medication issues if they:

  • are aged over 65 years
  • take five or more medicines
  • have conditions that are commonly associated with preventable medication-related hospital admissions – such as asthma/COPD, depression, cerebrovascular event, hip fractures, renal failure, acute confusion, bipolar disorder and hyperkalaemia1.
  • are identified as at risk of falls or have decreased mobility – some medications can alter balance and coordination
  • have a cognitive or sensory impairment – the patient may not be able to follow medication instructions
  • are identified as at risk of under-nutrition – nutrition and hydration play a major role in the absorption of medications
  • are identified as at risk of incontinence – some medications may cause continence problems
  • are identified as at risk of delirium – some medications can cause delirium
  • are identified as at risk of depression – apathy may impact on the patient’s ability to take medications accurately
  • manage their own medications and live alone or are socially isolated. They may be taking medications inaccurately, or they may have difficulty in accessing medication or seeking support regarding their medication. Conversely, social connectedness helps with medication adherence.2
  • have been recently discharged from hospital - this is a high risk time for medication errors due to the number of medication changes that are typically made during a hospital stay
  • have poor literacy or are from a non-English speaking background - this may impact on their understanding of how and when to take medications and what they are for.

Assessment can inform medication management

If a person is identified as being at risk of or as experiencing medication issues, we need to refer them to the pharmacist and treating doctor for a comprehensive assessment. This will inform our intervention plan. In addition, start by completing a Best Possible Medication History.

Best Possible Medication History (BPMH)

This is a complete medication history that should be taken for each patient identified as being at an increased risk of issues with medication management.

Obtain information for the BPMH by interviewing the patient and a family member or carer.

Collect the following information for the BPMH:

  • current dosing schedules
  • duration of treatment
  • current indications
  • allergies and ADRs (including a description of the reaction)
  • current levels of adherence (the extent to which a patient follows the agreed instructions or recommendations for taking a medication as given by the health care provider).

Confirm the information through other sources, such as the patient’s medicine containers and medication list, their family (particularly if the person is quite unwell, has a cognitive impairment or receives assistance from someone to take their medications), GP, community pharmacy and other health services.

Medication reconciliation

To avoid errors in transcription, check that all of the medications the patients should be taking are what they are actually taking.

Repeat this process on admission, discharge and transfer of care between healthcare settings, for example, from the Emergency Department to the General Medical Ward.

To reconcile medications prescribed:

  • verify against medicines ordered on the medication chart
  • compare to admission, transfer and discharge orders
  • resolve any discrepancies with the prescriber.

Reviewing the medications list

When complete, the medications list should be reviewed to focus on medications that are associated with the development of geriatric syndromes.

Targeting medications with the highest risk of causing injury could prevent more adverse drug events and emergency department visits.1,2,3 These medications include Warfarin, Insulin, Digoxin, narcotics, opiates and sedatives. If an older person is taking any of these medications, discuss them with the treating doctor and refer to the ward pharmacist for further assessment. Along with the team’s clinical judgment, use the prescribing appropriateness criteria and the STOPP/START tool to minimise inappropriate prescribing during the review process.

Optimising medication use

Medication safety is improved and errors decrease significantly when strategies are put in place to increase the accuracy of medication history taking and medication reconciliation8.

There are several things we can do to support an effective and easy to manage medication regime for older people while they are in hospital.

Document medication information

Keep detailed records of medication to monitor for changes to the older person's baseline Best Possible Medication History (BPMH).

The records should include:

  • BPMH
  • medication reconciliation
  • key information about each medicine (drug name, dose, form, frequency, duration)
  • patient compliance/adherence issues
  • support for managing medications, for example carer and family help the patient manage medicines; the patient collects medicines in a medicopak/webster pack from community pharmacy
  • risk factors
  • medicines recently ceased
  • allergies and adverse drug reactions
  • plans to continue, cease or change medicines during the patient’s episode of care, which can be used to inform the discharge summary and prescriptions at time of discharge.

Medication information tools

The following tools for documenting and sharing medication information can be used to reduce prescribing, dispensing and administration errors.

  • Medication Management Plan (MMP) – use this standardised form to ensure complete and accurate documentation of medication information on admission and throughout the episode of care9.
  • National Inpatient Medication Chart (NIMC) - is an evidence-based, best practice suite of nationally standard medication charts. The NIMC enables information to be communicated consistently between health professionals10. Use of the NIMC is a mandatory requirement for health service organisations seeking accreditation against NSQHS Standard 4.

Deprescribing

Deprescribing is reducing the dosage or discontinuing a medication with the aim of reducing the risks associated with polypharmacy and improving quality of life11.

Talk to the patient, the doctor and pharmacist about the possible benefits of deprescribing and consider it after a thorough medication review when12:

  • there is a risk of polypharmacy
  • the patient is experiencing adverse drug reactions
  • the treatment has been ineffective
  • the patient has experienced a fall
  • the patient's treatment goals have changed.

Approach deprescribing with caution, as there are both risks and benefits. Focus on improving quality of life, reducing risks and alleviating symptoms. Ensure that this is a shared decision with the patient10.

When considering deprescribing, the nursing, medical and pharmacy teams will:

  • weigh up the benefits with the potential adverse consequences
  • target patients with highest Adverse Drug Event risk
  • target non-beneficial medications
  • target drugs known to do harm or are inappropriate
  • set a discontinuation regime and ongoing evaluation (ideally with the same clinician)
  • set shared goals with the patients and provide education, as it can be daunting for patients and families to discontinue medications they have been taking for many years.

Balance the risks and benefits of medications

Medication use in older people involves balancing disease management with avoiding adverse events.

Discuss the risks and benefits of each treatment with the patient.

Consider how treatments may affect the patient’s care goals, such as maintaining physical function and independence.

Consider how medications may impact on the person’s quality of life.

Medication and discharge planning

As discharge can be an overwhelming time for patients and families, there is high risk for medication errors and misunderstandings. We can help patients make a smooth transition from the hospital to their home or care facility by providing comprehensive and clear information.

Prepare a discharge summary

Discharge summaries should include:

  • a comprehensive discharge medication list
  • detailed medication information (generic medication name, dosage form, dose, directions, route of administration, regular and PRN medication)
  • indication and duration for new medication
  • explanation of any changes that may have been made to their usual medications (differences to pre-admission medications)
  • details of ongoing medication management plan and medication management needs (issues with taking the medications, recommendations for home medication reviews).

Educate patients and carers

  • Provide the patient, and family and carers with an accurate list of medications
  • Educate the patient and family and carers prior to discharge, including
    • proper storage and use of medications – demonstrate where possible
    • what to do if a dose is missed
    • potential side effects
    • when to call the GP or pharmacist about any concerns
    • refill information.
  • Provide a written copy of all information that is given verbally.
  • Consider what strategies will assist the patient to take their medication properly.
  • Ensure the patient is able to follow medication instructions.
  • Sometimes, pharmacists in hospitals can arrange a medication trial. This is a good way to see if the patient can take their medications independently before they are discharged home.
  • Some Victorian hospitals have a pharmacy outreach service that can visit patients at home after discharge to review their medication management, provide education and facilitate continuity of care. These services do not require a GP referral. Link the patient to this service if needed. This is especially important if the patient lives alone and is socially isolated.

Make medication use simple

  • Medication regimens should be as simple as possible – ideally with once or twice daily dosages.
  • Medication instructions and dosages should be clearly written.
  • Consider if the patient would benefit from the use of dose administration aids (DAAs), such as monitored dosage boxes. Remember that DAAs are not suitable for all patients, for example, patients with cognition impairments, vision impairments or limited dexterity. Assess the need and suitability first13.

Simplify medication supply

  • Ensure the patient has enough medications to last to their next GP visit.
  • Encourage the patient and their family and carer to:
    • always carry an up-to-date list of medications
    • use only one pharmacy and visit only one GP.
  • Synchronise medication quantities so the patient can make repeat orders at the same time.

Inform the GP

  • Ensure discharge information is accurate and reaches the GP in a timely manner.
  • Provide the following information to the GP:
    • medication changes and the reasons why
    • need for follow up or review
    • need for a GP-initiated Home Medicines Review (HMR). Commonwealth Government-funded HMRs must be initiated by the patient’s GP and carried out by an accredited pharmacist.

Inform the pharmacy

Ensure discharge medication information is provided to the patient’s community pharmacy, especially if a pharmacy-packed DAA will be used after discharge.

Inform the care services

If the patient is being discharged to a residential aged care facility or a community nursing service, ensure that a medication chart will be available to facilitate continuity of medication administration (usually this requires provision of an interim medication chart from the hospital).

Practice person-centred care

Medicine safety is best achieved in partnership with older people and the risk of error is greatly reduced with patient involvement. Older people place great importance on maintaining independence in self-management of medicines and have a strong sense of responsibility for this14.

    1. Bath P.A. and A. Gardiner, Social engagement and health and social care use and medication use among older people. European Journal of Ageing, 2005. 2: pp. 65-63.
    2. Roughead, E.E., Semple, S.J., Medication Safety in Acute Care in Australia: Where Are We Now? Part 1: A Review of the Extent and Causes of Medication Problems 2002–2008, Australia and New Zealand Health Policy 2009, 6: p. 18.
    3. Hilmer, S. N., Gnjidic, D., Le Couteur, D. G. Thinking through the medication list: appropriate prescribing and deprescribing in robust and frail older patients. Australian Family Physician 2012. 41: pp. 924-28.
    4. Elliott, R. A. Problems with medication use in the elderly: an Australian perspective. Journal of Pharamacy Practice and Research 2006. 36: pp. 58-66.
    5. Hilmer, S. N., Gnjidic, D. The effects of polypharmacy in older adults. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 2009. 85: p. 86.
    6. Elliott, R. A. Problems with medication use in the elderly: an Australian perspective. Journal of Pharamacy Practice and Research 2006. 36: pp. 58-66.
    7. Roughead, E. E., Semple, S. J. Medication safety in acute care in Australia: Where are we now? Part 1: a review of the extent and causes of medication problems 2002–2008. Australia and New Zealand Health Policy 2009. 6: p. 18.
    8. Kalisch, L., Caughey, G. E., Barratt, J. D., Ramsay, E., Killer, G., Gilbert, A. L., Roughead E. E., Prevalence of preventable medication-related hospitalizations in Australia: an opportunity to reduce harm'. International Journal for Quality in Health Care 2012. 24: pp. 239-49.
    9. Dimatteo, M.R., Giordani, P.J., Lepper, H.S., Croghan, T.W., Patient adherence and medical treatment outcomes: a meta analysis. Medical Care 2002. 40: pp. 794-811.
    10. Fick D., Cooper, J., Wade, W., Waller, J., Maclean, R., Beers, M. Updating the Beers Criteria for Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use in Older Adults. Archives of Internal Medicine 2003. 163: pp. 2716-24.
    11. Petty, D. Can Medicines Management Services Reduce Hospital Admissions?, The Pharmaceutical Journal 2008. 280: pp. 123-26.
    12. McLeod, S. E., Lum, E., Mitchell, C. Value of Medication Reconciliation in Reducing Medication Errors on Admission to Hospital, Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research 2008. 38: p. 196.
    13. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care (ACSQHC), National medication management plan user guide 2009: ACSQHC, Sydney.
    14. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care (ACSQHC), National inpatient medication chart user guide 2009: ACSQHC, Sydney.
    15. Scott, I. A., Anderson, A., Freeman, C. R, Stowasser, D. A. First do no harm: a real need to deprescribe in older patients. The Medical Journal of Australia 2014, 201: pp. 390-92.
    16. Le Couteur, D., Banks, E., Gnjidic, D., McLachlan, A. Deprescribing. Australian Prescriber 2011. 34.
    17. Elliott, R.A. Appropriate use of dose administration aids. Australian Prescriber 2014. 37: pp. 46-50.
    18. Campbell Research & Consulting, Home medicines review program qualitative research project: final report 2008: Department of Health and Ageing, Canberra.

Pain in older people

Many older people in hospital experience pain. They are not always able to report the pain and it is sometimes overlooked.

To improve the quality of life of older people and prevent functional decline, pain should be identified, assessed and managed.

All healthcare professionals should be alert to the possibility of pain in older people. We should be prepared to treat the cause of pain and the pain itself.

Pain and ageing

Almost 46 per cent of hospital patients aged 80 years or older report experiencing pain and almost 13 per cent of those are not satisfied with the pain control provided1.

Older people can be under-treated for pain because of misconceptions about ageing and pain.

Some older people are less likely to report pain as they think it is a natural part of ageing, they don’t want to be a nuisance to staff, or they worry that pain signals disease progression which could mean more medications with undesirable side effects, diagnostic tests and loss of independence2.

Common causes of pain in older people

Common causes of pain in older people include:

  • arthritis (osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis)
  • fibromyalgia (a condition characterised by widespread pain and other symptoms)
  • cancer
  • circulatory problems
  • bowel disease
  • urinary tract infections
  • pressure injuries
  • old injuries
  • infections.

Impacts of pain on older people

Pain can have a negative impact on an older person’s quality of life, contributing to:

  • impaired mobility or immobility and associated muscle wastage
  • depression and anxiety
  • social isolation
  • financial distress
  • sleep disturbances
  • reduced participation in everyday activities
  • confusion and delirium
  • fatigue
  • delayed healing and recovery
  • pulmonary complications
  • increased mortality.

Persistent pain in older people can also have a negative impact on their:

  • gait
  • physical condition and muscle strength
  • risk of falls
  • cognitive function and mood
  • nutrition
  • ability to participate in rehabilitation activities.

Identifying pain

Screening questions

Ask the patient if they are experiencing any pain using questions like the following.

  • Do you have pain/are you aching or hurting anywhere right now?
  • Where do you have pain/are you aching or hurting?
  • How long have you been in pain/aching/hurting?
  • Does pain/aching ever keep you from sleeping at night?
  • Does your pain/aching ever keep you from participating in activities/doing things you enjoy?
  • Do you have pain/are you aching or hurting every day?

If the older person has no pain on admission, record ‘0’ as the pain score and advise them to let staff know if pain develops.

If the older person does report pain during the initial screening interview, then further assessment of pain intensity, location, quality and symptoms is needed to guide diagnosis and treatment.

Assessing for pain

There are two main methods for identifying pain in older people: self-report and observational.

Self-report

Self-report is the most reliable source of information on pain. Use it with all older people, including those with a cognitive or communication impairment.3,4 Self-report of pain may be obtained by:

  • asking an older person questions about their pain – consider using terms such as ‘hurting’, ‘aching’ and ‘soreness’ and document these terms if the older person uses them3
  • using a pain intensity scale
  • using a multidimensional self-report tool.

All self-reports should be taken seriously, including those from older people with a cognitive impairment.6 Self-reported pain from people with a severe cognitive impairment or non-communicative patients should be cross-validated with an observational pain assessment and, where appropriate, discussed with the patient’s family or carer. However, take care when using family or carer reports of pain in an older person, as pain intensity may be over- or under-estimated.4

Self-report pain assessment tools

Multidimensional tools are used for an initial comprehensive pain assessment. They evaluate the sensory component of pain (what the person is feeling), the emotional response to pain (impact on the person’s function and relationships, and the meaning of the pain) and quality of life (activities, mood, sleep). The following tools may be used.

  • Short-form McGill questionnaire
  • Brief pain inventory – short form
  • Brief pain inventory – long form
  • Pain disability index.

Unidimensional pain assessment tools are used for ongoing evaluation of pain intensity and response to treatment. They evaluate only the sensory component of pain. Examples include:

  • Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
  • Verbal Descriptor Scale (VDS)
  • Pain thermometer
  • Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
  • A pictorial pain scale (FACES pain scale).

Some patients prefer to use numbers to describe their pain, while others prefer words. If you are not successful in using one type of self-report tool with an older person, try a different tool.

Observational

In older people who have severe cognitive impairments or communication difficulties, their behaviour may be the only external indicator of pain.4

Pain behaviours are individual, so identifying pain requires clinical judgement and familiarity with the older person. Involving family and carers can help with identifying and confirming observational pain.4

The following observation scales are recommended for older people with severe cognitive or communication difficulties.7

  • Pain assessment checklist for seniors with limited ability to communicate (PACSLAC)
  • Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia (PAINAD)
  • Abbey Pain Scale

Pain should be assessed at rest and during activity, such as movement or transfer.

Behavioural and autonomic signs of pain

    • frowning, sad or frightened face
    • grimacing, wincing, eye tightening or closing
    • distorted facial expressions - brow raising/lowering, cheek raising, nose wrinkling, lip corner pulling
    • rapid blinking.
    • sighing, groaning, moaning
    • grunting, screaming, calling out
    • aggressive or offensive speech
    • noisy breathing
    • asking for assistance.
    • tense posture, guarding, rigid
    • fidgeting
    • pacing, rocking or repetitive movements
    • reduced or restricted movement
    • altered gait.
    • aggressive or disruptive behaviour
    • socially inappropriate behaviour
    • decreased social interactions
    • withdrawn.
    • appetite change, refusing food
    • increase in rest periods
    • sleep or rest pattern changes.
    • cognitive decline
    • increased confusion
    • crying
    • irritability or distress.
    • pallor
    • sweating
    • rapid breathing (tachypnoea)
    • altered breathing
    • rapid heart rate (tachycardia)
    • hypertension.

    Autonomic signs of pain are only observable during a severe acute pain episode.4 They may reflect active nociception and may assist with identifying pain in older people who are intubated or unconscious following surgery but need to be used carefully, because the absence of autonomic signs does not indicate the absence of pain.

  • Several factors may interfere with an older person disclosing pain, including:

    • communication issues – the older person and health professionals use different words to describe pain
    • fears, beliefs and misconceptions about pain – the older person may be concerned that pain means their condition is worse, that they may have to rely on medication or that complaining about pain will distract health professionals from taking care of more important health issues
    • literacy skills, numeracy skills, language and cultural needs
    • cognitive impairments – be aware that behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) could indicate a person is experiencing pain
    • communication or sensory impairments
    • some behaviours or autonomic responses may have other underlying causes.
  • When an older person is identified as being at risk of pain or experiencing pain, a comprehensive geriatric-focused pain assessment should be conducted. The assessment should include the following elements.3,7,8

  • Include prior and coexisting medical conditions, pain and treatment outcomes.

    • Commencement and trajectory
    • Intensity – at rest and on movement, duration, current, during last week, highest level
    • Aggravating and relieving factors
    • Location – point to pain site on body or body map
    • Radiation or referred sites of pain
    • Quality – descriptors such as dull, throbbing, aching (associated with nociceptive pain) or burning tingling, pins and needles, numbness or itching (associated with neuropathic pain)
    • Acute or chronic, including acute exacerbations of chronic pain
    • Reported and referred pain and common pain sites
    • Musculoskeletal and neurological systems – stiffness, muscle strength, range of motion, gait and balance problems
    • Signs of arthritis – swelling, inflammation, stiffness
    • Sensitisation of pain responses – pin prick or brush tests to assess for heightened or abnormal sensitivity to pain such as hyperalgesia (an increased response to a painful stimulus) or allodynia (pain from a stimulus which wouldn’t usually cause pain)9.
    • Physical function
    • Assistance needed to perform activities of daily living
    • Changes in mobility and activity levels (such as not wanting to get out of bed)
    • Sleep – difficulty falling asleep or waking due to pain
    • Changes in appetite
    • Pain intensity
    • Range of movement
    • Mood – anxiety and depression may worsen with pain and make it harder for the older person to find ways to cope. Older people with chronic pain are four times more likely to develop depression than people with no pain
    • Social relationships, coping skills and social supports, pain-related fears, feelings of loneliness
    • Social engagement-experiencing chronic pain increases the risk of becoming socially isolated, as a person can lose the confidence and/or ability to participate in activities10
    • Mental status including acute or sub-acute confusion or delirium associated with pain
    • Pain beliefs and fears
    • Behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) – unrelieved pain has been identified as a possible cause of BPSD
    • Effectiveness and side effects of all past and present pharmacological and non-pharmacological pain management strategies
    • Older person’s satisfaction with past and present pain management strategies
    • Older person’s expectation of and goals for pain management

Managing and treating pain

The treatment and management of pain should be based on the findings of a pain assessment.

Treatment approaches vary according to the type of pain, but all involve a combination of pharmacological and non-pharmacological approaches.

Coordinated, multidisciplinary treatment strategies are sometimes required, particularly if pain persists and does not respond to conventional treatment.

The National Pain Strategy (2010)11 , which is currently under review, recommends a multidisciplinary pain management plan that includes a combination of medical approaches, physiotherapy, environmental and psychological interventions based on Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT).

Identify the pain

Classify the pain to inform treatment planning.Most chronic pain may be classified as:

  • nociceptive - pain that arises from actual or threathened damage to non-neronal tissue and is due to the activation of nociceptors. This could include post-operative and inflammatory arthropathy (such as arthritis or gout) and may be described as dull, aching or throbbing.
  • neuropathic - to describe pain caused by a lesion or disease of the somatosensory nervous pain, it is often described as burning and may be associated with tingling, pins and needles, numbness or itching.

Some types of pain can be both nociceptive and neuropathic (cancer pain)

  • Treat pain without a pain score when the older person is not able to focus or use a pain rating scale or is visibly in pain12.
  • Always consider the possibility of pain in all contacts with older people.
  • Ask older patients about pain routinely and be aware of behaviours that might indicate underlying pain.
  • Regularly record assessment results to facilitate ongoing care.

Manage the pain

Follow your hospital policies and procedures and pathways for pain management.

Consider pharmacological and non-pharmacological approaches:

A pharmacological approach requires an understanding of the mode of action, common side effects and common drug interactions. Medication dose, administration, monitoring and adjustment must be carefully considered, taking into account age-related changes in drug sensitivity, efficacy, metabolism and side effects. Analgesic treatments should be tailored to individual needs.

  • Consider pre-emptive analgesia prior to any medical procedure (IV cannulation, dressing change), or rehabilitation procedure (physiotherapy exercises) likely to cause significant pain.
  • Consider patient-controlled analgesia post-operatively.
  • Chronic pain is best managed with around-the-clock analgesia. Medications should be given, even if the person doesn’t have pain at the time the medication is due.
  • Monitor regularly for any side effects following pain treatment (such as nausea, vomiting, sedation, constipation or dizziness)
  • Address opiophobia:
    • Many older people with pain respond well to opioid therapy, particularly if nociceptive pain. Opioids should not be denied because of fears of addiction.
    • It is reasonable for a person with severe pain to seek and/or be offered analgesia.
    • Addiction, also known as psychological dependency, is manifested by opioid-seeking behaviours for reasons other than pain relief. Psychological dependency should be differentiated from physical dependency.
    • Physical dependency occurs after a person has been on certain medications for some time, including opioid analgesics, and is manifested as withdrawal symptoms if the drug is suddenly stopped. Chronic opioid therapy should therefore not be abruptly stopped.
    • Opiophobia by health care staff may contribute to persistent unrelieved pain.
  • Simple analgesia, such as regular paracetamol, is well tolerated and can provide a background level of analgesia. If the person's pain is not well controlled the addition of opioids provided regularly and/or as required can be an effective strategy to manage a person's pain.
  • Some medications that are not typically used for pain may also be helpful for its management. Examples of these include tricyclic or SNRI antidepressants and gabapentinoids. These may improve the quality of opioid analgesia and limit the development of opioid tolerance.

Non-pharmacological approaches include psychological approaches (cognitive behavioural therapy, relaxation, education), physical therapies (physiotherapy, occupational therapy, superficial heat and cold, TENS, gentle exercise, hydrotherapy), and complementary and alternative therapies (acupuncture, massage, other supplements).

  • Encourage the older person to move regularly around the ward if they are capable and it is appropriate.

Refer the patient for an inpatient management assessment or to an outpatient multidisciplinary pain clinic on discharge if their pain persists after pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapies.

Re-assess pain regularly

  • Interventions introduced to manage pain should be regularly re-assessed.
  • Re-assess pain levels every one to two hours until the pain episode is under control (for example, post-procedural pain).
  • Increase the frequency of pain assessments if:
    • pain is poorly controlled, that is, if the patient is experiencing moderate pain, scores 5/10 on a measurement scale or the pain stimulus or intervention alters. Consider the potential for undiagnosed serious pathology, including ischaemia.
    • an analgesic infusion is in progress, which indicates a higher intensity of pain and appropriate safety monitoring occurs.
  • Reassess pain after analgesic treatment to determine if:
    • the treatment was effective
    • further treatment is necessary
    • any side effects have occurred as a consequence of the treatment (for example, nausea, vomiting, constipation and sedation).
  • Wear badges and use stickers on care plans as visual reminders to regularly assess and report pain.

Assess and document the pain assessment outcome and pain management treatment provided12,13.

Pain and discharge planning

We can help patients make a smooth transition from hospital to their home or residential aged care facility by planning their discharge and providing information about what to do when they leave hospital.

Develop a discharge plan

Pain should be assessed as part of hospital discharge.

Allow enough time to develop a pain management discharge plan with the older person and their family or carer.

Ensure the person’s GP and other healthcare professionals are informed of the care plan and ask them to be involved in developing the plan.

The plan should include:

  • the person’s functional goals following discharge
  • a list of prescribed medication, including the dose, frequency and expected duration medication is to be taken. If an opioid has been started during the admission, outline the prescribing plan and include the potential weaning strategy as the pain resolves
  • prevention and management strategies for potential medication side effects
  • restrictions and precautions associated with prescribed medication, such as limitations on driving and work
  • potential drug interactions between pre-hospital prescribed medication, over-the-counter medication and medications prescribed on discharge
  • details of the person who should be contacted (by the patient or their family or carer) if pain relief on discharge is inadequate
  • details of follow-up appointments or referrals for outpatient or community-based rehabilitation.

Share the plan

Give the older person and their family and carers a copy of the pain management discharge plan.

With the older person’s consent, and where appropriate, give a copy of the pain management discharge plan to their:

  • GP
  • residential aged care facility
  • rehabilitation service
  • community services.

Educate patients and carers

Older people and their family and carers should be educated about implementing the pain management discharge plan and the importance of maintaining adequate pain control on discharge.

Discuss ongoing pain control with the older person and their carers prior to discharge.

Medication information

Provide information about medication doses, how often the medications need to be taken and for how long, and how to deal with any side effects. Discuss the plan regarding a medication review and weaning strategy if improvement is expected. Encourage older people to request pain relief at the onset of pain.

Self-managing pain

Provide information on self-management interventions to reduce pain, including:

  • energy conservation
  • pacing activity
  • work simplification techniques
  • relaxation strategies and anxiety reduction.

Social engagement

Pain can increase the risk of social isolation. Help the older person to find ways of becoming or remaining as engaged as possible and include these strategies as part of their discharge plan.

Informing others

Remind older people to tell healthcare professionals about any pain they feel, where it is, the intensity and characteristics of the pain, activities that make pain better or worse, and how pain impacts on their daily routine (appetite, sleep, mood, mobility).

Managing chronic pain

Sometimes chronic pain cannot be relieved; however, the negative impact can be reduced. Give older people advice on how to deal with chronic pain. Share the following strategies.

  • Find out as much as possible about the condition so you understand what is happening and don’t worry unnecessarily about the pain.
  • Keep active and exercise gently, even though this may cause some discomfort. Discuss what options would be best with your doctor.
  • Take steps to prevent or reduce depression and loneliness by any means that work for you, including talking to friends or health professionals.
  • Think positively; identify and challenge negative thoughts you have in response to pain.
  • Don’t let pain interfere with your life more than necessary – if you miss activities you used to do before the pain, try reintroducing them gradually and remember to pace yourself. Take pain medication before an activity that you know will aggravate your pain. You may need to cut back on activities if pain flares up, but you will be able to increase slowly again as you did before. Remember: pacing, planning and pre-emptive pain medication.
  • Recognise that pain increases your risk of becoming socially isolated. Make an effort to stay engaged and involved with others and your community.
  • Focus on finding enjoyable and fulfilling activities that don’t aggravate your pain.
  • Seek advice on different types of coping strategies.
  • Seek a referral to a pain clinic or chronic pain specialist or team if pain is ongoing.
    1. Desbiens, N., et al., Pain in the oldest-old during hospitalization and up to one year later. Journal of American Geratrics Soceity, 1997. 45: p. 1167-1172.
    2. Herr, K. and L. Garand, Assessment and measurement of pain in older adults. Clinics in geriatric medicine, 2001. 17(3).
    3. The American Geriatric Society, The management of persistent pain in older persons: American Geriatric Society panel on persistent pain in older persons. Journal of American Geriatric Society, 2002. 50: pp. S205-S224.
    4. British Pain Society and British Geriatrics Society, Guidance on: The assessment of pain in older people., 2007, British Pain Society and British Geriatrics Society.
    5. Royal College of Physicians, British Geriatrics Society, and British Pain Society, The assessment of pain in older people: national guidelines. Concise guide to good practice series, No 8., L. Turner-Stokes and B. Higgins, Editors. 2007, Royal College of Physicians: London.
    6. Herr, K., Pain assessment in the older adult with verbal communication skills, in Pain in Older Persons, S. Gibson and D. Weiner, Editors. 2005, IASP Press: Seattle. pp. 111-133.
    7. Zwakhalen, S.M., et al., Pain in elderly people with severe dementia: a systematic review of behavioural pain assessment tools. BMC Geriatrics, 2006. 6.
    8. The Australian Pain Society, Pain in residential aged care facilities: Management strategies, 2005, The Australian Pain Society: Sydney.
    9. International Association for the Study of Pain. IASP Taxonomy 2012. 2012 [cited 2015 April 15]; Available from the International Association for the Study of PainExternal Link
    10. Commissioner for Senior Victorians. Ageing is everyone’s business: a report on isolation and loneliness among senior Victorians, 2016, State of Victoria: Melbourne.
    11. National Pain Summit Initiative, National Pain Strategy: Pain Management for all Australians, 2010
    12. The Victorian Quality Council, Acute pain management measurement toolkit, 2007, Rural and Regional Health and Aged Care Services Division, Victorian Government, Department of Human Services: Melbourne.
    13. Herr, K., Pain assessment in the older adult with verbal communication skills, in Pain in Older Persons, S. Gibson and D. Weiner, Editors. 2005, IASP Press: Seattle. p. 111-133.

Palliative approach to caring for older people

Palliative care is an approach that improves the quality of life of patients and their families with life-threatening illnesses through the prevention of suffering including physical, psychological and spiritual suffering.

As modern healthcare has been successful in keeping more people alive, with illness, for longer, the nature of hospitalisation is shifting from cure to care, including managing the end of life. There are more older people in our population; people are living longer; and more people are living with chronic disease, dementia and increasing frailty.

Many people experience disease that results in increased disability often with recurrent hospital admissions and progressive decline over time. Our role is to highlight increasing chronic disease, to shift our focus from prolonging life to maximising quality of life and providing appropriate care to patients and their families.

Palliative care is an approach that improves the quality of life of patients and their families with life-threatening illnesses through the prevention of suffering including physical, psychological and spiritual suffering.

A palliative approach to care is relevant and will benefit any older person who has an illness or condition that is likely to affect how long they will live or if they are becoming frail.

Palliative care is 'an approach that improves the quality of life of patients and their families facing the problems associated with life-threatening illness, through the prevention and relief of suffering by means of early identification and impeccable assessment and treatment of pain and other problems, physical, psychosocial and spiritual.'1.

Palliative care is not just for when the person is dying or at the end of their life; it is for any time during a terminal illness. 'Palliative care:

  • provides relief from pain and other distressing symptoms
  • affirms life and regards dying as a normal process
  • intends neither to hasten or postpone death
  • integrates the psychological and spiritual aspects of patient care
  • offers a support system to help patients live as actively as possible until death
  • offers a support system to help the family cope during the patient’s illness and in their own bereavement
  • uses a team approach to address the needs of patients and their families, including bereavement counselling, if indicated
  • will enhance quality of life, and may also positively influence the course of illness
  • is applicable early in the course of illness, in conjunction with other therapies that are intended to prolong life, such as chemotherapy or radiation therapy, and includes those investigations needed to better understand and manage distressing clinical complications.'1

Palliative care and ageing

People and their families with the following conditions may benefit from palliative care.

  • Progressive dementia
  • People dying as a result of the ageing process
  • Advanced heart disease
  • Advanced respiratory disease
  • End-stage renal failure
  • End-stage liver disease
  • Secondary cancers
  • Degenerative neurological conditions

Specialist palliative care is care provided by those who have undergone specific training and/or accreditation in palliative care/medicine working in the context of an expert interdisciplinary team of palliative care health professionals and the designated service system funded to deliver palliative care.2 These services support people with life limiting illness in a number of ways, including:

  • direct care for people requiring specialist palliative care interventions for management of complex symptoms/care needs
  • consultation and advice to other services and health care teams providing end of life care
  • education and training on palliative care and end of life issues
  • undertaking and disseminating research about caring for the dying and their families/carers.

Not everyone with a life limiting illness will require access to specialist palliative care. In many instances, the most valuable role specialist palliative care can play is to support other healthcare teams and professionals to provide end of life care to their patients.

All patients with a life limiting illness and their families and carers will require support and care from health professionals who understand and are skilled in the palliative approach to care.

A palliative approach to care incorporates an holistic approach that considers and meets all aspects of the person’s and their families, physical, emotional, spiritual and psychosocial needs.

A palliative approach to care emphasises comfort and quality of life and involves a team approach to care.

A palliative approach to care also considers some of the challenges for older people as they near the end of life:

  • loss of independence
  • having to rely more on others for assistance
  • losing control of their life
  • not being able to think as clearly as they used to
  • changes in physical appearance and functional abilities
  • depression/anxiety
  • increased social isolation and/or feelings of loneliness
  • not feeling valued
  • feeling a sense of being a burden to others
  • not being treated with respect or understanding.

Responding to the need for palliative care

Communication

When we have identified that a patient needs palliative care, we should introduce the approach to the patient, and to their family and carers, in a clear and sensitive way.

When introducing and providing palliative care, good communication is critical.

Communication occurs in many forms with the person, family member and between team members and other care providers. It can be verbal, non-verbal and written.

The key principles of communication are:

  • Individualise communication
  • Listen
  • Check and clarify
  • Maintain dignity.

Communication needs to be individualised by considering:

  • The person’s culture
  • Their emotional state
  • The diagnosis
  • Current conditions
  • Disabilities and impairments such as vision, speech and cognitive impairment.

It also needs to involve family members as appropriate.

Greet the person by name, use eye contact and position yourself at their eye level.

Consider non-verbal language such as movements, posture, gestures, facial expression and eye contact.

Ask open questions.

Avoid providing lengthy explanations early in your interaction and take time to hear issues from the person’s perspective.

Use facilitative statements such as “tell me about that”.

And maintain a person’s dignity at all times by:

  • Greeting the person and calling them by name
  • Treating the person as an adult
  • Giving them privacy
  • Finding out about their earlier life
  • Maintaining their comfort.

Develop a care plan

Good communication can facilitate the development of a comprehensive care plan that is both medically sound and has the patient’s wishes and values at the forefront3. If discussions around the preferences for end of life care are prolonged or avoided, patients and their family may have limited opportunity to appropriately prepare for death.

Do not assume

Be curious and do not assume that the patient does not want to discuss their prognosis or end of life care just because they have not raised the issue themselves or because of their cultural or spiritual background. It is also important not to force the patient to have discussions about their prognosis or end of life care.

Check advance care planning

Check if the person has an advance care plan. Advance care plans identifies and documents and individual’s future wishes and preferences based on the values that are important in their life and ensures that end-of-life goals have been established. It also helps establish a plan based on discussions between the person, the family and their care providers and assists them to understand a person’s end-of-life choices.

Palliative care - grief and loss

Our role extends to caring for the person and their family after death. This care can include the following:

  • Making the call to the person’s family that they died. This can be daunting, so speak to experienced clinicians about the strategies they find helpful in this situation.
  • Preparing the person’s body and cleaning the hospital room to prepare for viewing as soon as possible after death.
  • Being aware that personal care after death is best carried out within two to four hours of the person dying; this preserves their appearance, condition and dignity.
  • Providing support to the family and friends and giving them the opportunity to participate in the process of preparing the body if they wish to do so.
  • Honouring the spiritual and cultural wishes of the older person and their family and friends, for example, having a family member wash and care for the body or ensuring only someone of the same gender washes and cares for the body.
  • Preparing the person’s body for transfer to the mortuary, funeral director or other location based on the older person’s and their family’s wishes.
  • Using the person’s preferred name and give families some warning of what to expect if they have not been present. This can be as simple as normalising the fact that once a person has died their body can become stiff and a bit cold to touch, but it can be comforting to touch their hair.
  • Ensuring privacy, respect and dignity of the deceased person is maintained.
  • Honouring people’s wishes for organ and tissue donation.
  • Ensuring the safe return of the deceased person’s personal possessions to the relevant family member or friend.
  • Providing family and friends with written information about the processes following death, such as what will happen with their body, how to collect the death certificate, the role of the funeral director and bereavement support services. Provide them with the opportunity to ask any questions. Some hospitals have bereavement procedures and provide a follow up phone call to families. Follow your health service procedures.

We should also be mindful that other patients and their families will be aware the person has died and this may raise some emotions for them. It’s best to acknowledge and respond to these concerns.

Grief and loss

Grief is a common and especially significant concern for carers and family members. Reassure family and caregivers that these responses are common and that grieving is the normal response to the death of a loved one. Grief is profound as it affects so many domains of our lives. Early actions can be taken to minimise distress associated with grief.

It can manifest as sadness, anger, fear distress, despair, anxiety, guilt, worrying thoughts, sleep disturbance, social withdrawal and/or decreased ability to maintain an organised lifestyle.

Grief can also trigger feelings of loneliness and social isolation for family and carers. These feelings may be pre-existing but exacerbated by the loss, or caused by the grief if a person withdraws from their usual activities. It is important to ask how they are feeling, acknowledge their feelings and help them to seek appropriate support and engage with others. It is also important to:

  • allow a person to talk about their concerns
  • offer practical support
  • allow for individual responses
  • accept strong responses or stoicism
  • take time, don’t rush
  • encourage family and friends to take time to say goodbye
    1. World Health Organization, WHO Definition of Palliative Care, 2015, World Health Organizsation.
    2. Cherny N. et al (eds) 2015, Oxford Textbook of Palliative Medicine, Fifth Edition, Oxford University Press, Oxford, p. 10.
    3. Balaban, R.B., A Physician's guide to talking about end-of-life care. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2000. 15: p. 195-200

Managing needs of older people during palliative care

Managing physical symptoms

People who need palliative care may experience some of the following symptoms, depending on their illness. These symptoms can impact on their quality of life and be distressing for their family and carers.

We need to be familiar with these symptoms and work with our team to determine what can be addressed:

  • Pain
  • Delirium
  • Nutrition and hydration
  • Breathlessness
  • Oral health problems.

Palliative care patients may experience more than one symptom at a time.

Pain

Pain is something that is felt and is subjective. It is what the person says it is and not what others think it should be. It is also individual with physical, psychological and spiritual dimensions. And pain is under-treated for many reasons. Under reporting of pain for people with dementia is a particular problem as it can be difficult to assess.

Use simple words to ask about pain such as hurting, aching burning, stabbing. And allow time for the person to reply.

Observe and assess:

  • Changes in behaviour
  • Facial expressions and grimaces
  • Vocalisations
  • Crying
  • Breathing patterns
  • Body language.

Ask about pain regularly, especially when changes have been made to the patient’s regime. Document the responses and consider conducting a comprehensive pain assessment.

We can try to relieve the patient’s pain, for example, by:

  • A change of position
  • A gentle massage or using hot packs (be careful using these if the older person has a problem with feeling heat or cannot easily move the pack if it causes discomfort)
  • Distraction techniques, such as talking, music
  • Medication.

Referral to a specialist palliative care service for assistance with pain management should also be considered.

Delirium

Delirium is quite common in palliative care patients, with the incidence reported as high as 85 per cent of patients. Delirium can be caused by a one or a number of factors, including:

  • Medications
  • Infections, such as a urinary tract infection or chest infection
  • Acute metabolic disturbances
  • Dehydration
  • Poor symptom control, for example, constipation or urinary retention
  • Drug withdrawal.

Palliative care patients who have delirium can:

  • Appear confused
  • Have difficulty focusing or paying attention
  • Experience sleep disturbances, for instance awake overnight and asleep during the day time
  • Be very physically restless
  • Be quiet and withdrawn
  • Have no concept of time or place
  • See, hear or feel things that are not there1.

Report and manage delirium by:

  • Identifying and treating underlying causes such as infection, dehydration and/or pain
  • Reviewing medication to see if it is contributing to the problem
  • Speaking calmly to the person and make them aware of where they are, who they are with and orient them to time and place
  • Implement strategies to minimise the risk of injury
  • Provide routine and a familiar environment to help with the person’s orientation and awareness.

Nutrition and hydration

Many factors can contribute to decreased nutrition and hydration at end of life. Contributing factors can include:

  • Difficulty swallowing
  • Poor oral health
  • Confusion/not recognising food
  • Need for increased assistance to eat
  • Decreased desire to eat and drink.

Investigate and determine reasons for a change in eating and drinking behaviour. Review and respond to the person’s wishes regarding nutrition and hydration. At the end of life, management will depend on the person’s wishes.

There are often psychosocial implications around loss of appetite and nutritional changes for a person and their family. Often the most distressing symptoms for family members to see if weight loss and increasing frailty. There may also be cultural, symbolic or religious meanings to food, drink and eating that need to be considered.

Artificial nutrition and hydration may not be beneficial in last stages of life and does not prolong life. In some instances it increases the person’s discomfort and the body does not require it in the last few days of life. It is important, however, to have the discussion with families around artificial nutrition and hydration so that they understand the implications for end of life care.

Breathlessness (dyspnoea)

Breathlessness is the unpleasant sensation of difficulty in breathing. It impacts on quality of life, activities of daily living, mobility, anxiety, fear and social isolation.

Observe changes in breathing behaviour including the rate and depth of breathing.

Observe signs of fear or distress that makes breathing worse.

Observe changes in functional ability due to breathlessness.

Observe changes to skin colour.

Assess timing of breathlessness including how often it occurs, when it occurs, how long it lasts and how long between episodes.

To assist with the management of breathlessness:

  • Minimise anxiety and distress
  • Position the person in a more upright position
  • Speak calmly and reassuringly
  • Pace physical activity
  • Pharmacological agents may be prescribed depending on cause.

Problems with breathing can be distressing for the older person and their family. Keep them informed about what can be managed and what is normal towards the end of life.

Oral health problems

Quality of life is affected by mouth pain, ulceration, dry mouth and swallowing difficulties.

Notice indicators of potential oral health problems such as broken teeth, broken or missing dentures, a swollen face, the condition of the tongue and bad breath.

Regular oral hygiene needs to be provided and encourage the person to drink water after meals and after taking medication.

Dry mouth is often caused by the disease or the medication regime. We can conduct an oral examination to determine what could be causing the dry mouth and implement the following regimes to improve dry mouth:

  • Regular mouthwashes with water or water with sodium bicarbonate
  • Frequent sips of water to maintain hydration if possible
  • Using a soft toothbrush and gentle brushing twice daily
  • Offering foods that aid in increasing saliva, such as pineapple chunks, frozen lemon slices and chewing gum
  • Using saliva substitutes such as sprays and gels
  • Using lip balm or lanolin based balms to prevent cracking of lips
  • Referring to a pharmacist consultant for a medication review.

Swallowing difficulties are common at the end of life and dysphagia, a severe swallowing difficulty, is a sign that a person’s disease is at end stage. If a person is having swallowing problems, we can refer them to a speech pathologist for a swallowing assessment and guidance for appropriate interventions.

We can assist an older person with swallowing difficulties to eat by ensuring that they:

  • Have meals in a quiet place with no distractions
  • Take small mouthfuls and eats slowly
  • Avoid talking while eating
  • Swallow each mouthful before taking another
  • Positioning them sitting upright with the head forward (not leaning back) when meals or drinks are taken and for at least 30 minutes afterwards.

Managing personal, emotional, cultural and spiritual needs

Grief is the normal human response to any perceived loss. It can occur well before a person dies and it presents with many subtle nuances.

People receiving palliative care can experience heightened emotions and may value the opportunity to express their identity and culture and to practise their spiritual and religious rituals.

We need to enhance our ability to respond to people’s individual wishes so that we can provide quality and respectful care.

Emotional needs

In addition to physical symptoms, people who are at a palliative stage often experience emotional symptoms, such as anxiety, loneliness, depression and anger, which are all associated with grief.

Anxiety can include feelings of apprehension, fear and dread, which can lead to nausea, dizziness, shortness of breath and diarrhoea.

Loneliness is a ‘subjective, unwelcome feeling of lack or loss of companionship or emotional attachment with other people’2 . It is often experienced in conjunction with social isolation, if the person has little social contact or others have withdrawn from them. Some people may feel alone even when in the company of others.

Depression may result in a loss of pleasure or interest in things around them. Depressed people may feel hopeless or helpless and become isolated from those around them.

Anger can affect the way people talk, act and accept their treatment and it is a common reaction to a life-threatening illness.

The following are some communication strategies we can use to help older people and their families in palliative care who are experiencing emotional symptoms:

  • Listen to their concerns, regardless of how we perceive the situation.
  • Acknowledge their emotion: “I can see you are very upset/angry”.
  • Invite them to tell their story: “Can you tell me what’s bothering you?” and listen out for goals we may be able to address.
  • Reframe emotions or situations from ‘negative or difficult’ to an opportunity or catalyst to further explore a situation.
  • Align our body language with the intention to listen, nod, make eye contact, don’t cross our arms, etc.
  • Avoid interruption
  • Use skills such as empathy, reflection and validation to negotiate a realistic goal – sometimes it can be as simple as saying we will ask the doctor to give them a call.
    • Empathy: “ It sounds like what you are going through is really upsetting and difficult”
    • Reflection: “So I hear you saying you are very concerned that…?”
    • Validation: “It’s understandable that you feel angry about …
    • Negotiate: “It’s afterhours now, but what I can do is…?"

These strategies may not solve the issue every time and we may need to call on support from experienced and senior clinicians, but often just listening to the person’s concerns, displaying empathy and validation can diffuse a situation and provide the person with some sense of control in a situation that can be very disempowering.

Cultural and spiritual needs

Cultural safety is providing an environment that is respectful of an individual’s culture and beliefs. Spiritual care may become more important to people when they are in a palliative state, and their spiritual needs may include finalising things they have set out to do and ‘making peace’ with others or they may be religious or spiritual beliefs.

It is important to be aware of any religious or spiritual beliefs or rituals a person may have during their palliative care and after death.

Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander (Aboriginal) people can have different and unique languages, customs, beliefs, healing practices and cultural practices depending on what community they are from. For many Aboriginal people, the topic of death and dying is a very sensitive area. However, you cannot generalise across all Aboriginal communities in relation to spiritual values and beliefs.

It is important that you find out from the older Aboriginal person their cultural and spiritual values and preferences in relation to:

  • Place of death
  • Who should be there
  • What care is needed when they have died, such as disposal of the body and associated rituals.

For some Aboriginal people, these cultural and spiritual needs may be more important than meeting physical needs, such as pain relief.

It is also important to consider the Aboriginal person’s family and community. An Aboriginal Health Worker or Liaison Officer may help Aboriginal people and their family and carers feel more comfortable and at ease with their care.

Some factors that we need to consider when an Aboriginal person is receiving palliative care in hospital include:

  • Involving the family in providing direct care in the hospital environment
  • The size of the rooms due to the large number of visitors
  • Accommodation for the family
  • Access to external spaces
  • Type of food provided, with Aboriginal person requesting traditional or ‘bush tucker’
  • Environment of the hospital being considered too sterile and alienating; Aboriginal art and artefacts may help make it more welcoming
  • Accommodating special ceremonies.3

There may be certain cultural practices that need to be followed after the death of an Aboriginal person.

Culturally and Linguistically Diverse (CALD)

To provide culturally appropriate palliative care to older people, we need to understand the meaning of death and dying from the person’s cultural perspective. As we can’t know all cultural beliefs and practices in relation to palliative care, death and dying, we should ask the older person and their family what is important to them.

If the older person is unable to communicate clearly in English, use a translator and provide written information about services or treatment in the person’s preferred language.

Be aware that not all people from the same country speak the same language, for example, people from China may speak Cantonese or Mandarin. First determine the person’s spoken and written language.

A person’s customs and values may be based on the country they are from or their religion. People from one country may have different religions.

Customs or values that people may have that are important in relation to palliative care may include:

  • Importance of the family
  • Discussing private issues with health professionals or non-family members
  • The amount of information they want about their diagnosis and prognosis
  • Whether it is appropriate to communicate with the family about diagnosis and prognosis
  • Importance of food or refreshments
  • Feelings about hospitals
  • Attitudes to pain management
  • Certain medical practices that they want withheld
  • End-of-life rituals, for example, last rites, visits from friends and family, patient giving away belongings
  • Post-death rituals, for example, what needs to happen to the body in preparation for burial
  • Post-death procedures, for example, autopsy or organ donation.

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, intersex, queer/questioning, asexual (LGBTIQA+) people

When a person is nearing the end of their life, it is important that the people they choose are included and recognised in their healthcare.

When grieving, it is important that a bereaved same sex partner is provided with the same support as a bereaved heterosexual partner is given.

All people should be provided with the opportunity to express and live as their chosen gender identity during palliative care.

Supporting family and friends

Watching a loved one go through palliative care can be a difficult time, and it is important to support family and friends both during the palliative care stage as well as afterwards. We can help family, carers and friends cope by informing and educating them about:

  • What they can do as a carer to help the older person
  • The diagnosis and prognosis of the illness
  • The cause of the illness
  • Symptoms and how to manage them
  • Treatment options and side effects
  • What to do at the end of life.
  • What to expect after their loved one has died
  • The experience of grief, isolation and loneliness
  • Where to seek support.
    1. Online learning – Palliative care: Getting started, 2015, Centre for Palliative Care.
    2. Commissioner for Senior Victorians. Ageing is everyone’s business: a report on isolation and loneliness among senior Victorians, 2016, State of Victoria: Melbourne.
    3. Department of Health, Providing culturally appropriate palliative care to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples: Resource kit, 2014, Australian Government.

Pressure injuries and skin tears

Pressure injuries and skin tears are the most common wounds that affect older people as a result of being in hospital.

As we age, our skin can experience changes that make it more vulnerable to damage.

Older people, especially those who are frail, are at significant risk of developing pressure injuries and skin tears.

Hospital acquired pressure injuries and skin tears are considered an adverse event. Most pressure injuries and skin tears can be prevented by following simple steps such as maintaining good nutrition and hydration, regular but careful mobilisation, good skin hygiene and a good moisturising regime.

This topic defines pressure injuries and skin tears and their impacts; describes methods of screening and assessment for risk; and recommends interventions to prevent and manage pressure injuries and skin tears. In addition to following health service policy and procedures, consider the following actions and discuss them with colleagues and managers.

Definitions

A pressure injury is ‘a localised injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, shear and/or friction, or a combination of these factors’.1 Pressure injuries can also be called pressure ulcers or bed sores.

As pressure injuries usually occur over bony prominences, such as the sacrum or base of the spine, heels and hips, they are often not visible.

The severity of pressure injuries can be classified using a staging system. Management and treatment of pressure injuries depends on the stage.

A skin tear is ‘a wound caused by shear, friction and/or blunt force resulting in separation of skin layers’.2

Skin tear severity can be classified according to the Skin Tear Audit classification system. Management and treatment of skin tears depends on its classification.

Impacts

Hospital acquired pressure injuries and skin tears are considered an adverse event and can have a profound physical, social and psychological impact on the lives of older people.

This is going to affect her mobility, and emotionally this is going to make her shattered.
- Family member, Western Health

Older people who experience pressure injuries and skin tears while in hospital are at increased risk of:

  • morbidity and mortality
  • pain
  • reduced mobility and loss of independence; which increases the risk of developing pressure injuries
  • longer hospital stay
  • reduced quality of life
  • anxiety and worry
  • reduced social contact and increased social isolation.
  • loneliness.

Skin and ageing

We should screen all patients over 65 years of age for pressure injury and skin tear risk as soon as possible after admission to hospital (within 8 hours) and following any change in health status.

Older people are at risk of skin damage, as changes that can occur to skin as it ages can affect its integrity, making it more vulnerable to damage, and to the development of a pressure injury or skin tears3. In addition, older people in hospital are likely to spend more than 23 hours per day either in bed or sitting4.

As skin ages it:

  • becomes thinner and less elastic
  • loses moisture and can become dry and more vulnerable to splitting and cracking
  • develops folds and wrinkles
  • loses its cushioning layer of subcutaneous fat
  • has decreased sensory perception and is less likely to be able to detect temperature changes or pain
  • has decreased temperature control and therefore an older person is less able to regulate their body temperature
  • is more easily injured (prone to tearing and bruising)
  • is slower to heal5,6,7.

Pressure injuries and skin tears and discharge planning

We can help patients make a smooth transition from the hospital to their home or residential aged care facility through comprehensive and clear discharge planning and communication.

If a patient is ready to go home with a continued need for wound dressings, talk to the patient and their family and carers about the type of dressing regime that will work for them.

Involve appropriate support services, such as home nursing, and communicate the person-centred care plan to ongoing care providers.

Having a wound increases the risk of a person becoming socially isolated and experiencing loneliness. Find out what social support the person has, and include their engagement with formal or informal supports as part of their discharge plan.

Provide a discharge summary, including the wound management plan, to the patient’s GP. Ensure the patient and their family and carer also receive a copy of the discharge summary and wound management plan.

Make referrals to allied health specialists or other services as appropriate:

  • wound specialist or clinic if wound advice is required
  • dietitian if malnutrition or dehydration is suspected
  • podiatrist if foot care or footwear advice is needed
  • physiotherapist if balance or mobility advice is needed
  • speech pathologist if there are swallowing problems
  • occupational therapist if patient requires specialised equipment at home.

Consider if the person needs personal care, help with other tasks of daily living or appropriate wound dressing, and refer to appropriate services.

Local services such as the council, neighbourhood house or library can link the person to local social activities.

    1. Australian Wound Management Association, Pan pacific clinical practice guideline for the prevention and management of pressure injury, 2012: Cambridge Media Osborne Park, WA.
    2. LeBlanc, K. and S. Baranoski, Skin tears: state of the science - consensus statements for the prevention, prediction, assessment, and treatment of skin tears(c). Advances in Skin and Wound Care, 2011. 24(9 Suppl): pp. 2-15.
    3. Best Practice Statement, Care of the Older Person's Skin, 2012, Wounds UK: London.
    4. Brown, C.J., et al., The underrecognized epidemic of low mobility during hospitalization of older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc, 2009. 57(9): p. 1660-5.
    5. MacNeal, R., Effects of aging on the skin, in The Merck manual home health handbook for patients and caregivers, R. Porter, Editor 2006.
    6. Carville, K., Wound care manual. 5th edition ed2005, Osborne Park: Silver Chain Foundation.
    7. Edwards, H., et al., Champions for Skin Integrity: CSI Guide and Resource Pack, 2013, Brisbane University of Technology.

Classifying and responding to pressure injuries and skin tears

Effective management and treatment of pressure injuries and skin tears depends on their stage or classification.

Pressure injuries and skin tears can be classified using a staging system. This staging system provides a consistent method of assessing, documenting and communicating the extent of the injury.

Effective management and treatment of pressure injuries and skin tears depends on their stage or classification.

Classifying pressure injuries

For pressure injuries, examine the:

  • location, size and depth of pressure injury
  • appearance of wound bed
  • condition of wound edges and surrounding skin
  • odour, amount and types of exudate
  • level of pain and discomfort1.

Pressure injuries can be classified using a staging system:

  • Stage 1 – non-blanchable erythema
  • Stage 2 – partial thickness skin loss
  • Stage 3 – full thickness skin loss
  • Stage 4 – full thickness tissue loss
  • Unstageable – depth unknown
  • Suspected deep tissue injury – depth unknown2.

Use a validated pressure injury healing assessment scale to evaluate the healing progress of the pressure injury:

  • Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing (PUSH)
  • Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool (BWAT)
  • Sessing Scale3.

Classifying skin tears

For skin tears, examine the:

  • location and duration of skin tear
  • size and depth
  • wound bed characteristics and percentage of viable and non-viable tissue
  • type and amount of exudate
  • presence of bleeding or haematoma
  • degree of flap necrosis
  • integrity of surrounding skin
  • signs and symptoms of infection
  • associated pain4.

Skin tears can be classified according to the Skin Tear Audit Research (STAR) classification system:

  • Category 1a – a skin tear where the edges can be realigned to the normal anatomical position (without undue stretching) and the skin or flap colour is not pale, dusky or darkened
  • Category 1b – a skin tear where the edges can be realigned to the normal anatomical position (without undue stretching) and the skin or flap colour is pale, dusky or darkened
  • Category 2a – a skin tear where the edges cannot be realigned to the normal anatomical position and the skin or flap colour is not pale, dusky or darkened
  • Category 2b – a skin tear where the edges cannot be realigned to the normal anatomical position and the skin or flap colour is pale, dusky or darkened
  • Category 3 – a skin tear where the skin flap is completely absent

If a patient has a pressure injury or skin tear, consider whether you should refer the patient to a wound specialist.

Responding to pressure injuries and skin tears

Pressure injuries and skin tears are considered an adverse event, and if they occur we need to manage them. This means being aware of the factors that can promote and prevent healing and taking steps to manage and address injuries and tears. There are several things we can do to promote injury and wound healing and prevention in hospital.

Develop a management plan

A combination of physical, social and environmental factors can have a major impact on a person’s ability to heal from a wound. When developing a management plan for someone with a pressure injury or skin tear, we need to consider and ask the following:

How long have they had the skin problem for? Is this the first episode or have there been episodes of recurrence?

What caused the skin problem? For example:

  • Was a skin tear due to being knocked on an environmental hazard at home?
  • Was a pressure injury due to their mattress prior to coming to hospital?
  • Do they have a diabetes-related foot ulcer because they have suboptimal glycaemic levels for long periods?

Are the dressings and skin care products acceptable to the patient?

  • Will the availability of the dressings and skin care products while in hospital and after discharge affect the patient’s ability to manage the care plan?
  • Will the cost of the dressings and skin care products affect the patient’s ability to manage the care plan?

Who will care for the skin problem, particularly after discharge?

  • Does the patient or family and carer understand what they need to do and what others will do?
  • Will the patient or family and carer be able to remember what they need to do and what others will do?
  • Does the patient have adequate social support and contact to provide emotional support and help with skin care if needed?
  • Have they been provided with precise written instructions, including measurements if appropriate?
  • Will they be able to change the dressings and apply the skin care products themselves?
  • How often will the dressing need to be changed?
  • How often will the skin care products need to be changed?

What is the goal for the skin problem?

  • Can it heal, or is that not possible? If it is not possible, what will that mean for the patient?
  • Does discharge from the skin problem need to be contained and odours managed to improve the person’s comfort level?

Dress wounds

When choosing an appropriate wound dressing, we should consider:

  • cause (aetiology) of the wound
  • type of wound
  • characteristics of the wound
    • location
    • extent of tissue damage
    • size
    • phase of healing
    • pain
    • odour
    • infection
  • cost and availability of dressing
  • comfort to the patient, especially overnight
  • patient preference
  • pain management.1

Manage pain

When someone tells you that their foot is hurting, take a bit of notice.
- Patient who experienced a hospital acquired pressure injury

Pain can indicate that the patient has a skin problem.

Assess for the presence of pain in people who have a pressure injury or skin tear:

  • Use a validated pain assessment tool2.
  • Develop an individualised pain management plan in partnership with the patient, family and carer and interdisciplinary healthcare team.

Ask the following questions to help develop a pain management plan and monitor wound healing:

  • What makes the pain better or worse?
  • What kind or pain are you experiencing?
  • Would you describe it as sore, aching, deep, cramping, burning, shooting or sensitive?
  • Where is the pain?
  • Does it radiate? If so, where to?
  • Would you describe your pain as none, mild, moderate, severe or excruciating?
  • How would you rate the pain on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being no pain and 10 being worst pain possible?
  • What is the pain intensity at its worst, best and now?
  • Is the pain better or worse at any particular time of the day or night?
  • When does the pain start and stop?
  • Is it intermittent or constant? Or does it only occur when you are moving?

Manage nutrition

Optimise good nutrition and hydration, to reduce risk and optimsie healing, for under-nourished people who do not have sufficient nutrients available to maintain and repair tissues3.

Nutritional interventions, such as vitamin or protein supplements, could be implemented to assist healing of pressure injuries and skin tears if the individual’s diet is deficient. Consider referral to a dietitian.

Support wellbeing

Although the most important concern in relation to the management of skin tears and pressure injuries is healing the actual wound, it is also important to consider the overall wellbeing of the person and how this may impact on the management and healing process.

A wound can have a big impact on a person’s life, and if not treated or managed properly can affect their wellbeing, including their physical, mental, social, spiritual and cultural wellbeing.

Having a wound is often associated with increased anxiety and depression and poor quality of life. Anxiety and depression are also associated with delayed wound healing.

Having a wound can contribute to social isolation and loneliness. Encourage the person to engage with others and return to previous activities wherever possible, and to seek support.

Document interventions and outcomes

Health professionals are required by law to have written evidence of all communication, assessments and outcomes or interventions. This documentation aims to facilitate communication between healthcare staff, patients and family and carers both within and across healthcare settings.

The following information, including date and time completed, should be documented in the patient’s clinical record or notes:

  • risk status
  • skin assessment
  • interventions to prevent skin damage
  • interventions to manage pressure injuries or skin tears
  • evaluation of the interventions.

Involve and inform the patient, their family and carers

Evidence shows that when patients are involved in their care, their outcomes improve.

We can include the patient in all treatment and management options following pressure injuries, skin tears or any other wounds.

We can educate patients, their family and carers about maintaining healthy skin and reducing the risk of pressure injuries and skin tears by:

  • providing relevant, easy to understand information
  • offering information in languages other than English if necessary
  • checking the person’s understanding of the information you have provided
  • asking the patient and their family and carers to assist with the prevention strategies
  • displaying pressure injury and skin tear prevention posters in ward areas commonly used by patients, their family and carers4.

Patient information should include, but not be limited to:

  • risk factors for developing pressure injuries and skin tears, and what can be done to reduce those risks
  • how to inspect skin and recognise skin changes and be aware of body sites that are at greatest risk of damage
  • how to care for skin, including correct hygiene and moisturising procedures
  • use of support surfaces and protective devices
  • methods for pressure redistribution including movement and positioning
  • treatment schedule and what they need to do
  • who and when to ask for further advice or assistance5.

There are many things a patient can do to maintain their own skin integrity both in hospital and at home. These include:

  • using only unscented, soap free, pH balanced body wash
  • performing a daily skin inspection to pick up any problems
  • discussing skin problems with their GP or other health professional
  • using the right moisturiser type twice a day to protect dry skin
  • using skin tear protection strategies, such as taking care when moving (either by self or with the help of a carer), using padding on furniture edges, and removing unnecessary furniture or equipment to reduce clutter
  • moving regularly by following a pressure relieving regime to avoid pressure on an area for a long time
  • using pressure relieving equipment
  • maintaining appropriate and adequate nutrition and hydration
  • maintaining good balance and mobility
  • avoiding falls.

Identifying and preventing skin problems

Most pressure injuries and skin tears can be prevented by following simple steps such as maintaining good nutrition and hydration

Digital photography is a useful tool for monitoring pressure injuries and skin tears, providing visual enhancement to written assessment and management of these wounds.

Risk screening and risk assessment of skin integrity generally refer to the same process, which is used to identify patients who are at risk of developing skin problems or who have skin problems. The results of screening or assessment are used to inform the implementation of prevention and management strategies.1

As clinicians, we need to be alert to risk factors, use a recommended risk screening tool and complete a head to toe physical examination of the patient’s skin.

Identifying skin problems

Risk factors

The following are risk factors for older people developing skin problems. We must be aware that these risk factors may be unrelated to the primary reason for the person being admitted to hospital.

  • Ageing
    • The changes that can occur to skin as it ages can affect its integrity, making it more vulnerable to damage and at a higher risk of developing pressure injuries and skin tears.
    • Changes to the skin include its mechanical properties, geometry, physiology and repair, and transport and thermal properties.
  • Previous pressure injuries or skin tears
  • Poor nutrition
    • Poor nutrition can result in the patient missing important nutrients and vitamins required to maintain healthy skin and assist with wound healing.
    • People who are malnourished can be both underweight or overweight, which can increase the risk of skin damage, especially pressure injuries.
  • Dehydration
    • Dehydration can cause a person’s skin to be less elastic, more fragile and more likely to break down.
  • Swallowing or dental problems
    • Swallowing or dental problems can result in poor nutrition.
  • Balance or mobility problems
    • Balance or mobility problems may cause patients to fall or knock themselves against furniture, which can cause skin tears.
    • All patients who are restricted to bed or chair rest are considered to be at risk of developing a pressure injury.2
  • Skin moisture
    • Faecal and urinary incontinence can result in excess moisture on the skin, which can cause skin problems.
    • Urine on the floor can be a hazard and can cause a slip, resulting in skin damage.
    • Elevated body temperature and perspiration can increase the risk of pressure injury development.
  • Cognitively impaired
    • Patients who are cognitively impaired may be unable to:
      • regularly reposition themselves
      • knock themselves on furniture and cause skin tears
      • care for their skin
      • verbally communicate that they are experiencing pain related to a pressure injury or tear.
  • Certain medications
    • These medications can cause cutaneous or inflammatory interactions and reactions:
      • antibacterials
      • antihypertensives
      • analgesics
      • tricyclic antidepressants
      • antihistamines
      • antineoplastic drugs
      • antipsychotic drugs
      • diuretics
      • oral diabetes agents
      • nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
      • steroids.
  • Dexterity problems
    • Having difficulties washing or drying any part of their skin (for example, contractures, folds beneath abdominal aprons or hard to reach areas between toes).
  • Certain medical conditions
    • Hypotension (low blood pressure)
    • Sensory perception disorders
    • Blood circulation (for example, diabetes)
    • Quality of circulating blood (for example, anaemia)
  • Radiation therapy.

Explain the risk factors and the risk of developing a pressure injury or skin tear to the patient and their family and carer so they can play a role in preventing problems.

Screening and assessment tools

Best practice guidelines recommend conducting a structured risk screening or assessment process for all older people as soon as possible after admission (within 8 hours) and as often as required by the individual’s condition or if there is a significant change in their condition2.

If the older person has existing pressure injuries or skin tears upon admission to hospital, it is important to classify them and treat and manage them appropriately.

Use an organisational-wide agreed pressure injury risk screening and assessment tool for all people aged 65 and over3.

The most commonly used and recommended pressure injury risk assessment tools for adults are:

  • Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk (Braden Scale)4
  • Norton Scale5
  • Waterlow Scale6.

For skin tears use:

  • Skin Tear Risk Toolkit

Once you have identified that an older person is at risk of developing a pressure injury or skin tear complete a nutritional screen and assessment7.

Physical examination

A comprehensive head to toe examination of the older person’s skin will help us identify existing damage to the skin, pressure injuries or skin tears and evaluate any changes to the skin2. The skin examination should be done as soon as possible after admission (within 8 hours) and as often as required by the individual’s condition or if there is a significant change in their condition2, 3.

During the skin examination, we should make sure that:

  • the room is quiet, private and has a stable temperature
  • there is adequate lighting to see the skin colour properly
  • fingernails are trimmed and jewellery minimised (so we don’t hurt the patient)
  • we inspect all areas of the skin, especially those not usually exposed, such as the buttocks, armpits, back of thighs and feet, and pay attention to bony prominences such as the sacrum, heels and ankles, elbows, shoulders and ears
  • we note other areas on the body subject to pressure from equipment such as nasogastric tubes, oxygen masks and bed rails
  • we include the patient and inform them about what we are doing. Often the patient can give us useful information about what they are feeling.

“It is quite difficult if you are in bed, how can you look at your bottom for instance, and that is where you most likely to get pressure areas. It’s not easy to do that. You just sort of feel that it is not right. It feels tender.” (older patient)

Ask the patient, their family or carer about:

  • past medical history, such as diabetes, peripheral vascular disease or continence problems that may affect skin quality or healing
  • current medications that treat skin problems or that may have an affect on the skin condition, such as steroids
  • previous skin problems
  • recent changes to the skin
  • any areas of pain or discomfort
  • skin care routine – including the products they use, such as soap and creams
  • psychological wellbeing – is the patient under any particular stresses at present?

This will help us determine the cause of any skin problems and assist in treating and managing them.

Look and assess:

  • signs of dry skin, oedema, variations in skin colour, bruising, inflammation, scratch marks, jaundice, swelling, breaks, ulcers, lesions or rashes
  • pressure areas for signs of potential breakdown
  • general skin quality of the whole body.

Touch, feel and assess:

  • texture – is it smooth or course?
  • moisture – is it dry?
  • turgor (swelling) – is the skin layer firm and resistant to being pinched? Does it ‘tent’ or stay in condition when being pinched? Tenting can be an indicator or dehydration or malnutrition
  • temperature – is the skin hot or cold and are there variations around the body? A hot area could indicate inflammation; a cold area could indicate decreased arterial blood supply and vascular changes
  • reddened areas – differentiate whether the skin is blanchable or not. Non-blanchable erythema means there is structural damage to the skin and indicates a stage 1 pressure injury. To assess, apply light pressure with your finger over the erythema for three seconds. If the area remains the same colour as before the pressure was applied, this is non-blanchable.

Smell and assess:

  • if the patient is able to wash
  • the condition of flexures (skin folds)
  • if the patient has incontinence8,9.

Document the results

Document the results of all risk screening or assessment, including the skin assessment, in the patient’s clinical records or notes2. Use these results to develop a prevention or management plan.

Preventing skin problems

Most pressure injuries and skin tears can be prevented by following simple steps such as maintaining good nutrition and hydration, regular but careful mobilisation, good skin hygiene and a good moisturising regime.

  • We can use the results of the risk screen or assessment to develop and implement a prevention plan3. We should then monitor the plan.

    The following prevention strategies may be included in a plan to reduce the risk of skin damage.

  • Being immobile or staying in one position for a length of time can increase our risk of developing pressure injuries.

    • To relieve pressure, patients should change position regularly, whether they are in a bed or a chair. If the patient is unable to reposition themselves, they are at high risk and need repositioning every two hours.
    • For patients in bed, a 30 degree tilt to either side is enough to reduce pressure. We can use ‘side to side’ nursing, which involves alternating the patient’s position from one side, to their back, and then to the other side.
    • The frequency of repositioning depends on the following factors:
      • risk of developing a pressure injury and skin condition
      • tissue tolerance
      • level of activity and mobility
      • general medical condition
      • overall treatment objectives
      • support surface used
      • comfort1,2.
    • Encourage patients to change their position as often as necessary to reduce the risk of developing pressure injuries.
    • Use transfer assistance devices to promote independent transferring.
  • The environment can increase a person’s risk of injuring their skin.

    • Keep the environment free of clutter, well-lit, well signed and easy to navigate. This will help avoid a collision with environmental hazards such as bed rails, lifting machines parts and wheelchair footplates.
    • Orient the person to the environment to minimise injury, confusion and disorientation.
    • Provide adequate lighting.
    • Provide patients with equipment to prevent damage to the skin, including:
      • protective mattresses or bed support surfaces
      • seat cushions and support surfaces
      • heel wedges or support - heel protection devices should elevate the heel completely and distribute the weight of the leg along the calf without placing undue pressure on the Achilles tendon.2,10

    “Disposable, single patient devices, such as positional foams, which are utilised within one area of the hospital could be part of the patient’s package of care and travel with them throughout the various departments of any care setting”11

    • Refer to an occupational therapist for specialised advice.
    • Note that sheepskins and water filled gloves are not considered pressure relieving devices.
  • Encourage the patient to wear protective clothing to reduce the risk of skin tears, such as:

    • long sleeves
    • long trousers
    • knee-high socks
    • shin and elbow guard pads
    • appropriate footwear.
  • Good nutrition plays a key role in maintaining good skin. Under-nourished and dehydrated people do not have sufficient nutrients available to maintain good skin health7.

    Use a valid and reliable nutrition screening tool to determine the nutritional status of patients at risk of or with a pressure injury3.

  • Exposure to urine and faeces is one of the most common causes of skin breakdown and makes the skin more susceptible to injury.

    • If required, develop and implement an individualised continence management plan in partnership with the patient, their family and carer and interdisciplinary healthcare team as appropriate3. This is particularly important to keep the patient’s skin dry overnight without disturbing them.
    • Refer to a continence specialist if necessary.
    • If a patient perspires a lot, they may benefit from more frequent skin washing, especially in skin folds.
    • Regularly change a patient’s clothes and bed linen if they become moist. Cotton sheets are best as moisture can evaporate more quickly.
    • Avoid using plastic or rubber chair or mattress protectors. These are more likely to make patients sweat.
  • As the skin ages it can become very fragile.

    • Use warm water instead of hot water when washing.
    • Use soap alternatives to reduce the drying effects of soap, for example, emollient soap substitute or skin cleanser.
    • Dry the skin thoroughly but gently, using light patting. Do not rub the skin as this may lead to further damage.
    • Apply pH neutral moisturiser at least twice daily. Application should follow the direction of the body hair and be gently smoothed into the skin. Evidence shows that the twice-daily application of moisturiser morning and night can reduce skin tears by almost 50 per cent. Moisturisers come in a lotion, cream and ointment. Assess which moisturiser is appropriate for a patient’s skin type.
    • Keep frail skin on limbs moisturised and covered for protection.
    • Keep the patient’s fingernails and toenails suitably trimmed.
    • Use non-adherent and non-adhesive dressings.
  • Older people should be encouraged to mobilise regularly during their hospital stay to minimise the risk of functional decline. However, we need to be aware that using mobility aids can increase a patient’s risk of skin damage through wheelchair injuries, falls, transfers or blunt trauma from bumping into objects.

    • Conduct a falls risk assessment and if necessary implement a falls prevention program.
    • Use padding on mobility aids to reduce the risk of injury.
    • Refer to a physiotherapist if there appears to be balance and mobility problems.
  • Certain medications can affect a patient’s skin.

    • The following medications can cause various types of cutaneous or inflammatory interactions/reactions:
      • antibacterials
      • antihypertensives
      • analgesics
      • tricyclic antidepressants
      • antihistamines
      • antineoplastic drugs
      • antipsychotic drugs
      • diuretics
      • oral diabetes agents
      • nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
      • steroids
    • Refer to a doctor or pharmacist for a review of medications if there is concern that the patients’ medications are affecting their skin.
  • Document prevention strategies in the patient’s clinical notes and communicate these strategies during clinical handover and on transfer or discharge.

  • Monitor and evaluate the prevention plan and strategies for their effectiveness. Modify the strategies and interventions, in consultation with the patient and treating team as necessary.

    1. Department of Health, Preventing and Managing Pressure Injuries, 2014, Sector Performance, Quality and Rural Health, Victorian Government, Department of Health.
    2. National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel, European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel, and Pan Pacific Pressure Injury Alliance, Prevention and Treatment of Pressure Ulcers: Quick Reference Guide, 2014: Perth, Australia.
    3. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Healthcare (ACSQHC), National Safety and Quality Health Service Standards, 2011, ACSQHC: Sydney.
    4. Bergstrom, N., et al., The Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk. Nursing Research, 1987. 36(4): p. 205-10.
    5. Norton, D., R. McLaren, and A. Exton-Smith, An investigation of geriatric nursing problems in hospital, 1962, National Corporation for the Care of Old People (now Centre for Policy for Ageing): London.
    6. Waterlow, J., Pressure sores: a risk assessment card. Nursing Times, 1985. 81(48): p. 49-55.
    7. Acton, C., The importance of nutrition in wound healing. Wounds UK, 2013. 9(3): p. 61-64.
    8. Cowdell, F., Promoting skin health in older people. Nurs Older People, 2010. 22(10): p. 21-6.
    9. Finch, M., Assessment of skin in older people. Nurs Older People, 2003. 15(2): p. 29-30
    10. Australian Wound Management Association, Pan Pacific Clinical Practice Guideline for the Prevention and Management of Pressure Injury, 2012: Cambridge Media Osborne Park, WA.
    11. Bateman, S.D., Pressure ulcer prevention in the seated patient: Adopting theatre practices to protect skin integrity. Wounds UK, 2013. 9(3): p. 71-75.

Supporting information for older people in hospital

Older people in hospital are at risk of experiencing functional decline.

This supporting information provides additional material and examples that reinforce the principles and strategies provided throughout Older people in hospital.

It includes:

  • a set of stories showcasing how individual health services have made improvements during the Improving Care For Older People initiative
  • an outline of initiatives taken by health services as part of the Improving Care For Older People Program
  • a set of fact sheets for clinicians outlining strategies to provide best care for older people in hospital
  • information on clinical handover, including a case study outlining best practice principles
  • resources to engage consumers in taking active steps to remain as well as possible when in hospital
  • information on guardianship and least restrictive practice.

Guardianship and least restrictive practice in Victoria

A guardian is a person legally appointed by the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (VCAT) to make specific lifestyle decisions for another person who, due to disability (including dementia), lacks decision-making capacity for a decision that needs to be made. In cases where there is no-one known to the person who is able and willing to take on this role, the Public Advocate may be appointed as the guardian of last resort. Before this occurs, VCAT must be satisfied that the needs of the person could not be met by other means less restrictive of the person’s freedom of decision and action.

This section was developed in collaboration between a range of expert clinicians from Victorian health services, and representatives from the Victorian Department of Health (DH VIC), the Office of the Public Advocate (OPA), VCAT and researchers from the National Ageing Research Institute (NARI). It explores the concept of least restrictive practice in the context of discharge planning for older people in hospital who have complex needs. It also outlines the importance of having supportive decision making in place for people who require support to make decisions, as well as the types of supportive and substitute decision makers in Victoria.

Discharge planning requires comprehensive assessment of each patient’s unique values, preferences, strengths and risks. This is particularly important when the treating team expects an older person’s care requirements will be quite substantial after discharge. In some cases the team may consider it is not possible or in the patient’s best interest to discharge them to the accommodation they were in prior to admission. This can be very distressing for the older person and their family, and they may disagree, especially in cases where (the team believes) a person’s cognitive impairment is impacting on their ability to understand the consequences of their decision. These situations can also be very challenging for staff involved in the person’s care, and it is essential that each staff member plays a key role in identifying, trialling and documenting least restrictive alternatives to the appointment of a guardian (if feasible).

This resource is intended as general guidance only. Give due consideration to whether or not the advice should be followed in each individual situation. It is not a substitute for individual health services seeking their own independent legal advice. In addition to following policy and procedures specific to your health service, it is important to familiarise yourself with the information outlined on the websites of OPA External Link and VCATExternal Link , consider the recommended actions and discuss them with colleagues and managers.


Application for guardianship

Application processes and the roles of the organisations involved

Before seeking appointment of a guardian of last resort for an older person in hospital, you should explore all least restrictive options. This is in the best interests of the patient, and it is a legal requirement. The Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (VCAT) will need to be satisfied that the treating team has worked with the older person and their family and carers to rule out least restrictive alternatives.

If you are satisfied that seeking guardianship is the most appropriate option, familiarise yourself with the roles of each organisation and the terminology used, to ensure you approach the formal application process in the best possible way. This page provides information about who is involved in the process when applying on behalf of an older person in hospital. You should also follow your health service’s policies and procedures, and consult the Office of the Public Advocate (OPA) website, the VCAT website and the OPA advice service for guidance on the process.

The following table outlines a list of common terms and their meanings.

TermMeaning in this context
Proposed represented personOlder person who needs a guardian.
ApplicantPerson who submits the guardianship application (you or your health service).
Registry VCAT Guardianship ListReceives and processes applications; appoints hearing time, place and person to decide it.
VCAT memberPerson who hears the case and makes the decision.
Office of the Public AdvocateOrganisation that provides guardians of last resort. Also provides advice and sometimes investigates before an application is heard by VCAT.
Advocate guardianAn employee of the OPA to whom the Public Advocate delegates their powers and duties in the guardianship order, when appointed as guardian by VCAT.

Who is involved in the application process

Proposed represented person

This term is used by VCAT to describe the older person for whom you are making the application.

Making an application has the potential to remove an older person’s rights to exercise decisions about their life and can be extremely stressful for them, their family and carers. We all play a role in providing support and empathy throughout this process.

Applicant

In many Victorian hospitals, social workers coordinate and complete the application forms for guardianship. However, they can be completed by any clinician who knows the proposed represented person. Whoever completes the application becomes known by VCAT as the applicant. The applicant must explain the process to the older person and their family or carers and keep them informed throughout the process.

The applicant can complete and lodge the application form online, or download it from the VCAT website. It can be lodged by email, in person or by post. Some hospitals in Victoria have an internal system for lodging applications. The applicant is expected to attend the hearing, or delegate the task to a colleague who can adequately speak to the person’s situation.

As the applicant, if you believe that the matter should be heard urgently, seek advice from the OPA advice service. If the risk is unmanageable you may have to apply for a temporary order; speak to the advice service about this.

By law, the applicant must provide a copy of the application to the older person and any other interested parties. Interested parties can include the person’s family and carers.

The applicant must also supply VCAT with a medical report and any other supporting documents (such as a social work report or a neuropsychological report) prior to the hearing date. The medical report must indicate what disability the proposed represented person has, how this was diagnosed, if the person is incapable of making reasonable judgement and how this has been assessed. The application may also be supported by additional clinical reports from physiotherapists, occupational therapists, and speech therapists as required. These reports should provide a context for the application and outline all least restrictive options that have been proposed and trialled. Be mindful that any individual party to the proceedings may apply to VCAT for a copy of these reports. In some circumstances, especially where a professional is feeling threatened by a person, a report may be provided under the name of the hospital rather than an individual.

Registry VCAT Guardianship List

The VCAT Guardianship List receives applications for guardianship or administration, hears the matter and makes orders appointing a guardian or administrator for a person with a disability (who is 18 years of age or over) when there is a need and it is in that person's best interests to do so.

VCAT is like a court but less formal. The Tribunal members listen to the legal cases, facilitate the proceeding and decide whether an order for guardianship is required.

Applications must be heard within 30 days of VCAT receiving the application; the applicant can assist to streamline this process by ensuring all relevant contact details are included on the application form. VCAT will inform all interested parties that are listed on the application of the date and venue of the hearing.

VCAT member

A VCAT member will manage all aspects of the hearing and make a decision which could include appointing a guardian or requesting OPA investigate the matter before an appointment of a guardian can be determined.

VCAT hearing

Who attends the hearing

The applicant or their delegate must attend the hearing and bring copies of relevant evidence. The person about whom the application has been made should be encouraged to attend, particularly if the hearing is on-site at a hospital. Other interested parties listed on the application will be formally invited by VCAT and they may choose to bring support people. Other people who may attend include service providers known to the older person, such as case managers and solicitors. VCAT will organise an appropriately trained interpreter to be present if the applicant has indicated that an interpreter is required on the application form. Hearings are open to the public; however the VCAT member may ask observers to leave if the matter is sensitive. VCAT can also order that hearings be closed to the public, and the applicant can request that VCAT consider this option. It is illegal to publicise any information of a proceeding unless VCAT orders otherwise.

Where hearings are held

Some hospitals in Victoria hold regular guardianship and administration hearings on site. In special circumstances hearings can be held at the older person’s bedside. Hearings can also take place at VCAT in Melbourne and at various local courts throughout Victoria. The applicant can nominate the preferred venue for the hearing, and should take into account the urgency of the matter and whether there might be a need for security to be on-call throughout the hearing. Hearings may also be held with some or all parties attending by phone or video-conference.

What to expect at the hearing

The formality of the hearing can vary depending on the venue and the VCAT member. The VCAT member will generally ask all present to introduce themselves and they will explain the purpose of the hearing.

Sometimes the VCAT member may decide to adjourn the hearing if a particular person is not in attendance. They may also decide to refer the matter to OPA to investigate the issues and report back to them before the matter can be determined. The VCAT member may also adjourn a hearing part heard to enable OPA to gather new information or research issues which have arisen in the course of the hearing. Before deciding to appoint a guardian, the VCAT member must be satisfied that the proposed represented person:

  • has a disability that is affecting their ability to make an informed decision
  • that a decision needs to be made
  • that all least restrictive options have been explored.
If the VCAT member considers that it is necessary to appoint a guardian then the next consideration is who to appoint as guardian. If there is no person eligible to be appointed as guardian then the Public Advocate will be appointed as guardian of last resort.

The VCAT order may be generated at the time of the hearing or sent to OPA after the hearing. It will outline what types of decisions the guardian can make. An order can be 'limited' - which means it is limited to only certain aspects of a person’s lifestyle - or in rare cases it can be 'plenary', which means that the guardian can make any decisions that involve a person’s lifestyle. It will include the length of time the order is valid before it needs to be reassessed. Guardianship orders are usually reassessed at least annually. Consistent with promoting a person’s human rights, guardianship orders are nearly always limited - confined to current relevant areas requiring decisions.

Office of the Public Advocate

After VCAT has made an order for the appointment of the Public Advocate as guardian, the order will be sent to the intake and hospital team at OPA. Victorian public hospitals now have dedicated advocate guardians (OPA staff members) and generally the case will be allocated to them.

Depending on the person’s immediate needs and best interests, the intake and hospital team may make interim decisions about a person’s care. They may be able to consent to the older person’s transfer to the Transition Care Program, particularly if this transfer may be helpful in providing additional information to the guardian about the person’s suitability for discharge to their usual accommodation or to residential care.

The proposed represented person’s case will be waitlisted to be allocated to an advocate guardian (an OPA staff member). This can take about 20 days and it is important that you and your team continue to work with the older person to maximise their participation in care and independence. The guardian may not apply the treating team’s recommendation and the team must be prepared to facilitate all possible options.

To streamline this process the applicant should ensure that all information on the original application is up to date, including the contact details of the relevant clinicians. Convey any changes of contact details to the guardian once they have been appointed.
During this time you can also contact the intake team at OPA for advice about the information the advocate guardian will require once allocated. This will assist in streamlining the decision making process once the advocate guardian is appointed.

Advocate guardian

If VCAT has made an order that appoints the Public Advocate as a person’s guardian, the Public Advocate delegates their authority to an advocate guardian. Once allocated, the guardian will generally make contact with the represented person and the applicant to explain their role and responsibilities. If the person is an inpatient in a Victorian public hospital when the application is made, they will usually be allocated a dedicated hospital advocate guardian.

Guardians must work within the framework of the Guardianship and Administration Act 2019. The guardian must act in the best interests of the represented person, and this includes taking into account, as far as possible, the wishes of the represented person and acting as an advocate for the represented person and in such a way as to:
  • encourage the represented person to participate as much as possible in the life of the community
  • encourage and assist the represented person to become capable of caring for herself or himself and of making reasonable judgements about matters relating to her or his person
  • protect the represented person from neglect, abuse or exploitation.

A guardian must also exercise their powers in a way which is least restrictive of the person’s freedom of decision and action.

The OPA website provides detailed information on the role and responsibilities of guardians.

Guardians are not case managers, and when appointed they will rely on the treating team to source and implement least restrictive opportunities. It may take some time for the guardian to come to a decision for the older person in hospital, and as clinicians it is our role to support the older person and their family and carers throughout this process.

It is also essential that we document continued attempts to trial least restrictive alternatives and work with our team to ensure the person’s ability to participate in everyday physical and cognitive tasks is encouraged and assisted.

Making an application and supplying supporting information for the appointment of a guardian of last resort

The decision to lodge an application to VCAT for the appointment of a guardian of last resort should only be made if you and the treating team are satisfied that an older person has a disability that is impacting on their ability to make an informed decision, and when:

  • a decision needs to be made
  • there is a conflict about the nature of this decision
  • you have trialled all least restrictive alternatives.

The application process

In many Victorian hospitals social workers are the 'applicant' and coordinate the application process. This includes:

  • completing the application form and an accompanying report
  • seeking advice from the OPA Advice Service
  • discussing the decision to proceed with the application with the older person and their family and carers
  • requesting reports from the treating doctor and other relevant clinicians.

The application

Application forms can be completed and lodged on the VCAT website and downloaded as an alternative if required.

As the applicant, it is essential that you provide the correct contact details for yourself and any interested parties, to ensure that the hearing is listed within the specified 30-day period and that the appointed guardian contacts the relevant parties as soon as possible.

Medical report

Use the medical report form provided on the VCAT website to describe:

  • the reason for admission, medical history and current functioning, including
    • previous admissions to hospital
    • nature of the decision-making disability
    • how this is affecting the decision that needs to be made
  • the trajectory of the admission, treatment provided, the person's ability to participate in their care routing and the level of support they require
  • your recommendation.

Examples of the information required in the medical report is provided in Mrs Brown's case study.

Social work report

Each person’s situation will be unique. As the application form has minimal space to provide the VCAT member with the relevant context, you may need to provide a separate report to support the application.

There is no universal template to guide this process; however, it would be helpful for the VCAT member if you provided as much relevant background information as possible, including the following:

  • What is the reason for admission? Outline the person's medical history and current functioning, including
    • previous admissions to hospital
    • nature of the decision making disability.
  • What is the trajectory of the admission, treatment provided, the person's ability to participate in their care routine and the level of support they require?
  • What is the reason for lodging the application?
    • What decision needs to be made?
    • If the issue is long standing, describe the history and what attempts have been made to address the issue.
  • Describe the person's usual living arrangements.
    • Do they own their own home?
    • Are there any relevant cultural, language preferences and values?
    • Do they live by themselves or with others?
    • Who is in their family/support network and what is their opinion of the reason for the application?
    • Outline if the person has been receiving services.
    • Determine if the person has an advance care plan or an advance statement.
  • If there is conflict between parties, describe what attempts have been made to negotiate and mediate these issues. What are the risks?
    • Is there a risk of harm?
    • What level of supervision does the team believe the older person requires?
    • Can these risks be minimised with formal services or informal supports?
    • What least restrictive attempts have been made to mitigate the risks?
  • What has been done to optimise the person's functioning while they are in hospital?
    • Include physical therapy/retraining, education to the older person and their family/carers, psychological and emotional support that acknowledges and assists the older person and their family and carers with the process of adjustment.
    • Has an occupational therapy home visit occurred? Have assistive devices been considered and trialled?
  • Have you spoken to the OPA Advice Service? If so, document their advice.
  • What does the treating team recommend?
    • What will the appointment of a guardian achieve?
    • Specify what decisions the team believe need to be made. This can include accommodation, access to services, access to the proposed represented person and medical, dental and other healthcare treatments.
    • Why are you recommending that OPA be appointed as guardian of last resort?

An example of a social work report is provided in Mrs Brown's case study.

  • This is a fictitious case that has been designed for educative purposes.

    Social work report

    Mrs Beryl Brown URN102030
    20 Hume Road, Melbourne, 3000
    DOB: 01/11/33

    Date of application: 20 August 2019

    Social work report: Background

    Mrs Beryl Brown (01/11/33) is an 85 year old woman who was admitted to the Hume Hospital by ambulance after being found by her youngest daughter lying in front of her toilet. Her daughter estimates that she may have been on the ground overnight. On admission, Mrs Brown was diagnosed with a right sided stroke, which has left her with moderate weakness in her left arm and leg. A diagnosis of vascular dementia was also made, which is overlaid on a pre-existing diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease (2016). Please refer to the attached medical report for further details.

    Social work report: Social history

    I understand that Mrs Brown has been residing in her own home, a two-story terrace house in Melbourne, for almost 60 years. She has lived alone since her husband died two years ago following a cardiac arrest. She has two daughters. The youngest daughter Jean has lived with her for the past year, after she lost her job. The eldest daughter Catherine lives on the Gold Coast with her family. Mrs Brown is a retired school teacher and she and both daughters describe her as a very private woman who has never enjoyed having visitors in her home. Mrs Brown took much encouragement to accept cleaning and shopping assistance once a week after her most recent admission; however, she does not agree to increase service provision. Jean has Enduring Power of Attorney (EPOA) paperwork that indicates that Mrs Brown appointed her under an EPOA two years ago. She does not appear to have appointed a medical treatment decision maker or any other decision-supporter.

    I also understand from conversations with her daughters that Jean and Mrs Brown have always been very close and that there is a history of long-standing conflict between Catherine and Jean. This was exacerbated by the death of their father. Both daughters state they understand the impact of the stroke on their mother’s physical and cognitive functioning, but they do not agree on a discharge destination. Mrs Brown lacks insight into her care needs and says she will be fine once she gets back into her own home. Repeated attempts to discuss options with all parties in the same room have not resulted in a decision that is agreeable to all parties.

    Social work report: Current function

    Mrs Brown has a history of Alzheimer’s disease; type II diabetes – insulin dependent; hypertension; high cholesterol and osteoarthritis. She has had two recent admissions to hospital for a urinary tract infection and a fall in the context of low blood sugars. She is currently requiring one to two people to assist her into and out of bed and one person with managing tasks associated with post-toilet hygiene. She can walk slowly for short distances with a four-wheel frame with one person to supervise. She benefits from prompting to use her frame; she needs someone to cut her food and to set her up to eat and drink regularly and to manage her medication routine. She requires one person to assist her to manage her insulin twice daily.

    The team believe that Mrs Brown’s capacity for functional improvement has plateaued in the last ten days. They recommend that it is in her best interests to be discharged to a residential care setting due to her need for one to two people to provide assistance with the core tasks associated with daily living. Mrs Brown is adamant that she wants to return home to live with Jean who she states can look after her. Jean, who has a history of chronic back pain, has required several admissions to hospital over the past five years, and states she wants to be able to care for her mother at home. Jean states she is reluctant to agree to extra services as her mother would not want this. Her sister Catherine is concerned that Jean has not been coping and states that given this is the third admission to hospital in a period of few months, believes it is now time for her mother to enter residential care. Catherine states that she is very opposed to her mother being discharged home.

    Social work report: The current risks

    Mrs Brown is at high risk of experiencing falls. She has reduced awareness of the left side of her body and her ability to plan and process information has been affected by her stroke. She is now requiring one to two people to assist with all her tasks of daily living and she lacks insight into these deficits. Mrs Brown is also at risk of further significant functional decline which may exacerbate Jean’s back pain. Jean has stated she is very worried about where she will live if her mother is to enter residential care.

    Social work report: Attempts to trial least restrictive options

    We have convened two family meetings with Mrs Brown, both her daughters and several members of the multi-disciplinary team. The outcome of the first meeting saw all parties agree for the ward to provide personalised carer training to Jean with the aim of trialling a discharge home. During this training Jean reported significant pain when transferring her mother from the bed and stated she would prefer to leave her mother in bed until she was well enough to get out with less support.

    The team provided education to both Jean and Catherine about the progressive impact of their mother’s multiple conditions on her functioning. The occupational therapist completed a home visit and recommended that the downstairs shower be modified so that a commode can be placed in it safely and the existing dining room be converted into a bedroom for Mrs Brown. Mrs Brown stated she would not pay for these modifications and Jean stated she did not wish to go against her mother’s wishes. The team encouraged Mrs Brown to consider developing a back-up plan and explore residential care options close to her home so that Jean could visit often if the discharge home failed. Mrs Brown and Jean refused to consent to proceed with an Aged Care Assessment that would enable Catherine to waitlist her mother’s name at suitable aged care facilities. We proceeded with organising a trial overnight visit. Unfortunately, this visit was not successful as Jean and Catherine, who remained in Melbourne to provide assistance, found it very difficult to provide care without the use of an accessible bathroom. Mrs Brown remains adamant that she will remain at home. The team is continuing to work with the family to maximise Mrs Brown’s independence, but they believe that it is unlikely this will improve. I have spent time with Jean to explore her adjustment to the situation, and provided her with information on community support services and residential care services. I have provided her with information on the Transition Care Program which can assist families to work through all the logistics. I have provided her with more information on where she could access further counselling to explore her concerns. I have sought advice on the process and legislative requirements from the Office of the Public Advocate’s Advice Service. I discussed this process with the treating team and we decided that it was time to lodge an application for guardianship to VCAT.

    Social work report: Recommendation

    The treating team believe they have exhausted all least restrictive alternatives and that a guardianship order is required to make a decision on Mrs Brown’s discharge destination and access to services. The team recommend that the Public Advocate be appointed as Mrs Brown’s guardian of last resort. We believe that this is the most suitable arrangement as her daughters are not in agreement about what is in their mother’s best interests. We also believe that there is a potential conflict of interest as Jean has expressed significant concern that her mother’s relocation to residential care will have an impact on her own living arrangements.

    Medical report

    Mrs Beryl Brown URN102030
    20 Hume Road, Melbourne, 3000
    DOB: 01/11/33

    Medical report: Background information

    Mrs Brown’s medical history includes Alzheimer’s disease; type II diabetes; hypertension; high cholesterol and osteoarthritis. She was admitted to Hume Hospital on 3 March 2019 following a stroke that resulted in moderate left arm and leg weakness. This admission was the third hospital admission in the past year. Other admissions have been for a urinary tract infection, and a fall in the context hypoglycaemia (low blood sugars), both of which were complicated by episodes of delirium.

    She was transferred to the subacute site under my care, a week post her admission, for slow-stream rehabilitation, cognitive assessment and discharge planning.

    Mrs Brown was diagnosed with Alzheimer’s disease by Dr Joanne Winters, Geriatrician, in April 2016. At that time, Mrs Brown scored 21/30 on the Standardised Mini-Mental State Examination (SMMSE). During this admission, Mrs Brown scored 15/30. I have undertaken cognitive assessment and agree with the diagnosis; further cognitive decline has occurred in the context of the recent stroke. There are global cognitive deficits, but primarily affecting memory, attention and executive function (planning, problem solving, mental flexibility and abstract reasoning). The most recent CT-Brain scan shows generalised atrophy along with evidence of the new stroke affecting the right frontal lobe. My assessments suggest moderate to severe mixed Alzheimer’s and vascular dementia.

    While able to recall some key aspects of her financial affairs, including the general monetary value of her pension and regular expenses, Mrs Brown was unable to account for recent expenditure (for repairs to her home) or provide an estimate of its value, and had difficulty describing her investments. In addition, I consider that she would be unable to make complex financial decisions due to her level of cognitive impairment. Accordingly, I am of the view that Mrs Brown now lacks capacity to make financial decisions.

    Mrs Brown states that she previously made an Enduring Power of Attorney (EPOA) but could no longer recall aspects of the EPOA, such as when it would commence and the nature of the attorney’s powers. Moreover, she confused the EPOA with her will. Her understanding of these matters did not improve with education, and therefore I consider that she no longer has capacity to execute or revoke an EPOA.

    Medical report: General living circumstances

    Mrs Brown acknowledges that she needs some assistance but lacks insight into the type of assistance that she requires, apart from home help for cleaning and shopping. She does not appreciate her risk of falling. She is unable to get in and out of bed without at least one person assisting her. She frequently forgets to use her gait aid when mobilising and is not able to describe how she would seek help in the event of falling. She is not able to identify or describe how she would manage her blood sugar levels, and this has not improved with education. Accordingly, I consider that she lacks capacity to make decisions about accommodation arrangements and services.

    Mrs Brown does not agree with the treating team’s recommendation to move into residential care and maintains her preference to return home. This is in spite of a failed overnight trial at home with both her daughters assisting her. Unfortunately, she was unable to get out of bed to get to the toilet and required two people to assist her to do so in the morning. In light of these matters, and in the context of family disagreement regarding the matter, the team recommends that the Office of the Public Advocate be appointed as a guardian of last resort.


Least restrictive practice

It is essential to find out what matters to each of your patients and embed a model of least restrictive practice to try and resolve the concern more informally than making an application for guardianship.

Applying to the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (VCAT) for the appointment of the Public Advocate as the guardian of last resort on behalf of an older person in hospital is a serious decision. All public authorities, including public hospitals, need to be aware that the appointment of a guardian (or an administrator) is effectively a limitation of a person’s human rights.

The central purpose of the Guardianship and Administration Act 2019 is to protect and promote the human rights and dignity of people with a disability, and to support them to make, participate in and implement decisions that affect their lives. The Act also requires that any order made is the least restrictive of the person’s rights that is possible in the circumstances.

Thoroughly exploring the person's values, preferences and motivations, and identifying the unique strengths and risks of the person and their situation is therefore essential. This will help the older person, their family and carers, and the treating team to identify and work towards trialling least restrictive alternatives.

A ‘least restrictive model of care’ aims to enhance an older person’s autonomy and respects their rights, individual worth, dignity and privacy. Any limitations on the person must be the minimum necessary and must allow them to participate as much as possible in all decisions that affect them. Weighing up decisions regarding responsibilities and duty of care within this model can be challenging for professionals and families. Keeping the rights of the older person at the centre can help everyone involved in the process of care planning.

Person-centred practice

Maximise and encourage participation

Being in hospital can be an alienating and at times frightening experience for an older person, and their family and carers. They are removed from their familiar environment, routines and usual supports. People are at their most vulnerable, and it can be helpful to empathise with their situation so that you may build rapport and develop a care plan in partnership.

It is essential that you engage the older person and their family and carers, and ensure they have multiple opportunities to express their wishes and be involved in developing their care plan for discharge.

Establish the person’s goals and develop steps and timelines to achieve them. Revisit the goals with the person, their family and carers, and the treating team and readjust as necessary during the person’s admission. As a team ensure that you:

  • Consider the cultural and linguistic background of the older person and their family and use formal interpreters as appropriate.
  • Explain options in plain language and be mindful of using health and legal jargon.
  • Organise a family meeting and consider which health professionals need to be present at the meeting.
  • Locate a private meeting room in which to hold the meeting, to reduce distractions and promote the comfort of the older person and their family.
  • Assist the older person and the family to prepare for the meeting.
  • Explain the purpose and who will be present; invite them to bring an advocate/support person and explain the process.
  • Provide the older person with ample opportunity to be engaged in the discussion - remembering that discussions about care needs can be confronting, especially in front of multiple people.
  • Do not assume that the older person or their family understand health and legal language or the complexity of the process.
  • Check that the older person and their family and carers have understood what you have told them.
  • Clarify the patient's condition, what you expect the impact of the diagnosis on their function to be and what this might mean in terms of care needs once they leave the hospital.

Find out how the older person has usually made lifestyle decisions

Check if the older person has made formal arrangements and appointed a substitute decision maker or support person. Ask to sight and request copies of any relevant paperwork to help clarify the nature of these arrangements.

Find out as much as you can about the older person’s values and wishes. Seek consent to speak with people close to them, including other health and aged care professionals who may have been involved with the older person.

Many people rely on the informal support of a family member, a friend or carer to help make important decisions. In these cases, it remains imperative that you encourage the older person to consider their options and give them opportunities to express their wishes. If the older person would like you to involve a person to support them to make a decision, ensure you remain alert to the possibility of ‘undue influence’. Also check where possible that the informal support person agrees to the arrangement and whether it is appropriate for them to seek formal appointment as a supportive guardian and/or administrator.

Demonstrate empathy and aim to preserve the older person’s significant relationships

Applications for guardianship are often made in the context of conflict between the older person, their family and the treating team. This conflict is frequently about whether an older person requires residential care as opposed to returning to their usual home environment. It is important to note that disagreement can also occur within the treating team about preferred discharge options.1 To avoid an application and work towards developing least restrictive options:

  • Find out what matters to the older person. Actively listen to their concerns and empathise with their situation. The impending loss of independence in lifestyle choices can be very overwhelming and trigger anxiety and anticipatory grief and loss for them and their family.
  • Be mindful of preserving the relationship between the older person and the family member, especially if there is disagreement between the older person’s family member or carer and the treating team.
  • Be mindful of carer and family stress. An episode in hospital can be very difficult for a spouse, son, daughter or sibling. It can spark a significant shift in family dynamics and be accompanied by grief and loss.
  • Give people time to adjust to the team’s recommendation and provide them with the information on the options in a transparent way.
  • Acknowledge and mediate family conflictwhere possible.1 Consider engaging formal conflict resolution strategies to explore least restrictive options. The Dispute Settlement Centre of Victoria (DSCV) is a free dispute resolution service that can provide a professionally mediated family meeting to help resolve conflict and reach an agreed decision. This may not be an appropriate avenue to pursue if you suspect the older person is experiencing elder abuse.

Work as a team to minimise functional decline

Be clear about the older person’s medical, functional, social and emotional needs and aim to minimise the risk of the older person experiencing functional decline in hospital.

Treat the person’s presenting issues and complete a comprehensive geriatric assessment to develop a care plan that can be continuously monitored and adjusted.

All staff play a key role in carefully considering least restrictive alternatives to making an application to VCAT for guardianship and ensuring that, where possible, these have been trialled and that the reasons for your intervention or lack of intervention have been documented in the patient record.

Work with the clinical experts in your health service to maximise the person’s access to regular:

  • hydration and nutrition - as this plays a large role in maintaining and maximising function
  • medication review - to simplify administration and frequency
  • mobility and sitting out of bed - to optimise independence
  • toileting - incontinence can be a major trigger for entry into residential care and there are many ways to avoid and treat issues
  • pain management - unmanaged pain can limit a person's participation in their self-care
  • monitoring for depression - most people with mild depression will respond to simple interventions such as listening, explaining and reassuring
  • monitoring for acute changes to cognition - delirium can impair decision making ability and, in many cases, can be prevented and managed.

Focus on the older person’s strengths and work with your team to develop a care plan that maximises the person’s ability to exercise their values and preferences.

A thorough psychosocial assessment should be completed by a social worker in order to determine the nature of the presenting issues and to consider any interventions that have been implemented in the past to mitigate risks. A social worker can assist the team to understand the role of guardians and the process of making an application to VCAT for a guardian, and what happens when the Public Advocate is appointed as the guardian of last resort.

Trial least restrictive alternatives

Be mindful of the concept of ‘dignity of risk’ when developing a care plan in partnership with the older person and their family and carers. Enable the older person to exercise their human right to make decisions that may entail an element of risk. You may not agree with the decisions the older person is making - and traditionally health services may have wished to avoid risks at all cost. ‘Dignity of risk’ prompts you to consider how you can support someone to do what they want to do safely by exploring:

  • What decision(s) need to be made?
  • What are the specific risks?
  • Can these risks be minimised?
  • Can the decision be made in a more informal way than making an application for a guardian?

Carrying out our duty of care to a patient is not compromised by incorporating ‘dignity of risk’ when exploring least restrictive options; in fact, it should be considered part of our duty of care.

Considering least restrictive options

  • Exploring what the older person's values are. This will help you to determine what sort of risks the older person would accept if he or she had capacity to make their own decisions.
  • Involving community services that have been providing services to the older person. There may be additional or alternative services available to address the older person's needs after discharge.
  • Arrange an occupational therapist to assess the older person’s function and to complete a home visit.
  • Explore the availability of other programs that can provide additional support on discharge, for example the Aged Care Assessment Service (ACAS), the Transition Care Program (TCP) and Health Independence Program (HIP).
  • Training willing family and carers to help to the older person with tasks of daily living and trial a period where staff are ‘hands off’.
  • Considering a trial discharge with a support package in place. This could be for a day, overnight or for a weekend.

Work with your team, and speak to senior managers and your ACAS to work through issues as they arise. Use the Office of the Public Advocate’s Advice ServiceExternal Link to troubleshoot options and document their recommendations.

Complex decision making in hospital and the importance of least restrictive practice

Clinicians are frequently required to make recommendations about the complex care needs of patients in preparing for their discharge. Sometimes this results in an application about Guardianship to the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (VCAT) for the appointment of the Public Advocate, as a guardian of last resort, for an older person in hospital.

People aged 65 and over with established cognitive impairment are the subject of a significant proportion of these applications. They are often made in the context of a disagreement between the treating team and the older person about the type of accommodation or services that are required to meet the older person’s care needs on discharge.2

The guardianship process can be long with the potential to have a significant impact on an older person’s levels of stress, autonomy and sense of control over their life. It may extend the older person’s hospital admission while they wait for a hearing, for a guardian to be appointed, and for a decision to be made and effected. An extended admission can play a significant role in increasing the risk of the older person experiencing functional decline in hospital, which in turn can further limit their ability to realise their lifestyle choices.3

Before deciding to pursue an application, a model of least restrictive practice should be employed. The Guardianship and Administration Act 2019 embeds the principles of least restrictive practice into supportive and substitute decision making. The Act requires that any order made is the least restrictive of the person’s rights that is possible in the circumstances.

Least restrictive practices include working with the older person and their families or carers to avoid an unnecessary application, maximise their participation and improve care during this process. In this process it can be useful to weigh up the risks and benefits of the older person leaving hospital versus the risks and benefits facing the older person if they are to remain in hospital for a lengthy period of time. By employing a least restrictive model of practice you can work with your team to minimise the extent of any limitations on the person and encourage them to participate in all decisions that affect them.

    1. National Ageing Research Institute, Health Services Guardianship Liaison Officer Pilot Evaluation, 2015, Melbourne: National Ageing Research Institute.
    2. Carter, B., Guardianship and the ageing population: profile of Victorian guardianship clients aged over 65 years, 2011, Melbourne: Office of the Public Advocate.
    3. National Ageing Research Institute, Health Services Guardianship Liaison Officer Pilot evaluation, 2015, Melbourne: National Ageing Research Institute.

Decision making for older people

Clinicians are frequently required to make recommendations about the complex care needs of patients in preparing for their discharge.

Supported and substitute decision making in Victoria and the law

Understanding the role of support people

In Victoria, if a person can make their own decisions but may need some support to do so, they can appoint someone they trust to assist them to make, communicate and act on their decisions. These decisions may be about financial, lifestyle or medical issues.

There is different legislation regulating the powers of support people in Victoria. The Office of the Public Advocate (OPA)External Link website includes information, fact sheets and forms. An Advice Service is also available if you need clarification.

In Victoria, there are a number of legally recognised support roles, made under different Acts:

  • Supportive attorney - Powers of Attorney Act 2014 (Vic)
  • Support person - Medical Treatment Planning and Decisions Act 2016 (Vic)
  • Plan nominee - National Disability Insurance Scheme Act 2013 (Vic)
  • Nominated person - Mental Health Act 2014
  • Supportive administrator (financial and legal decisions) or supportive guardian (medical treatment and lifestyle decisions) - Guardianship and Administration Act 2019 (Vic)

As a clinician it is essential to establish if an older person you are working with has existing arrangements in place to help them make decisions. These arrangements may be formal or informal.

Ask the older person if they have appointed someone to help them to make decisions. Check if any arrangements were made under previous Acts as many will remain valid.

Understanding the role of the substitute decision maker

All adults are presumed to have the capacity to make decisions for themselves unless demonstrated otherwise. However, despite available supports, some people may not have capacity to make a specific decision. Whether a person has decision making capacity is decision specific, and a person may have the capacity to make some decisions and not others. Under the Guardianship and Administration Act 2019, a person has decision making capacity if they are able to:

  • understand the information relevant to the decision and its effect
  • retain the information to the extent necessary to make the decision
  • use or weigh the information as part of the process of making the decision, and
  • communicate the decision and the person’s views and needs as to the decision in some way, including by speech, gestures or other means.

If a person does not have decision making capacity in relation to a specific decision, the appropriate substitute decision maker must be identified.

If a person does not have decision making capacity in relation to a specific decision, the appropriate substitute decision maker must be identified.

If the decision is about medical treatment, this will be the person’s medical treatment decision maker. There is a hierarchy for determining the person’s medical treatment decision maker, and the first available and willing person from the list below will be the medical treatment decision maker:

  • an appointed medical treatment decision maker
  • a guardian appointed by VCAT
  • the first of the following with a close and continuing relationship with the person:
    • the spouse or domestic partner
    • the primary carer of the person
    • the oldest adult child of the person
    • the oldest parent of the person
    • the oldest adult sibling of the person.

When making decisions about medical treatment, it is also important to find out if the person has made an advance care directive when they had decision making capacity to do so. An advance care directive is legally binding and may include instructional directives about medical treatment or refusal of care, and/or values directives about general preferences for care. An appointed medical treatment decision maker is also bound by an advance care directive. If necessary, VCAT can review an advance care directive to decide its validity or clarify its meaning.

If the decision is about another financial or lifestyle matter, the person’s enduring power of attorney will be their substitute decision maker.

Be aware that the legal context and decision-making powers of various roles can be misunderstood and confusing. Many people assume that if they are the ‘next of kin’ they automatically have the authority to make decisions on behalf of the older person. If someone indicates that they are legally able to make decisions on behalf of an older person in hospital, best practice involves clarifying what arrangements are in place, by requesting permission to sight, interpret, copy, and document and store any relevant documentation on the patient’s record. Familiarising yourself with some of the commonly appointed roles and responsibilities can help alleviate this confusion and help you to work with the older person and their family or carers.

VCAT appointment of a substitute decision maker

Any individual can make an application to the Guardianship List at the Victorian Civil Administrative Tribunal (VCAT)External Link to determine whether or not a person is in need of a substitute decision maker where an enduring power of attorney and/or medical treatment decision maker has not been appointed, or where there are concerns as to whether the substitute decision maker is operating in the best interests of the person who appointed them. Under the Guardianship and Administration Act 2019, VCAT has the power to appoint a guardian and/or an administrator. VCAT also has the power to instead appoint a supportive guardian and/or a supportive administrator to assist a person to make their own decisions.

VCAT must always try to make an order that is least restrictive of the person’s freedom of decision and action.

A guardian may be appointed for a person who has a disability that is impairing their judgement where there is a need for a specific decision or multiple decisions to be made about lifestyle and healthcare matters. VCAT must be assured the guardian will act in the represented person's best interests. If there is no willing or suitable person to be appointed as a guardian, the Public Advocate can be appointed to this role as a limited or plenary guardian of last resort.

  • A guardian can make decisions about health care, accommodation, employment, and access to people, including restricting or prohibiting particular people from having contact with the represented person.
  • VCAT may make an order appointing a limited guardian (the order will specify the type of personal and lifestyle decisions that the appointed guardian can make) for the person, or on rare occasions a plenary guardian (this order enables the guardian to make all necessary personal and lifestyle decisions and may include medical decisions).
  • The duration of an appointment is specified in the order. All orders must be reassessed within three years, and usually after one year. The date of the reassessment is usually written on the order. Sometimes there are ‘self-revoking orders’ which means that the order will expire on the specified date, unless someone seeks a hearing.

VCAT can also appoint an administrator to make financial decisions when a person cannot make reasonable judgements about managing their estate, and there are concerns about the decisions they are making, or about decisions that others are making for them.

For further information please refer to the Office of the Public Advocate websiteExternal Link .

Informal arrangements

Often family and friends can informally assist someone with a decision-making disability to make decisions. As a clinician, you will be aware of cases where these types of arrangements work quite well, and this may mitigate the need to apply for a formal appointment through VCAT.

It is important to obtain consent from a person with decision-making capacity or their substitute decision maker and ensure that there is clarity around who is actually making the decision.

In cases where you believe the wishes of an older person with a decision-making disability are not being respected, or they are experiencing or are at risk of harm or neglect, explore your concerns with them and your team, and contact the OPA Advice Service.

Exploring decision making capacity in the context of lifestyle decisions

All individuals over the age of 18 are considered to have the capacity to make decisions until demonstrated otherwise. A decision to formally assess a person's capacity should always be specific to the decision(s) at hand and start from a presumption of capacity. A person's decision-making capacity is determined by their ability to:

  • understand the information relevant to the decision and its effect
  • retain the information to the extent necessary to make the decision
  • use or weigh that information as part of the process of making the decision, and
  • communicate the decision and the person’s views and needs as to the decision in some way, including by speech, gestures or other means.

Capacity is:

  • domain specific (domains can include personal and lifestyle, finances, healthcare)
  • decision specific (even within domains, for example, the person might be able to consent to a blood test but not to an amputation)
  • time specific (note that capacity may fluctuate, for example, the older person might be better at certain times of the day).

Evidence of incapacity can include the person:

  • not knowing or understanding the issues
  • being unable to provide possible approaches to solving the issues
  • not appreciating reasonably foreseeable circumstances
  • making decisions based on delusional constructs
  • having significant cognitive impairment.

If you suspect that the individual has a disability that is impairing their ability to make an informed decision, consider whether an assessment of decision-making capacity is required. If you can avoid an application to the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (VCAT) you may not need to complete a capacity assessment.

If the older person and their family agree with the treating team’s recommendation, you may be able to avoid a formal capacity assessment and an application to VCAT for guardianship.

If the person or their family disagrees with the treating team’s recommendation, and you have explored least restrictive alternatives, a formal capacity assessment should be completed to determine the extent to which their disability is affecting their ability to make the specific decision.

Assessing capacity is complex and multidimensional, and can be affected by a range of factors. Clinicians who are experienced in assessing cognition and capacity, such as neuropsychologists and geriatricians, should be used undertake a formal capacity assessment. The Office of the Public Advocate (OPA) can provide advice to health practitioners conducting assessments of decision-making capacity in relation to proceedings under the Guardianship and Administration Act 2019.


Consumer information for older people in hospital

Older people are at risk of experiencing functional decline as early as their second day in hospital. There are simple strategies that they and their families can implement to prevent this occurring.

The Get well soon audio visual material and the supporting information sheets, which can be accessed through more information, explains some things they can do to remain well while they are in hospital.

In The patient experience videos older people and their families share their personal stories about the impact of being in hospital. They encourage clinicians to listen to them and to work in partnership with them to achieve the best possible outcomes.


Implementation case studies

Older people presenting to hospital are at high risk of experiencing functional decline. During the Improving Care for Older People Initiative, Victorian health services made many changes to address these risks. They used the evidence in Best care for older people everywhere: The toolkit, which has now been updated and rebranded as Older people in hospital.

This set of ten stories showcases some of the diverse ways that they have done this. The stories focus on making improvements to communication, assessment, nutrition, person centred practice, cognition, dementia, pressure care, involving consumers and providing education to clinicians on best practice.

  • Barwon Health took a novel approach to enhancing person centred care as part of the Best Care for Older People (BCOP) project – they stopped writing things down. Of course they haven’t stopped gathering information about their patients; it’s just that now they complete all assessments of new patients electronically. Using laptops or iPads, nursing staff are now able to comprehensively assess patients at the bedside, recording all information and making referrals to allied health services as they go.

    The decision to embark on changing the way the organisation approached risk assessments came about because of a focus on the principles of person centred care. Staff working on the BCOP project recognised that the paper based system of assessment and referral did not encourage engagement with the patient. It also meant that staff were duplicating information and that information was not always recorded, or recorded in a timely manner.

    “It’s all about engagement with that person… [working] in collaboration with that person, and educating them on their risks.”

    “To me it was around person centred care – we had this paper based system that we may or may not have filled out, but when we did we just ticked it,” says Sonya Whitehand, a NUM who has been involved in the project from the pilot stage. “What we were asking [the team] to do now was to actually take a device, sit with the person, actually ask them some questions and develop a plan in collaboration with them; so we were asking them to work in a person centred way…”

    Barwon Health’s electronic assessment and referral system uses portable devices – laptops and iPads – to enable staff to conduct screening and assessment at the bedside. Once a patient is admitted, a nurse sits with them at their bedside. They log-in uniquely to the system and access the patient’s information, such as their hospital ID and date of birth details. The assessment process involves completing a suite of screens, assessing areas including cognition, falls risk, depression, risk of malnourishment and pressure ulcer risk.

    Each screening tool is completed by the nurse with the patient and the system records the answers and the overall scores. Recommendations for action are triggered according to each screens’ outcome, including interventions and allied health referrals. These can then be discussed with the patient at the time and care planning can occur in a collaborative way. Patients also gain more understanding of their risks and what they can do to minimise them.

    The system also uses the information entered to generate reports for the patient’s file and automatically populates their electronic medical record, reducing administrative time as information is not being entered multiple times. Hospital administrators are also able to track completion rates and results in real time and use this data for benchmarking and statistical analysis.

    Developing and implementing the system was not without its bumps along the way, however. As Karen Heseltine, BCOP Project Manager says, “[when] we decided to go down the electronic route… we didn’t realise actually how long it would take and the journey that we went along really.” The project team found themselves on a steep learning curve as they tried to negotiate the complexities of introducing a new electronic system into the existing health service IT systems. Not only did they need to develop new software components to use for the assessments, but also find a hardware platform on which to run it and integrate the system into the existing systems and the hospital’s wireless network.

    Along with the technological issues the team faced, they also needed to convince ward staff who were to use the product that it was a good idea, despite the perception that the new system would take extra time, and the need for many to learn a whole new set of IT skills.

    Engaging with staff on the pilot ward from the outset was crucial to achieving this. Staff were asked for their input into the questions, as well as for continuous feedback on the usability of the system in the ward setting. Training was also approached in an ongoing, informal way, allowing staff to take as much or as little time as they needed to learn the new system.

    “We were asking them to work in a person centred way…”

    Lessons from implementing electronic assessments on the pilot ward and the enthusiasm of the staff helped with the success of the roll out to the broader organisation. The electronic screening and assessment tool is now used across all adult inpatient acute and sub-acute wards in Barwon Health – over 400 beds in total. As well as shifting the focus of assessment from administrative task to patient engagement, it has meant that assessment is now standardised for all adult inpatients.

    The project has had an impact beyond that originally envisaged and unexpected new applications and offshoots of the system are continually being discovered. For example, one of the surgical wards has started using the hardware to show patients their x-rays at the bedside. The team is also continually coming up with new ideas for the electronic system, such as using the information to generate discharge summary information rather than this having to be separately created, and having each ward’s journey board become electronic and populated by information from the system.

    Other uses for the software are also being developed. One of the most comprehensive is the development of electronic care plans for use by all palliative care teams. The team hope that this electronic care plan will provide the basis for developing similar tools for other settings in the organisation.

    No matter what new uses are developed in the future, the focus remains firmly on the patient. Everything that is done is with a view to embedding person centred care into everyday clinical practice by building administrative systems that are time efficient and that engage and involve the patient as a partner in their care. The team also hope that their experience can be used by others to find ways to utilise technology to enhance patient care. As Trish Mant, Practice Development Coordinator, says, “It’s all about engagement with that person… [working] in collaboration with that person, and educating them on their risks.”

  • If you are walking through the corridors of Northeast Health Wangaratta (NHW), don’t be surprised if you come across staff and patients playing cards together, reading the newspaper or even painting their fingernails. It’s all part of the hospital’s approach to caring for patients with delirium and dementia.

    When the hospital was looking at ways it could improve care for older people, they realised there was a need to improve the way patients with dementia and delirium, and associated behavioural problems were being cared for, especially in the acute wards.

    Delirium is common in older patients, and can have serious consequences including longer recovery times and functional decline. People with delirium appear confused and sometimes become hyperactive and agitated. Patients with both dementia and delirium are at particular risk of harm.

    “I saw a volunteer with a patient the other day and they had a doll and were folding nappies. She was very settled, whereas the day before she had needed [one-on-one care].”

    Nicola Coats, Best Care for Older People (BCOP) Project Officer and Jonelle Hill-Uebergang, Deputy Director of Nursing at NHW decided to take a three pronged approach to addressing the needs of patients with delirium and/or dementia: they developed a new way of documenting behavioural symptoms in order to provide more effective interventions; they revised the way one-on-one nursing care was provided to high needs patients and they created a library of activities for staff and visitors to use with patients. All these initiatives interrelate and provide a framework for best practice care for older people with delirium and/or dementia.

    Patients with behavioural issues or showing signs of confusion were often provided one-on-one care (sometimes called ‘specialling’). Staff providing this care were not always trained in caring for patients with dementia and delirium. It was not uncommon for them to understand their job to be preventing the person getting out of bed, and beyond that having little interaction with them.

    The hospital now has a guideline in place for providing one-on-one care. A handbook developed by Nicola is given to all staff providing one-on-one care, detailing information about the signs and treatment of delirium.

    Nicola also developed a behaviour chart for use with agitated or hyperactive patients with dementia or delirium. The patient’s level of agitation and pain is documented on an hourly basis, allowing clinical staff to look for patterns in behaviour and adjust the patient’s care to avoid triggers and improve outcomes. The chart also includes information on possible causes for behavioural problems and appropriate interventions, including whether one-on-one care should be provided. The behaviour chart is now used throughout the acute wards.

    Patients with dementia and/or delirium, especially if they become agitated or upset, often need to be distracted. The diversional activities library that has been developed is an innovative way of helping to manage patient symptoms while in the unfamiliar environment of hospital and during a severe illness. The idea behind the library is that if an agitated patient is given a task or activity, it can help calm them, by occupying and distracting them. The library includes items such as a toolbox filled with screws, nuts and bolts, realistic looking baby dolls and dogs and cats, games and playing cards, films on DVD and a manicure kit. There are also ‘fiddle mats’ sewn by a volunteer, designed to keep fingers busy with zips, buttons and different textures of material.

    Staff, family members and other visitors, and volunteers all have access to the library and are encouraged to find appropriate activities to share with the patient. Knowing about the person’s interests, history and habits helps to find a suitable activity.

    Nicola says when they first started introducing it she was unsure whether staff would accept it as a clinical intervention. “I got into work one day and got a call that ‘we’ve got an agitated patient up here in surgical – can you bring up your nuts and bolts’. My heart was in my mouth and I walked up there with my little toolbox and a few other things but it worked. I just said, ‘Bob, these things have got all muddled up here, can you give me a hand sorting them?’ This man had pulled out his IV, was trying to get his catheter out, very agitated – and it worked… the staff see this.”

    Family members, friends and volunteers have also found it helpful to have some direction about how to interact with a person who may be behaving quite differently than usual. It can be frightening to see a love one confused and worked up, and being able to use activities to calm a person can be reassuring for both parties. Even under the best of circumstances, having a focus during a visit can be helpful. Playing cards, reading the newspaper or watching a film can pass the time and introduce a sense of normalcy and routine into the hospital stay.

    This can also help keep patients calm and occupied, reducing the need for further interventions. Jonelle gives an example: “I saw a volunteer with a patient the other day and they had a doll and were folding nappies. She was very settled, whereas the day before she had needed [one-on-one care].”

    "The other day I was in the rehab ward and the unit manager had brought a little motor in because there was a patient there that was an old mechanic and he had started to go into a delirium... He took this motor apart and put it back together… and that kept him on track, as well as medication."

    These strategies all work together and all have a person centred approach at their core. Each intervention works best with input from patients (where possible) and their families and carers. Understanding a person’s usual routine, what they enjoy and what upsets them, their background and interests all enhance the effectiveness of the strategies used and work towards ensuring the best possible outcomes for the patient.

    Jonelle is full of praise for the way Nicola worked with staff and led by example. “Once Nicola started to educate and give them tools, and give them strategies, they were hungry for it, because they could see it was actually going to make their day easier... She demonstrated that [these strategies] work by practicing them, so people are now using their own initiative.

    The success of these strategies, the hard work of staff in championing their use and the dedication of the volunteers who now maintain the resources all contribute to this being an initiative that has now become part of the culture of care at NHW.

  • Hospitals can be daunting places at the best of times. They are bright, noisy, unfamiliar and crowded. For many older people these factors are compounded by hearing loss, and being unable to hear clearly can make the situation overwhelming. Kaye Gooch, a former patient who sits on the board of the Victorian branch of Better Hearing Australia, says “hearing loss - because it's ‘invisible’ - tends to be overlooked” by staff in hospitals and that this can be a very isolating experience.

    The audiology and speech pathology team at Alfred Health’s Caulfield Hospital recognised the risks associated with being ‘overlooked’ and set about improving the experience and outcomes for their older patients who had difficulty hearing. The team recognised that not being able to hear made it difficult for their older patients to understand clinical staff or participate in their care planning, which could have a negative effect on their recovery. As Kaye Gooch pointed out, difficulties with hearing were not always picked up, and other issues such as cognitive decline could be mistakenly blamed. Sometimes hearing loss had not been previously diagnosed; sometimes it had but the issue lay in the person’s equipment or lack thereof. Patients do not always arrive at the hospital with their hearing aids; sometimes hearing aids would be broken, or not working due to a flat battery or need for cleaning. Additionally, in the noisy environment of a hospital, hearing aids do not always work well because of the large amount of background noise.

    "At the first try, I asked my dad can he hear my voice, he said 'yes' with a big smile. I couldn't forget this smile! It seems my dad is back to our world. We were happy!"

    With such a broad array of issues to contend with, an innovative solution was needed. The team took a multi-pronged and multi-disciplinary approach to improving the recognition and treatment of older people with hearing loss at the hospital, utilising the framework and principles of the Improving Care for Older People (ICOP) program. The team looked at practical ways to help patients hear and communicate more effectively during their hospital stay and to refer them for further intervention if complex testing was needed.

    This approach included employing a part-time audiologist to provide education to nursing and allied health staff on communication strategies and using and troubleshooting with hearing equipment. The role also included providing assistive listening equipment to patients during their hospital stay.

    Personal amplifiers, one of the assistive listening devices introduced, has had a big impact on individuals. These amplifiers are just that – they increase the volume of the sound they pick up. This means they are particularly useful for one-on-one conversations, as one person can speak into the microphone and the volume at which this is heard through headphones can be adjusted by the wearer. Speaking into the microphone eliminates much background noise, unlike hearing aids. There are other advantages to the amplifiers – for one thing they are quite large compared to a hearing aid, making them easier to manipulate for people with limited dexterity. They are also useful when hearing loss had reached a point where aids are of limited use. Privacy for the person with hearing loss is also maintained, as people can speak at normal volume into the microphone and earphones ensure only the wearer experiences a loud volume. They can also be used by a person at the same time as a hearing aid.

    For Guang Dong Yu, using a personal amplifier made a huge difference to her father’s wellbeing and quality of life. Prior to his hospital admission, his hearing had deteriorated to the point where he was unable to hear clearly even with a working hearing aid. Guang Dong Yu says that because of this her father had “lost his self-confidence and… started to doubt what other people were saying about him. For example, he thought he might get cancer after I talked to the doctor about something like the weather and did not report to him.” She says he became embarrassed to talk to people and seemed despairing.

    Seeing this change in Pat has been, “Joy, pure joy! To see someone hearing, understanding and linking in with it.”

    Her father was provided with an amplifier to use while at Caulfield: “At the first try, I asked my dad can he hear my voice, he said "yes" with a big smile. I couldn't forget this smile! It seems my dad is back to our world. We were happy!” says Guang Dong Yu. He was also able to understand doctors and other clinicians and answer their questions; factors which she says helped his recovery. They found the amplifier so useful that on leaving the hospital they bought their own!

    The amplifiers have also helped to improve quality of life and communication for some long-term patients with dementia. When a person has moderate to severe dementia, it is easy to assume that their communication difficulties are entirely the result of their condition, however this is not always the case. As Lynda Loughridge, a Registered Nurse working with dementia patients, says of one her patients Pat, “we weren’t quite sure whether she wasn’t understanding what we were saying or wasn’t hearing, and a lot of it was that she wasn’t hearing… When we put the amplifier on her… absolute enlightenment! Now she still has the dementia, but we understand that cognitive level – but she could actually hear what we were saying.”

    Lynda says using the amplifier has improved Pat’s quality of life immensely, allowing her to communicate more effectively with family members and staff, and engage with her surroundings, alleviating some of the aggression that has been a symptom of her dementia. For Lynda, seeing this change in Pat has been, “Joy, pure joy! To see someone hearing, understanding and linking in with it.”

    For clinicians, patients and their families, this joy of hearing and understanding anew is an experience being repeated all over Caulfield Hospital thanks to the team and the ICOP program.

  • When a familiar face walked into the shop where Maria Berry was working, she had no idea that striking up a conversation with an old acquaintance would lead her in a new direction.

    That old acquaintance was Marie Marotta, then the project officer for Improving Care for Older People in the Hume region. The pair had met many years before, when Marie was a social worker in the hospital where Maria was having a child. Maria and Marie chatted and caught up, and Maria shared some of her recent experiences as carer for her mother while in and out of hospital.

    Maria had found her mother’s “hospital experience just horrid.” She felt there had been a lack of communication and that information was uncoordinated and difficult to access. Maria found it particularly upsetting that she had not been notified for some time after her mother had broken her hip while in hospital. Maria saw this as a culmination of a number of adverse events stemming from a failure to practice person centred care.

    “Her buzzer had been taken off her because she was ringing the bell too often. And I think the reason why she might have been ringing the bell too often was one, her pain. It still was not under control,” says Maria. “Sometimes I'd walk in and… she hadn't had enough to drink and things like that, so ... there was the pain, there was the urinary tract infection, and all of that, I think, didn’t help the situation with Mum becoming distressed and ringing a bell.”

    “She’s a carer, she’s articulate. She’s passionate, she knows how things ought to be for older people in hospital.”

    At the time, Alfred Health was developing a video resource on behalf of the Department of Health about improving care for older people in hospital, based on Best Care for Older People Everywhere: The Toolkit 1. The video resource was part of the sustainability strategy for the project, ensuring the lessons from The Toolkit would be accessible to a wide audience and beyond the period of the project’s funding.

    The project advisory group sought the views of clinicians, patients and carers from across Victoria. Others interviewed about their experiences shared similar stories about lack of communication and having their views overlooked. As Marilyn, a patient interviewed in the resource says, “the feeling you get is that you’re not a person at all; you’re just another thing that’s in there, or another condition, that you’re there for them to treat and get better and get home quickly.”

    The film features clinicians, patients and carers from across Victoria talking about care of older people in hospital and preventing functional decline. The emphasis is on person centred care and what that means, both for those working in hospital and for patients receiving care. The importance of being treated with dignity and being seen as a person are themes continually raised by consumers and carers in the film. Communication is also a key theme, and the difference good communication between staff and patient and their carers can make to a person’s experience and recovery.

    For Maria, sharing some of her experiences of her mother’s hospital care was in many ways a difficult experience, but ultimately rewarding. As Maria says, “it ignited this passion… to be part of a community that says this is not right.” This new found passion has led Maria on a journey to become deeply involved in improving care for older people across the health sector.

    Following her involvement with the Alfred Health film and with encouragement from Marie, Maria contacted Catherine O’Connell, Executive Director of Clinical Operations at Albury Wodonga Health. Catherine asked Maria to address the Acute Care Board about her mother’s care and the need for a more person-centred approach.

    Catherine also invited Maria to become a representative on the health service’s Consumer Advisory Committee. The Consumer Advisory Committee works collaboratively with the health service, integrating the perspectives of consumers into the practice of the service. Maria has found her involvement to be valuable and rewarding, but has not stopped there.

    Maria has also become involved with the Health Issues Centre, an independent organisation advocating for improvements to the health care system from a consumer perspective. She is also working with Social Connections, a project Marie is coordinating as part of the Hume Integrated Aged Care Plan, as a consumer representative on the project’s advisory group.

    Full of ideas and passion, Maria continues to have new ideas about ways to improve older people’s experience of the health and aged care systems in her region. She is constantly making new connections with people she meets and finding new avenues to advocate on behalf of older people.

    As Marie says, “She’s a carer, she’s articulate. She’s passionate, she knows how things ought to be for older people in hospital.” Uncovering these talents has been another lasting legacy of the project.


    1. The current edition of this resource is Older people in hospital.

  • It seems self-evident that being around nature makes us feel calmer and more relaxed. In fact, numerous studies have shown the therapeutic benefits of spending time outdoors. For those with dementia, it would seem all the more important to have access to a calming outdoor space, and yet it rarely happens within hospitals.

    Western Health’s (WH’s) Dementia Assessment and Management unit at Sunshine Hospital did have an outdoor area for patients, but it was little used having developed in an ad hoc way and didn’t have protection from the weather. When the Best Care for Older People (BCOP) project completed its environmental audit of the hospital, they saw a need for the area to be redeveloped into a space specifically designed with the needs of those with severe dementia and their families in mind.

    This patient group often stays for a significant amount of time in the unit, and most of these patients also exhibit behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD). The project aimed to create a space based on the latest evidence that would help improve mood, social interaction, sleeping patterns, spatial orientation and provide opportunities to participate in meaningful activities.

    The garden features different spaces to allow for reflection, activities or interaction, depending on need and inclination.

    Realising such grand ambitions was not going to be cheap! Aware that their vision was beyond their means with existing funding, the BCOP team sought to gain support from WH’s impressive community and volunteer support base.

    First up, they approached the Western Health Foundation for funding. They were provided with an impressive $100,000 from the Sunshine Hospital Auxiliary and Opportunity Shop, which is run by a dedicated group of volunteers. Next they partnered with Paul de la Motte, President of the Horticultural Therapy Association of Victoria and a Holmesglen TAFE manager, whose expertise was invaluable in planning and installing the garden. Partnering with the Engineering Department of WH was also instrumental to the success of the project, as well as having the ongoing benefit of an understanding between the two groups about how the other operates and what is important to their work.

    Opened in 2013, the garden features different spaces to allow for reflection, activities or interaction, depending on need and inclination. There are raised garden beds containing vegetables and herbs, encouraging patients to reminisce through access to familiar smells and sights. An undercover barbeque area is frequently used for communal meals. The garden also has various defined spaces within it, such as a ‘tranquility area’ where patients and visitors can have some seclusion and privacy. Other areas are designed with patients’ former lives in mind – such as a ‘bus stop’ where patients often enjoy waiting, and a Mediterranean section with mosaics and plants from the region. Seating is available throughout so that groups or individuals can find their own space within the larger area.

    The success of the garden has inspired the redevelopment and creation of other garden spaces within the hospital, including redeveloping another outdoor space for the geriatric assessment and management unit (GEM) and planning a garden for the palliative care unit.

    The students consult with staff, patients and families as part of their project planning, giving them an understanding of the needs of patients with dementia and a chance to interact with them, breaking down some of the barriers between the groups.

    The ongoing dedication of volunteers and nurturing of community partnerships has been essential to the success of the project. The therapy garden, as well as the GEM unit’s outdoor space, is tended by a group of volunteers who maintain the plants and continuously work to improve the garden. Other community groups also help with maintaining and improving the garden, including primary school students, gardening clubs and staff from a local Bunnings hardware store.

    WH also has a partnership with a local high school, Copperfield College, whose students undertake projects as part of their VCAL work. Up to 50 students work in small groups on defined projects with the help of a mentor. Projects have included making furniture and artworks, and a group is currently working on creating a workbench (inspired by men’s sheds) for patients in the garden. The students consult with staff, patients and families as part of their project planning, giving them an understanding of the needs of patients with dementia and a chance to interact with them, breaking down some of the barriers between the groups. In fact, this side of the project has been so successful that it has been recognised by WH with an excellence award.

    Others who volunteer and spend time in the garden also experience this same increase in understanding, something the BCOP project managers see as an added bonus of the program. “They’ve purely volunteered I think to maintain and develop the garden, but slowly just through informal connections with patients… they’re starting to interact with patients in their own way,” says Amy Parker. Kate Mangion agrees, and adds, “Because you’ve got the right people in those roles it’s a natural evolution”.

  • In a packed seminar room, clinicians from Northern Health listened intently to nearly a dozen presentations on practical projects implementing the principles of the Best Care for Older People Everywhere: The Toolkit (The Toolkit)2. What made this day different from many other study days, however, was that the presenters were also clinicians from Northern Health. Most had never previously undertaken project work, or presented to such a large audience. This was one of the outcomes of Northern Health’s (NH’s) Staff Capacity Building Initiative.

    The initiative provided successful applicants from NH’s clinical staff with training in project management, leadership and presentation skills. Those undertaking the program then used these skills to develop and implement a project in their clinical area based on the domains and principles of The Toolkit. A Project Mentor was also available to help throughout the period.

    Applicants were from a variety of allied health and nursing roles. Most were ward staff who had not previously had the opportunity to do this type of training or project work. Projects undertaken were quite diverse, from no lift techniques to be used with resistive patients, to trialling an exercise group in a secure dementia unit, to reducing falls in a short stay unit.

    "If we know the name of their football team or their granddaughter’s name it can help calm them – it doesn’t always work, but when it does work it’s really, really good."

    One participant was Jan Thomas, an experienced Enrolled Nurse in a secure dementia unit. Jan undertook a project to revise The Key to Me, an information form about the background and personal preferences of dementia patients, and champion its use. She initially thought taking on the project “was out of my depth, but I like to push myself… so I thought I’d give it a go.” Her project involved developing a questionnaire and distributing it to staff and some family members of patients about what they would like to see from the new form. She simplified and shortened the existing document to make it more relevant and easier to use. Involving staff and family also helped foster a sense of ownership.

    Jan found the process challenging, but ultimately rewarding. She says having information about a person with severe dementia can often help to manage some of the behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia. “If we know the name of their football team or their granddaughter’s name it can help calm them – it doesn’t always work, but when it does work it’s really, really good.”

    The program also had a personal impact on Jan. She says it was valuable creating connections with staff members outside of her area, and has also sparked a desire to undertake further education. Having the support of her team and finding others who are continuing to champion the use of the form have been other bonuses of her involvement.

    Angela Ruzzene, a Clinical Nurse Consultant who coordinated the education program, says that several of the projects are having an ongoing impact at the ward level, such as a delirium screening tool that was introduced in a dementia ward. Others are having an impact more broadly through the organisation. Perhaps the widest reaching of these is nurse rounding for falls prevention. Nurse rounding involves each patient being regularly checked by a nurse and asked several basic questions about their needs, such as whether they need to use the toilet, whether they have pain and whether they need to be repositioned. This was piloted by one participant as her project and is now being refined and will be rolled out across the organisation.

    "I’ve been nursing for a long, long time and sometimes you forget that [patients] had lives, they’re not just a patient… I think that did me the world of good."

    While some projects are having a lasting and tangible impact, the initiative was not without its challenges. Recruiting staff, particularly ward-based nurses, was challenging, and not all who undertook the program were able to complete it. The program required a detailed application, support from the participant’s manager as well as a significant time commitment, factors which Angela thinks may have limited the number of applications. Some projects participants began were too large scale and ambitious to be realistic and some were constrained by the need for costly equipment purchases.

    Nonetheless, Angela says the initiative has had a positive impact in spreading the principles of person centred care and of The Toolkit. She says the most successful projects were those that were small scale, contained and had tangible results. In many cases these projects have continued to have an impact and the participants continue to champion them. For several, being involved in the initiative has also led to moving into a more senior role within the organisation. Others have been able to utilise their new skills in their current roles.

    However, the most lasting impact may be the way the program allowed those involved to see their role, and their patients, in a different light. As Jan says, “I’ve been nursing for a long, long time and sometimes you forget that [patients] had lives, they’re not just a patient… I think that did me the world of good.”


    2. The current edition of this resource is Older people in hospital.

  • It seems obvious that when you’re not well, you will probably eat and drink less – after all you’re not doing much, and you may not have much of an appetite. In fact, it is important to eat and drink as much if not more that you would normally in order to recover in the quickest time possible. Under-nutrition can cause wounds to heal more slowly, increases the risk of complications and of infections and can lengthen the hospital stay. Adequate nutrition and hydration is particularly important for older people. In fact, food and drink are as important to getting well as medicine!

    Even when the importance of nutrition is recognised, it doesn’t always mean a person will get an adequate amount. In fact, many older people will be malnourished when they are admitted to hospital or will become so during their stay. While loss of appetite and feeling unwell account for some of this, there are many other reasons that patients may miss meals or not finish them. They may be asleep when the meal is brought and not woken up, they may be unable to open the packaging, or they may not be able to cut up the food themselves. Others may be unable to feed themselves or sit themselves up in order to eat. All of these factors can contribute to patients being undernourished while in hospital.

    Staff got a sense of what it's like to be unable to eat their meal through roleplaying scenarios like trying to eat while lying on a table.

    Goulburn Valley Health recognised the importance of helping ensure patients were able to eat and drink at mealtimes and that not everyone who needed assistance was getting it. They also realised that the number of malnourished patients being admitted to the hospital was not being fully counted. So they embarked on a process to change this.

    The approach was two pronged: ensuring every patient was screened on admission using the Malnutrition Screening Tool (MST), identifying those who were malnourished or at risk, and introducing red trays for patients who needed assistance to eat their meals. The MST also identified those needing meals assistance, and the level of assistance they needed.

    In order to have an impact, they first needed to identify the scale of the problem. To do this an audit was conducted to see how many patients were sitting up for meals, could reach their tray, were given assistance if needed and were finishing their meal. The audit showed there was room for improvement on all the measures, and that around 20 per cent of those who needed assistance weren’t receiving it.

    Having identified the need, the next challenge was to get everyone on board – not just the clinical staff, but also the catering staff, the patients, and their families and carers. For Lisa Pearson, Best Care for Older People (BCOP) Project Officer, and Wendy Swan, Manager Nutrition and Dietetics, this involved a lot of consultation to get it right. It was important that the trays would work with the existing catering equipment and systems – finding the right trays was “a project in itself” says Wendy.

    One of the keys to the success of the initiative was involving the catering staff from a very early stage. Denise Maloney, Manager Hotel Services says that the fact that members of the catering staff had input in to the process of developing and implementing the system, as well as understanding why it was being done, made a big difference. “I think it’s imperative that you do [that], because at the end of the day they’re the people actually handing out the trays,” she says.

    The next step was educating staff about the trays and the MST. Catering staff were educated about how to respond to patient queries about the new trays. A staff event was also held to launch the red tray system and the MST. Staff got a sense of what it’s like to be unable to eat their meal through roleplaying scenarios like trying to eat while lying on a table. A sense of fun and ownership helped the new system to gain acceptance. The system has also been designed so that any member of staff can flag that a patient requires a red tray.

    Information brochures were developed for patients and their families and carers. These explained why red trays had been introduced and what they meant, as well as tips on how to maximise nutrition while in hospital. Each person who received their meal on a red tray was also given a flyer that briefly explained why their tray looked different and why it is important to eat and drink enough when in hospital. A video about nutrition and the red trays was also made for patients and families, and was provided in English, Arabic and Turkish.

    The system has now become part of usual practice in the hospital, and is also being rolled out to the health service’s satellite campuses, as well as to local small rural health services. Patients and families are also accepting of the system, with many wondering why “no-one thought of it before”. Many have indicated they feel less anxious if they are unable to be at the hospital during meal times.

    The mealtime audit was repeated several months after the trays were introduced and found improvements on almost all the measures. Significantly, the proportion of patients who needed help and didn’t receive it had dropped to just five per cent. The catering staff have also noticed a difference through their own waste monitoring, particularly a reduction to the number of meals returning to the kitchen untouched. “It was going unnoticed,” says Denise, “but now the red trays have certainly flagged it… it’s certainly increased the amount of patients eating their meals.”

    There is always room for further improvement, of course, and Wendy says that there is a continual need not to just make sure patients have assistance, but to make sure that it is timely and adequate also.

  • It takes courage to admit that you got it wrong, and courage to try to set things right. The Royal Melbourne Hospital (RMH) is a highly respected institution and prides itself on the quality of care provided to patients. However, even in the best organisations, sometimes things happen that are not ideal. It is how we respond that makes the difference – do we ignore them and hope for the best, or do we admit our faults, examine our mistakes and try to learn for the future.

    When the hospital received a complaint from an elderly patient’s daughter, it followed best practice and responded to and addressed her concerns. Usually, that is where the story would end, however, this time they decided to go further. They saw an opportunity to document the experience for a wider audience within the organisation and to use it as a teaching and learning tool. Thus the journey of making Lola’s Story, and with it a new approach to listening to patients, began.

    "We are not just talking about a bunch of figures or graphs on paper - these are real people that have real experiences with us."

    Lola had been a patient at the hospital. An elderly woman, she had communication difficulties following a stroke and was quite frail. Her daughter spent a great deal of time with her at the hospital and felt that her mother was overlooked by staff who didn’t make the time to try to understand her needs or what she wanted from her care. She also felt there was a lack of communication between staff and Lola’s carer’s (herself and other family members) and that there was no interest shown by staff in initiating or pursuing conversations about Lola’s care.

    The complaint came to the attention of senior staff within RMH. There had been discussions within the executive leadership for some time about ways that patient stories could be utilised constructively to improve practice. Sharon McGowan, Executive Director of Communications and Community Relations, Associate Professor Denise Heinjus, Executive Director of Nursing Services and Allied Health, and Liz Cashill, Consumer Liaison and Integration Manager had all seen the way patient stories had been utilised elsewhere, in Australia and internationally.

    They had used patient stories at some committee meetings, but wanted to reach a wider audience. In order to do this they made a conscious decision to move away from seeing the recording of such a story in terms of risk. Instead they saw it as an opportunity – to acknowledge a failure to provide person centred care and to use it to inform better practice in the future.

    Part of the decision to film the story stemmed from the situation itself. Lola’s daughter was an experienced aged care professional, with a robust understanding of best practice in the area of caring for older people. Most importantly, perhaps, she was keen to work towards creating something positive from her mother’s experience. As Sharon says, “we had clearly a very detailed complaint, clearly a very articulate carer, and somebody that wanted to help us change things.”

    The process of filming and showing Lola’s Story has also been a learning experience for the team involved. While they all feel there are things they would have done differently with hindsight, a lot has been learned from the process and this has informed subsequent use of patient stories and other strategies to embed patient centred care into practice.

    The experience producing and sharing Lola’s Story has given impetus to using patient stories further within RMH. A second patient story, Florence’s Story has been filmed, and is now used for staff training. As well, the hospital is continually expanding the contexts where patient stories are shared verbally. They now open all quality committee meetings and Board of Directors meetings with a patient story.

    Patient stories are just one of a raft of strategies being used by RMH to put patient experience front and centre, and ensure that person centred care is delivered across the organisation and by all staff, all the time. All staff are required to complete an online training package on Partnering with Consumers and Person Centred Care. Other training resources include Florence’s Story, as well as videos on person centred care and on providing health care to the ATSI community.

    The hospital has also been surveying patients after discharge about their experience of the hospital and its care. The survey is sent by email to all patients who provided an address. The hospital has also implemented the Partnerships in Care Strategy, endorsed in early 2014. The strategy is multi-pronged and aims to empower consumers as well as build workforce capacity.

    These strategies all form part of a concerted organisational push to ensure that person centred care is something that is central to clinical practice in every profession and every occasion of care. Ultimately it is about remembering what a hospital’s performance is actually about . As Sharon says, “we are not just talking about a bunch of figures or graphs on paper – these are real people that have real experiences with us.”

  • If you are a patient at St Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne, you will find yourself sitting in a very comfortable chair. Thanks to the Best Care for Older People (BCOP) initiative, every patient chair at the hospital is now equipped with a custom designed pressure relieving cushion. The initiative is reducing the incidence of pressure injuries via a preventative health approach.

    Pressure injuries are largely preventable. They are painful, difficult to treat, costly and can have severe adverse consequences for those experiencing them. However, they still occur in hospitals every day.

    "Even if there's one person we prevented from a pressure injury, then it's worth it."

    The use of pressure relieving equipment, such as pressure reducing cushions and heel wedges has been shown to reduce the likelihood of pressure injuries forming. However, preventable injuries can often occur because appropriate pressure relieving equipment is not available unless a patient is deemed high risk or has already sustained an injury. Additionally, staff are not always aware of when or how to use the equipment available, or how to monitor patients’ skin integrity.

    St Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne was no exception. An audit revealed that 92 per cent of inpatient units did not have sufficient pressure-relieving devices available. Equipment was hired when needed, a costly and inefficient exercise.

    The innovative approach to preventing pressure injuries taken by St Vincent’s came about organically. Natalie Newman, a BCOP Project Officer and Amber O’Brien, an Occupational Therapist, met to discuss a project to help nursing staff decide when and what type of pressure relieving cushions to provide to patients. As they explored the types of cushions available, they decided they needed to further understand the impact of extended unsupported sitting and the pressure relieving devices available.

    Natalie and Amber mapped the pressure on the sacral area for a person sitting on a standard hospital chair using an image mapping system. The results were surprising, clearly showing very high areas of pressure particularly on the sacrum. Mapping the pressure areas while using available cushions showed that none were right for the job. Not content with this, they set about designing their own. Collaborating with patients, infection control and an external manufacturer they came up with a suitable design. The new cushion reduced pressure by a massive 65 per cent.

    Realising the potential impact of such a huge reduction in pressure, they decided that all patients, not just those deemed at high risk, would benefit from access to this equipment. “Once we realised that everyone could benefit from these cushions, then we ran with it and it turned into an organisational strategy” says Natalie.

    With funds available through BCOP, 560 of the custom designed pressure cushions, as well as 200 heel wedges, were purchased and the pair set about introducing them to every acute and sub-acute inpatient ward. The approach meant that all patients sitting out of bed would be on a pressure relieving cushion at all times, no matter how low risk they might be. High risk patients would still be referred for assessment by Occupational Therapy and further interventions introduced if necessary. All wards were also provided with enough heel wedges for patients confined to bed for long periods.

    Crucial to the success of the roll out was the extensive education campaign – over 500 staff attended tutorials on the preventative approach to pressure injuries and the use of the cushions. In addition, over 750 educational posters were distributed, and all inpatient units were provided with an information pack about the cushions, including infection control, maintenance and ordering. This comprehensive approach meant that the roll out went smoothly with everyone understanding the purpose and requirements of the new practice.

    The approach to pressure injury prevention has become part of daily clinical practice at SVHM. The ongoing responsibility for maintaining the initiative has been taken up by the Occupational Therapy Department and the Nurse Unit Managers of each ward. Occupational Therapy staff now work with Nurse Unit Managers to assess the condition of the cushions and replace them as necessary. They are also champions of the policy and work to ensure it remains standard practice throughout the hospital. The Occupational Therapy Department even keeps a supply of cushions for patients to purchase and use at home.

    This groundbreaking approach to preventing pressure injuries has already shown impressive results. Just six months after the roll out was completed, pressure injuries of all types were reduced by 34 per cent. Not only that, but the severity of the injuries that did occur were reduced across the board.

    Recognition of the effectiveness of the initiative has come from far and wide. St Vincent’s Health Australia awarded the project a Quality Award in 2013 for Exceptional Care – A culture of no harm. Several other organisations have also expressed interest in adapting the initiative for their own use.

    Not only that, but the custom designed pressure relieving cushions developed by SVHM have proved very popular with other healthcare providers, due to the evidence based development process. They have been so effective that their manufacturer has now made them their standard.

    Perhaps, however, the worth of the initiative can be gauged more simply - as Natalie says, “even if there’s one person we prevented from a pressure injury, then it’s worth it.”

  • Health services showed great innovation and creativity in how they went about promoting and educating on this concept ... of person centred care ... and working towards it being embedded in usual clinical practice.

    When most of us think of hospital, we think of a place you go to get better – either because you’re very sick or injured. Historically, this has been the main role of the hospital – the treatment of acute disease and trauma – but it is no longer the case.

    As the population ages and the nature of healthcare changes, hospital admissions are increasingly about treating chronic conditions, often at the times when they flare up. This has meant a significant shift in approach for hospitals and clinicians. Some have taken longer to realise this change, and some have been resistant to accepting it, but others have seen these changes as an opportunity to create new ways of providing services and new models of care that meet the needs of this predominantly older hospital population.

    This philosophy is what underpinned the Council of Australian Governments Long Stay Older Patients Initiative (COAG LSOP) in Victoria. The COAG LSOP ran initially from 2006 to 2010, and was then extended to 2013. In Victoria, the program has been implemented by the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) as Improving Care for Older People (ICOP), building on work that had been ongoing since the development of the 2003 policy of the same name. In the second stage, from 2010 to 2013, 35 public health services across the state participated in the initiative, including all metropolitan health services. These health services implemented a huge range of innovations and changes to improve the care of older people in hospital.

    Health services were funded to make changes in a range of areas. They were asked to make improvements to the physical environment that would facilitate better outcomes for older people. One of the most popular improvements was purchasing clocks for patient rooms, especially those showing date and day as well as time. In fact over a thousand clocks were bought! Other improvements included improving chairs and signage, buying pressure care equipment like cushions and heel wedges, through to creating garden areas for older patients and patients with dementia.

    Policy development was another focus of the program, namely including ICOP principles for minimising functional decline into policies and clinical guidelines. In fact almost all participating hospitals had developed and implemented an organisation wide policy on minimising functional decline by the end of the initiative.

    Health services were also asked to provide professional development to improve their workforce’s ability to best care for older people. A range of education programs were delivered, ranging from lunchtime seminars to vocational qualifications.

    Of course, all this policy and knowledge has to be translated into practice, and embedding the evidence into models of care was perhaps the biggest focus of the program. The ways health services went about this, the areas on which they focused and the approaches taken were greatly varied – many examples of innovation can be found within these case studies. All have contributed to our knowledge of what works in minimising functional decline and what can be implemented to improve care for older people.

    Underpinning all this work was the principle of person centred practice, which is putting the patient at the centre of their care. Health services showed great innovation and creativity in how they went about promoting and educating on this concept and working towards it being embedded in usual clinical practice.

    Implementing such culture change needs leadership to be successful. As Chief Executive of Eastern Health, Alan Lilly has prioritised the patient experience. His recognition that older people are the major users of the health service – he estimates that people over 70 make up at least 40 per cent of their patients – puts their experience front and centre. Using patient feedback to work out priorities for changes has led to improvement like the roll out of staff name badges that can be easily seen by patients and visitors.

    Eastern Health now compiles a list of the top 12 priorities for the year, from the patients’ perspective. Ultimately, what comes out as being most important to patients is communication and feeling listened to by staff, says Alan.

    Sue Race, Divisional Director of Subacute and Aged Care Services at Western Health (WH), has championed the principles of ICOP since working on the original policy Improving care for older people: a policy for health servies in 2003. She finds it particularly rewarding to have seen a culture shift occur within Western Health during that period, so that the ICOP principles are now embedded into everyday practice across the organisation. She says that having the principles embedded into the clinical governance structure at WH has been essential.

    Eastern Health's CEO says they now compile a list of the top 12 priorities for the year, from the patients' perspective. Ultimately, what comes out as being most important to patients is communication and feeling listened to by staff.

    Kate Mangion, Manager Communications and Partnerships, division of Subacute and Aged Care Services at WH, who worked on the ICOP project, agrees. “There’s high level governance and really high level support [for this work], and I think it’s great that now we’re seeing so many different people involved in leading all this work,” she says.

    This new way of working is spreading through health services as more and more clinicians who were involved in the program champion its ongoing importance. Kate Allen, Nurse Unit Manager of the Geritatric Evaluation Management ward at St Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne worked on the ICOP project there. She says that there are people who worked on the project in positions throughout the organisation. “We all approach our work with our headspace changed,” she says, “and this approach influences others and the message keeps spreading.”

    Nicole Doran, Manager Ageing and Complex Care at DHHS, has played a key role in overseeing the implementation over the past decade. Nicole is proud of Victoria’s role in leading the way in best care, and says “these implementation case studies are just some of the many good news stories across the State.” She also stresses that this has only been possible because of the commitment and collaboration of health services, DHHS, the National Ageing Research Institute and a host of experts in their field, to improve outcomes for older people.

    Indeed Best care for older people everywhere: The toolkit, affectionately known throughout health services as The toolkit, and the Improving the environment for older people: An audit tool are two tangible resources developed during this period to support health services make evidence based changes.Nicole’s hope is that The toolkit, now in its third edition as this new web based resource Older people in hospital, will retain the existing audience and attract a new audience, not only within Australia, but also internationally. As she says, “that alone is a legacy in itself.”


Clinical handover for older people in hospital

Applying a person-centred approach to clinical handover plays a critical role in preventing functional decline in older people in hospital.

Applying a person centred approach to clinical handover plays a critical role in preventing functional decline in older people in hospital.

To prevent harm or decline include strategies to optimise mobility, self-care, nutrition and hydration, orientation and independence with continence, at each handover.

Explaining these strategies to each of our patients and their families and carers encourages them to become involved in preventing their decline in hospital.

The accompanying case study highlights some of these strategies and can be read in conjunction with each of the clinical topics.

Clinical handover

Clinical handover is the ‘procedure’ we use in hospitals for transferring “professional responsibility and accountability, in writing and face to face, for some or all aspects of care for a patient, or group of patients, to another person or professional group on a temporary or permanent basis.”1

It has been recognised as a high risk area for patient safety and a priority for all clinicians.

It can occur:

  • shift-to-shift
  • ward-to-ward
  • between clinical staff
  • between disciplines, and
  • between treating teams.

Good clinical handover includes considering if:

  • environmental factors are impacting or might impact the patient1
  • a patient needs significant care or immediate attention1
  • a patient is deteriorating or might deteriorate (see Standard 9)1
  • occupational health and safety issues need to be addressed1

The process is enhanced when:

  • it follows a standard format
  • uses a checklist
  • contains a minimum dataset1

As clinicians, it is our responsibility to understand and follow the documented and standardised clinical handover processes in use at our health services.

Many Victorian health services are moving towards involving patients and their families in bedside handover wherever possible and appropriate, such as during shift-to-shift and ward-to-ward handovers within daylight hours. This provides the opportunity to invite patients and their families to take small evidence-based actions to keep well during their stay in hospital.

Handing over involves communicating the actions needed to address the person’s presenting problem and the actions needed to prevent additional problems occurring. This includes incorporating strategies outlined in the topics to prevent functional decline.

ISBAR/ISOBAR

Victorian health services are using the ISBAR or ISOBAR1 tools as a means to implement standardised clinical handovers. Each of the components of these tools contains essential elements to guide clinicians in the process of face-to-face and written handover2,3

I – Identification of patient

  • Should include three patient identifiers such as name, date of birth and medical record number
  • Current clinical status
  • Advance care planning
  • Person centred care requirements
  • Prospect of discharge or transfer

S - Situation and status, including risk of delirium, pressure injuries, falls, continence and medication issues and so on

O – Observation, including latest risk assessments, examinations etc

  • Latest observations and when they were taken (NSQHS Standard 9 recognising patient deterioration)
  • Presenting problem
  • Background problems
  • Current issues
  • Evaluation (examination findings, investigation findings, current diagnosis)
  • Management to-date and an assessment as to whether the management is working

B – Background and history

A – Assessment and actions, including risk assessments and successful management strategies such as providing water with meals to alleviate swallowing difficulties

  • Understanding of what problems are being treated or clear communication that the diagnosis in unknown
  • Tasks to be completed
  • Abnormal or pending results (includes recommendations and an agreed plan and who to call if there is a problem)
  • A plan for communication to the senior in charge
  • Clear accountability for actions

R – Responsibility and risk management, including documenting and recording all successful/unsuccessful prevention strategies

  • Responsibility and task acceptance from the incoming team. Ideally includes signing or accepting handover sheets
  • Read back of critical information by the incoming team
  • Where risks are identified for a patient ensure clinical risk management plans are included in handover.

1. 'Safety and Quality Improvement Guide Standard 6: Clinical Handover (October 2012)', (Sydney: ACSQHC, 2012).

2. Clinical Communique [electronic resource]: Department of Forensic Medicine Monash University Victorian Institute of Forensic Medicine, 2 (2015).

3. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care, 'The Ossie Guide to Clinical Handover Improvement', (Sydney: ACSQHC, 2010).

Clinical case study

  • I reinforce to Elsie the best thing she can do to get back to her garden, is to try and keep doing all the usual things she would at home whilst she’s in hospital. Like drinking and eating regularly, getting up to go to the toilet and taking short walks with her daughter or one of the nurses around the ward.

    Arriving on the ward

    When I meet Elsie on the ward, I read in her notes that she is an 85 year old lady who presented to ED via ambulance following a fall. She has fractured her left shoulder in two places and has just had surgery. She has a history of osteoarthritis, had a mild stroke some years ago, has mild congestive cardiac failure, a mild cognitive impairment and wears glasses for myopia and hearing aids. Elsie lives alone, drives to see her husband in a nursing home every day and has been independent with all her activities of daily living. This is not the picture I see when I look her. She is quite a thin lady, who is drowsy after her anaesthetic and looks quite dishevelled in her hospital gown. Elsie looks quite frail. She’s been in hospital for two days and her notes say that she could have been on the ground for over 8 hours before a neighbour found her.

    Orientating Elsie to the ward

    I introduce myself and tell her that I’ll be the nurse looking after her today. I ask her if she can tell me where she is and she says she knows she’s in hospital but doesn’t know what day it is or how long she’s been here. The last thing she remembers is being in her garden. I explain that she had fallen over and that she has fractured her shoulder in two places. I tell her that her surgery went well and that she’s now in ward 2B. I tell her that I’ll help her settle in and then we will run through a few tests to make sure we give her the right care while she’s here.

    Elsie denies that she’s in any pain, but I notice she is wincing when I help her move around in bed. I also note that there is no record of her having used her bowels since she presented in ED two days ago.

    I know Elsie has had a little bit to eat and drink in recovery and I’m keen that she keeps her fluid up so we can keep her hydrated. I help her to sit up and put her glasses on the tray table within her reach. She has a few sips of water and we complete the menu for her lunch together. I place a request to have her meal delivered on a red tray, which lets all staff know that she needs assistance with her meal when it arrives. I ask her if she’d like me to give her daughter a call to let her know that she has arrived on the ward. Elsie thinks this would be a good idea and requests that I ask her daughter to bring in her hearing aids. In the meantime, we decide that I’ll speak directly into her right ear, as she says that makes it easier for her to hear me.

    I explain that she’ll need to keep drinking and eat well. I also explain that once she’s a little more alert in a few minutes, we’ll get her up and walk to the bathroom together.

    Elsie seems reluctant to get up to go to the toilet, so I explain to her that it is one of the most important things to do in order to keep up her strength. Even a few short walks to the toilet can help her to stay mobile and helps prevent problems like developing pressure sores from staying in the one position for too long.

    In the bathroom, the small amount of urine she passes is very dark in colour. I show her how to sit on the commode safely and I explain that this is a sign of dehydration so we’ll need to keep her fluids up.

    I explain to Elsie that even a few short walks to the toilet can help her to stay mobile and helps prevent other problems like developing pressure sores from staying in the one position for too long.

    Working with the team, Elsie and her family

    She is clearly in pain when she is getting back into her gown, so I ask the registrar to review her medication and she recommends some pain relief. The doctor also notes that Elsie is at high risk of developing delirium from both unmanaged pain and dehydration. She completes a frailty, pain and cognitive screen so that we can decide how to manage her symptoms and have a baseline on these areas to monitor throughout Elsie’s stay. I also commence a bowel chart.

    With Elsie’s permission I call the GP to get more of a picture of her usual cognitive and physical function. When her daughter arrives, the doctor and I both speak to her to gather further information. We encourage her to let us know if she notices any changes in Elsie’s level of alertness during her stay in hospital.

    I note that as Elsie is particularly at risk of falling and that her balance is compromised by only using one arm. I place her call bell within reach of her right arm and show her how to use it. She’s a bit drowsy so I’ll need to assess her ability to use the bell and repeat the instruction again.

    I let her know that we that I’ll be checking in on her regularly to monitor her pain and provide medication if necessary, help her with getting comfortable, see if she needs to go to the toilet and help with anything else. I remind her to take regular sips of water to avoid a dry mouth and explain the importance of this to her daughter too and provide the daughter with reassurance as I can see she is worried.

    Handing over Elsie’s care

    When my shift is about to finish I make sure my notes are up to date. I introduce Elsie to my colleague and we complete handover at Elsie’s bedside. I let Elsie know that I’ll explain to my colleague what has brought her into hospital and the types of measures we have put in place to ensure she stays as well as possible whilst she’s here. I run through the post-surgery precautions, wound care, pain relief, the bowel chart and falls prevention interventions and explain to my teammate that Elsie needs prompting to keep up her fluids and assistance with eating. I also explain that Elsie’s daughter will be bringing in her hearing aids a bit later. Elsie adds that her appetite hasn’t been good for the last few months and says she thinks she’s lost some weight. We make a note of this and my colleague says she’ll make a referral to the dietitian.

    Second day on the ward

    Elsie looks much brighter today but says she’s worried she might not make it home to her garden. When I ask her why it is worrying her, she says her husband John also had a fall about four months ago and did very poorly after he got home from hospital. She says he is now in a nursing home. She shows me a photo of herself and John, in their garden, taken about two weeks before he had the fall. I see a well-groomed lady, with a bright smile and I can tell she has a spring in her step. I empathise that this must have been so hard for them both and then ask her to tell me about John. She starts smiling and says “he’d be saying to me ‘chin up Else!’”. I say he must be a lovely man and she laughs and nods saying “‘not a bad looker either’”. We both have a giggle.

    I reinforce to Elsie the best thing she can do to get back to her garden, and her usual routine, is to try and keep doing all the usual things she would at home whilst she’s in hospital. Like drinking and eating regularly, getting up to go to the toilet and taking short walks with her daughter or one of the nurses around the ward. I also emphasise that getting dressed and sitting out of bed for her meals is really important, as is asking for pain relief. I ask her to make sure she and her daughter keep a note of her questions for when the doctor, nurse or pharmacist came to see her. I tell her that we’ll be organising a physiotherapist, occupational therapist and possibly a social worker to come and see her over the next few days so we can all work with her to get her back home. I also encourage her to talk to her daughter about who she would like to make decisions for her if there comes a time in the future when she no longer can. She says that she’s been thinking about this since John went into the nursing home. I tell Elsie it’s not surprising and it’s likely her daughter is too.


Improving access

Older people in hospital are at risk of functional decline and require a multi-dimensional approach to minimise this risk.

Older people in hospital are at risk of functional decline and require a multi-dimensional approach to minimise this risk.

This set of ten fact sheets cover the topics of communication, comprehensive geriatric assessment, identifying and managing cognitive impairment, multi-morbidity, preventing adverse events, advance care planning, interdisciplinary practice, implementing evidence based practice and minimising the risk of transitions.

  • What is it?

    Best care for older people in hospital uses a person-centred approach and evidence-based tools and resources to identify and respond to the risks associated with hospital admission.

    To provide best care we must consider how the person’s medical treatment and healthcare may limit their activity as well as impact on their level of independence and ability to return to their pre-morbid lifestyle. During their stay in hospital older people can:

    • experience falls
    • develop a delirium
    • become malnourished or dehydrated
    • develop depression
    • become incontinent
    • experience unidentified or poorly managed pain
    • develop pressure injuries.

    Any of these issues can have a significant effect on a patient’s ability to maintain a level of independence that allows them to return home.

    Why is it important?

    • As the population ages, older people are becoming the major user of hospital services.
    • Older people who present to hospital have a significantly higher risk of experiencing functional decline.
    • Older people have diverse care needs. These challenge the traditional care models of modern hospitals that focus on single disease or conditions at the expense of a holistic person-centred approach.
    • Frailty is estimated to effect a quarter to a half of all older people. Being frail means that relatively minor stressors can trigger significant changes in health status.1
    • Dementia is highly prevalent in older people and becomes more prevalent with increasing age. It is estimated that between 21 and 24 per cent of those aged 85 years and over have dementia.2
    • Having dementia puts patients at significantly higher risk of adverse outcomes such as falls and delirium.

    How can you provide the best care for older people in hospital?

    Find out what matters to your patient. It is essential to be person centred in every encounter you have with older people, their families and carers.

    This approach is the cornerstone of providing the best care for older people in hospital. Consider your patient’s treatment needs in the context of their physical and mental health, their emotional and social needs.

    The following evidence-based strategies will play a large role in improving your patient’s experience and outcomes in hospital:

    • Treat the person not the disease. With many older people having multiple medical conditions you need to identify what is important to the person.
    • Monitor the older person for signs and symptoms of clinical deterioration. Routine vital signs on their own will not alert clinicians to changes in an older person’s health status.
    • Promote independence through encouraging your patient to be dressed, to self-care, mobilise and toilet themselves. Prolonged resting in bed must be avoided.
    • Ensure your patient is eating and drinking. A high percentage of older people present to hospital malnourished.
    • Look out for changes in cognitive and functional status, which may indicate that your patient is developing a delirium.
    • Always involve family and carers in all aspects of care planning. Family and carers know the person best and can provide an understanding of pre-morbid level of function.
    • Screen the older person’s family or carer for psychosocial and emotional wellbeing issues and link them with appropriate supports during their stay.
    • Identify, respond and develop a plan to manage an older person’s pain. Pain is highly prevalent in older people; it is commonly under-treated and can affect an older person’s efforts to self-care.
    • Review medications. Older people are more at risk of experiencing problems related to medications.
    • Recommend frail older people for a comprehensive geriatric assessment. This should not be delayed because of other medical issues.

    1. Clegg A, Young J, Iliffe S, Rikkert MO & Rockwood K 2013, ‘Frailty in elderly people’, Lancet, 381(9868):752-62.

    2. Deloitte Access Economics 2011, Dementia Across Australia, 2011–2050, Report to Alzheimer’s Australia, Kingston.

  • What is it?

    Communication is much more than just providing information. It is a shared process in which participants exchange information, ideas and feelings to create mutual understanding and shared meaning.1

    Communication is reflective of person centred care practices, whereby an older person is placed at the centre of a collaborative partnership with hospital staff.

    The communication process is an intervention; you need to be mindful of its impact during every encounter.1 All hospital staff have a shared role in improving communication with older patients and their family and carers while in hospital.

    Why is it important?

    • There is much room for improvement in the area of communication. The majority of complaints received by health services are related to dissatisfaction with the person’s experience of communication.2
    • People wish to be engaged in healthcare discussions in a way they can understand.3 They want to know what you are doing and why.
    • Effective communication is one way of enhancing an older person’s experience of and participation in their healthcare, leading to better health outcomes.4
    • Improving communication:
      • Empowers older people – knowing and understanding what is happening, what to do and where to get help when needed.5
      • Enables older people to express their views and beliefs, identifying “what matters to them” rather than “what is the matter with them”.6
      • Increases a person’s capacity to manage their health condition(s).
      • Requires clear expression from the person delivering the message and the full comprehension of the person receiving the message within a two-way dialogue.

    How can you improve your communication with older people?

    As an individual:

    • Be mindful that an admission to hospital can be a major life event for some older people.
    • Introduce yourself, explaining your role and why you are seeing the person.
    • Ask the older person how they would like to be addressed, making eye contact and engaging in general conversation.
    • Gain consent to involve the family or carers. They can provide important information about the older person’s life.
    • Screen, assess and adjust the way you respond to people who have vision, hearing, speech or cognitive impairment.
    • Adjust your own voice, tone and body posture to demonstrate respect and interest.
    • Listen and support an older person to express their needs and wants.
    • Be mindful of not using patronising language like ‘love’ or ‘dear’ and consider how your own attitudes and value base to ageing may influence the encounter.
    • Don’t refer to the person as a task, bed number or diagnosis either directly or to colleagues on the ward (acknowledging privacy and confidentiality concerns).
    • Avoid using acronyms for diagnoses, hospital wards, service providers etc. that are likely to be unfamiliar to older people.
    • Be sensitive to the potential impact of low literacy levels, in particular health literacy.
    • Use language-specific interpreters for all important conversations.
    • Use language aids to assist with day-to-day care.
    • Encourage the older person to use the ‘ask me 3’ questions – “what is my main problem?”; “what do I need to do?” and “why is it important for me to do this?”. 7

    As a team:

    • Decide who will engage the older person and their family or carer in difficult conversations.
    • Decide which team members will be involved in the conversations.
    • Nominate one member of the team to lead the conversation.
    • Discuss the routines of the hospital and explain when the older person and their family or carers will have the opportunity to discuss their concerns with the doctor/treating team.
    • Provide the older person with the number of the person they can contact post discharge if they have any questions.

    Consider simple adjustments:

    • Check that lighting is adequate.
    • Reduce reflective glare/visual distractions.
    • Reduce background noise.
    • Encourage the patient to use their hearing aids or amplifiers and ensure they are within reach.
    • Provide quality written materials in plain language/easy English/alternative languages.
    • Ensure the room set-up is as comfortable as possible when having family and carer meetings.
    • Consider and respect privacy and gender differences in shared wards.

    1. Hill S, Lowe DB & Ryan RE 2011, Interventions for Communication and Participation: Their Purpose and Practice. In: Hill S (ed.), The Knowledgeable Patient: Communication and Participation in Health , Wiley-Blackwell, UK.

    2. Office of the Health Services Commissioner 2008, 2008 Annual Report , Office of the Health Services Commissioner , Victoria.

    3. Prictor M & Hill S 2011, Does communication with consumers and carers need to improve? In: Hill S (ed.), The Knowledgeable Patient: Communication and Participation in Health , Wiley-Blackwell, UK.

    4. Department of Health 2012, Best care for older people everywhere – The toolkit , State Government of Victoria, Melbourne.

    5. Hill S & Draper M 2011, A new conceptual framework for advancing evidence-informed communication and participation. In: Hill S (ed.) The Knowledgeable patient: Communication and participation in health , Wiley-Blackwell, UK.

    6. Berwick D 2013, A promise to learn – a commitment to act: improving the safety of patients in England . Report to the National Advisory Group on the Safety of Patients in England.

    7. National Patient Safety Foundation, 2014, Ask Me 3 , Retrieved 8 Dec 2014.

  • What is it?

    Comprehensive geriatric assessment is ‘a multidimensional, interdisciplinary diagnostic process to determine the medical, psychological, and functional capabilities of a frail elderly person in order to develop a coordinated and integrated plan for treatment and long-term follow-up’.1

    It requires us to use a person centred approach to find out what matters to our older patients to maximise their strengths, functional independence and outcomes.

    Why is it important?

    • Older people are the major users of hospitals, and often have longer stays, which increases their risk of functional decline.
    • Older people with frailty and multimorbidity as well as impaired cognition, poor mobility and incontinence will benefit from a comprehensive assessment.2
    • Information gained from a comprehensive geriatric assessment allows clinicians to implement a person-centred care plan which can reduce functional decline, support independence and improve quality of life.
    • An assessment can also facilitate discharge planning and reduce length of stay, medication use, and the need for admission to residential care.2,3
    • A comprehensive geriatric assessment is a good time to encourage the older person and their family to consider advance care planning, identify their substitute decision maker and document their decisions.

    How can you carry out a comprehensive geriatric assessment?

    An initial risk screen of all older people in hospital aged over 70 years should identify those who would benefit from a comprehensive assessment. This need may change during the patient’s hospital stay, as indicated by ongoing monitoring of their health status.

    What does a comprehensive geriatric assessment involve?

    • A specialist interdisciplinary team approach involving a geriatrician to undertake a comprehensive assessment.
    • Use of validated tools to gather a complete picture of the older person’s:
      • medical health
      • physical functioning
      • psychological functioning
      • social functioning.2
    • Collecting information through observation, open questioning of the older person and their family or carers, and reviewing their medical records to complement your assessment using the validated tools.

    Involve the older person, their family and carers

    • Assume the patient is well placed to provide accurate information unless you suspect a medical condition is significantly affecting their ability to do so.
    • Consider the patient’s health literacy and their cultural and linguistic background. Check they have all their necessary aids such as hearing aids and glasses.
    • Communicate clearly with the patient, their family or carer and explain why you are collecting the information and how it will inform their care plan.
    • Screen the patient’s family or carer for carer stress and refer to appropriate inpatient and outpatient support services such as the Social Work team and Alzheimer’s Victoria and Carers Victoria.
    • Ask the person what matters to them and what they would like to see happen next.

    What to do with the information

    • Communicate the outcomes of the comprehensive assessment to the person, their family, carers and all necessary staff.
    • Use the assessment information to inform both the person’s care plan and their discharge plan.
    • Monitor the older person’s health status and evaluate their care plan on an ongoing basis throughout their hospital stay.
    • Refer to your health service’s recommended template or validated tools to collect information during the assessment.

    1. Wieland D & Hirth V 2003, ‘Comprehensive geriatric assessment’, Cancer Control 10(6):454-462.

    2. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare 2013, Australian hospital statistics 2011–12,Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, Canberra.

    3. Centre for Applied Gerontology, Bundoora Extended Care Centre, Northern Health 2004, A guide for assessing older people in hospitals. Report to the Australian Health Ministers' Advisory Council, Victoria.

    4. Ellis G & Langhorne P 2004, ‘Comprehensive geriatric assessment for older hospital patients’, British Medical Bulletin 71(1):45-59

  • What is it?

    Cognitive impairment refers to an individual having memory and thinking problems. The person may have difficulty with learning new things, concentrating, or making decisions that affect their daily life. The most common causes of cognitive impairment among older people are dementia and delirium.1

    Dementia is a general term used to describe a form of cognitive impairment that is chronic, generally progressive and occurs over a period of months to years. It can affect memory, language, perception, personality and cognitive skills.2

    Delirium is an acute disturbance of attention and cognition where the patient experiences confusion. It is temporary and is a symptom of an underlying issue.3 Delirium is often overlooked or misdiagnosed in the hospital setting.4

    Depression is not just low mood or feeling sad, but a serious condition that needs treatment. Its symptoms can mimic those associated with cognitive impairment and it is often overlooked or misdiagnosed.

    Why is it important?

    • In the hospital environment almost 30 per cent of older people have cognitive impairment.5
    • Older people with a cognitive impairment are at greater risk of:
      • malnutrition
      • dehydration
      • falls
      • hospital-acquired pressure injuries
      • developing incontinence
      • medication issues.
    • These risks often lead to an increased hospital stay6,7 and poorer outcomes for older people.
    • Screening and early recognition is vital as the first presentation of cognitive impairment can occur during hospital admission.5
    • Ten to 15 per cent of older people have delirium at admission, and a further five to 40 percent are estimated to develop it during their hospital stay. Patients with dementia have double the risk of developing delirium.5
    • The hospital environment can increase levels of distress and disorientation experienced by people with cognitive impairment. This can put older people at risk and be distressing for staff, carers and family.
    • If unrecognised, cognitive impairment can increase the likelihood that an older person will end up in a premature placement rather than return home.

    How can you care for people with cognitive impairment?

    All hospital staff have a shared role in caring for patients with cognitive impairment. Best practice informs us that all patients over the age of 65 should be screened for cognitive impairment at the first point of contact with the health service, and when they transition to another area in the hospital. It is vital that this screening is documented in the patient’s medical record, and that the patient’s premorbid state is taken into account.

    Screen and assess patients with cognitive impairment

    • Recognise the different characteristics of delirium and dementia and rule out the possibility of depression.
    • It is vital that the all patients with a delirium are thoroughly investigated for the underlying cause so it can be treated.
    • Use a validated screening tool for cognitive impairment. These tools enable you to determine a baseline, develop a person-centred care plan and implement risk management strategies. The most commonly used tools in hospitals include:
      • Abbreviated Mental Test (AMT)
      • Standardised Mini-Mental State Examination (SMMSE)
      • Clock Drawing Test (CDT).
    • Identify the presence of behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) that respond to changes in the environment:
      • aggression
      • resistance to care
      • screaming/calling out/agitation
      • wandering
      • confusion
      • withdrawal.
    • Always check your observations with the person’s family or carer to ascertain if these BPSD symptoms are long standing or new. This will assist in developing an intervention plan and in forming a diagnosis.
    • If the patient is displaying signs of agitation, consider whether they may need to go to the toilet, if they are hungry or are in pain.

    Actively engage patients and families in all aspects of their care plan

    Families and carers offer a wealth of expertise and can often suggest care strategies to minimise risk of functional decline and the person’s level of distress.

    • Involve the family and carer in the care planning process and provide them with written information about cognitive and memory difficulties.
    • Establish the patient’s pre-morbid cognitive status. This will help you to determine intervention strategies.
    • Be mindful that a diagnosis can be quite confronting for the individual and their family and carer.
    • Screen the patient’s carer and family for carer stress and refer to appropriate inpatient and outpatient support services such as the Social Work team, Alzheimer’s Victoria and Carers Victoria.
    • Communicate clearly by using the strategies outlined in the Improving communication factsheet.
    • Use these key points:
      • introduce yourself
      • always use the patient’s name when addressing them
      • make sure you have eye contact at all times
      • remain calm and talk in a matter-of-fact way
      • keep sentences short and simple
      • give time for a response
      • take the time to explain what you are going to do and why you are doing it
      • focus on one instruction at a time
      • repeat yourself ­– don't assume you have been understood
      • don’t offer too many choices.
    • Encourage the patient and family and carer to discuss advance care planning with each other and the care team. See Advance care planning factsheet for more information.

    Respond to the needs of a patient with cognitive impairment

    • Adjust the immediate environment to minimise patient distress:
      • make every effort to reduce the number of times a patient transfers between wards
      • reduce stimulation
      • use diversional strategies such as engaging in a one-on-one conversation
      • situate the patient within sight of the nursing station
      • make sure the call bell is within the patient’s reach
      • involve the family and carers in providing direct care.
    • Engage in intentional rounding (carrying out regular checks with the patient at set intervals). Assist the patient with eating, drinking, pain relief, ambulation, regular toileting and repositioning (as required).
    • Some hospitals place the cognitive impairment identifier (cii), the information about me form, and a universal falls symbol above a patient’s bed, which acts as a communication tool to all staff.
    • Consider whether your health service could complete an environmental audit.
      • Improving the environment for older people in health services: an audit tool
      • Dementia Enabling Environment Principles.

    Monitor and evaluate a patient’s ongoing care

    • Document all interventions, and in conjunction with family and staff monitor whether they have been successful.
    • Formally handover that the older person has a cognitive concern and any strategies that you have found helpful to respond to these concerns:
      • between nursing shifts
      • within interdisciplinary care planning meetings
      • when the patient transfers to another area of the health service.

    All healthcare organisations and clinicians must practice in alignment with the National Safety and Quality Health Service Standards.


    1. Milisen K, Braes T, Fick DM & Foreman MD 2006, ‘Cognitive Assessment and Differentiating the 3 Ds (Dementia, Depression, Delirium)’, Nursing Clinics of North America, 41(3):1-22.

    2. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare 2012, Dementia in Australia, Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, Canberra, Australia.

    3. Clinical Epidemiology and Health Service Evaluation Unit, Melbourne Health 2006, Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Delirium in Older People. Report to Australian Health Ministers’ Advisory Council.

    4. Inouye S, Foreman M, Mion L, Katz K & Cooney L. 2001, ‘Nurses' recognition of delirium and its symptoms – Comparison of nurse and researcher ratings’, Archives of Internal Medicine, 160(20):2467-2473.

    5. Travers C, Byrne G, Pachana N, Klein K & Gray L. 2013, ‘Prospective observational study of dementia and delirium in the acute hospital setting’, Internal Medicine Journal, 43(3):262-269.

    6. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare 2013, Dementia care in hospitals: costs and strategies, Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, Canberra, Australia.

    7. Bail K, Berry H, Grealish L, Draper B, Karmel R, Gibson D & Peut A 2013, ‘Potentially preventable complications of urinary tract infections, pressure areas, pneumonia, and delirium in hospitalised dementia patients: retrospective cohort study’, BMJ Open, 3(6):2770.

  • What is it?

    Multimorbidity is the presence of multiple diseases and medical conditions – chronic or acute – in the one person.1 A recognition of multimorbidity requires these multiple diseases and conditions to be treated concurrently without a hierarchical order.2

    Aspects of the patient’s context – biopsychosocial factors, risk factors, support networks, health care consumption and the patient’s coping strategies – may function as modifiers of the effects of multimorbidity.3 Multimorbidity requires a holistic approach which puts the patient, not the disease, at the centre of the plan.4

    Why is it important?

    • Multimorbidity is associated with more complex clinical management, poor treatment outcomes, longer hospital stays, increased healthcare costs and increased risk of readmission.
    • The prevalence of multimorbidity increases substantially with age.5 More than half of older people have three or more chronic diseases.4 These may include cancer, diabetes, asthma, arthritis, pain and mental illness.
    • Current clinical guidelines have a single disease focus and rarely consider the cumulative impact of multimorbidity. This can lead to inefficient care which is inconvenient and unsatisfactory to both patients and clinicians.6,7
    • Older people with multimorbidity are more likely to have a poorer quality of life, experiencing depression, premature mortality and frequent hospital admissions.6,8
    • Older people with multimorbidity are often prescribed multiple medications (polypharmacy). Those on five or more medications are three times more likely to be taking inappropriate medications and are at greater risk of an adverse drug reaction or medication errors. Non-adherence to prescribed regimes, and the interaction of drugs and multiple diseases can affect the burden of care.6
    • Eighty per cent of older people report having poor health literacy that impacts on their ability to understand and use health information.9

    How can you respond to the needs of older people with multimorbidity?

    All hospital staff have a shared role in identifying and responding to multimorbidity in patients.

    To provide best care:

    • Ensure that the patient’s medical history is complete and that medication safety and quality systems are in place to monitor the management of multimorbidity.
    • Check that mental health issues such as depression and cognitive issues such as dementia are recognised as multimorbidity.
    • Consult with the patient and their family and carers to determine what the patient’s primary concerns are.
    • Engage an interdisciplinary team to manage the patient’s multimorbidity.

    Involve patients, their family and carers in the management of multimorbidity

    • Find out what is most important to the patient, their family and carers in determining the treatment or care plan.
    • Ask the patient about their experience of their multimorbidity, and what they want from their treatment.
    • Consider the patient’s health literacy level and their understanding of multimorbidity.
    • Encourage shared decision-making so the patient and their family or carer are engaged in the management of their conditions.
    • Encourage the discussion of advance care planning with the patient and their family or carer.

    Assess medication safety in older people with multimorbidity

    • Discuss the need for a medication review with the patient, their family or carer, the multidisciplinary team and the patient’s GP.
    • Check the patient’s understanding of their medication needs.
    • Minimise the risks to the patient associated with polypharmacy and medication non-adherence.

    Ensure continuity of care for patients with multimorbidity

    • Engage the patient’s other care providers such as pharmacists, specialists, case managers and GPs to provide a coordinated service.
    • Make sure the patient and their family or carers are involved in the management of multimorbidity and care plan processes.
    • Ensure there are mechanisms in place to monitor older people with multimorbidity and escalate their care when required.
    • Review and ongoing appraisal of the revised care plan is required when the patient’s circumstances and goals of care change. Ideally this should be coordinated through a single clinician who intimately knows the patient, the issues and the care goals.

    1. Akker Mvd, Buntinx F & Knottnerus JA 1996, ‘Comorbidity or multimorbidity’, The European Journal of General Practice, 2(2):65.

    2. Akker Mvd, Buntinx F, Roos S & Knottnerus JA 2001, ‘Problems in determining occurrence rates of multimorbidity’, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 54(7):675-679.

    3. Le Reste JY, Nabbe P, Manceau B, Lygidakis C, Doerr C, Lingner H, Czachowski S, Munoz M, Argyriadou S, Claveria A, Le Floch B, Barais M, Bower P, Van Marwijk H, Van Royen P & Lietard C 2013, ‘The European General Practice Research Network presents a comprehensive definition of multimorbidity in family medicine and long term care, following a systematic review of relevant literature’, Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 14(5):319-25.

    4. Boyd C, McNabney M, Brandt N, Correa-de-Araujuo R, Daniel M, Epplin J, Fried T, Goldstein M, Holmes H, Ritchie C & Shega J 2012, ‘Guiding principles for the care of older adults with multimorbidity: an approach for clinicians: American Geriatrics Society Expert Panel on the Care of Older Adults with Multimorbidity’ J Am Geriatr Soc, 60(10):E1-E25.

    5. Barnett K, Mercer SW, Norbury M, Watt G, Wyke S & Guthrie B 2013, ‘Epidemiology of multimorbidity and implications for health care, research, and medical education: a cross-sectional study’, Lancet, 380(9836):37-43.

    6. Salisbury C 2013, ‘Multimorbidity: time for action rather than words’, British Journal of General Practice:64-65.

    7. Vitry A & Zhang Y 2008, ‘Quality of Australian clinical guidelines and relevance to the care of older people with multiple comorbid conditions’, MJA, 189(7):360-365.

    8. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare 2012, Australia's Health 2012, Australian Institute of Health and Welfare Canberra, Australia.

    9. Department of Health 2012, Best care for older people everywhere – The toolkit, State Government of Victoria, Melbourne.

  • What is it?

    An adverse event is an incident that results in harm to the patient. Adverse events commonly experienced in hospitals by patients over 70 include falls, medication errors, malnutrition, incontinence, and hospital-acquired pressure injuries and infections.

    What we do or do not do to identify and respond to issues such as malnutrition, uncontrolled pain and unrecognised delirium can contribute to a patient experiencing an adverse event and, in turn, functional decline.

    Why is it important?

    Physical and cognitive functional decline is often unrelated to the primary reason a person presents to hospital and can have a significant impact on a person’s ability to perform activities of daily living.

    • Older people are particularly vulnerable to experiencing adverse events due to inherent complexity in managing their care and a decline in physiological reserves. Approximately three in four older adults have complex multimorbidity1, and one in two older people take over four medications.2
    • Approximately one in 20 patients experience an adverse event while in hospital.3
    • Patients with adverse events stay about ten days longer and have over seven times the risk of an in-hospital death than those without complications.4

    How can you prevent an adverse event?

    Adverse events can be prevented through screening and early identification of the factors that put older people at risk.3,5

    Patients aged 70 years and over should be screened to determine the risks of adverse events, and undergo a comprehensive interdisciplinary assessment where risk is identified.

    Effective communication with patients, their family, carers and other healthcare professionals is important in preventing adverse events for older people in hospital.5 A lack of communication and collaboration between health professionals is a common factor in the majority of adverse events.6

    All staff have a shared role in preventing harm to older patients.

    Make sure you are familiar with your health service’s official policy regarding the prevention of adverse events.

    Screen and assess patients to minimise the risk of adverse events

    • Use validated tools to screen for the risk of adverse events such as: falls, medication errors, malnutrition, continence, delirium and hospital-acquired pressure injuries.
    • Ensure screening and assessment are undertaken at admission and transition to other areas in the health service.

    Engage patients, families and carers in the care plan

    • Encourage patients, family and carers to ask questions when you discuss risk factors and preventative measures:
      • Consider the patient’s health literacy and their cultural and linguistic background.
      • Check the patient has all necessary aids such as glasses and hearing aids.
    • Involve patients, family and carers in clinical handover processes and the care plan.
    • Ensure patients, family and carers know how to identify and respond to clinical deterioration.

    Respond to a patient who has a high risk of experiencing an adverse event

    • Undertake a comprehensive geriatric assessment – with interdisciplinary team input – to ensure that risk is addressed and preventative strategies are included in the patient’s care plan.
    • Discuss preventative strategies (such as a medication review) with the patient and their family or carer and implement any changes to reduce the risk of an adverse event.
    • Communicate adverse event risk factors to other staff involved in caring for the patient, for example by using alert symbols above patient beds, during team meetings and on clinical handover.
    • Ensure that critical information, such as a medication list or falls history, is transferred, acted upon, and documented during clinical handover. Many health services use the framework ISBAR (identify, situation, background, assessment and recommendation) when transferring patient information during clinical handover.

    Respond to a patient who has experienced an adverse event

    • Provide the necessary care to address the impact of the adverse event on the patient.
    • Inform and involve the patient and their family or carers of the adverse event and the strategies used to minimise risks.
    • Review all preventative strategies and assessment procedures to minimise further adverse events occurring.
    • Refer to the relevant specialist for best practice advice and management.
    • Monitor and evaluate the outcomes of the ongoing care plan and adjust as necessary.

    Monitor a patient’s ongoing care

    • Ensure you deliver person-centred care in agreement with the patient’s monitoring plan, including documenting the type and frequency of observations to be recorded for the patient.
    • Engage in intentional rounding (carrying out regular checks with the patient at set intervals) and assist the patient with eating, drinking, pain relief, ambulation, regular toileting and repositioning (as required).
    • Escalate the care of a patient whose condition deteriorates.

    The National Safety and Quality Health Service Standards provide a useful resource for hospital staff to prevent adverse events and harm to the patients.


    1. Barnett K, Mercer SW, Norbury M, Watt G, Wyke S & Guthrie B 2013, ‘Epidemiology of multimorbidity and implications for health care, research, and medical education: a cross-sectional study’, Lancet, 380(9836):37-43.

    2. Morgan TK, Williamson M, Pirotta M, Stewart K, Myers SP & Barnes J 2012, ‘A national census of medicines use: a 24-hour snapshot of Australians aged 50 years and older’, Med J Aust, 196(1):50-53.

    3. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare 2012, Australia's Health 2012, Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, Canberra, Australia.

    4. Ehsani JP, Jackson T & Duckett SJ 2006, ‘The incidence and cost of adverse events in Victorian hospitals 2003–04’, The Medical Journal of Australia, 184(11):551.

    5. Department of Health 2012, Best care for older people everywhere – The toolkit, State Government of Victoria, Melbourne.

    6. Mansah M, Griffiths R, Fernandez R, Chang E & Thuy Tran D 2014, ‘Older folks in hospitals: the contributing factors and recommendations for incident prevention’, Journal of Patient Safety, 10(3):146-153

  • What is it?

    Evidence-based practice (EBP) is an approach to care that integrates the best available research evidence with clinical expertise and patient values.1

    It involves translating evidence into practice, also known as knowledge translation, and ensuring that ‘stakeholders (health practitioners, patients, family and carers) are aware of and use research evidence to inform their health and healthcare decision-making’.2

    Why is it important?

    Implementing clinical knowledge, and introducing new interventions and therapies, is an important way to minimise functional decline in older people.

    • Four in 10 adult patients receive care that is not based on current evidence or guidelines, including ineffective, unnecessary or potentially harmful treatments.2
    • Despite the availability of evidence-based guidelines, there are significant gaps in implementing evidence into routine clinical practice.3
    • Translating evidence into practice can not only improve outcomes and quality of life for older people, it can also improve productivity and reduce healthcare costs.1

    How can you implement evidence-based initiatives to improve outcomes for older people?

    Implementing evidence-based practice is a key part of improving outcomes for older people in hospital. When considering current best practice in the areas of nutrition, cognition, continence, medication, skin integrity, and mobility and self-care, a good first reference is the Older people in hospital website.

    The National Safety and Quality Health Service Standards outlines the standards for providing best evidence care for older people in hospital.

    The ‘how to’ guide: turning knowledge into practice in the care of older people identifies a five-stage process to implementing change, which can be applied to translate evidence into practice.

    Identify a practice that could be improved

    • Select an area of interest in your clinical practice that could be improved – for example falls, medication errors or malnutrition.
    • Identify current best practice guidelines and evidence-based interventions associated with improved outcomes.
    • With your team, select an appropriate intervention and outcome measures that will influence your practice.
    • Collaborate with quality teams and researchers with expertise in the area you are focussing on.

    Barriers, enablers and issues

    • Identify the barriers to implementing change. This includes anything that might obstruct or slow down the adoption of a new clinical intervention, such as feasibility, existing care processes or existing team culture.
    • Explore the enablers to implementing change. This includes anything that might assist or encourage take up of a new evidence-based practice, such as positive staff attitudes, funding or alignment with accreditation standards.
    • Consider issues for any data collection for measuring the effectiveness of your intervention.
    • Plan for sustainability to ensure the change can be maintained.

    The intervention

    • Tailor the intervention to fit within the appropriate policies, standards and guidelines.
    • Engage and communicate with relevant stakeholders including staff, patients, family and carers to promote and facilitate adoption of the new intervention.
    • Consider implementing a plan-do-study-act cycle from the ‘how to’ guide in which interventions are introduced and tested in the real work setting, in a sequence of repeating, smaller quality cycles.

    What did and didn’t work

    • Monitor patient outcomes following the adoption of a new intervention.
    • Measure the impacts of translating evidence in your current practice.
    • Outline an evaluation to measure outcomes and demonstrate any improvement.

    Maintaining the intervention

    • Adapt and integrate the new intervention within the current systems taking into account funding and resources.
    • Ensure all new staff receive ongoing training.
    • Maintain ongoing communication, engagement and partnerships with relevant stakeholders and the broader network.

    1. Sackett D et al. 2000, ‘Evidence-Based Medicine: How to Practice and Teach’ EBM, 2nd edition. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, p1.

    2. Grimshaw JM, Eccles MP, Lavis JN, Hill SJ & Squires JE 2012, ‘Knowledge translation of research findings’, Implement Sci, 7(50):50.

    3. Runciman WB, Hunt TD, Hannaford NA, Hibbert PD, Westbrook JI, Coiera EW, Day RO, Hindmarsh DM, McGlynn EA & Braithwaite J 2012, ‘CareTrack: assessing the appropriateness of health care delivery in Australia’, Med J Aust, 197(2):100-5.

  • What is it?

    An interdisciplinary approach involves team members from different disciplines working collaboratively, with a common purpose, to set goals, make decisions and share resources and responsibilities.1

    A team of clinicians from different disciplines, together with the patient, undertakes assessment, diagnosis, intervention, goal-setting and the creation of a care plan. The patient, their family and carers are involved in any discussions about their condition, prognosis and care plan.2

    In contrast, a multidisciplinary approach involves team members working independently to create discipline-specific care plans that are implemented simultaneously, but without explicit regard to their interaction.3

    Depending on the resources of the individual health service, a combination of the two approaches may be used when caring for older people.

    Why is it important?

    • Older people in hospitals often have a number of different diagnoses and consequently have multiple and complex needs. Compared to younger age groups, a greater proportion of older people require an interdisciplinary approach to their care in order to deal with complex multimorbidity, social and psychological issues.3
    • The best possible outcomes for older people are achieved through a consultative, collaborative approach to care that actively involves the patient, their family/carers and an interdisciplinary team.1
    • An interdisciplinary approach can help avoid risk averse thinking by weighing up the risk against benefits for the patient.
    • An interdisciplinary approach can improve patient outcomes, healthcare processes and levels of satisfaction.4,5 It can also reduce length of stay 6,7 and avoid duplication of assessments, leading to more comprehensive and holistic records of care.8
    • The opportunity for discussion created by interdisciplinary care planning can be used for the patient, their family and carers to develop their ongoing plan.3

    How can you adopt an interdisciplinary approach to caring for older people?

    The care team need to work together, utilising an interdisciplinary approach, to provide and implement a care plan that meets the patient’s goals and needs.

    All health care professionals have a shared role in providing person-centred care for older people.

    Elements integral to a successful interdisciplinary approach

    Leadership

    Positive leadership and management give clear direction and vision for the team through:

    • Promoting an atmosphere of trust where contributions are valued and consensus is fostered.
    • Ensuring that the necessary resources, infrastructure and training are available, as well as a mix of skills, competencies and personalities amongst team members.9

    Person-centred practice

    Well-integrated and coordinated care that is based on the needs of the patient can contribute to reducing delays to provision of care and duplicating assessment.1

    • Involving the patient in all aspects of their care empowers them to speak up and contribute to decision-making.
    • Formulating shared standardised interdisciplinary care plans and records of care to contribute to holistic and comprehensive person-centred care.

    Teamwork

    An interdisciplinary approach relies on health professionals from different disciplines, along with the patient, working collaboratively as a team. The most effective teams share responsibilities and promote role interdependence while respecting individual members’ experience and autonomy.9

    • Ensure team members have clear goals, and an understanding of their shared roles and responsibilities within the team structure.5
    • Participate in joint assessment, diagnosis and goal setting.
    • Recognise the overlap in knowledge and expertise of staff from different disciplines.8
    • Encourage team cohesiveness and creativity through team commitment and the identification of mutual goals.5
    • Encourage less experienced team members to ask questions which may give rise to creative ideas and alternative perspectives.5
    • Establish teams with members from diverse disciplines to foster higher overall effectiveness, and hold regular team meetings which are associated with higher levels of innovation.10

    Communication

    Communication across disciplines, care providers and with the patient and their family/carers, is essential to setting the goals that most accurately reflect the person’s desires and needs.

    • Involve the patient’s GP or pharmacist to increase the success of the intervention.11
    • Communicate openly to encourage genuine collaboration. A breakdown of communications between health professionals is a common factor in hospital errors and adverse events.4,12
    • Document assessments and ensure clinical handover documents are completed thoroughly and stored in a central place.
    • completed thoroughly and stored in a central place.

    1. Department of Human Services 2008, Health independence programs guidelines, State Government, Melbourne.

    2. Jessup RL 2007, ‘Interdisciplinary versus multidisciplinary care teams: do we understand the difference?’, Australian Health Review, 31(3):330-331.

    3. Continuing Care Section, Programs Branch, Metropolitan Health and Aged Care Services Division, Department of Human Services 2003, Improving care for older people: a policy for health services, State Government of Victoria, Melbourne. .

    4. Fewster-Thuente L & Velsor-Friedrich B 2008, ‘Interdisciplinary collaboration for healthcare professionals’, Nursing Administration Quarterly, 32(1):40-48.

    5. Youngwerth J & Twaddle M 2011, ‘Cultures of Interdisciplinary Teams: How to Foster Good Dynamics’, Journal of Palliative Medicine, 14(5):650-654.

    6. Curley C, McEachern JE & Speroff T 1998, ‘A firm trial of interdisciplinary rounds on the inpatient medical wards – An intervention designed using continuous quality improvement’, Medical Care, 36(8):AS4-AS12.

    7. Curley C, McEachern JE & Speroff T 1998, ‘A firm trial of interdisciplinary rounds on the inpatient medical wards – An intervention designed using continuous quality improvement’, Medical Care, 36(8):AS4-AS12.

    8. Jacob A, Roe D, Merrigan R & Brown T 2013, ‘The Casey Allied Health Model of Interdisciplinary Care (CAHMIC): Development and implementation’, International Journal of Therapy & Rehabilitation, 20(8):387-395.

    9. Nancarrow SA, Booth A, Ariss S, Smith T, Enderby P & Roots A 2013, ‘Ten principles of good interdisciplinary team work. Human Resources for Health’, 11(1):1-11. doi:10.1186/1478-4491-11-19.

    10. Xyrichis A & Lowton K 2008, ‘What fosters or prevents interprofessional teamworking in primary and community care? A literature review’, International Journal of Nursing Studies, 45:140-153.

    11. Nazir A, Unroe K, Tegeler M, Khan B, Azar J & Boustani M, 2013, ‘Systematic Review of Interdisciplinary Interventions in Nursing Homes’, Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 14(7):471-478.

    12. Mansah M, Griffiths R, Fernandez R, Chang E & Thuy Tran D 2014, ‘Older folks in hospitals: the contributing factors and recommendations for incident prevention’, Journal of Patient Safety, 10(3):146-153.

  • What is it?

    Advance care planning is a process that enables a person to express their wishes for care, levels of treatment and acceptable health outcomes.

    When an advance care plan is documented it can guide clinical decision-making should a person be unable to participate in making decisions for themselves.1

    Advance care planning is a values-based approach with two main aspects:

    • discussing and documenting, a person's wishes in an advance care directive.
    • appointing a medical treatment decision maker.

    In Victoria, a person can create a legally binding advance care directive. A person’s advance care directive can include general statements about their values, medical preferences and what they would like their medical treatment decision maker to consider when acting on their behalf. It can also include instructional statements, in which a person may consent to or refuse a particular medical treatment.

    However, people may use a range of documents to express their values and preferences for care and treatment. Health services must give due consideration to a person’s advance care planning documentation, whatever form it takes.

    Why is it important?

    Advance care planning has wide-ranging benefits including:

    • improving the quality of life of the older person
    • reducing the stress and anxiety in family members2
    • supporting clinicians to provide person-centred care
    • improving professional satisfaction.

    ’Advance care planning helps to give me an ongoing voice in the level of medical treatment and quality of life I want, while I can still have my say.’ Maryan Tozer, healthcare consumer.

    How can you guide a person in advance care planning?

    All healthcare professionals have a shared role in providing the best care for older people. Person-centred care is central to advance care planning and involves having a conversation with a person about their future health outcomes and respecting their choices.

    Make it part of your daily practice

    There is no better time than now to have a conversation about advance care planning – it is a conversation that needs to happen over time, not just at the end of life. Advance care planning needs to be embedded into an older person’s usual care.

    Having the conversation

    Communication, particularly the skill of listening, is central to good advance care planning.

    Older people rely on the expertise of the medical team to guide their decision making and to initiate a conversation to assist them to clarify their priorities. Having a values-based conversation provides you with an opportunity to encourage an older person to explain what is important to them and for you to assist them to document their goals.

    Some ways to start the discussion about advance care planning include:

    • ‘Your health is quite good at the moment, so now is a good opportunity to talk about the future.’
    • ‘Let’s talk about what would happen if you couldn’t make decisions.’
    • ‘Who would make decisions for you and would they know what you would want?’

    Some things to keep in mind

    • Listen to the person – encourage them to express their fears, wishes and feelings. Ask them how they’re coping, and look for potential cues which may indicate that they want to discuss future plans.
    • Be honest, straightforward and sensitive.
    • It is often helpful to introduce the idea of advance care planning first, and discuss in more detail later.
    • Encourage the person to speak with their family, friends and treating team about their wishes for future care.
    • Consider health outcomes in terms of pain, cognition, eating, mobility, continence and what the person would find acceptable and the compromises they would be willing to make.

    What to do after the conversation

    You can help a person document their advance care plan in the following ways:

    • Follow your health service’s policy.
    • Give the person an advance care directive form. If your health service does not have one, there is a template available on the advance care planning forms pageExternal Link .
    • Create an alert in the medical record that a person has an advance care directive and/or an appointed medical treatment decision maker.
    • Document the conversation and decisions on an advance care planning discussion record.

    Encourage or assist the person to:

    • Write down their wishes for medical treatment in an advance care directive.
    • Appoint a medical treatment decision makerExternal Link .
    • Have a conversation about their future preferences and choices with their family and friends, particularly their medical treatment decision maker.
    • Provide copies of their advance care directive to their medical treatment decision maker, GP, local hospital, and those involved in providing their care.
    • Keep the originals.

    1. Department of Health 2014, Advance care planning: have the conversation. A strategy for Victorian health services 2014–2018, State Government of Victoria, Melbourne.

    2. Detering KM, Hancock AD, Reade MC & Silvester W 2010, ‘The impact of advance care planning on end of life care in elderly patients: randomised controlled trial’, British Medical Journal, 340.

  • What is it?

    The complex needs of an older person, together with increasing age, means that the older person will often experience multiple transitions during their hospital admission.1

    There may be a need to transfer the care of older people during a hospital admission for the following reasons:

    • Planned and emergency transfers between the treating teams and specialities.
    • Planned and emergency transfers between wards or units for the most appropriate or specialty care or completion of care (e.g. between emergency departments, short stay units, general medical, surgical departments, geriatric evaluation management units, ongoing rehabilitation or transition care programs).
    • Transfers into ambulatory settings such as Hospital in the Home.

    Why is it important?

    Older people are the major users of hospitals and often have longer stays. In 2011–2012, people aged 65 years and older accounted for almost half of patient days.2 The importance of mitigating the risks associated with discharge planning are well known in the hospital setting. However, identifying and responding to the same risks when an older person transitions within the hospital need greater care and consideration.

    Each treating team of the hospital needs to consider strategic ways they can identify and respond to risks associated with these transitions. Implementing a person-centred approach is essential in minimising these risks.

    The consequences of multiple transitions for older people include:

    • Increased risk of adverse events.
    • Increased risk of functional decline.
    • Increased risk of unnecessary tests and procedures.
    • Poor, or no communication, between staff members, older people, their families and carers, which can contribute to the risk of conflict and formal complaints.
    • Increased risk of loss of continuity of care.
    • Increased risk of developing delirium.
    • Potential delay in delivery of information held in medical records.
    • Increased length of stay for the older person.
    • Increased risk of premature readmission to hospital.
    • Possible residential care placement.
    • Practical concerns such as misplacement of hearing aids, glasses, teeth and walking aids – all of which play a large role in promoting a person’s independence and participation in their own care.

    How can you determine the risks associated with transitions for an older person?

    Engage the older person

    • Ascertain the needs and preferences of the older person on admission.
    • Include the older person, carer, family members and general practitioner in all decision-making and keep them informed of any changes to the care plan.
    • Use the following questions to guide conversation:
      • Is the older person aware of the reason for transition?
      • Is the family or carer aware of the reason for transition?
      • Have you considered using written or audio-visual materials to communicate the reasons for transition?
    • Ensure the older person and their family and carers have adequate opportunity to ask questions.
    • Employ the ‘teach-back method’.
    • Give the older person or their family and carers the information.
    • Ask them to use their own words to confirm their understanding.
    • Re-phrase or use other strategies to ensure they understand and can repeat the information accurately (if necessary).3
    • Bear in mind that you may need to repeat the conversation, or have the conversation at another time better suited to the older person.

    Ensure team collaboration

    • Identify and respond to risks of functional decline before, during and after the transition.
    • Ensure that critical information, such as a medication list or falls history, is transferred, acted upon, and documented during clinical handover. Many health services use the framework ISBAR (identify, situation, background, assessment and recommendation) when transferring patient information during clinical handover.
    • Advocate for the older person as part of the interdisciplinary team.
    • Ensure vital tasks are delegated and followed up.

    Consider practical issues

    • Ensure the older person has their belongings (including glasses, hearing aids, dentures and walking aids) when they are transferred.
    • Ensure that all medications, the patient summary and full medical history are transported with the older person.
    • Ensure the older person’s family or carer has the exact details of the impending destination.
    • On arrival to the new ward welcome the patient and ensure they are orientated to the bathrooms and the ward routines.

    1. Department of Health 2014, Advance care planning: have the conversation. A strategy for Victorian health services 2014–2018, State Government of Victoria, Melbourne.

    2. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare 2007, Older Australia at a glance (fourth edition), Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, Canberra, Australia.

    3. UnityPoint Health 2014, Always Use Teach-Back! Retrieved 9 Dec 2014


Improving Care for Older People Program - Health service initiatives

The second stage of the Improving Care for Older People (ICOP) program operated in Victoria from 2010 to 2013. Across Victoria, 35 public health services participated in the initiative, including all metropolitan health services. As part of the program, they were required to undertake initiatives to minimise the risk of functional decline in older patients and improve the provision of care in four areas:

  • Evidence-based environmental improvements
  • Organisation-wide policy development that provides a framework for improving care for older people across the organisation
  • Embedding the evidence base contained within The Toolkit to inform models of care to minimise functional decline for older people, with a focus on acute settings
  • Professional development activities to support workforce capacity building to better respond to the needs of older people in hospital settings

Outlined is a snapshot of the types of initiatives taken by health services relating to a range of clinical topics.

  • Health ServiceRequirement Addressed and Project Summary
    Alfred Health

    Environmental Improvements – Purchase of IT equipment to support implementation of electronic assessment

    Models of Care - An extensive review and revision of the Initial Nursing Assessment Tool (INAT) has been completed in partnership with the Improving Care for Older Persons (IC4OP) initiative and nursing services; implemented Electronic Documentation System (EDS) in subacute

    Austin HealthPolicy Development - Falls Risk Assessment Prevention & Management guideline introduced
    Barwon HealthModels of Care - Introduction of Electronic Risk Assessments based on toolkit assessment tools and NSQHS Standards – implemented in acute wards, short stay and inpatient rehabilitation - continuing roll out; E-Risk assessments trigger automated e-referrals for dietetics, occupational therapy and physiotherapy
    Bendigo Health

    Policy Development - Redeveloped policies to reflect/incorporate IC4OP principles including Falls Assessment and Management; Nutrition Screening and Assessment; Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment and Prevention

    Models of Care - Generic Adult Admission Screen – reviewed and updated to incorporate all toolkit domains and uses toolkit icons and NSQHSS icons; education conducted; work on increasing compliance via file audits etc.

    Melbourne HealthModels of Care - Development of nurse risk screening, assessment & care planning tool
    Mildura Base HospitalModels of Care - ‘Person Centred Admission Document’ (admission form) reviewed and updated - addition of falls risk assessment (Ontario Modified STRATIFY) and nursing discharge summary (copy given to patient on discharge)
    Monash HealthPolicy Development and Professional Development– Implementation of a pre and post fall assessment and management procedure. Staff education provided
    Portland District Health

    Models of Care - Introduction of models of care introduced and embedded into the sub-acute and acute wards - based on toolkit domains including assessment. Creation of clinical champion role for preventing functional decline with focus on person centred care and assessment

    Professional development - Education sessions run by clinical champion for preventing functional decline, including falls risk assessment, functional assessment, pressure sore risk assessment and patient handling assessment

    South West Healthcare

    Professional Development – Existing policies reviewed to include PCC approach including screening and assessment

    Models of Care - Introduction organisation wide of Cognition Risk Screen, Braden scale, Malnutrition Screening Tool (MST) and Falls Risk Assessment Tool (FRAT); introduction and roll out of new wound assessment tool including best practice guidelines; work on embedding use of pain assessment tools including cognitively impaired patients into practice via care plans

    Swan Hill District HealthModels of Care - Development and implementation of admission and risk assessment tool – includes FRAT, pressure risk assessment, malnutrition screen, referral tool, cognition screen, thrombosis risk, medication risk
    Werribee MercyPolicy Development - Clinical practice guidelines developed for continence screening and management, malnutrition screening, depression screening, delirium and dementia screening
    Western District Health Service

    Policy Development - Policies reviewed and redeveloped to reflect IC4OP principles, including assessment policy, including use of screening tools

    Models of Care - Assessment documentation consistent across organisation and sites

    Professional Development - E-learning packages developed and competency compliance monitored – use of screening tools including Braden and FRAT

    Western HealthModels of Care – implementation of revised screening and care planning tool across acute and subacute wards
  • Health ServiceRequirement Addressed and Project Summary
    Austin Health

    Models of Care – Implementation of Admission and Risk Assessment Tool – includes delirium screen for all patients on admission – where there was a wide uptake

    Professional Development – ‘Dementia, Delirium and Depression in the older person’ study days were provided

    Bendigo Health

    Policy Development - Redeveloped policy on Management of Wandering Behaviours in Cognitively Impaired People

    Professional development - Cognition consultant position – provision of education to 3000 staff (2011-13) across Bendigo Health and to health services throughout region

    Castlemaine HealthModels of Care - Use of cognitive identifier on patient board
    Echuca Regional Health

    Models of Care - Cognition Assessment on admission; established Memory Clinic (part of Speech Pathology)

    Professional Development - Training provided on dementia, delirium and depression

    Goulburn Valley HealthEnvironmental Improvements – Introduction of date, day, month and time analogue clocks, automatic doors
    Latrobe Regional Hospital

    Policy Development - Inpatient delirium screening and management policy implemented

    Models of Care – Delirium Care Pathway was introduced

    - Introduced common process for screening of cognition and also management of patients across LRH; established Cognitive, Dementia and Memory Service (CDMAS)

    Peninsula Health

    Policy Development – Development of clinical practice guidelines for prevention and management of Delirium

    Models of Care - Large piece of work in the area of reviewing delirium management practices - linked to Standard 9 of the National Safety and Quality Health Service Standards (NSQHSS): Recognising and responding to clinical deterioration

    Professional Development – Education on delirium and new guidelines using catchphrase ‘Spot it, flag it, treat it, stop it’; delirium champions on each ward/clinical area; extensive education program and internal publicity

    South West Healthcare

    Models of Care – An Aged Behaviour Cognition nurse role was introduced – to provide support to staff caring for patients with delirium and/or dementia via education; developing care strategies and documentation; introduction of cognition risk screen and behaviour chart trialled and rolled out

    Professional Development - Developed cognition and delirium e-learning packages internally

    St Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne

    Models of Care - Medical file audit of patients with dementia which lead to an audit to gauge prevalence of delirium; review of Code Greys and usage of one-to-one nursing; exploration of relationship between fractured neck of femur and delirium.

    - Development & implementation of the ‘all about me’ personal patient profile

    - Review of cognitive assessment tools, trial of the cognitive identifier

    - Medical file audit of patients with dementia which lead to an audit to gauge prevalence of delirium; review of Code Greys & usage of one-to-one nursing; exploration of relationship between fractured neck of femur and delirium.

    Stawell Regional Health

    Policy Development - Improving Care for Older People (ICOP) principles incorporated into Cognitive Impairment Policy

    Models of Care– Cognitive screening tool embedded in admission assessment process and ward handover procedure; Cognitive Impairment Identifier use was embedded; ward champions identified; policy and use of screening tools part of staff orientation

    Professional Development - Cognitive Impairment Identifier training for nursing staff; ward champions system in use; education for Visiting Medical Officers (VMO’s)

    Swan Hill District Health

    Policy Development – Cognition screen included in admission and risk assessment tool

    Professional Development - Nurse education on difference between dementia and delirium; two education days held on Dementia, Delirium and Depression – 48 staff attended plus 6 from external organisations

    Werribee MercyPolicy Development – Development of clinical practice guidelines including for Delirium
    Western District Health Service

    Policy Development - Cognitive Impairment policy reviewed and redeveloped to reflect ICOP principles

    - Delirium policy reviewed and redeveloped to reflect Improving Care for Older Persons (ICOP) principles

    Models of Care - Brochures developed and distributed based on redeveloped guidelines including delirium

    Western Health

    Policy Development– Cognition Advisory committee established and continuing

    Professional Development - Engaged volunteers in establishing the Time To Talk (TTT) program and to complete the ‘about me’ tool for patients with dementia, delirium or cognitive impairment

  • Health ServiceRequirement Addressed and Project Summary
    Alfred HealthModels of care and Professional development – Hard of Hearing project at Caulfield Hospital involving introduction of assistive listening devices; staff education on their use, on communication strategies and on troubleshooting with hearing equipment
    Monash HealthEnvironmental improvements - Introduction of Patient journey boards across all clinical settings
    Peninsula Health

    Models of care - Introduction of:

    • Clinical handover ISBAR (Identify, Situation, Background, Assessment and Recommendation) to Clinical handover
    • DailyRapid Rounds;
    • Rounding in sub-acute
    • Interdisciplinary Care Program
    • Consumer Advisory Group
    South West Healthcare

    Policy development - Development and implementation of effective communication between staff and patients with Sensory Loss policy. Developed in collaboration with Speech Pathology department, incorporating Improving Care for Older Persons (IC4OP) principles

    Models of care – Communication: Introduction of communication equipment for use across organisation (e.g. Bellman Maxi amplifier, cue cards); sensory information included on admission assessment documentation; use of magnets to alert staff to hearing or vision impairment

    Professional development - Education on communication provided - education around hearing impairment and communication provided by an external source to each of the clinical units; each clinical unit given an education session on the Bellman Maxi and the cue cards following their introduction

  • Health ServiceRequirement Addressed and Project Summary
    Echuca Regional HealthModels of Care - Multidisciplinary clinic for non-admitted patients; bladder scanner purchased
    Goulburn Valley Health

    Models of Care - Screening and assessment implemented in all acute and sub-acute settings (part of suite); development of model of care to support level 1-3 Sub-Acute Care Services

    Professional Development - Support of Moira Health alliance and Seymour Health via training opportunities in continence

    Portland District HealthModels of Care - Model of care based on toolkit domain introduced and embedded into sub-acute and acute wards
    St Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne

    Policy Development - Continence Management Guidelines developed and launched in collaboration with regional continence clinic and the Department of Geriatric Medicine

    Professional Development - Certificate II in Continence Promotion and Care, and Graduate Certificate in Continence developed

  • Health ServiceRequirement Addressed and Project Summary
    Albury Wodonga Health

    Policy Development - Minimising functional decline policy still in development

    Models of Care - Functional Maintenance Program implemented in acute wards at Wodonga – to be rolled out to Albury Campus; bed based exercise program via patient television operating in Albury – will roll out to Wodonga

    Alfred Health

    Policy Development - An overarching minimising functional decline policy known as Better Care for Older People was developed. Additionally, minimising functional decline guidelines were ratified in April 2013

    Models of Care - Key elements of functional decline have been incorporated into the Point of Care Audit; this information will be used to inform future improvement efforts. Brochures promoting best practice against prevention of functional decline have been developed with consumer feedback incorporated into the final version

    Professional Development - Production of AV material to support implementation and education regarding the domains of the Toolkit and preventing functional decline

    Austin HealthPolicy Development - Functional Maintenance guideline and policy 2013 (awaiting final approval)
    Bairnsdale Regional Health ServicePolicy Development - Functional maintenance policy completed
    Barwon HealthProfessional Development - Online training tool on functional decline and ICOP principles in use throughout organisation – delivered through clinical software; developed a DVD for older patients called Maximising your health in hospital.
    Bass Coast Regional HealthPolicy Development - Ongoing work on organisation wide Preventing Functional Decline policy
    Benalla Health

    Policy Development - Minimising functional decline policy developed – waiting approval and implementation

    Models of Care - Information booklet for patients and carers at bedside on how to minimise functional decline

    Professional Development - Functional Independence Measure training completed by several staff; developed an e-learning quiz for clinical staff.

    Bendigo HealthPolicy Development - Prevention of Functional Decline in Older Hospitalised Patients policy developed and adopted
    Castlemaine HealthPolicy Development - Preventing Functional Decline Policy introduced
    Colac Area HealthPolicy Development - Functional Decline Policy for Older Persons endorsed across organisation
    Echuca Regional HealthPolicy Development - Preventing Functional Decline Policy drafted
    Latrobe Regional Hospital

    Policy Development - Functional maintenance/decline policy developed and under review

    Models of Care - Functional Maintenance Program (FMP) in medical and surgical wards utilising toolkit domains and symbols. Evaluated and shown to be successful. Establishment of ongoing Allied Health Assistant (AHA) position for FMP

    Maryborough District Health ServicePolicy Development - ICOP principles embedded in Minimising Functional Decline Policy
    Melbourne HealthPolicy Development - Care Planning and Implementation Policy amended to incorporate statement to support minimising functional decline; developed multiple online learning packages including best care for older people, falls prevention, pressure injuries, medication management and safe swallowing.
    Northeast Health WangarattaPolicy Development - Overarching Functional Decline Policy – in progress. To include hyperlinks to the toolkit domains
    Northern HealthPolicy Development - Input into development of functional decline policy by state-wide Best Care for Older People (BCOP) group
    Peninsula Health

    Policy Development - Organisation wide policy on ‘minimising functional decline’ ratified

    Models of Care - Enhanced existing functional maintenance programs and introduced falls identifier

    Portland District Health

    Policy Development - Preventing Functional Decline in Hospitalised Older Patients Policy developed and implemented – includes dementia, delirium and depression

    Models of Care - Clinical champion for preventing functional decline with focus on person centred care and assessment – role in educating staff on these domains

    Professional Development - Education sessions run by clinical champion for preventing functional decline – falls risk assessment, functional assessment, nursing care plan, nursing admission/discharge, pressure sore risk assessment and patient handling assessment

    Seymour Health

    Policy Development - Person Centred Care Policy and Minimising Functional Decline in Hospital Policy – developed, not yet approved or implemented

    Professional Development - Graduate program orientation includes functional decline and person centred care session

    South West HealthcarePolicy Development - Development and implementation of IC4OP Preventing Functional Decline in Hospitalised Older People policy
    St Vincent’s Hospital MelbournePolicy Development - ‘Prevention of Functional Decline Policy’ implemented organisation wide at CEO forum in February 2013. Introduction of internal tracking system so that all internal policy considers the needs of Improving Care for Older People (ICOP) and prevention of functional decline
    Stawell Regional HealthPolicy Development - Preventing Functional Decline policy developed and implemented
    Swan Hill District HealthPolicy Development - Minimising Functional Decline Policy implemented
    Werribee MercyPolicy Development - ‘Preventing Functional Decline in Hospitalised Older People’ endorsed
    West Gippsland Healthcare GroupModels of Care - Functional maintenance program utilising AHAs ongoing
    Western District Health ServicePolicy Development - Preventing Functional Decline policy implemented and staff educated
    Western Health

    Policy Development - Organisation wide ‘Preventing Functional Decline in Older Hospitalised Patients’ policy to be implemented by September 2013.

    Professional Development - Held the ‘Great Debate’ in May 2013 to highlight that minimising functional decline and practicing Person Centred Care is everybody’s role.

    Wimmera Health Care GroupPolicy Development - Preventing Functional Decline Policy in operation
  • Health ServiceRequirement Addressed and Project Summary
    Maryborough District Health ServiceModels of Care - work ongoing on reducing medication errors; including monitoring and investigation of incidents, reconciliation processes tightened and staff education provided
  • Health ServiceRequirement Addressed and Project Summary
    Albury Wodonga Health

    Models of Care - Functional Maintenance Program implemented in acute wards at Wodonga – to be rolled out to Albury Campus; bed based exercise program via patient television operating in Albury – will roll out to Wodonga

    Models of Care - Falls committee meets monthly; introduction of hip protectors to acute wards; possible future introduction of ‘stick to stand’ system and gripper socks

    Austin Health

    Policy Development - Falls Risk Policy; Falls Risk Assessment Prevention and Management Guideline; Nurse Rounding Guideline (awaiting final approval) and Functional Maintenance Guideline and Policy (awaiting final approval)

    Models of Care – Focus on nurse rounding – was rolled out across 20 wards on three hospital campuses, and one residential aged care (RAC) facility. There was a significant reduction in falls

    Professional Development - Rounding education incorporated into hospital orientation, graduate nurse orientation, night duty study days and ward in-services

    Bairnsdale Regional Health Service

    Policy Development - Functional Maintenance Policy developed

    Models of Care - Falls, infection, medication, pressure (FIMP) group established – uses unit based nursing ‘champions’ for each standard – receive education and responsible for sharing; developed resource folders including Toolkit information as well as instructions for intranet access of Toolkit

    Professional Development - Staff member trained as Functional Independence Measure (FIM) trainer; 31 staff trained as FIM assessors

    Ballarat Health Services

    (at Nov 2012)

    Models of Care – 6-PACK falls prevention project – research project/intervention pilot for high falls risk patients conducted by Monash University at six hospitals around Australia

    Barwon Health

    Policy Development - Falls Prevention Policy implemented incorporating Improving Care for Older Persons (IC4OP) principles

    Models of Care – Falls Risk Assessment Tool (FRAT) included in e-risk assessments

    - Falls awareness campaign – includes film on free TV channel; poster displays, articles in local media and social media

    - Nurse rounding implemented in Rehabilitation Centre wards, palliative care wards and some acute wards

    Professional Development - Education sessions around falls risk and management including the use of FRAT

    Bass Coast Regional Health

    Environmental Improvements - Patient activity area created in medical ward

    Policy Development - Review of falls policies; brochures developed; use of Upright and Independent Program

    Professional Development - Eight staff trained as FIM assessors

    Bendigo Health

    Policy Development - Redeveloped policies including Falls Assessment and Management

    Models of Care - ICOP mobility project officer; development of falls resource section on Intranet; introduction of red socks in clinical areas

    Castlemaine Health

    Models of Care - Introduction of Falls Risk Assessment and Management Tool (FRMT), identifiers for high falls risk patients (orange dots on patient board and above bed), falls incident stickers; introduction of Functional Maintenance Program (exercise program) (continuing); introduction and ongoing use of red (grip) socks; electronic falls resource folder created; annual April Falls Day established for awareness/education

    Professional Development - Falls education provided as annual competency

    Colac Area Health

    Policy Development - Falls Prevention and Management for Older Acute Patients policy

    Models of Care - Falls prevention focus including use of ‘red socks’ for high risk patients and introduction of non-slip mats in acute ward; easy identification of high risk patients via coloured medical record folders; five step intervention posters for staff in residential aged care and acute wards; FRAT e-training mandatory for all staff; brochures for patients/families introduced; assessment forms include person centred care; Falls Committee meets regularly (ongoing) and input to other areas including Quality and Research Committee

    - Acute ward - individualised functional arrangement in patient’s room to align with needs, reduce risks and create more ‘home like’ setting

    - Introduction of nurse rounding – gradual roll out across organisation – currently in RAC and acute

    East Grampians Health Service

    Environmental Improvements – Introduction of ‘red dot’ notification boards (falls risk/mobility)

    Policy Development - ICOP principles embedded in policies including Preventing Falls and Harm from Falls

    Models of Care - FRAT completed on admission for all older people; bedside audits for Falls risk completed; Falls Minimisation and RED Dot system brochures developed and distributed; Red Dot system to denote falls risk in place; use of referrals and equipment for high falls risk patients

    Eastern HealthModels of Care – Falls prevention initiative; volunteer delivered falls prevention interventions- supported by Gerontology Clinical Nurse Consultant (CNC) and Personal Care Assistant (PCA) who oversee and work with volunteers
    Echuca Regional HealthModels of Care - falls and balance clinic established – focus on high risk, both inpatients and outpatients
    Goulburn Valley Health

    Environmental Improvements - falls prevention – stick to stand trial, improved flooring

    Policy Development - Clinical Practice Guidelines with ICOP focus developed and introduced including falls prevention

    Models of Care - Policy work on preventing falls and harm from falls including reporting and monitoring systems, staff training, use of ‘rounding’

    Latrobe Regional Hospital

    Policy Development - ICOP principles embedded into policies across organisation including inpatient falls prevention and management policy

    Models of Care - Improved delivery of falls prevention across health service - Inpatient Falls Risk Assessment Tool (FRAT) form and Community FRAT developed, trialled and in use; patient identifier signs in use across service; continued monthly auditing of falls and alert processes, spot auditing and ongoing staff education carried out

    Maryborough District Health Service

    Policy Development - Falls Assessment and Management Policy and Post Fall Management Policy under review

    Models of Care - Inpatient activity group weekdays focusing on strength and cognitive function – exercise physiologist, Allied Health Assistants and other Allied Health staff; red grip socks use embedded – evaluation showed significant falls reduction; use of FRAT embedded; falls incident stickers introduced; “April No Falls Week” held to raise awareness

    Monash HealthModels of Care - Introduction of nurse rounding across four campuses as part of Patient First initiative; introduction of pre and post fall management procedure for medical staff
    Stawell Regional Health

    Environmental Improvements – Introduced of falls alert signage in acute ward

    Policy Development - Falls Prevention policy developed (unclear if implemented); falls risk committee introduced and operating; introduction of FRAT

    Werribee Mercy

    Policy Development - Clinical practice guidelines developed including Falls Prevention and Management

    Models of Care - Magnetic risk identifiers including falls risk implemented

    Professional Development – 6-PACK falls education planned

  • Health ServiceRequirement Addressed and Project Summary
    Albury Wodonga HealthModels of Care - “Meal Time Mates” program (volunteers assisting with meals) and protected meal times embedded practices in acute wards – staff education prior to introduction; policies and guidelines in place
    Alfred Health

    Policy Development - Under-nutrition Assessment, Prevention and Management Guideline in place

    Professional Development - Interdisciplinary education program has run 180 sessions across 3 sites with over 1200 attendees, including focus on under-nutrition

    Models of Care – Opportunities for practice development identified via education sessions – including focus on under-nutrition. Executive led Under-Nutrition Steering Committee to have started from August 2013

    Bairnsdale RHSPolicy Development - Malnutrition screening on admission implemented – Malnutrition screen being trialled in acute and sub-acute units at June 2013
    Ballarat Health Services

    As at November 2012

    Environmental improvements – Refurbished acute wards’ sunrooms and included communal dining areas

    Models of Care - Malnutrition Screening Tool and improved referral process introduced as part of Nursing Management Plan and education provided; volunteer meal assistance program operating and training provided

    Bass Coast Regional Health

    Policy Development - Developed Nutrition and Hydration Policies and assessment tools including Malnutrition Screening Tool

    Models of Care – Food services review, implementation of weekly weighs in sub-acute units. Improvements to malnutrition screening planned

    Bendigo Health

    Policy Development – Management of malnutrition key focus in strategic plan 2015-18 Redeveloped policies on Nutrition Screening and Assessment; Nutrition and Food; Mealtime Environment and Assistance Guideline

    Redeveloped Malnutrition Screening Tool – increased compliance

    Models of Care - Improving Care for Older Persons (ICOP) Nutrition Project Officer; introduction of ‘Plum Domes’ to indicate patient need for assistance with meals – gradual roll out across wards; introduction of high energy/high protein meal plan for those identified as undernourished via screening; consultation with patients and menu changes to remove/replace unpopular items; education around ‘Plum Domes’ via brochures, displays in hospital foyer and local newspaper coverage

    Castlemaine Health

    Policy Development - Procedures reviewed in line with ICOP principles including Malnutrition Assessment, Prevention and Management Procedure; Malnutrition Risk Reduction – Red Tray Procedure

    Models of Care - Red Trays (indicating need for assistance with meals) established on acute and rehabilitation wards; menu choices review conducted

    Professional Development - Nutrition education identified as a need – Nutrition Education Plan developed by dietetics department for nursing staff; nutrition education provided to Food Service staff; Nutrition Allied health Assistant trained (unclear if completed or position ongoing)

    East Grampians Health Service

    Models of Care - Blue Tray system (to denote patients needing meal assistance) developed and implemented in Inpatient Unit – ongoing; protected mealtimes (lunch) implemented in Inpatient Unit and information distributed to consumers; Malnutrition Screening Tool (MST) used within global screening tool; nutrition screening/referral audit completed

    Professional development - Nutrition education developed based on nutrition audit results and pre-education survey; education on Blue Tray system (including for support/catering staff) and Protected Mealtimes conducted

    Echuca Regional Health

    Policy Development - High Protein Diet Implementation Policy; Malnutrition Screening Policy

    Models of Care - Red Tray (denoting need for assistance with meals) implemented on acute ward; electronic food ordering system implemented in hospital to facilitate correct and appropriate meal ordering; Residential Aged Care food process includes serving on site to allow residents the sensory enjoyment of meals

    Professional Development - Swallowing education provided to nursing staff on identifying and managing swallowing problems prior to Speech Pathology review – in context of stroke project

    Goulburn Valley Health

    Environmental Improvements – Purchase of Joey scales and red trays

    Policy Development - Clinical Practice Guidelines on nutrition with ICOP focus developed and introduced

    Models of Care - Organisation wide implementation of meal alert and red tray initiative and roll out to local Small Rural Health Services. Initiative involves use of red trays for patients requiring assistance with meals and information about program and nutrition for patient and families on trays

    Latrobe Regional HospitalModels of Care - Protected mealtimes and red trays to flag need for assistance implemented in GEM and Rehabilitation wards; ongoing education provided; regular auditing; Protected Mealtime Champions utilised; Meal Tray Advisory Group convened and recommendations for dark purple trays to provide contrast to food and hot beverage cups with larger handles implemented
    Maryborough District Health ServiceModels of Care - Review of hotel services with improvement in meal quality and reduction of waste; updated signage for patients with nutrition needs; food chart for patients at risk of malnutrition implemented
    Melbourne Health

    Policy Development – ICOP principles embedded in policies including Nutrition Assessment and Management

    Models of Care - Recruitment of a part-time Nutrition Project Officer for 12 months who developed and validated a mental health nutrition risk screening tool

    Monash HealthEnvironmental improvements, Policy Development, Models of Care, Professional Development – Red trays to identify need for meals assistance in use across organisation Associated Policy and Procedure implemented and communicated to staff via formal education processes
    Northeast Health Wangaratta

    Models of Care - Swallowing screen implemented with accompanying staff education – in use on medical ward and in emergency department; to be implemented in Coronary Care Unit

    Policy Development – Improving Care for Older Persons (ICOP) principles embedded in policies including Nursing Screen of Dysphagia

    Northern HealthModels of Care - Introduction of protected mealtimes on selected sub-acute wards; audited baseline and subsequent; further expansion of program (mealtimes and settings) continuing; communal dining introductions planned
    Peninsula Health

    Models of Care – Protected mealtimes implemented and sustained in sub-acute, trial in acute services scheduled for June 2013

    Policy Development, Professional Development – Protected mealtimes supported by clinical practice guidelines and staff roadshow

    South West Healthcare

    Policy Development – Development and implementation of Communal Dining policy; review of nutrition policy

    Models of Care - Introduction of nutrition screen into admission documentation across organisation, (auditing occurring); introduction and embedding of protected meal times

    St Vincent’s Hospital MelbourneModels of Care - Blue Dome system reviewed; PAS software system upgrade for an electronic identifier for patients requiring the blue dome (assistance). Evaluation demonstrated a 38% increase in blue dome usage
    Stawell Regional Health

    Policy Development - Nutrition policy developed and implemented; use of malnutrition screening tool

    Models of Care - Nutrition Screening Policy and Tool implemented and periodically audited; volunteer meal assistance introduced and in use in residential aged care; communal dining area expanded in acute ward and use encouraged

    Western HealthPolicy Development – ICOP strategies embedded into organisation wide nutrition management policy (developed with BCOP involvement)
    Wimmera Health Care Group

    Policy Development - Under-nutrition policy and guidelines (draft); under-nutrition assessment, prevention and management flow chart (draft)

    Models of Care - Embedded use of Malnutrition Screening Tool; plan to further embed domain via NSQHSS Nutrition policy; use of nutrition survey to educate staff particularly in acute ward

    Professional Development - Education of nursing staff by Dietician; plan to develop e-learning tool

  • Health ServiceRequirement Addressed and Project Summary
    Alfred HealthPolicy Development – Pain guideline developed
    Goulburn Valley HealthModels of Care - Pain Clinic opened in February 2013
  • Health Service

    Requirement Addressed and Project Summary
    Alfred Health

    Policy development – Introduction of End of Life Guidelines

    Models of care – Implementation and roll out of Care of the Dying Pathway

    Barwon HealthModels of care - Development of interdisciplinary e-care plan incorporating Improving Care For Older Persons (IC4OP) principles
    Maryborough District Health Service

    Policy development - IC4OP principles embedded in policies including Palliative and End of Life Care Policy

    Environmental improvements, Models of care - Development of palliative care suite in acute ward (“Merrin”) to provide inpatient palliative care – fundraising and volunteer help was utilised

    Models of care - Liverpool End of Life Care Pathway implemented

  • Health ServiceRequirement Addressed and Project Summary
    Alfred HealthModels of Care - Developed an eLearning package on patient centered care combined with safety and quality responsibilities, with links to the Best Care for Older People Everywhere Toolkit
    Bairnsdale Regional Health ServicePolicy Development - Person-centred practice included in strategic plan, position descriptions and to be included in staff selection processes
    Professional Development - One day person-centred care (PCC) workshop held; newsletter on person centred care and journey boards distributed to Nurse Unit Managers and ward staff
    Ballarat Health Services

    Policy Development - Patient Management Plan developed and implemented; inclusion of dementia and delirium assessment tools; requirement of patient and family involvement

    Models of Care - Nursing Admission Plan developed and implemented; includes PCC principles

    Models of Care, Professional Development - Introduction of Patient Experience Tracking system; education of staff; promotion of PCC principles

    Barwon Health

    Policy Development - Consumer and Person Centred Policy developed and implemented;

    - PCC principles included in existing policies and guidelines, as well as strategic plan and annual statement of priorities

    - ‘Doing it with us not to us’ policy reviewed by consumer Centred Committee and health literacy principles incorporated

    - Development of Written Information (WISE) Policy and Procedure across organisation – including templates for providing written consumer information and implementation of consumer participation process for all consumer information

    Professional Development - Factsheets on all Toolkit domains based on PCC principles distributed across organisation – displayed on wards’ education boards

    Central Gippsland Health Service

    Policy Development - Development and implementation of Care Coordination Model across service – based on the Improving care for Older People (ICOP) framework and the Toolkit. Person centred care model – based on patient identified goals

    - Consumer and Carer Chronic Disease Network provides ongoing feedback to Care Coordination project

    - All patients provided with Consumer Information Booklet and encouraged to provide feedback. Closely aligned with Consumer Advocate position (ongoing)

    - ICOP principles embedded in Care Coordination, Service Delivery Planning and Intake Process policies and procedures – overarching policies and inform others

    Models of Care - Development and implementation of Care Coordination Model across service – based on ICOP framework and the Toolkit. Person centred care model – based on patient identified goals

    Professional Development - Introduction of Care Coordinator roles (previously assessment officers)

    - Care coordinators, Intake Officers and other clinical staff trained via the online program in Central Gippsland Health Service. Care coordination model based on national qualifications with a focus on integrating PCC principles and the ICOP framework

    Colac Area Health

    Policy Development - ‘Doing it with us not for us’ policy

    Models of Care - Work on improving discharge processes including planning and communication with patients

    Models of Care - Ongoing development of patient/consumer brochures on specific services incorporating PCC principles

    Professional Development - Orientation and Graduate Nurse Program updated to include ICOP principles and NSQHS standards, with inclusion of person centred care principles

    East Grampians Health Service

    Policy Development - ICOP principles embedded in policies: Person Centred Care policy implemented

    Professional Development - Education on use of Patient Experience Tracking System

    Eastern Health

    Policy Development - The Charter of Rights for Older Patients was formally launched in December 2012 and addresses the attitudes, behaviours and practices of staff in their direct interactions with older people and is used to inform the planning, design and provision of the services accessed by older patients

    Models of Care - PCC emphasised in the Productive Ward Program

    Professional development - Professional development, education and training with the implementation of the Charter of Rights for Older Patients

    Latrobe Regional Hospital

    Policy Development - ICOP principles embedded into policies across organisation including PCC policy

    Professional Development - Two ICOP Conferences held – Person Centred Care and Everyone’s Business – Best Care for Older People (BCOP)

    Melbourne Health

    Models of Care – BCOP champion program: 13 champions received Lean Six Sigma training

    Models of Care - Introduction of BCOP volunteer program

    Professional Development - Development of BCOP learning kits – aligned with National Safety and Quality Health Service Standards (NSQHSS), education will continue beyond life of program, packages available on the intranet

    - Development of audio visual resource “Lola’s Story” – emphasising the patient experience

    - 15 in-service sessions on PCC

    - Quality Improvement showcase raised profile of BCOP champion work

    Northern Health

    Policy Development, Models of Care - BCOP input into development of organisation wide Vision, Mission, Values statement, Admission Policy and Model of Care for the Older Inpatient

    Models of Care - PCC patient brochure developed – Continuing Your Care at Northern Health – with PCC focus; was translated into 7 languages

    - PCC nurse rounding being trialled (post BCOP) and NH wide rollout planned

    Peninsula Health

    Models of Care - Person Centred Care

    • Staff member travelled to USA on PCC study tour with Victorian Quality Council funding
    • PCC workshops with strategic focus will continue post ICOP and plays a large part in development of strategic plan to 2017
    • PCC principles embedded in Position Descriptions templates including Community Advisory Groups/Consumer Advisory Groups, executives etc
    • PCC a formal component of orientation to PH
    Portland District Health

    Policy Development - Person-Centred Care Policy developed and implemented

    - Consumer Participation Policy reviewed to ensure inclusion of ICOP principles and implemented

    Models of Care - Development of models of care based on toolkit domains of assessment, person centred care and continence – introduced and embedded into sub-acute and acute wards

    - Clinical champion for preventing functional decline with focus on PCC and assessment – role in educating staff on these domains

    - Auditing to ensure nursing staff have patients sign their care plans as measure of inclusion in decision making

    South West Healthcare

    Policy Development - Review of existing policies to include person centred care approach: Volunteer Implemented Patient Engagement Regime (VIPER); Cognition, Dementia, Delirium, Depression Assessment and Care; Improving Care for Older Persons; Assessment and Screening; Music Therapy Program; Key Contact Person; Mobility, Vigour and Self Care; Communal Dining

    - Inclusion of a consumer stakeholder on Improving Care for Older Persons Steering Committee

    Stawell Regional HealthModels of Care - Patient Experience Tracking System implemented to flag areas for improvement
    West Gippsland Healthcare Group

    Policy Development - Person Centred Care Policy developed and implemented

    Models of Care - Efforts to engage consumers and encourage participation

    Western District Health Service

    Policy Development - Acute Care Framework including Person Centred Care focus developed and implemented

    - Partnering with Consumers policy developed and implemented (person centred care and consumer participation)

    - PCC included in orientation manual for staff and volunteers

    Professional Development - Person centred care and ICOP principles included in orientation package

    - Education provided on person centred care to 50 staff; clinical championship to 16 staff; comprehensive assessment to 9 staff

    - Representation of older people on Consumer Advisory Committee

    Western Health

    Models of Care - Engaged volunteers in establishing the Time To Talk program and to complete the ‘About Me’ tool

    Professional Development – Western Health held the great debate in May 2013 to highlight minimising functional decline and practicing PCC is everybody’s role.

    Wimmera Health Care Group

    Policy Development - Patient Charter of Healthcare Rights Policy, Consumer Participation Policy both in operation

    - All new or revised policies and procedures to include person-centred care statement – this is ongoing

    - All clinical pathways include statement on patient/family/carer involvement

    Models of Care - Person Centred Care development and roll-out across organisation and promotion of booklet “Nothing about me without me”

    - Implementation of Patient Experience Tracker System to monitor feedback in real time - initially in use on acute ward

    - Patient Information Directory includes information/brochures on person-centred care and ‘10 tips for safer healthcare’

    Professional Development - Patient Charter of Healthcare Rights and Person Centred Care included as Mandatory Competencies for all staff; training days for Mandatory Competencies commenced

    - Position Descriptions include person centred care statement

    - Person centred care included in orientation program

  • Health ServiceRequirement Addressed and Project Summary
    Albury Wodonga HealthModels of Care - Skin integrity poster distributed to acute admissions
    Austin Health

    Models of Care – Focus on implementing nurse rounding – pressure injury prevention one focus of rounding

    Professional Development – Falls and Pressure injury prevention training (four study days held)

    East Grampians Health Service

    Policy Development – Improving Care for Older Persons (ICOP) principles embedded in Pressure Injury Prevention and Management policy

    Models of Care - Pressure Injury Prevention and Management Plans developed; Braden Scale included in global screen; bedside audits for Pressure Injury risk completed; consumer brochure developed

    Professional Development - Held “Move…ember Week” to raise staff awareness of Pressure Injury risk; to be held annually

    Professional Development - Education on use of Braden scale and skin assessment form

    Eastern HealthModels of Care – Work standard for optimising skin integrity
    St Vincent’s Hospital MelbourneEnvironmental Improvements, Policy Development, Models of Care, Professional Development – ‘One per bum’ initiative: surveyed for existing barriers which were identified as lack of equipment and lack of staff awareness; 560 preventative cushions (1 per inpatient), 200 heel wedges and 20 cameras purchased; staff education and user guide developed; Skintastic Expo held
    Wimmera Health Care Group

    Policy Development - Skin Integrity Policy developed; Implementation of screening of all patients over 16 years for skin integrity –using Waterlow Pressure Injury Risk Assessment Scale (WPIRAS)

    Models of Care - All patients over 16 years screened using WPIRAS, regular audits of compliance and for management of injury

    Professional Development - Wound care training completed by over 250 staff via ‘Train the Trainer’ model – ongoing; staff education on use of screening and assessment for skin integrity


Reviewed 17 July 2024